Author |
Message |
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:25 am Post subject:
DIY Synths General Discussion Subject description: For the small things |
|
|
It just seemed to make sense to me to have a thread that we can talk about anything related to DIY Synths, but not important enough to warrant a new thread about it. A true discussion, and a place to ask small questions and get answers.
Mosc- sorry if I've overstepped my bounds.
--------------------------------------------------
In the not too distant future I might be doing a run of Step sequencer boards. These will be surface mount technology and have normal SIL headers for the LEDs/Pots/Reset-on-step/etc. Is anyone interested in obtaining one of these? It'll be the cost of parts, shipping and a bit extra.
Mac |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
mosc
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18197 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 212
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:25 pm Post subject:
Re: DIY Synths General Discussion Subject description: For the small things |
|
|
Macaba wrote: | It just seemed to make sense to me to have a thread that we can talk about anything related to DIY Synths, but not important enough to warrant a new thread about it. A true discussion, and a place to ask small questions and get answers.
Mosc- sorry if I've overstepped my bounds. |
Well, we have the Schmooze forum for general discussion on topics not related to anything else. . You can talk about anything there, but if you want to start a topic in the DIY forum, that's OK.
Your offer to provide boards for your step sequence seems anything but not important though. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
v-un-v
Janitor
Joined: May 16, 2005 Posts: 8933 Location: Birmingham, England, UK
Audio files: 11
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:56 am Post subject:
Re: DIY Synths General Discussion Subject description: For the small things |
|
|
Macaba wrote: | It just seemed to make sense to me to have a thread that we can talk about anything related to DIY Synths, but not important enough to warrant a new thread about it. A true discussion, and a place to ask small questions and get answers.
|
Mac, if you want to start a new thread discussing DIY- just go ahead- that's what the DIY forums are there for. Don't feel like you are overstepping the mark- you are not. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Mikmo
Joined: Dec 01, 2005 Posts: 150 Location: Copenhagen - Denmark
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:27 am Post subject:
|
|
|
It's a nice initiativ.
I would be interested in one or maybe a couple of these boards. Depending of course on price and functinality.
Mikael _________________ Stay Cool
Mikael
http://www.mikmo.dk |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:15 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I just hand soldered my first SMT part!
I used a blunt gas soldering iron, thats not great to be honest. Still managed to solder all the joints and have no bridges.
I'll be getting a better soldering iron with fine tip, finer gauge solder, and some fine soldering braid. I should get nice joints then. Its rather good this SMT stuff! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:19 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Oh, just to show off my latest SMT board:
Anyways... QUESTION:
How do you convert a Linear CV(v/hz) to a LOG(v/octave) CV? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
dnny
Joined: Mar 12, 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 8
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 5:13 am Post subject:
|
|
|
cute SMT´s i think we all have to learn that someday. soon there will be only surface mount´s...
but i still like more this kind of surface mounts
sorry for cross posting
d _________________ Association of experimental electronics
www.koelse.org
flickr: cable porn group |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
rylos
Joined: Sep 06, 2004 Posts: 8 Location: missouri
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:54 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Doing this one with press-n-peel was pretty tedious! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
dnny
Joined: Mar 12, 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 8
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:18 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
rylos wrote: |
Doing this one with press-n-peel was pretty tedious! |
what is it? what does it do?
you must have good nerves and non shaking hands
thing i like on "through hole" IC´s that you can heat the socket and then press the IC on its place. whit no worries about overheating.
there are some sockets for PLCC and SOJ type
by the way what is the difference between SMT and SMD ?
d _________________ Association of experimental electronics
www.koelse.org
flickr: cable porn group |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:47 am Post subject:
|
|
|
'SMT and SMD'
Surface Mount Technology and Surface Mount Devices.
I wish there was a socket for 6x6mm 16 pad QFN! Its interesting trying to solder these.
Anyways... QUESTION:
How do you convert a Linear CV(v/hz) to a LOG(v/octave) CV? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
mosc
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18197 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 212
G2 patch files: 60
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:01 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Just tried simulating the diode circuit. It doesn't really work out too well.
So I tried the CV expo converter off the VCO of the soundlab. That works nicely. I dunno why it didn't occur to me before to try this.
I've always wanted to get the OP-AMP cookbook, just never the money. Is there a free downloadable version, or is it still copyrighted?
EDIT:
Ahh, that last link. Most interesting, its very similar to the soundlab version. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
zipzap
Joined: Nov 22, 2005 Posts: 559 Location: germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:19 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
isn´t logarithmic the opposite of expotential?
I thought you use an log-amp to convert v/oct to v/hz (why would you do that?)
Vactrols are best driven by a log-amp, right? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:31 am Post subject:
|
|
|
An exponential is a logarithmic to the base E (approx 2.71828183). |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bigtex
Joined: Mar 30, 2006 Posts: 323 Location: Cupertino, California
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:36 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Look here:
http://www.themathpage.com/aPreCalc/logarithmic-exponential-functions.htm
An exponential equation using e as the mantissa (y = e^x) would be symmetrical, about y, to the natural log, or logarithm with e as the base (y = ln x)
The natural log, which uses e as the base, is just one specific logarithm.
y = log x would usually be assumed to have 10 as the base.
You stated that "An exponential is a logarithmic to the base E (approx 2.71828183)" which doesn't really make sense. An exponential equation can have any mantissa (base) or exponent (what base is raised to).
