Author |
Message |
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
textual
Joined: Dec 05, 2009 Posts: 78 Location: New York City
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:07 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
who thats super cool! i assume this provides a CV of sorts to drive say an oscillator? polyphony? schematic? sound sample sounds great! why not then use an op-amp or a CMOS booster circuit with 4049 to get the level back up? _________________ Dave
______________________
www.dlbelectronics.com
www.textualmusic.com
www.mercuryprogram.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Cynosure
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 11, 2010 Posts: 966 Location: Toronto, Ontario - Canada
Audio files: 82
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Very cool. I did something similar a while ago but added the option to play dual top octave sets with one an octave higher. then i added a bunch of other cmos stuff all within the same housing (schmidt trigger, dividers, sequencer, Wasp filters) and have both an input and output for the sequencer clock. More info on the site in my signature.
I am intetested in seeing a schematic of yours if you have one. _________________ JacobWatters.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
attdestroyers
Joined: Mar 29, 2012 Posts: 47 Location: Malvern, Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
This is awesome. I've been researching this a bit because this is definitely the next step for me and my lunetta. I'd love to see any schematics or additional info you have.
Cynosure - Your C-monster is awesome. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
richardc64
Joined: Jun 01, 2006 Posts: 679 Location: NYC
Audio files: 26
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:06 am Post subject:
|
|
|
jcintheus wrote: | The outputs (all 44) are summed with resistors. |
Ah ha! At that point the signal becomes "audio" -- analog, not clearly defined 1s and 0s, which is why "the output is too weak to drive other CMOS." You have to get to the AND outputs before they're mixed -- but which one?
You could make a 44-input OR with each input connected to a AND output to drive other CMOS, but that would only be effective -- or should I say "predictable"? -- when playing one note at a time. Another strateqy would be to divide the keyboard into zones, with several multi-input ORs, then select one for driving whatever CMOS you think up.
A somewhat cheesy effect would be to add a pull-down to all the 4520 ENables and pulse them to repeatedly turn all notes on/off while sounding.
Quote: | It's in the key of D. |
More like "A", for Awesome. _________________ Revenge is a dish best served with a fork... to the eye |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:16 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Quote: | Ah ha! At that point the signal becomes "audio" -- analog, not clearly defined 1s and 0s, which is why "the output is too weak to drive other CMOS." You have to get to the AND outputs before they're mixed -- but which one? |
Thanks, that's just the kind of clue I needed!
Also, I've been wondering about 3-state outputs? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Cynosure
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 11, 2010 Posts: 966 Location: Toronto, Ontario - Canada
Audio files: 82
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:43 am Post subject:
|
|
|
What i did with mine was I actively mixed them with an opamp. I used a pot for the feedback resistor on the opamp. When I want a nice polyphonic mix for sound then i turn the pot down so there is no distortion. When I want to use the sound to drive other CMOS chips then I turn up the pot, which increases the amplification on the output. _________________ JacobWatters.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:10 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Cynosure wrote: | What i did with mine was I actively mixed them with an opamp. I used a pot for the feedback resistor on the opamp. When I want a nice polyphonic mix for sound then i turn the pot down so there is no distortion. When I want to use the sound to drive other CMOS chips then I turn up the pot, which increases the amplification on the output. |
I tried something like that, but I always ended up with too much distortion.
Maybe a schematic? or a part no. for the op-amp? single supply?
Maybe I should look at your site.
Thanks for the feedback! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Cynosure
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 11, 2010 Posts: 966 Location: Toronto, Ontario - Canada
Audio files: 82
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:32 am Post subject:
|
|
|
There isn't a schematic on my site. I worked from bits and pieces of various schematics and some stripboard layouts.
I basically did this without the pots on each input:
http://sound.westhost.com/articles/audmix-f4.gif
Also, I think i used 100k resistors on the inputs, and R4 was a pot (I think either 100k or 500k). _________________ JacobWatters.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
richardc64
Joined: Jun 01, 2006 Posts: 679 Location: NYC
Audio files: 26
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:50 am Post subject:
|
|
|
jcintheus wrote: | Quote: | Ah ha! At that point the signal becomes "audio" -- analog, not clearly defined 1s and 0s, which is why "the output is too weak to drive other CMOS." You have to get to the AND outputs before they're mixed -- but which one? |
Thanks, that's just the kind of clue I needed!
Also, I've been wondering about 3-state outputs? |
Hmmm. I'd have to think about that. My first thought is that it would be an extensive revision of the circuit.
