Author |
Message |
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:07 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
vtl5c3 wrote: | Hiya,
The original did not have stepped outputs. That's one of the mods that Scott showed to me. The original didn't have a noisy triangle output either.
R.
ericcoleridge wrote: | VTL5C3, or anyone,
Just noticed, on the FRV section of the 266 SOU, there are only 2 outputs.
Was there no FRV Step output on the original, or maybe one side outputs just FRV and the other side just Stepped FRV? |
|
Yeah, it really is a great mod. I'm reproducing the original front panel, so I may just use one of the stepped outs as the second FRV out. But then, when it's paired with the stored random voltage, S+H, etc, perhaps it won't seem as necessary. We'll see. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:36 pm Post subject:
Subject description: RV |
|
|
ericcoleridge wrote: |
LetterBeacon wrote: |
Board 1 - 266_1 - Quantized Random Voltages
|
The first output adds up a mix of all equal quantized voltages (all 1.2V, for instance). The second output adds up a mix of different quantized voltages (for instance: 1.2V, 2.4V, 4.8V, 9.6, etc--all in related ratio)
|
Damn !?
So I want a 1 V/Oct QRV module |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:46 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
OK, I have a new problem (sorry ):
I have board 4 all populated and powered. I've looked at all of the chip and diode orientations, the board looks clean--no bridges or shorts, all chips are getting power.
But I don't think anything is working. Everything is passing signal-- but the slew won't slew very much- if at all.
The sample and hold seems to be more just following the input voltage, then going to ground on gate. When I input a noise, it more less just outputs a garbled noise.
I should say first that I did not populate any of the LED cicuitry. But, it doesn't seem like this should have any effect-- and indeed, it's marked as 'optional' in the notes.
So, my next suspicion is the trim pot orientation. I'm sure this could be effecting the Slew, but not sure why it would have any effect on the S+H.
Could anyone make a suggestion on where I could start looking for problems on eirther the slew or S+H, or both? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Scott Stites
Janitor
Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:03 am Post subject:
|
|
|
This is such a cool project! One thing that I found really nice was to rig a trigger output from the 556 (I actually used a 7556 in my experiments) that drives the FRV. That was nice, because it was synchronized with the stepped output of the FRV, and its rate is voltage controlled to boot (via the Probability of Change control input). It provides an additional opportunity for the SOU to "feed on itself" - for example, you can patch it into the pulse input of the S&H or one of the pulsed random voltages. Or is that already in? Guess I better check.
I dredged this sample up off my old site - here's the description on the site:
Quote: | And finally, this is a sample of the RFV doing what it does best - it's controlling a VCO, the DSC2000, and the 2040 filter. There's quite a bit of overdubbing in this sample - check it out if you like 'weird' =0). The creepy intro timing is all determined by the RFV - the EG is controlled by the trigger out of the module, and the smooth output is controlling the 'probability of change', which controls the clock frequency and smooth lag time. |
I had the mistaken habit back in those days of writing "RFV" instead of "FRV" It's the piece called "Landing on a Different Planet in the '50's", in case you've already heard it.
Cheerios,
Scott
Description: |
|
Download |
Filename: |
rfv_sam_short2.mp3 |
Filesize: |
4.61 MB |
Downloaded: |
1462 Time(s) |
_________________ My Site |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:07 am Post subject:
Subject description: RV |
|
|
funkyfarm wrote: | ericcoleridge wrote: |
LetterBeacon wrote: |
Board 1 - 266_1 - Quantized Random Voltages
|
The first output adds up a mix of all equal quantized voltages (all 1.2V, for instance). The second output adds up a mix of different quantized voltages (for instance: 1.2V, 2.4V, 4.8V, 9.6, etc--all in related ratio)
|
Damn !?
So I want a 1 V/Oct QRV module |
If you could figure out the right values on the outputs of the shift register, you change the voltage levels to standard volt/octave quantization. Or you could get the Doepfer version which is re-designed for volt/octave. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:13 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Scott Stites wrote: | It's the piece called "Landing on a Different Planet in the '50's", in case you've already heard it.
|
What a fantastic sample. Thanks for posting this. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:49 am Post subject:
Subject description: well-tempered sou |
|
|
ericcoleridge wrote: |
funkyfarm wrote: |
So I want a 1 V/Oct QRV module |
If you could figure out the right values on the outputs of the shift register, you change the voltage levels to standard volt/octave quantization. Or you could get the Doepfer version which is re-designed for volt/octave. |
So i'll vamp dieter's work
I guess B266-2 SRV module would also suffer from a strange 1,2V quantification.
