Author |
Message |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:44 pm Post subject:
bad CA3280 dual OTA's Subject description: from futurlec.com? |
 |
|
hi all,
i recently built jim patchell's vocal filter. this monster filter unit uses 9 (nine!) CA3280 dual OTA's. i bought mine from futurlec.com, due to their reasonable price.
last weekend i brought the unit to an annual german modular synth meeting (HK2009) and the unit ran from 1200LT to 2000LT without any issues, then one filter died.
i troubleshot the unit and traced the failure down to 2 (two!) CA3280 that went bad.
sometimes it is good to 'burn in' a gear, isn't it?
now i wonder, could this have happened due to low quality ICs? the only other conclusion would be to have a weak design here, what i cannot believe, since jim patchell surely knows his stuff! _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source Last edited by fonik on Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
neandrewthal

Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 672 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
That`s balls. I just got a few 3280`s from futurlec for my Teezers. They better work  _________________ " I went through quite a few trannies til I found one I liked" - Wild Zebra |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
there was a thread at Synthesizerforum.de. ( maybe 2 threads )
Tomcat statet that parts from futurelec may vary, i think he was speaking about CA3280 ( or LM 394).
some were pulled, some not etc. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peng

Joined: Feb 23, 2006 Posts: 111 Location: Chicago
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject:
Re: bad CA3280 dual OTA's Subject description: from futurlec.com? |
 |
|
fonik wrote: |
now i wonder, could this have happened due to low quality ICs? the only other conclusion would be to have a weak design here, what i cannot believe, since jim patchell surely knows his stuff! |
It is not the design it is the chips. I ordered 100 CA3280 from Futurlec (2, 3 years ago?) and many of them are bad or out of spec. Example: I built a Neural Agonizer which uses three 3280. I had to go through a batch of 25 chips to find three that worked well. Some had large offset problems and others had noise riding on any signal that was passed through them. I had a decent test circuit which I will try to find ASAP. The data sheet probably has a good test circuit to use. Also, Jim Patchell has good info studies he did on the 3280. You could probably use those for testing purposes, too.
Here are the markings on the 3280's I got from Futurlec:
CA3280E
H9801
Surplus/discount parts are always hit or miss. I seem to recall Ian Fritz got LM394 from Futurlec and these were fine. Pretty good deal on those, too.
Best advice I can give for surplus parts is to by just a few of anything you are interested in, test and test again, and if they check out OK, then order your desired quantity.
p. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:52 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
realy good info, peng. very appreciated.
BTW i bought 30(?) LM394 from futurlec in 2007 and they are quite fine, as far as i can tell... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
anyone has another source for CA3280?
i did planned to order from future but when i read thit.. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peng

Joined: Feb 23, 2006 Posts: 111 Location: Chicago
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Strange thing is...I would think more people would have had these problems. Perhaps Fonik and I were just unlucky?
Fonik - can you post the number from your bad 3280s? It could be a case that a batch or specific make are bad/out of spec and others may be fine.
I haven't gone through the full 100 chips yet. Many of them ARE good but you just have to test out a bunch first to find them. Hey, even if half of the 100 are bad, that comes out to $150 for 50 CA3280E. It is still a good deal.
but...I won't be ordering anymore.
It's a shame these chips where discontinued (could care less about the 3080). For any new designs I pretend they don't exist.
I'm saving the good ones for replacements or for pcbs that need them (Neural Ag., Vocal Filter).
I'm also keeping the bad chips. Some of them did really interesting 'bad' things. Could be cool for one-of-a-kind sound fx devices, etc.
p. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
here is the markings of the batch of my ICs:
CA3280E
H0011 _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
whomper

Joined: Dec 15, 2007 Posts: 201 Location: Israel
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've had my fair share of problems with the LM13600 ordered from Futurlec. They did not behave as required and caused me some minor headache till I replaced them.
I have ordered some 13700 to try them out. _________________ Erez Yaary
Home Page: http://www.yaary.com
Buy my CDs at http://www.mellowjet.de |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
whomper wrote: | I've had my fair share of problems with the LM13600 ordered from Futurlec. They did not behave as required and caused me some minor headache till I replaced them.
I have ordered some 13700 to try them out. |
i've ordered about 30 13700 from futurlec and used only 5 yet. they have been fine. _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
zthee

Joined: Feb 20, 2008 Posts: 414 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:42 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
whomper wrote: | I've had my fair share of problems with the LM13600 ordered from Futurlec. They did not behave as required and caused me some minor headache till I replaced them. |
Thanks for the info.
I got 3 LM13600 from futurlec - and I've tried them in the compander circuit in my Haible FS-1A - with really strange results. Bought a LM13700 to replace them today. Hope that does the trick!
Edit: Yep! Swapped the LM13600 for a brand spanking new LM13700 - it now works as it should! _________________ http://www.thehumancomparator.net/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
etaoin

