Author |
Message |
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:50 am Post subject:
303 filter ... help needed |
|
|
Hello,
I try to patch the 303 within the nord modular...biggest problem..
to get the filter wright.
Has any of you more electronic minded guys any insights how the 303 filter actually works in detail? when i look on the circuit diagram it looks like 4 pole design where one pole is one octave up...
maybe i am wrong... i only can read schematics on a pretty surfaced level.
But i need more detail information... how is this filter working..how is feedback applied? any additional filterings?
the waveform gets altred drastical by passing the filter...
a mid boost is happening ...for example...
Any small detail information can be helpfull...
Also when you know somebody that have build the 303 filter and might have studied in detail it would be nice if you could point me there..
thanks for reading this far
Sven
http://machines.hyperreal.org/manufacturers/Roland/TB-303/schematics/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
deknow
Joined: Sep 15, 2004 Posts: 1307 Location: Leominster, MA (USA)
G2 patch files: 15
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:53 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
yes..but its not accurat best source i found sofar are the pages of the devilfish maker Robin Whitle. He however dont likes to tell everything...
and he is not touching the filter so there is no deeper information on the circuit design. it needs an expert electronic guy to tell what really goes on there. I am not sure if one pole is one octave up... just one capaciator on the ladder just has half the szise... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Scott Stites
Janitor
Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:44 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Thanx Scott,
that document looks like an interesting resource...
Sven |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Scott Stites
Janitor
Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:58 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Hey Sven,
I hope you can understand more of it than I can
Cheers,
Scott |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ian-s
Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2669 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:41 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Impulse response graph to show effect of decay? I wonder what grade this got. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Scott Stites wrote: | Hey Sven,
I hope you can understand more of it than I can
Cheers,
Scott |
no... but the note about rising low boost on accented notes is interesting...
i was lookin thru the internet searching for statements regarding the 303...
some is contradictionary... and it seems that the total technical truth about the 303 never got really explained in public sofar. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 6:27 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I found some other statements on the net regarding the 303 and its filter...
I wondfer if some of this statements are false ...
if somebody can clearly state as such regarding the schematics it would be nice to let us know.
I also would like to know what the difference between a diode ladder and a transistor ladder is soundwise... and why roland to choose transistors to build a diode ladder filter...
Questions over question s :-/
The found statements: various authors cutup
1) Non-oscillating filter which has CV control over resonance (and large
amounts of resonance at that).
2) An Attack/Release Envelope which is bipolar (or some sort of level
shifter to make a unipolar envelope bi.
Note that the cutoff is lowered at the end of decay - this is due to the
infamous "Gimmick" circuit, 3 transistors which pull this little trick.
WHY, I don't know. Needless to say, it's a pretty feature that you'll have
trouble duplicating w/o a modular. On a typical AR envelope circuit,
you'll want to add a -5VDC offset to the normal 0-10V output.
As for the filter, in Barry Kleins book as well as Electronotes is a Dual OTA filter. This is a simple filter with BP/LP/HP/N outputs. A simple substitution of one resistor in the resonance section turns it into a LI'l monster
The TRICK seems to be the 303's filter has INSANE amounts of resonance
but DOES NOT OSCILLATE. I suspect distortion in the feedback loop has
something to do w/ it's character, but I haven't verified that.
The 303 filter is a diode-ladder filter (only that it uses transistors that
are
connected to act as diodes). So it is more similar to the EMS AKS or
Minisonic design than to the Moog in some way. It is a 4-pole filter; but
due to the pole location, which is quite different from Moog- or
CEM-filters,
it has more of a 18dB/Oct than the 24db/Oct slope in the interesting
range. (Of course, in the infinity, every 4-pole low pass is 24dB).
It is a 4-pole filter, with 3 poles the same and the 4th pole about 2.5
times higher in
frequency than the others. So, it will more resemble a 18dB/oct response.
With the 303 however the first cap has a value half that of the others.
So the first pole is a octave higher.
Because we have a LOW pass filter here this first pole does not contribute
to the filter function.
Not sure how the first pole contributes to the resonance point, with some
other filters the resonant frequency is determent by the last pole only.
However I duno how this is with the moog ladder.
The difference between the 303 ladder and the Moog ladder is how the
resonance feedback is applied. On the 303 the feedback is applied to the
transistor that drives the current through the ladder, which gives extra AM
modulation in the filter, causing that typical 303 filter distortion sound.
On the Moog ladder the resonance feedback is applied to one of the two
inputs of the ladder itself, hence the 'clean' resonance sound. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ian-s
Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2669 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:19 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3phase wrote: | The found statements: various authors cutup
|
1) Non-oscillating filter which has CV control over resonance (and large
amounts of resonance at that).
Rubbish, no CV for resonance and it does oscillate, you just cant switch off the VCO to here it.
2) An Attack/Release Envelope which is bipolar (or some sort of level
shifter to make a unipolar envelope bi.