Even with a standard 1/12V quantiser on output, it won't lead to the same melodies as in a Buchla 200 system...and you insult Don's talent
PS : if you can have QRV module working, I think it would not be so hard to test different points on pcb, find 1,2V and its multiples, maybe check which voltage supply is involved, and then have some really simple maths... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:08 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Scott Stites wrote: |
I had the mistaken habit back in those days of writing "RFV" instead of "FRV" It's the piece called "Landing on a Different Planet in the '50's"
|
Cool sample !
(forget what I've just said before, there is no insult) |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:39 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
ericcoleridge wrote: |
Could anyone make a suggestion on where I could start looking for problems on eirther the slew or S+H, or both? |
I changed out the trim pot-- but to no avail! I'm not sure where to go next with this circuit. Are there any points where I could test for a specific level, anything to give me some idea of what might be in error here? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
vtl5c3
Joined: Sep 08, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: PDX
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:07 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi Eric,
The fact that the slew circuit isn't working shouldn't affect the rest of the board, unless there's something melting down and drawing the current away from everything else.
Focussing on the S&H circuit - first of all, how hot are your pulses? 5V or higher?
Are you seeing pulses at the pulse outputs?
What are you seeing at pins 7&8 of the LF398s?
How about pins 6&12 of the CD4016?
Romeo
ericcoleridge wrote: | ericcoleridge wrote: |
Could anyone make a suggestion on where I could start looking for problems on eirther the slew or S+H, or both? |
I changed out the trim pot-- but to no avail! I'm not sure where to go next with this circuit. Are there any points where I could test for a specific level, anything to give me some idea of what might be in error here? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:58 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I'll check all of these things. Thanks-- sorry for all of the trouble. Perhaps when others build these circuits- these notes will be useful. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:33 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
vtl5c3 wrote: |
The fact that the slew circuit isn't working shouldn't affect the rest of the board, unless there's something melting down and drawing the current away from everything else. |
vtl5c3 wrote: |
Focussing on the S&H circuit - first of all, how hot are your pulses? 5V or higher? |
Yes 5v or higher from an Arp Gate out, and an LFO trig out. Curiously, when I touch the lead of my meter to the clock input, I get a little response from the sample and hold-- rather than just garbled noise from the noise at the S+H input. Not sure what this indicates-- if anything.
vtl5c3 wrote: |
Are you seeing pulses at the pulse outputs? |
Yes, 10v or more pulse output.
vtl5c3 wrote: |
What are you seeing at pins 7&8 of the LF398s? |
about 2v at pin 7 and 3v to 4v at pin 8.
vtl5c3 wrote: |
How about pins 6&12 of the CD4016? |
I'm getting a constant 14v at pin 6, and nothing at pin 12 (unless it's negative, in which case I can't read it on my analog meter).
I just realized something else-- my decoupling .01uf caps were pulls. Is it possible that if any of them are bad-- that one or more could be drawing out current to ground--and causing the circuit to malfunction. Is this a dumb question? Should I replace them all? Is it safe to run the circuit without these decoupling caps? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:06 am Post subject:
|
|
|
ericcoleridge wrote: | Perhaps when others build these circuits- these notes will be useful. |
I'm certainly following this thread with interest.
Does anyone know where I can find the 1N5228 zener diodes in the UK or Europe? I can't find a source at all. Could I perhaps use a substitute? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
vtl5c3
Joined: Sep 08, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: PDX
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:16 am Post subject:
|
|
|
That's simply a 3.9 V Zener diode. There others that would work, such as the 1N4730 and 1N748.
LetterBeacon wrote: | ericcoleridge wrote: | Perhaps when others build these circuits- these notes will be useful. |
I'm certainly following this thread with interest.
Does anyone know where I can find the 1N5228 zener diodes in the UK or Europe? I can't find a source at all. Could I perhaps use a substitute? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:40 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Ah I see, so any zener diode with a voltage rating of 3.9 will work? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:22 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I sent out MM5837 noise ICs today to everyone with a US address who requested one. I have one IC left for anyone who wants.
EDIT: All the ICs have gone out now. Last edited by ericcoleridge on Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
forbin
Joined: Jan 29, 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Fremantle, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Well i have finished the SRV board (board #2) and have found a couple of minor tweeks are required for all to be well.
* pin 4 of the TL074 (left hand one on overlay) needs to be connected to power
* pin 9 of the 4015 (center CMOS) needs to be connected to the clock line (same as the pin 9 of the other 4015)
* the diode bridge pull-up to +15 needs to be moved to the other end of the diode bridge
All the changes are very short bridges and can be easily done.
Other considerations:
I found that I had to boost up the decoupling as I was getting a lot of noise and glitches. I put some extra 1uF/10uF tantalum's around the place which fixed it up. I also had some 10V references lying around and I found that they made a significantly cleaner 10V source for the CMOS devices.
Does work well now and I am very pleased with the results. Thanks again to vc3tl again for the board layout!