Joined: Jun 30, 2005 Posts: 761 Location: Utrecht, NL
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
peng wrote: | Strange thing is...I would think more people would have had these problems. Perhaps Fonik and I were just unlucky? |
I'm not sure but I think the ones I got are fine. They are in my Threeler. But it's hard to tell as I can't compare it to any other Threeler to see if it behaves differently.
Mine are datecode H0011 as well. _________________ http://www.casia.org/modular/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Same exact thing with me. Seems ok but since the Threeler is an original design I don't have the total frame of reference to say it performs 100% as it should but it seems ok. Not sure of the datecode on the chip offhand can check later.
Etaoin wrote: | peng wrote: | Strange thing is...I would think more people would have had these problems. Perhaps Fonik and I were just unlucky? |
I'm not sure but I think the ones I got are fine. They are in my Threeler. But it's hard to tell as I can't compare it to any other Threeler to see if it behaves differently.
Mine are datecode H0011 as well. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:48 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
just for clarification:
at the first power up the vocal filter worked fine, and it worked fine at any occasion i used it from then, unitl the day i run the unit constantly for more than 8 hours. some call that a "burn in", i think!? after these 8 hours two 3280 OTAs went bad. one totally, the 2nd lost one half... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:56 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
fonik wrote: | just for clarification:
at the first power up the vocal filter worked fine, and it worked fine at any occasion i used it from then, unitl the day i run the unit constantly for more than 8 hours. some call that a "burn in", i think!? after these 8 hours two 3280 OTAs went bad. one totally, the 2nd lost one half... |
we have that with LM3900 on our VCS
we did a burn in for 24 hours to test the (cloned)design and got up to 3 times a 3900 blow up |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
TekniK wrote: | fonik wrote: | just for clarification:
at the first power up the vocal filter worked fine, and it worked fine at any occasion i used it from then, unitl the day i run the unit constantly for more than 8 hours. some call that a "burn in", i think!? after these 8 hours two 3280 OTAs went bad. one totally, the 2nd lost one half... |
we have that with LM3900 on our VCS
we did a burn in for 24 hours to test the (cloned)design and got up to 3 times a 3900 blow up |
i got a tube of 3900's from futurlec as well. did not use them yet. _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
etaoin

Joined: Jun 30, 2005 Posts: 761 Location: Utrecht, NL
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
fonik wrote: | just for clarification:
at the first power up the vocal filter worked fine, and it worked fine at any occasion i used it from then, unitl the day i run the unit constantly for more than 8 hours. some call that a "burn in", i think!? after these 8 hours two 3280 OTAs went bad. one totally, the 2nd lost one half... |
Ok, so they should die completely. That should be noticable even in the Threeler. I think I have left the modular on overnight on at least one occassion, but I can't be sure. I'll just try right away and leave it on for the rest of the day. _________________ http://www.casia.org/modular/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Ricko
Joined: Dec 25, 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 27
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
What actual proof (not second hand or speculation) does anyone have that Futurlec supplies pulled parts for their standard catalog? (Either now or ever...)
Ever since I saw that one Asian specialty supplier was slagging off at his business rival (whether fairly or unfairly) I have been worried that the meme of "cheating foreigners" would become the first thing that comes into people's minds rather than the last. (I am sure that was not Fonik's intent, he is just asking AFAICS)
How do you tell a pulled part? (serious question: bent pins?) I have had at least half a dozen orders from them of lots of different things, all good as far as I can tell.
When I Google for comments about Futurlec the comments seem to be either old (did they not have their fulfillment capability in place in 2005?) or irritating (people from a certain country who don't realize that shipping goods from the other side of the globe takes longer than 1 week, apart from order filling time.) There was the recent comment about resistor tolerances, IIRC too (I tend to think that if you want such exact values for resistors, you probably want more than 1% or need a trimmer anyway, but I agree that things should match their description, especially in this age of Six Sigma)
They have a 90 day warranty: I am not sure that it would apply when plugging into a new board with a new board design with a new circuit design though, but you could try. If there is a problem with quality, tell them. How will they know if a supplier is dodgy unless they are told? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:36 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ricko wrote: | What actual proof (not second hand or speculation) does anyone have that Futurlec supplies pulled parts for their standard catalog? (Either now or ever...) |
Paul Schriber says he got a batch of fakes from them. Anyway, they do not currently have 3280's available.
Ian |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
[quote="frijitz"] Ricko wrote: | Anyway, they do not currently have 3280's available.
Ian |
site stock says they have |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i did not say anything at all about pulled parts - i was just stating that 2 out of 9 CA3280's in my vocal filter went bad after 8 hours of constant operation, due to low quality standards of the manufacturer probably.
Ricko wrote: | What actual proof (not second hand or speculation) does anyone have that Futurlec supplies pulled parts for their standard catalog? (Either now or ever...)
Ever since I saw that one Asian specialty supplier was slagging off at his business rival (whether fairly or unfairly) I have been worried that the meme of "cheating foreigners" would become the first thing that comes into people's minds rather than the last. (I am sure that was not Fonik's intent, he is just asking AFAICS) |
_________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
etaoin

Joined: Jun 30, 2005 Posts: 761 Location: Utrecht, NL
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
fonik wrote: | to low quality standards of the manufacturer probably.  |
I'm not sure what the standard failure rate of these chips was supposed to be. We're all used to almost infallible chips at the moment due to the ever increasing quality of manufacture, but these were manufactured almost ten years ago.
The ones I got from Futurlec are from Harris. I know that Harris also sold "burn in" versions, where they attached an "X" to the component name (I have several CA3080EX from them). This suggests Harris knew there were bad parts in the normal batches, otherwise there would be no need to sell burn-in versions (probably at a higher price) and that people were prepared to pay for known good ones.
Even if the percentage of bad parts in a batch is low, you can end up with two in an order of nine.
The 3280's in my Threeler haven't died by the way, after almost 24 hours of continuous operation. _________________ http://www.casia.org/modular/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
oeps sorry,din't pay attention
damn i need some,somebody knows where to buy them? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
etaoin

Joined: Jun 30, 2005 Posts: 761 Location: Utrecht, NL
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:26 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
The only source I know which has been pointed out is Bridechamber, but when I asked a couple of weeks ago Scott only had a few left and was selling close to $20 each. So that's not a real source in my book. _________________ http://www.casia.org/modular/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|