| Author |
Message |
RSFC
Joined: Sep 02, 2010 Posts: 65 Location: space lab
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:34 pm Post subject:
Thomas White 292c question Subject description: CV vs control |
 |
|
| I’m working on my panel layout for my Thomas White 292c. Looking at his MOTM panel designs I don’t really understand the CV and CTRL differentiation. Both the single panel and double panel have distinct separate jacks for “CV” and “control”. All I can guess is that they are both just CV inputs and one has attenuation and the other doesn’t. I just want to make sure I am not missing something. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emdot_ambient
Joined: Nov 22, 2009 Posts: 669 Location: Frederick, MD
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:12 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
That's exactly what it is.
If you look at the PCB you'll see there are 2 sections that have "IN1", "IN2" and "IN3" pads along the edge. One of those is marked "CV SUM STAGE". To the right of that, though, there is also one pad marked "CV" under the title "DIRECT INS".
The only difference between them is tha the "CV SUM STAGE" inputs are all mixed together and can have attenuators added (or not). Those don't have to be used and can actually be used as a seperate 3-input mixer if you need it. The "DIRECT INS" section are unattenuated straight inputs, one for Audio and one for CV.
I'm pretty sure the jack on the MOTM panels marked CTRL is wired to the "DIRECT INS" CV input, while the CV input(s) are going to the CV mixer and are attenuated. _________________ Looking for a certain ratio since 1978 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emdot_ambient
Joined: Nov 22, 2009 Posts: 669 Location: Frederick, MD
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:16 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Actually, if you look at the schematic, you'll see the Direct CV Input in the dop left, going to Pin 1 of the CV Jumper. Pin 2 connects to the CV Sum Stage (kind of in the middle of the schematic) with its 3 inputs.
You could, of course, add attenuation on the Direct CV In...but it isn't run through the CV Sum section. _________________ Looking for a certain ratio since 1978 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
RSFC
Joined: Sep 02, 2010 Posts: 65 Location: space lab
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Thanks. I am trying to design a panel similar to the original but also incorporate some of the additional features. So CV attenuation may be out… |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
diablojoy

Joined: Sep 07, 2008 Posts: 730 Location: melbourne australia
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:16 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | Thanks. I am trying to design a panel similar to the original but also incorporate some of the additional features. So CV attenuation may be out… |
I would really recommend adding at least 2 of the CV attenuators if at all possible they are generally the first things i go for when using these modules
the patches i most favour use all 3 cv's in small amounts so the ability to change the incoming cv levels is excellent for a slow morphing of the LPG's
response |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3619 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
RSFC
Joined: Sep 02, 2010 Posts: 65 Location: space lab
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:53 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| The LPGs were originally designed to be used at lower levels (buchla was/is line level, no?) than what is the norm in DIY land. Thoughts? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
knob_alchemist

Joined: Mar 03, 2012 Posts: 11 Location: Italy, Südtirol
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Anybody can help me with this trouble? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|