Sorry to get all math nerd on you... but I am a nerd at heart and I just can't help myself sometimes |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:45 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Hey, what can I say, my ass was kicked by superior knowledge! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bigtex
Joined: Mar 30, 2006 Posts: 323 Location: Cupertino, California
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Well.... I understand the math of linear versus logarithmic, but I'm still figuring out how to get a circuit to do it right. I just need to read more schematics.
So, to be clear, in the logarithmic scaling used for audio audio, "e" never comes into play (e = 2.718281828) because we use base 10 for audio frequencies and amplitudes. That way, on a frequency graph, octaves will be equally spaced.
So... I get the math part, but I'm still learning the electronics part. I think this is kind of funny, since I've taken as many electronics classes as math classes ....oh well.... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
v-un-v
Janitor
Joined: May 16, 2005 Posts: 8933 Location: Birmingham, England, UK
Audio files: 11
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:01 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Macaba wrote: | Hey, what can I say, my ass was kicked by superior knowledge! |
me too _________________ ACHTUNG!
ALLES TURISTEN UND NONTEKNISCHEN LOOKENPEEPERS!
DAS KOMPUTERMASCHINE IST NICHT FÜR DER GEFINGERPOKEN UND MITTENGRABEN! ODERWISE IST EASY TO SCHNAPPEN DER SPRINGENWERK, BLOWENFUSEN UND POPPENCORKEN MIT SPITZENSPARKSEN.
IST NICHT FÜR GEWERKEN BEI DUMMKOPFEN. DER RUBBERNECKEN SIGHTSEEREN KEEPEN DAS COTTONPICKEN HÄNDER IN DAS POCKETS MUSS.
ZO RELAXEN UND WATSCHEN DER BLINKENLICHTEN. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Scott Stites
Janitor
Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jksuperstar
Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:16 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Wow, those *are* pretty schematics!
OT -- I wish I knew what programs people used to make these, and if the software can keep up as fast as pencil/napkin. I'd like to move my urge of drawing into using a PC more, since it's soooo much more organized and repeatable. And it's hard to store napkins around. I did get a tablet to try & do this, but it's slow going, mostly due to the lack of software support. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
zipzap
Joined: Nov 22, 2005 Posts: 559 Location: germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:48 am Post subject:
|
|
|
That interests me too. very much. Especially when it comes to making a pcb layout. I´m working on this sequencer-master section right now. Where all the signals come together, are mixed, gatelength, lag and so on.
Its 9 ICs and some resistors, cabs. Well, right now, when i´m doing this i draw each ic with the related parts around it seperetly, numbering the places that have to go to other places in the shematic. Then i try to figure out how to get it all onto the board. Of course it works, but its kind of annoying sometimes, and you really have to concentrate. The larger the circuit gets, to harder it is not to need too much space, not to have too many wires going from one part of the board to another. Also the connections to the outside are spread all over the place.
I´ve tried Eagle, but the freeware version doesn´t include the autorouter. I´ve heard it´s making rather strange layouts anyhow.
But you can use it to draw nice shematics. Problem is, i guess, that you have to spend some time learning the program, to get a good workflow. For me the napkin is much faster. As long as there is a note on the napkin saying what it is its even possible to remain some kind of orginasation.
I never write notes |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
toppobrillo
Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:58 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
heya i havent been on here much lately, it is starting to warm up finally outside i really can't wait for summer...
as far as auto-routing things, i have never used it. some software has this option that show you what connections have yet to be made point for point and allow you to rotate things around until none of them are crossing paths. this is all done off the schematic you have drawn. i never really liked that though. the program i use is very very simple but i like it because it is easy to keep track of what's going on visually. it does require alot of concentration for the more complex layouts. i have literally started over from scratch halfway thru if something isn't working. probably because i am obsessed with efficiency! i.e. using all space available to the maximum potential. but i only do single-sided boards [for now] .
oh, the software i use [and there are a bazillion out there] is called PCB Designer from Niche Software. Check it out it's cool and there is a demo for free.
josh |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
zipzap
Joined: Nov 22, 2005 Posts: 559 Location: germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Quote: | heya i havent been on here much lately, it is starting to warm up finally outside i really can't wait for summer...
|
true!
i´ll check that prog |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Macaba
Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Posts: 160 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:56 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Hey guys, might as well show you what I knocked up this morning:
This takes acceleration data from all three axis (X,Y,Z) and sends it down a serial data link to my computer.
My first program was a mouse program. When you tilt the board in the direction you want the mouse to move, the mouse moves that way. (Tilt because of acceleration due to gravity).
Obviously it has musical applications. Later on, I will make the data translate into MIDI signals, and see how intuitive it seems!
I will buy the 3-axis all in one accelerometer in a QFN package to experiment with, this will basically eliminate the top board in that picture because its only 6x6mm. Which makes soldering it a master feat in itself. But its doable, i'm quietly confident.
QFN package = Tiny and LEADLESS. Gotta try though.
This surface mount stuff is addictive. The surface mount parts you see in the picture are pretty much the large end of the SMT scale. The IC's are SOIC package, and the resistors and caps are 0805. I find it lots quicker to solder these compared to their through-hole counterparts. Whats more, i just do it with a pair of normal eyebrow tweezers and a $5 rat-shack soldering iron. I encourage people to try it!
Now its just occured to me that the only thing thats more expensive in transferring to SMT is the equipment to make decent PCB's. You'll probably want a UV exposure box and laserjet transparencies. But some people have this equipment for through-hole PCB making, so its a simple change really.
The board in the picture was made with a CNC engraver, simply because the PCB etching equipment at college was not then functional.
Hope this gives you all a nice insight. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator
Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:00 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Very cool little board Mac _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|