| Author |
Message |
crazeydazey

Joined: Feb 15, 2007 Posts: 259 Location: England
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:40 am Post subject:
rene schmitz 4069 VCO |
 |
|
Hi all,
I'm half way through knocking this up on pref board and had to stop because I'm missing a few resistors although I do have 5% (I was gonna do it all in 1% resistors)
so I then got thinking, maybe there a quite a few resistors on here that don't really need to be 1%.. but I'm not clever enough to work out which ones myself.
could someone please tell me which resistors ideally should be 1% and which could be 5%
many thanks
daz _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
JingleJoe

Joined: Nov 10, 2011 Posts: 789 Location: Lancashire, England
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Schematics would be helpful try meassuring a few resistors with your multimeter, you may find some 5% which are within 1% tolerance.
In a random selection of five 10% resistors I can usually find one within 2% of the stated value. _________________ As a mad scientist I am ruled by the dictum of science: "I can't really be certain but I think I might have an idea"
Green Dungeon Alchemist Laboratories |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
crazeydazey

Joined: Feb 15, 2007 Posts: 259 Location: England
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
sorry mate, just thought it was one of those circuits that everyone had looked at at some point..
it's - this one.. _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
slacker
Joined: Nov 18, 2007 Posts: 301 Location: England
Audio files: 11
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:47 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I think the only ones that need to be 1% are the 100k and 10ks connected to the CV Ins, and they only matter if you want accurate V/octave tracking on both the inputs.
Like Jingle Joe said you could just match those resistors by measuring a bunch from your 5% ones. What you want is resistors that are the same value if they're a bit higher or lower than 100k doesn't really matter because you can adjust for that with v/oct trimmer. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
crazeydazey

Joined: Feb 15, 2007 Posts: 259 Location: England
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
thanks for that guys, I've managed to find some 5% ones that are pretty close
next question... I don't know if it matters or not, but it doesn't actually say what type of capacitors I need to use.. I know some circuits I've built clearly state (these ones need to be polyester, these ceramic.. tbh, I don't really know the difference I'm not that clever with electronics, I just know what I need to and copy other peoples circuits.. it gets me by )
so can you recommend a type or can I just go with polyester?? I have a few of those kicking around - I think)
cheers again
daz _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elmegil

Joined: Mar 20, 2012 Posts: 1045 Location: Chicago
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Had a recent conversation about caps that was similar (polystyrene rather than polyester) and this reference turned out to be a good one to explain the differences among capacitor types:
http://my.execpc.com/~endlr/
Ian Fritz was saying that most circuits that call out poly* caps can do well with C0G / NP0 (different names for the same thing) high quality ceramic caps instead, and VCO's in particular.
If you have the polyesters around and not the ceramics (common non-polarized usually circular...) I don't see why you couldn't use them--but I'm not a whole lot more experienced than you are so take my words with salt . I built this circuit using aluminum electrolytics for the polarized caps and standard (not the C0G) ceramics for the non-polarized ones and it worked fine. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
crazeydazey

Joined: Feb 15, 2007 Posts: 259 Location: England
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
thanks for the reply elmegil.. I think I may have some ceramics kicking around too, but they may only be cheap nasty ones I got on ebay from china (about a million for £1 ), so I tend to only use this on breadboards..
I may just buy some new ceramics (not sure what NPO and COG are, tried searching on ebay for these and go no items returned).. I'm a bit of a shopaholic and love buying new components.. a bit sad really, I guess I can see why women like doing it with shoes and handbags
| Quote: | | built this circuit using aluminum electrolytics for the polarized caps and standard (not the C0G) ceramics for the non-polarized ones and it worked fine. |
Polarized caps??? I don't have any polarized ones on.. have you just done the standard VCO on there or have you added new bits?? (I can't see polarized on schem.. do I need em?? and if so where??)
cheers
daz _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Paradigm X
Joined: Feb 15, 2011 Posts: 254 Location: Null and void
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
its np [zero] and c [zero] g not NPO and COG btw, prob why you cant find
Rapid UK have a load of them.
For example. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elmegil

Joined: Mar 20, 2012 Posts: 1045 Location: Chicago
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Sorry about that I just looked at my breadboard and not the circuit diagram again.
I have 10uF polarized caps across the power leads out of habit, but not any in the circuit proper. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Benjamin AM

Joined: Nov 04, 2010 Posts: 48 Location: Boise
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've been trying to convert this circuit into single power rail version. My expo converter is more true to the ARP version: normal Tempco to ground at summing node rather than the NTC, PNP's collector to ground. I've been struggling to get the oscillator to move at reasonable speed(it's to fast) unless I use a negative reference at the summing node. A larger capacitor distorts the signal, so that's out. Any suggestions? Should I just use a charge pump.
Does a 1V/oct single rail sawtooth core VCO already exist? No reason to reinvent the wheel on this one. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|