See http://forbinthesynthesizer.blogspot.com/ for some CRO plots and other pix -- i have some other SPICE simulations and a couple of other suggestions for component tweeks that I am still experimenting with, but will post when they have solidified... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:43 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Great blog. Thanks for posting your results. I'll keep watching for updates. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
vtl5c3
Joined: Sep 08, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: PDX
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi Forbin,
Thanks for the feedback. FunkyFarm had pointed out the missing trace on the TL074. I fixed that and the trace on the CD4015. The posted layouts have been updated with those fixes today.
Sorry to hear about the noise and glitches. I haven't noticed any on mine, but maybe I haven't looked at it as closely as you.
I'll check out your blog a bit more closely later on. I will say that it's nice to see people etching boards with my layouts. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside!
forbin wrote: | Well i have finished the SRV board (board #2) and have found a couple of minor tweeks are required for all to be well.
* pin 4 of the TL074 (left hand one on overlay) needs to be connected to power
* pin 9 of the 4015 (center CMOS) needs to be connected to the clock line (same as the pin 9 of the other 4015)
* the diode bridge pull-up to +15 needs to be moved to the other end of the diode bridge
All the changes are very short bridges and can be easily done.
Other considerations:
I found that I had to boost up the decoupling as I was getting a lot of noise and glitches. I put some extra 1uF/10uF tantalum's around the place which fixed it up. I also had some 10V references lying around and I found that they made a significantly cleaner 10V source for the CMOS devices.
Does work well now and I am very pleased with the results. Thanks again to vc3tl again for the board layout!
See http://forbinthesynthesizer.blogspot.com/ for some CRO plots and other pix -- i have some other SPICE simulations and a couple of other suggestions for component tweeks that I am still experimenting with, but will post when they have solidified... |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
forbin
Joined: Jan 29, 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Fremantle, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:55 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi vtl5c3
The board layouts are fantastic and i am positive that i wouldn't have done anything if you hadn't laid them out! I did spend a lot of time analyzing some of the Buchula stuff about 4 or 5 years ago with the plan to making some boards, but it rapidly came to naught.
The problems that i saw was that the output would go into oscillation on largish transients. Unfortunately i didn't photograph it as i didn't have the camera with me at the time!
I am onto board #1 now -- will let you know how that goes. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
266-2
STORE RANDOM VOLTAGE
Hi,
looking at the pcb layout, the two led drivers don"t look the same ; i guess one 100ohm resistor is missing for CV 2...or maybe there is one unwanted resistor, that put base signal to ground (via only 100ohm ?).
why not putting 100nf all the way for decoupling, instead of 10nF ?
Two 10/22uF are perhaps missing with ferride beads...
Looking at Scott's schematic, the pot and cv control circuitry only affect CV 2 output, right ? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
vtl5c3
Joined: Sep 08, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: PDX
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:47 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Bwahahahaaaa! You guys are finding all sorts of mistakes.
The 100ohm resistor from base to ground on the CV1 LED should not be there. Only from Emitter to ground.
You can definitely use .1 uF caps instead of .01 for decoupling. I tried to make extra pads to accomodate two sizes of caps.
And yes, I forgot the electrolytic/tant caps after the ferrite beads. I'll make corrections and post another update.
funkyfarm wrote: | 266-2
STORE RANDOM VOLTAGE
Hi,
looking at the pcb layout, the two led drivers don"t look the same ; i guess one 100ohm resistor is missing for CV 2...or maybe there is one unwanted resistor, that put base signal to ground (via only 100ohm ?).
why not putting 100nf all the way for decoupling, instead of 10nF ?
Two 10/22uF are perhaps missing with ferride beads...
Looking at Scott's schematic, the pot and cv control circuitry only affect CV 2 output, right ? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:51 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
funkyfarm wrote: | 266-2
STORE RANDOM VOLTAGE
Looking at Scott's schematic, the pot and cv control circuitry only affect CV 2 output, right ? |
I hardly understand the original serigraphy...
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Doepfer serigraphy is simplier for me
POT is only for SRV 2 output....
i guess cv too. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
funkyfarm
Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:10 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
266-3
FLUCTUATING RANDOM VOLTAGE Stepped outputs - dual input
I've understood that two sockets should be added : two "stepped" versions of main FRV1 and FRV2 outputs.
But it is mentionned here or there that ou could also add a NC socket input for each circuits. Normally connected to digital noise source (more or less 11V), it allows user to feed the module with standard noise source (is there any interest ?) or wogglebug signals...
If so, any diode or resistor protection is needed ? see "a" point on this schematic :
http://www.musicsynthesizer.com/Buchla/266-3.jpg
266-4
SAMPLE & HOLD separate inputs
Is there any use in adding separate pulse inputs and cv inputs for both S&H circuitry ?
separate pulse just requires cutting a trace ; dual cv in requires another R65 10K resistor.
http://www.musicsynthesizer.com/Buchla/266-4.jpg |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|