Another thing you might try is powering the stuff you want to interface with your keyboard at a lower voltage. CD4xxx works at Vcc=3V; 74HCxxx at 2V, and 74AC(T) at 1.5V. Alternatively, you could power the kb at a higher voltage than 5V cmos. The signals are bound to hit the right levels at least some of the time. _________________ Revenge is a dish best served with a fork... to the eye |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JL
Joined: Jun 25, 2012 Posts: 20 Location: New England
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:00 am Post subject:
|
|
|
This is really cool! I've been wanting to do something like this for some time, but finding a proper keyboard has been difficult. Where did yours come from?
Your design is very similar to combo organs of the 60's. The difference is instead of gating the oscillators with the key, the key would send the oscillator to a common buss (usually one per octave), which would then be filtered and mixed with the subsequent octave busses. The downside to this was that you needed a key switch for every footage and a buss for every octave of every footage so for a nice full sound with, say, five footages, you needed five switches for each key, making the whole key assembly rather bulky.
Well done! At the very least you have a polyphonic square wave synth, which is totally rad. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Cynosure
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 11, 2010 Posts: 966 Location: Toronto, Ontario - Canada
Audio files: 82
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:50 am Post subject:
|
|
|
For mine I just used a regular scanning type keyboard. I attached the outputs from the dividers the appropriate keys at the solder point where the diode is connected, on the side of the diode closest to the switch. The pcb for the keyboard mixes all the key outputs into a few buses, which I soldered together with a strip of bare wire and then I took my output from there. the mixing resistors were at the divider outputs (although I was later told that it is best to have them close to the opamp if possible).
And this top octave method is extensive no matter how you go about it (even with a MK50240).
_________________ JacobWatters.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
richardc64
Joined: Jun 01, 2006 Posts: 679 Location: NYC
Audio files: 26
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Cynosure wrote: | And this top octave method is extensive no matter how you go about it (even with a MK50240). |
Indeed...
http://www.sdiy.org/richardc64/topoctave/ _________________ Revenge is a dish best served with a fork... to the eye |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
richardc64 wrote: |
Hmmm. I'd have to think about that. My first thought is that it would be an extensive revision of the circuit.
Another thing you might try is powering the stuff you want to interface with your keyboard at a lower voltage. CD4xxx works at Vcc=3V; 74HCxxx at 2V, and 74AC(T) at 1.5V. Alternatively, you could power the kb at a higher voltage than 5V cmos. The signals are bound to hit the right levels at least some of the time. |
Yeah, maybe 12v, not bad.
JL wrote: | finding a proper keyboard has been difficult. Where did yours come from? |
I got it from an old Wurlitzer(broken), it's a single buss manual. I have another with three busses. More footages? Maybe later.
Eventually I'd like to make some music.
cynosure wrote: | (although I was later told that it is best to have them close to the opamp if possible |
I'll keep that in mind |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:06 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
jcintheus wrote: | Cynosure wrote: | What i did with mine was I actively mixed them with an opamp. I used a pot for the feedback resistor on the opamp. When I want a nice polyphonic mix for sound then i turn the pot down so there is no distortion. When I want to use the sound to drive other CMOS chips then I turn up the pot, which increases the amplification on the output. |
I tried something like that, but I always ended up with too much distortion.
Maybe a schematic? or a part no. for the op-amp? single supply? |
I tried again and now it works! I think my problem involved the value(1k) of the summing resistors I initially used. This time I tried 220k and it worked!
Here's a sample:http://soundcloud.com/bill-chavez/eleven-plus-two
Ok, let's see, output from keyboard to op-amp, op-amp to 4093 set up as an inverter.
From inverter to simple passive mixer(resistors) ALSO to 4046 set up as a multiplier.
Now, to multiply you must divide, for a divider I used a 4051/17 melody generator.
The A, B, and C inputs on the melody generator are controlled by a 4040.
From the output of the multiplier to another divider to divide by 8.
This multiplied and divided signal then is mixed with the signal from the 4093 and this is what I recorded.
Pitch bend is provided by a starve pot on the top octave osc's.
Also a starve pot on the osc to the clock on the 4040, to make the melody generator freak out.
