Author |
Message |
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:56 am Post subject:
|
|
|
jksuperstar wrote: | Tape drives today don't use ferrite heads anymore, they use magneto-resistive elements, |
Thanks for the interesting update on tape. I kinda suspected things might have changed in the past 15 years. These computer thingies change fast _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jksuperstar
Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:44 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I design the things to pay for my hobbies, and being an engineer, I only get to see the worst of the worst that gets sent back from manufacturing. But even knowing what I do, I'd still trust a tape drive over optical media at this point. Even though I'm forced ($$$) to use DVDs at home. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
mosc
Site Admin
Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18197 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 212
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:42 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Yes, I don't have any links to point to, but I've read a lot of horror stories about people who have CDRs they thought had their archives on turning out to have gone bad over time - in some cases as little as two years. Some claim that light will ruin them. Tapes may be better.
Still, the best thing is to use multiple of what ever stragegy you use. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jksuperstar
Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:47 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I've heard that burning at 1x speed is the most reliable, since each bit is burned for a longer time into the media, the disc will "last longer". The speed of the disc is also more stable, and will be written with less jitter.
Most disc manufacturers that accept CD-roms as masters require writing at 1x probably for this reason. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:02 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I have to say my preference for archival storage remains gold film optical. But definitely multiple copies. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
destroyifyer
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: Babylon
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:19 pm Post subject:
on cd backup... |
|
|
For those who will stick to CD backup, all i could reccomend would be to burn you backup as an Audio cd, as opposed to a Data cd.
I mean, decay of Audio CD music does take a real long time, long enough to take a breath in-between backups i guess.
goodbye |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
This doesn't seem to be an issue that has gotten much real research. I have found no comparisons of tape versus gold film optical. And no research papers on gold film CD. Believe it or not the best I could come up with is this.
http://www.melbpc.org.au/pcupdate/2106/2106article14.htm
If anybody has anything better please share it.
One consideration is that if your read device fails and a replacement is unavailable you're completely up the creek. Tape drive formats are proprietary and the drives are likely to disappear before those for a given optical standard. As yet it does not seem to be a simple clear cut issue to me. But more data would surely help. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ian-s
Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2669 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
jksuperstar wrote: | I've heard that burning at 1x speed is the most reliable, since each bit is burned for a longer time into the media, the disc will "last longer". The speed of the disc is also more stable, and will be written with less jitter.
Most disc manufacturers that accept CD-roms as masters require writing at 1x probably for this reason. |
I have read that although burning at a drives maximum rate is probably not a good idea, some drives minimum error rates are achieved at moderate speeds like 8x or 16x. Testing seems to be difficult as errors are quite rare unless you use those nasty 5cent per disk brands.
Does anyone recall how bad floppy disks got in terms of retention during the end of that era? I had verified data just vanish in a months. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jksuperstar
Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:08 am Post subject:
Re: on cd backup... |
|
|
teradacto wrote: | For those who will stick to CD backup, all i could reccomend would be to burn you backup as an Audio cd, as opposed to a Data cd.
I mean, decay of Audio CD music does take a real long time, long enough to take a breath in-between backups i guess.
|
That depends on how the things will be used. With an Audio (Red Book) format, you get slightly more space, but less error correction as a data format has (yellow or green books). You don't hear these errors in a cd-player, because everything is interpolated to remove any clicks and pops that might occur due to dust, errors, etc. You're also limited to stereo 16-bit, 44.1kHz audio.
For data formatted discs, errors won't be ignored as they are on audio cds, so they seem more prone to errors, even though the opposite is true.
Either way, if you ever clean cd's, do it from the center out. Since the disc is reading in a spiral, any scratches you make from the center out will be very short when the disc is being read, and would be more readily correctable, while scratches that are arc-shaped and concentric to the disc will look very large, and prevent data from being recovered. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator
Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:31 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I hear about people going to their CD backups to find that the disk is unreadable every other week! They are definately not reliable. Generally I reckon the safest place for data is on a hard drive. Though not the one you use everyday. You can get a caddy that will turn any hard drive into a USB drive for just AUS$40. With one of these you can use any drive you like, swap to a second one for added security, and the drive is only used for the backup, so it should last for ages. We get lots of lightning strikes, so it has to be something that has no connection to the outside world 99% of the time.
If you use CDs, don't use re-writables, burn at a slow speed, and re-do them every 6months even if nothing has changed. _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator
Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:40 am Post subject:
|
|
|
g2ian wrote: |
Does anyone recall how bad floppy disks got in terms of retention during the end of that era? I had verified data just vanish in a months. |
I used to advise people not to store floppy disks near credit cards,.......Because the credit card will probably wipe the disk!! _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:02 am Post subject:
|
|
|
In most cases, backing up a modern DAW does require a well thought out strategy. First of all, a song file is not really just a file, it is rather a project with lotsa different files involved all over the place. What you might want to do is making full backups that will capture both the state of the PC/Mac ( OS versions, plugins etc, DAW version and then all the related project subfiles that are dependant on this very state of the machine. That is why I recommend doing both incremental backups with snapshots ( which should capture the full state of the machine) and also regular ful backups of everything. tape is the way to go. This is the most flexible and cheapest in the long run. The backup software is important too. A reasonably good app is Retrospect from EMC/DANTZ http://www.dantz.com I have used Retrospect for some 15 years or more and it has always performed 100%.
Retrospect can be run over a network, so you can use any decent mac or PC for this. A G4 400mhz Powermac wil do just fine. Retrospect does also support the use of CD or DVD, not just tape. However, tape is best. CD or DVD is best IMO for archiving data and is not fit for backup.
Important: Always run a verification of the data. This applies both for CD/DVD and tape. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:41 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OK. I'll agree, RAID, to tape, to archival CD. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:33 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Right.. and those high heel pumps are optional.
_________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:57 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
elektro80 wrote: | Right.. and those high heel pumps are optional. |
Good thing, there won't be much left over for accessories
OMG Any woman who would wear those things... -- I mean shades of foot binding. Lordy what ever happened to feminism!? _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
destroyifyer
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: Babylon
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject:
hi Subject description: hi |
|
|
in reflection of my past recording methods, relying on CD-R backup has got to be the biggest mistake of my musical life
100% honestly
good luck,
teradacto |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|