| Author |
Message |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:11 pm Post subject:
Noise Subject description: as simple as possible |
 |
|
I'm trying to find the simplest noise source circuit possible.
One jack, noise out. _________________ DRONEGOAT Last edited by j.dilisio on Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks, I'll give it a try. _________________ DRONEGOAT |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sine

Joined: Sep 10, 2007 Posts: 111 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I have had good results with 2n2222's as "noise" transistors. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:59 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I would like recommend the book "The Noise Generator Cookbook" by Thomas Henry.
Regards. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:13 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Here are a couple other similar noise circuits I found.
The first is from the CGS Synare and the second from a Thomas Henry tunable noise schematic.
They're pretty much the same as the EFM circuit above. I was just wondering about the differences.
Thomas has the transistor wired to -15 rather than ground.
The EFM op amp is wired differently (inverted?).
Ken omits the capacitor on the output.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
28.07 KB |
| Viewed: |
9871 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
33.21 KB |
| Viewed: |
9871 Time(s) |

|
_________________ DRONEGOAT |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Servo

Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:11 pm Post subject:
Subject description: Noise stuff |
 |
|
Hey JD,
Yes, those schemos are fairly similar. Most designs I've seen use a non-inverting op amp to amplify the noise coming of the transistor. The non-inverting config has a higher input impedance, so that's the config to use unless you specifically need to invert the signal or you need to sum two or more signals (using an inverting summing circuit).
As far as the different supply voltages, these transistors make noise when they're reverse-biased. Thomas' design increases the potential difference and generates more consistent noise (IMHO). The output cap is simply to remove any DC bias. It looks like the EFM design does this by adding an offset at the op amp to accomplish roughly the same thing.
One plug for my own Magic Smoke stuff - Thomas' Noise Generator Cookbook can be found at:
http://stores.lulu.com/magsmoke
You can also preview the first few pages, including the table of contents.
Tim (let's make some noise) Servo |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks Tim. The world of electronics is slowly starting to make more sense.
I was messing with the Thomas Henry circuit today minus the 10k resistor.
It works fine of course.
I went through a bag of NPN switching transistors from radioshack and found that in general the 2n3904s were the least noisy, the 2n2222s were consistently the most noisy, and the 2n4401s fell somewhere in between. _________________ DRONEGOAT |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| j.dilisio wrote: | | I went through a bag of NPN switching transistors from radioshack and found that in general the 2n3904s were the least noisy, the 2n2222s were consistently the most noisy, and the 2n4401s fell somewhere in between. |
Most noisy should not be the selection criterion. The most noisy usually have the most popcorn (1/f) noise. So you get smoother noise by actually using the ones with lower noise.
A couple of years ago I went through a bag of 2N3904's. Only two out of 50 had a flat spectrum down to 10 Hz. They were the ones with the lowest output.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
that is very valuable information. thank you, ian. _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Oh, and guess what the worst one I characterized was? The 2N2712, touted as the all time best ever noise transistor.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:47 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ahhh, I see what you mean.
The noise from the 2n3904s is much smoother/even sounding.
So in order to amplify the signal I just need to increase the resistance of R13 (on the TH circuit), correct? _________________ DRONEGOAT |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| j.dilisio wrote: | Ahhh, I see what you mean.
The noise from the 2n3904s is much smoother/even sounding.
So in order to amplify the signal I just need to increase the resistance of R13 (on the TH circuit), correct? |
Yes, R13. My circuit is set up differently -- with two gain stages -- but try some different devices and gains and see how the simple one does.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
stolenfat

Joined: Apr 17, 2008 Posts: 476 Location: Sunny Oakland California
Audio files: 1
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24499 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 298
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:16 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| j.dilisio wrote: | I just get a loud crackling when I try it.
I must be missing something here.
|
amplifying a million times might be a bit much ... try to lower the 1 M in one of the stages to maybe 10 k or so. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yep, the 1M's were a bit much.
I get a good level with a 200k in one stage and a 10k in the other.
thanKs _________________ DRONEGOAT |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
j.dilisio

Joined: May 19, 2009 Posts: 200 Location: baltimore
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|