Author |
Message |
slabman
Joined: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 102 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:23 am Post subject:
$5 processor has potential for music |
|
|
Quote: | 'The XS1-L family of chips are designed to emulate hardware through software programming ... the chips can emulate USB interfaces, audio processors, Ethernet adaptors, display drivers or other electronic circuits ... The single-core version of the chip will cost under $5 (£3) ... this technology is as accessible to people in their garden sheds as it is to the consumer electronics industry' |
Story here - http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/0,1000000091,39666690,00.htm
Sample code for a midi synth here - http://www.xlinkers.org/node/122 |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
State Machine
Janitor
Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2809 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:10 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Looks nice. it's like the Parallax Propeller chip concept except they call their processing elements "cogs" instead of cores.
I think more and more MCU/Processor companies are jumping on the multi-core bandwagon ! Gone will be the days of writing assembler code for embedded system because it would just be plain too hard to manage all those CPU's and coherency among memories. Not that his is bad, it's progress as even hand held devices are demanding very complex, fast, programs to run on them like phones and media players ..
Just an aside. I found it odd that the company explicitly states that it can emulate hardware though software but this has been a given for several years on processors, for example, like the Scenix SX series and their software MODEM examples.
On another plus, I also see that there are web based tools to work with this which is makes it completely platform independent.
If one wants, they can download the Eclipse based "IDE"
I have not heard any samples from the synthesizers that were created from these as the projects came with no samples. If there are any, I would like to hear them.
Thanks for posting this
Bill |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
slabman
Joined: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 102 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:19 pm Post subject:
emulating hardware thru software |
|
|
I guess digital synthesizers have been emulating hardware through software since the 60s and 70s! I think this chip has potential for some modular synth applications though. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:32 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Just had a glance over the instruction set, seems very interesting, and it made me think of the transputer ... wonder if there is a relation. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
State Machine
Janitor
Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2809 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
slabman
Joined: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 102 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:44 am Post subject:
The Transputer is back |
|
|
I love the idea that the Transputer lineage continues. Given that we've had InMos, and now XMos (X meaning out), the next Transputer-related company will have to be called Shake-it-all-aboutMos. (Sorry about that).
Seriously, I see that one of the built-in strengths of the XMos chip is creating networked audio machines. This could lead to something along the lines of Buchla using the I2C bus. I'm imagining piping audio and OSC control signals over Ethernet between XMos-based modules.
I note that the example midi synth uses code from code from LOVE, a patchable music enviroment written in Occam (https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/research/groups/sys/wiki/LOVE). So you could further imagine that there could be an associated software environment too. I wish I had an ounce of the brainpower needed to make some of that happen.
BTW - SID fans - there's an example SID emulator too - http://www.xlinkers.org/node/240 |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Tim Servo
Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject:
Re: The Transputer is back |
|
|
slabman wrote: | I love the idea that the Transputer lineage continues. Given that we've had InMos, and now XMos (X meaning out), the next Transputer-related company will have to be called Shake-it-all-aboutMos. (Sorry about that).
|
Okay, now THAT'S funny!
Tim (sir laffsalot) Servo |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Tim Servo
Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
slabman
Joined: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 102 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:14 am Post subject:
Pokey. |
|
|
Bill Bailey is the man! Or at least a close approximation of one.
There could be enough constructs in the Hokey-cokey to create a viable programming language -
- Left foot in
- Left foot out
- In out
- Shake it all about
- Do hokey-cokey
- Shout
- Etc.
Well, it worked for LOLcode.
Back to the serious for a minute... no, sorry, it's gone. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
BobTheDog
Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:13 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I did some work on Transputers in the dim and distant past using Occam it was all pretty neat stuff at the time.
I though it had a great future, wrong again |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|