Author |
Message |
Thomas Henry
Joined: Mar 25, 2007 Posts: 298 Location: Southern Minnesota
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Scott Stites wrote: |
One reason would be that if your control voltage, say an ADSR EG, for whatever reason, has a positive offset on it, the only way you could close the VCA while the CV is connected would be to mix a bit of negative voltage with it. |
Exactly! And that happens all the time in various other patches.
Which is one more reason to commend the forward-thinking Bernie Hutchins for having figured all this out some thirty years ago. Ever since 1980, I've followed his input/output/impedance/voltage standards and have never rued the day.
Thomas Henry |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
fonik
Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:16 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Coriolis wrote: | fonik: did you have success with this layout?
C |
i have not finished it yet. most of the components are placed, but all the DIY stuff is in packing cases these days... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Coriolis
Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:11 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Oh yes, you are moving, right? Sorry to bug you.
Anybody else?
Phil? Did you get to finish this?
C |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
philpeery
Joined: Nov 08, 2006 Posts: 137 Location: new jersey, usa
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:17 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I've got a few boards made, but have not even had the time to drill them out yet. Hopefully soon! I am also sending a couple to my pal loss1234 most likely by friday. He's been pretty hot with DIY lately, maybe he will beat us all to the punch and get one of these vca's built! One of us will be sure to post our results.
Hang in there loss! The pcb's are coming!
Phil |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Coriolis
Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:51 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Aww heck - I should stop bothering other people and take part in the testing of this layout myself!
Think I will do one of these in the very near future, then we can compare results, yes?
C |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:41 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Hello,
Looking at the schematics of the XXI Century VCA, I see that the line output; in addition of the attenuator, have a 15K resistor (impedance?) instead a 1K resistor of the synth output.
Since that I have an attenuator on my Line mixer input it means that I can connect the synth output to the line input of the mixer...
But theoretically... It is better the 15K output? Why? Because the impedances?
It's Ok 15K or may will be better put the value resistor at the same impedance of the Input line mixer?
Since I have an attenuator on my line mixer input, Do I need the output attenuator In my VCA module?
In my modular Synthesizer project I would like to have 8 voices directly connected to my line mixer. I understand the mixer like a heart of my system, 8 voices from the modular synthesizer more two chanels from two microphones- flute-voices and two chanels more for other synths. All perfectly integrated like a more big modular concept.
It's very important to me the clean of the sound and its quality. It is because I'm interested in this kind of details.
So I would like to have 8 XXI Century VCA like a final step of my modular Synthesizer connected permanently to the mixer.
Any answer to my questions? Any advice? Please a little of light over this matter. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Coriolis
Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:51 am Post subject:
|
|
|
If you didn't have the pot and the 15k resistor, you would have 10V PP signals going straight into your line mixer - much too hot a signal level for that. Then you would find it difficult to adjust the volume of the synth with the attenuator on your mixer - just turning it a tiny, tiny bit, would result in too much level for the mixer input.
So to make it easier to adjust levels, the 15k resistor pads it down, and the pot makes that pad adjustable.
Hope that helps (and hope it isn't wrong)
C |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:45 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Coriolis wrote: | If you didn't have the pot and the 15k resistor, you would have 10V PP signals going straight into your line mixer - much too hot a signal level for that. Then you would find it difficult to adjust the volume of the synth with the attenuator on your mixer - just turning it a tiny, tiny bit, would result in too much level for the mixer input.
So to make it easier to adjust levels, the 15k resistor pads it down, and the pot makes that pad adjustable.
Hope that helps (and hope it isn't wrong)
C |
Hi Cariolis, it is easy. But is that the only difference within line or synth level? I think (but i don't understand exactly) that it have relation with the impedance. If I understood the emitter, the line, and the receiver must to have the same impedance?... maybe it is the reason of the 15K resistor?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristic_impedance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_line |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
fonik
Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 2:29 am Post subject:
|
|
|
just wanted to let you know (expecially you, coriolis) that i finished the dual VCA last night and it works like charm - as expected
i built it from my layout using my documentation so everything seems to be okay.
i will post some pics as soon as the front panel arrived and i mounted the whole module. _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Coriolis
Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 5:01 am Post subject:
|
|
|
That's good news (as expected ). Puts it on top of my to-do list.