Note that the cutoff is lowered at the end of decay - this is due to the
infamous "Gimmick" circuit, 3 transistors which pull this little trick.
WHY, I don't know. Needless to say, it's a pretty feature that you'll have
trouble duplicating w/o a modular. On a typical AR envelope circuit,
you'll want to add a -5VDC offset to the normal 0-10V output.
seems to be verified by the service manual
The 303 filter is a diode-ladder filter (only that it uses transistors that
are
connected to act as diodes). So it is more similar to the EMS AKS or
Minisonic design than to the Moog in some way. It is a 4-pole filter; but
due to the pole location, which is quite different from Moog- or
CEM-filters,
it has more of a 18dB/Oct than the 24db/Oct slope in the interesting
range. (Of course, in the infinity, every 4-pole low pass is 24dB).
It is a 4-pole filter, with 3 poles the same and the 4th pole about 2.5
times higher in
frequency than the others. So, it will more resemble a 18dB/oct response.
With the 303 however the first cap has a value half that of the others.
So the first pole is a octave higher.
Because we have a LOW pass filter here this first pole does not contribute
to the filter function.
Not sure how the first pole contributes to the resonance point, with some
other filters the resonant frequency is determent by the last pole only.
However I duno how this is with the moog ladder.
sounds ok, the transisters are wired different and the moog has a resister in each pole. I think diode ladders just distort more. The 1st pole shift gives the slope a 'knee' so 18dB for first octave, 24dB after. I suspect they wanted a brighter tone without reduced resonance.
The difference between the 303 ladder and the Moog ladder is how the
resonance feedback is applied. On the 303 the feedback is applied to the
transistor that drives the current through the ladder, which gives extra AM
modulation in the filter, causing that typical 303 filter distortion sound.
On the Moog ladder the resonance feedback is applied to one of the two
inputs of the ladder itself, hence the 'clean' resonance sound.
not according to the schematic |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ian-s
Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2669 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:17 am Post subject:
|
|
|
g2ian wrote: | 3phase wrote: | The found statements: various authors cutup
|
|
Thanks.. i ve updated the main thread in the G2 section..
i also will check your patch later...
the classical filter distorts internally? interesting... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:29 am Post subject:
|
|
|
To g2ian and others
http://machines.hyperreal.org/manufacturers/Roland/TB-303/schematics/roland.TB-303.schem-8.gif
could you retranslate this back to japanese?
I am wondering what the authors want to tell us about the difference of the 303 envelope against "normal" designs...
Do i have to understand it this way that there is just a triger pulse that defines the maximum point with a constant rate dicharging elko?
thanks for any info..
Sven |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:23 am Post subject:
|
|
|
My newest idea is that the 303 has 2 filters working...one resonating the other not...
Can anybody refer on this by cheking the circuit diagram?
Am i on the wrong path?
thanks
Sven |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ian-s
Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2669 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
That description covers the env.mod to VCF expo converter connection. If the diagram is to scale, adding 1/3 negative offset to envelope signal should do the trick. The accented envelopes also get connected to the same point but via a lower value resister so the accent has about twice the max sweep of the env mod?
The accent mod env signal (with no negative bias) is also added to the VCA. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:58 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I have understood that when i have read the manual in the first place... but there is more about it...
My emulation from 2 years ago was based on this idea about the 303..
And the info on Robin Whitles site...he knows probably more about the 303 as anybody else but his opinion is that he has revealed enough of the 303 secrets allready and that i should sit with an oscilloscope on one finding my own clues...I however cant do that to a lent machine...
So lets see how far we get with listening and tghe opinions of other synth specialists
I like to win this challange... not just for me..it will be good promotion for the G2 when its shown that a digital synth can do it.
After all the tests I am sure its possible to get close enough..
Its just necessary to get the wright structure patched... It maybe wont sound 100% like a 303 but like an elastic nord...thats good enough for me...just...sofar all 303 emulations on the nord are not going deep enough.
They behave rather stiff because whats really going on in a 303 is sofar not published in detail...its like a puzzle with lots of missinformation and overseen details.
The envelope thing is different to a fixed offset...seems to react dynamic...
or the envelope has constant rate and therefore needs longer when the fixed offset is down... but when the offset is lowering as more as more the envelope gets down...it would also appear to get alonger decay time..
I am rather curious why they state that theire envelope is differnet to others where the shape of the envelope is performed regardless of its input... Is this just babelfishing or do we really have here a constant rate envelope while the glide is constant time? just the opposite like its usually done?
Also some mysteries about the filter question..i recorded some audio snippets direct after the filter that sound indeed strange... either there are 2 filters working in parallel or the resonance is somehow not affecting all poles...
Have you the electronic knowledge to see such things in the circuit diagram?
I started to add some audio examples to the 303 cloning thread in the nord modular forum.
Thanx anyway for your input allready..and when you have the knowledge..the complete circuit diagram is also to find on at the posted link.
Sven |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|