| Author |
Message |
abducted
Joined: Nov 05, 2005 Posts: 6 Location: france
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:18 pm Post subject:
Will I be able to create these sounds with a NM ? Subject description: help needed from pro sound designers please ... |
 |
|
hi !
I'm a NM newbie.
I have the oppurtunity of buyin one but I
need it for specific sounds...
Can you listen to theses sounds please :
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=430405
and tell me if it is possible to recreate them
with the NM ?
I need a patch king who could program them !
Thanks |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Blue Hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 19623 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 116
G2 patch files: 317
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:52 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Can't listen right now to the link you posted, but just wanted to say hi & welcome.
That, and a question, are you maybe going to buy an NM Classic or will it be a G2 ? These are somewhat different in character and certain things go easier on the one while others go easier on the other. _________________ Jan |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 17341 Location: Allentown, PA
Audio files: 107
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 9:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Those sounds would be very simple with either a NM or a G2, IMHO.
I suggest you download the free G2 demo from the Clavia website. It will give you an idea of what's possible. You can even play some of the patches posted here on electro-music.com. In fact, the demo may be all you need. In any case, you'll see if this is attractive to you. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
abducted
Joined: Nov 05, 2005 Posts: 6 Location: france
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:49 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
thanks for your welcome.
I was talking about a nord modular classic.
I've heard demos on the clavia site, but
they did not convince me...
By the way, what do you think is a fair
price for it ? It's almost 10 years old so
is it still a good buy or are there much better
stuff right now ?
The fact that it's only 4 part multitimbral
is a problem.
And about the sounds I posted on soundclick :
is it possible to guess what synths generated them ?
they were created around 1982 ... |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2519 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 584
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| abducted wrote: |
And about the sounds I posted on soundclick :
is it possible to guess what synths generated them ?
they were created around 1982 ... |
Sound 4 might be a CZ101 (organs were possibly it's only strong point). Sound 1 sounds like one of the cheep Korgs, poly61 or similar. Sound 2 and 3 could be done on almost any 2 oscillator synth but has no distinctive character that I recognize.
All the samples sound like they are heavily post processed and perhaps lifted from tape. Nailing them on a NM classic would be difficult without external effects, but I'm sure you could easily get close enough for live use.
Where did you get the samples? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Axiom
Joined: Feb 19, 2005 Posts: 288 Location: Italy
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 28
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:40 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've heard the demos and are very simple to do with almost all virtual analog synths on the market. The NM can do that and very much more. The first synth strings pad seems a Roland machine to me. The two bass lines are so common that can be everything, but I bet a dollar on a SCI Pro-One. The last organ-like sound can be done with a minimoog without so much problems. I've made a similar sound, more clicky, using a Nord Lead schema on my Modular.
My 2 cents,
Luca _________________
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Kleinert

Joined: Mar 12, 2004 Posts: 990 Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Audio files: 6
G2 patch files: 201
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:34 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
The basses and pads sound very rolandy. In fact, if all sounds come from the same box, I'd guess Jupiter8.
I don't know about the NM1, but making that stuff on the G2 would be easy. It all sounds "tapey", as Ian said, so using Robs spectrum tilter and some subtle saturation would already go a long way. _________________
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
abducted
Joined: Nov 05, 2005 Posts: 6 Location: france
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
thanks for all your replies, they are very interesting.
All these sounds are from old mix tapes, recorded from
unidentified source.
I've tried very hard to emulate these sounds on
Reason but I failed in every way !
All I could do was crap ... I really don't understand
how to do it. Looking at the basslines closely in cool edit,
I found out that the waveforms are really weird.
Not saw or square, but probably pulse modulated oscillators...
But how ?
Oh, by the way, I've added new sounds so you can listen
to them if you wish !
Thanks for your time. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Kleinert

Joined: Mar 12, 2004 Posts: 990 Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Audio files: 6
G2 patch files: 201
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 5:52 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| abducted wrote: | Looking at the basslines closely in cool edit,
I found out that the waveforms are really weird.
Not saw or square, but probably pulse modulated oscillators...
But how ? |
Remember that analog-generated waveforms are far from "perfect" due to the impure nature of the analog signal path. Depending on design (and age), there is inherent drift, jitter, soft clipping, noise, DC and other assorted funk going on in an analog oscillator.
This kind of behaviour (which is part of the "analog sound") is hard to get on most digital synths (if they are not analog emulations to begin with), but can be modeled to a certain degree on the NordModulars. _________________
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 17341 Location: Allentown, PA
Audio files: 107
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 6:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've seen lots of discussion here on the forum by people trying to emulate some particular sounds they like. Ususally these are novice sound designers who think emulating some sounds is the way to master synthesis. IMHO, this can lead to frustration. Make patches and explore the sounds - see where they go when you fiddle with them. With experience you'll master your own palette.
I hardly ever use an osciloscope to study sound. Sounds change constantly, unless they are very boring ones. Sure, these instruments have their uses, but waveforms are not nearly as significant as you might think.
Most of the characteristis of the sounds you are looking at are by their envelopes, filters, and other processing. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Axiom
Joined: Feb 19, 2005 Posts: 288 Location: Italy
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 28
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 7:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
mmm I agree partially with you, Howard. Emulation (or reverse eginering) can be very educative. I've spent a lot of time studying both synthesis and doing reversing. Studying how real synthesizer works, their sound flow, how they process sounds and, yes, trying to replicate them. The "bad" side (and now I agree totally) is that this attitude can lead you to don't care about experimentition and sound exploration.
Just my 2 cents
Luca
p.s.:
"sound 12" seems to be the moroder's bass line of "I feel love". This is made with a moog modular  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|