Thanks!
C |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:35 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Murphy's law in action!
This VCA was fine on the breadboard, but now that I have finally gotten my boards made, and populated the first quadrant of it with the LAST of my applicable parts...NADA!!! No signal is passed, no nothing, what a drag!!
Anybody have a nice build of this running that could give me some voltages etc. to look for?? I have checked the layout vs. the schematic 10x+, it is spot on. Very confusing and maddening, I spent far too much of a beautiful Saturday inside trying to figure this one out.
Should have some more parts by the end of the week to re-breadboard it to test, but if any kind soul can lend a hand I would be most appreciative.
EDITED!! Man am I stupid, murphy's law indeed, sometimes we miss the most obvious things, and I mean THE MOST OBVIOUS!!!
Hats off to Thomas for this great simple VCA.
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
56.66 KB |
Viewed: |
458 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Coriolis
Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:37 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Aww, c'mon - tell us what you did!
Actually I recently finished one of these (fonik's dual vca layout), and it worked right off the bat! That's rare for me...
C _________________ Some Rubber Stamp Sound Effects - and other sound effects |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:52 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Lets just say it was a missed connection...
A rather IMPORTANT one...
Very stoked with this one, this is going to provide me with not only regular old VCAs, but big banks of voltage controlled mixers, and eventually quad panning joystick modules. I imagine I will think of some others as well. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
macumbista
Joined: Sep 12, 2007 Posts: 398 Location: berlin
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:18 am Post subject:
|
|
|
numbernone wrote: | Very stoked with this one, this is going to provide me with not only regular old VCAs, but big banks of voltage controlled mixers, and eventually quad panning joystick modules. |
Just found this as well, looks very interesting! TH's designs haven't failed me yet. My dream is a 4x4 joystick controlled matrix mixer for CV. Doing the math, that means 16 VCAs!!!! Which leads to my question:
How big was your board, numbernone? I'm using the 100x160 Bungard boards for etching, but I can only fit two of Fonik's layouts on one (and in a very inefficient, space-wasting way). Turns into a lot of boards. I have enough space on the height and width, as I lay my boards parallel to the faceplates which are 4U high. But I don't have the depth in the case for 4 PCBs (+ extra for DC mixers and room for joysticks...)!
I'm still pretty bad with Eagle/KiCad, but perhaps this case would be a candidate for SMD-ization? I'm imagining a 100x160 (or a bit smaller actually) PCB with 8 linear VCAs (i.e. 4 x 2164 ICs) on it. Then I'd only need two PCBs and my matrix would be complete!
Would anyone be interested in helping me with this project? I might be willing to invest in some production if so... reply here or by PM.
best!
Derek _________________ Esoteric drones and nonlinear distortion
Custom/handmade experimental instruments
macumbista.net |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
julian
Joined: Jan 11, 2008 Posts: 103 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:50 am Post subject:
|
|
|
...just recieved the book through the mail : )
Am looking at the schematics, and have a quick query, partly, i guess, in relation to Matthias' layout...
There is provision for Input attenuation (R36) but also Gain (Initial) using (R34).
I havent built the module, but wouldnt attenuating the input, and applying a -ve voltage (using R34) have similar effects?
Im tempted to sacrifice the input attenuation in place of CV attenuation, and still keep the panel components to five. _________________
For custom cnc engraved panels see - http://www.thebeast.co.uk/cnc/
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Tim Servo
Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:45 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
julian wrote: | ...just recieved the book through the mail : )
Am looking at the schematics, and have a quick query, partly, i guess, in relation to Matthias' layout...
There is provision for Input attenuation (R36) but also Gain (Initial) using (R34).
I havent built the module, but wouldnt attenuating the input, and applying a -ve voltage (using R34) have similar effects?