One take, keyboard gibberish, very fun. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
attdestroyers
Joined: Mar 29, 2012 Posts: 47 Location: Malvern, Ohio
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:43 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Awesome recording! sounds so good! This is starting to get pretty complex with all the divide then multiply stuff though. I think I'll try to figure out a simpler solution when i do mine. probably not possible, but ya never know. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JingleJoe
Joined: Nov 10, 2011 Posts: 878 Location: Lancashire, England
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:45 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
The part around 1 minute sounds awesome maybe I'll make something like this, how did you acheive the sound in that section, jcintheus? _________________ As a mad scientist I am ruled by the dictum of science: "I could be wrong about this but lets find out"
Green Dungeon Alchemist Laboratories |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:55 am Post subject:
|
|
|
JingleJoe wrote: | The part around 1 minute sounds awesome maybe I'll make something like this, how did you acheive the sound in that section, jcintheus? |
What you hear at around 1:00 is a musical interval, a fifth in this case, D and A.
All I did was hold down the keys and let physics do the rest.
attdestroyers wrote: | Awesome recording! sounds so good! This is starting to get pretty complex with all the divide then multiply stuff though. I think I'll try to figure out a simpler solution when i do mine. probably not possible, but ya never know. |
It's fully possible, all the divide then multiply stuff is just for fun, it's not "necessary".
I thought it was a good idea to use a melody gen. as a multiplier. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JingleJoe
Joined: Nov 10, 2011 Posts: 878 Location: Lancashire, England
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:20 am Post subject:
|
|
|
jcintheus wrote: | JingleJoe wrote: | The part around 1 minute sounds awesome maybe I'll make something like this, how did you acheive the sound in that section, jcintheus? |
What you hear at around 1:00 is a musical interval, a fifth in this case, D and A.
All I did was hold down the keys and let physics do the rest. |
Why does that sounds so good!? thanks for getting back to me, I thought perhaps you used some circuit trickery, but it was very simple after all! _________________ As a mad scientist I am ruled by the dictum of science: "I could be wrong about this but lets find out"
Green Dungeon Alchemist Laboratories |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:22 am Post subject:
|
|
|
JingleJoe wrote: | Why does that sounds so good!? thanks for getting back to me, I thought perhaps you used some circuit trickery, but it was very simple after all! |
I think it's simply a matter of square waves interfering with each other at a specific ratio.
There's also a major third in there that sounds rather nifty.
This may provide some insight:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_intonation
I'm using 12 tone equal "temperament" But tempered 5th's are pretty close to just 5th's. I think. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JingleJoe
Joined: Nov 10, 2011 Posts: 878 Location: Lancashire, England
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:58 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I'm aware of thier relationship I recently did some work into calculating the frequencies of notes in a scale. For a better sound it is better to go with just intonation. I think, if I remember correctly, just fourths and thirds are very close to thier equal tempered counterparts too. _________________ As a mad scientist I am ruled by the dictum of science: "I could be wrong about this but lets find out"
Green Dungeon Alchemist Laboratories |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:33 am Post subject:
|
|
|
JingleJoe wrote: | I'm aware of thier relationship I recently did some work into calculating the frequencies of notes in a scale. For a better sound it is better to go with just intonation. I think, if I remember correctly, just fourths and thirds are very close to thier equal tempered counterparts too. |
If you want to play diatonically maybe, I think for full chromaticism you may be better off with equal temperament.
P4 and P5 are in inverse relationship to the tonic.(same error)
Thirds, while "sweeter" sounding in just intonation, wreak al kinds of havoc if you want to, for instance, use a secondary dominant chord so...
The nice thing about 12 osc's is that I can tune this thing however I need.(muti-turn trim-pots) |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JingleJoe
Joined: Nov 10, 2011 Posts: 878 Location: Lancashire, England
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:01 am Post subject:
|
|
|
aye thats a very useful feature I plan to impliment the same tuning method if I make a cmos synth this way. _________________ As a mad scientist I am ruled by the dictum of science: "I could be wrong about this but lets find out"
Green Dungeon Alchemist Laboratories |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jcintheus
Joined: Oct 16, 2011 Posts: 59 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:22 am Post subject:
|
|
|
So, here's another CMOS keyboard track.
http://soundcloud.com/bill-chavez/the-money-programme
This time I sent the summed output to a mixer then used an lm386 to boost the analog signal back into CMOS range.
Then I divided by 2(4027) and multiplied by 3(4046 and 4027) for a nice full tone.
The 4046 used in the multiplier circuit is responsible for the 'falling" tones between key presses. (The Drall laser effect)
Just a bunch of cheesy midi instruments and the CMOS "Synth" |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|