Im tempted to sacrifice the input attenuation in place of CV attenuation, and still keep the panel components to five. |
Hi Julian,
Actually, the two functions (R34 and R36) are very different animals. The "Initial Gain" setting is a lot like the Coarse frequency control on a VCO; it sets the starting point, and then any CV modulation will add or subtract from that point. With the Initial Gain control, you can do things like open the VCA for a drone (so that sound comes through all the time), or open the VCA a little bit (so that sound still comes through all the time, but it gets louder when the CV from an envelope is applied), or you could even bias the VCA so that the bipolar signal from an LFO gives you tremolo (normally the VCA would only respond to the positive side of the LFO signal, but you can offset the CV with the Initial Gain control so that the tremolo sounds correct).
So again, think of the Initial Gain pot like the Coarse Tune pot on a VCO: It sets the initial frequency of the VCO, and then the signal from an LFO would modulate the frequency up and down from that initial point. The Input Attenuator on the other hand, can only change the level of the audio inputs, and while this is handy (especially when mixing several inputs), it doesn't allow you to change or offset the CV going to the VCA. If anything, R36 and the CV input attenuator (R35) are much more similar, although not exactly the same. Hopefully this helps
Tim (hopefully helpful) Servo |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
julian
Joined: Jan 11, 2008 Posts: 103 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:19 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your reply, although it wasnt quite what i was getting at... It has caused me to think further though, and have now concluded -
What i was getting at though was that adding a -ve offset to the cv input, and attenuating the audio input would have similar (but not identical) effect.
Take, for example, a white noise input on the audio input, and the vca being controlled by a sine wave -
Adding a -ve offset would, effectlivly, make the output quieter, however, the downside (as opposed to attenuating the audio input) is that the lower portion of the sine modulation would be clipped. (this is the part i had overlooked)
The situation on an envlope would obviously almost be like a delay on the start of the envelope.
...however, if im wanting to kind of adhere to eurorack spacing, as per Matthias' design theres a compromise.
I think i will maybee use the panel space to attenuate the CV input, and use the offset (initial) control to give some approximation of audio attenuation if i need to. In more critical situations, ill have to attenuate it somewhere else.
I guess, in conclusion, when properly thinking about it, id rather have the attenuation on the CV input than the audio input, if i can only have one or the other! : ) _________________
For custom cnc engraved panels see - http://www.thebeast.co.uk/cnc/
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
fonik
Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:54 am Post subject:
Re: VCA for the 21st Century |
|
|
frijitz wrote: | Tim Servo wrote: | Linear. The VCA uses the four sections of a 2164 Quad VCA chip (each section with expo control) to create two linear response VCAs. The 2164 chip is very quiet and has a VERY wide dynamic range. |
OK, so it's the old Mike Irwin trick?
I always thought it would be fun to try antilogging the input CV to get a linear response, rather than dedicating a VCA stage to be a servo.
Ian |
so anyone tried this actually? i mean a simple diode or transistor based antilog (expo) amp for the CV?
if not, i will ASAP. i need quite a few VCAs on little room and wanted to use the 2164, however it would be a shame to use 2 VCa cells for only one lin VCA in the end... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
macumbista
Joined: Sep 12, 2007 Posts: 398 Location: berlin
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:27 am Post subject:
Re: VCA for the 21st Century |
|
|
fonik wrote: |
so anyone tried this actually? i mean a simple diode or transistor based antilog (expo) amp for the CV?
if not, i will ASAP. i need quite a few VCAs on little room and wanted to use the 2164, however it would be a shame to use 2 VCa cells for only one lin VCA in the end... |
Please report back on this, Matthias, I'd be quite curious to know since the 2164 is a fairly expensive part compared with a transistor. _________________ Esoteric drones and nonlinear distortion
Custom/handmade experimental instruments
macumbista.net |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
fonik
Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:04 am Post subject:
Re: VCA for the 21st Century |
|
|
macumbista wrote: | fonik wrote: |
so anyone tried this actually? i mean a simple diode or transistor based antilog (expo) amp for the CV?
if not, i will ASAP. i need quite a few VCAs on little room and wanted to use the 2164, however it would be a shame to use 2 VCa cells for only one lin VCA in the end... |
Please report back on this, Matthias, I'd be quite curious to know since the 2164 is a fairly expensive part compared with a transistor. |
and the 'irwin'-method would require one more opamp as well. not expensive pricewise, but in regards to PCB real estate... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|