Author |
Message |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:16 pm Post subject:
Serge-style DIY rack panel Subject description: Please critique |
 |
|
Since I've had a little building time under my belt doing synth DIY the past year, I recently came to the decision to repanel/case all of my synth modules. I really want to come up with a standard for "finishing" my DIY projects at a quality level I can be satisfied with, that will stand the test of time, be cost-effective, and be flexible enough for me to incorporate into any future cases or systems.
The first thing I decided was to make _everything_ rackmounted. This way any number of cases can house my projects. Also, the gear I make is shared between 3+ performers in my current band, so we needed a better way to swap modules and units between our individual rigs. This meant that my current oversized wooden case and wood-mounted panels all needed to be redone.
At first I was considering MOTM rackmount mounting rails, and standard MOTM-sizing for everything -- but I realized that this was gong to cost a fortune in panels and individual silkscreen jobs (doing my own panel designs is very important to me, and I prefer small 1/2" knobs.)
I also had been growing more and more unsatisfied with bulky 1/4" jacks and cables... the cost was so much, and I used cheap jacks on most of my stuff out of neccesity, many of which have already needed to be replaced.
So I finally convinced myself to switch to a completely banana-plug system, and this led me to study the serge panels (which I would never be able to afford!)
Anyway, I am going to try assembling collections of modules onto Serge style 4U height x 19" blank Hammond rack panels. Really nice quality 4U rack panels, already painted and 0.125" thick cost me $25/each from Mouser... about the cost of a couple MOTM panels. Also, there's no need for the $50/pair mounting rails. The major drawback to this decision, and the only reason I'm still reconsidering it, is it does hurt the "modularity" of my system, and requires much more thought put into which modules to put on each panel. Since they may be swapped between rigs, I'm trying to group each panel in a way that could be used as a standalone synth, fx processor, sequencer, etc.
Attached is a rough design I made for the first panel. As you can see, because I have the full 19" to work with, and don't have to worry about vertical spacing on the top and bottoms of the panel, I've got 17 inches of columns instead of the 16 inches of columns on a serge panel, and I've also stretched it out vertically a bit to give me more comfortable spacing between some of the knobs.
The modules are:
MFOS VCO
Thomas Henry XRVCO
CGS Wave Multipliers
Warp633 Ringmod
2x MS20 VCF
2x CGS VCA
1x CGS Mixer
2x CGS Utility LFO
2x MFOS ADSR
I had to scale back some of the modules compared to how I would be doing them on MOTM panels... but for the dual modules, I tried to give each one slightly separate features to compensate. I plan to use push/pull pots in a couple of cases as well (such as to select AC or DC signals for the Warp633's X and Y inputs.)
I haven't decided on a color-scheme for the banana jacks (and knobs) yet, so for now they're all yellow and black.
Is this a really bad idea? Anything look weird on the panel to you? Did I miss anything obvious that's going to bug the crap out of me later? Most of you are much more experienced modular synth users, builders and patchers than I am, so please share your advice.
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
219.29 KB |
Viewed: |
471 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
A main loss in going from phone to banana format is normalizing/interrupting signals. Slightly less, is the capability to have increased signal bleed. Watch out for noise sources with 10V p/p ranges...
You gain:
-Stackability (excellent for clock and trigger source distribution)
-Speed in patching and unpatching
-Visibility (cords are usually thinner than 1/4" phone)
-Loss of expensive multiples
-Easier color-coding/visual troubleshooting of patches
-Inspiration from examining a new way of patching
-Increased interest in Modcan and Buchla gear, and their philosophy
and I'm sure there's more.
Creating a fixed panel will exercize your mind and your methods. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:01 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the words!
I use a few normalled jacks in my current modules, but I think I can find ways around it, with toggles or pull pots... I really admire a lot of the amazing work with normalled jacks in Scott Stites system or the Wiard modules... but I find that as far as musical inspiration goes, the aesthetics and visual interface of a system really are what do it for me. Just being able to color-code jacks is a big deal.
Since I am almost entirely focused on performance pieces instead of studio sessions, the speedier patching is a big plus too. I'm much more at home with a drum sequencer than a keyboard, so I am really excited about taking advantage of all the CGS-related timing and sequencing modules, which I don't think would really "feel" the same, with 1/4" jacks and a differently styled layout. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've seen the yellow in your setup (at least on the MIDIbox SEQ) but ASSume that you'll use the Buchla/Serge/Modcan color scheme for your jacks? Red for trigger/clock out, etc.? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Well I was thinking about using a similar signal differentiation, but using Black, White, Grey + One Color. And the color (which would also be the silkscreen color) would change on each panel... so then I've got a "yellow panel", an "orange panel", etc... I'm not sure which jacks would be colored -- maybe audio signals? Or all outputs? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:27 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Could be interesting.
I'd recommend, since you have space, using a large knob (than the rest of them) for your oscillator Coarse frequency control.
Don't forget to brace the panel in the middle to reduce wobble while patching.
I can't wait to see your results! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
neandrewthal

Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 672 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:40 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Looks amazing. That little panel has nearly as much function as my 5U x 24U modular. Are the FM pots on the VCOs dual gang?
Peake wrote: | A main loss in going from phone to banana format is normalizing/interrupting signals. Slightly less, is the capability to have increased signal bleed. Watch out for noise sources with 10V p/p ranges...
You gain:
-Stackability (excellent for clock and trigger source distribution)
-Speed in patching and unpatching
-Visibility (cords are usually thinner than 1/4" phone)
-Loss of expensive multiples
-Easier color-coding/visual troubleshooting of patches
-Inspiration from examining a new way of patching
-Increased interest in Modcan and Buchla gear, and their philosophy
and I'm sure there's more.
|
Oh, cut that out Shirley. You're making me want to redo my whole system as well
I'm a big fan of normalized connections, though, so I'll just have to go absolutely nuts with those to justify my choice. If only they made stackable 1/4" plugs and colored washers. _________________ " I went through quite a few trannies til I found one I liked" - Wild Zebra |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:46 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | Are the FM pots on the VCOs dual gang? |
Yep, that's the plan, I think. Looking at this, I realize that I would have never been able to think through some of the concerns with this design a year ago when I laid out my first panels, so I guess I don't feel so bad about redesigning them. I really wish I had 2 attenuated CV ins on each of the filters, but I tried to compensate by covering various possibilities with other modules. Maybe I should drop one of the columns in favor of a second mixer.
A source for plastic colored washers probably would have kept me from going to bananas! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
neandrewthal

Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 672 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
creatorlars wrote: | mixer.
A source for plastic colored washers probably would have kept me from going to bananas! |
Yeah, when I started my system, I didn't think color coding would matter. It's easy enough to patch up, but when I come back to it after a day or two I look at the mess of cords and think "what the hell was I doing here?" _________________ " I went through quite a few trannies til I found one I liked" - Wild Zebra |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BananaPlug

Joined: Jul 04, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Philly
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:21 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | the only reason I'm still reconsidering it, is it does hurt the "modularity" of my system, and requires much more thought put into which modules to put on each panel. |
That's the one I'd be concerned about. Note that they recently came out with the new M series that splits the panel in two. I'm really warming up to that idea. It's still going to save you from rack rails, and half a panel is enough space for a reasonable function block. You just need some support in the middle and that's called for anyway. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | Yeah, when I started my system, I didn't think color coding would matter. It's easy enough to patch up, but when I come back to it after a day or two I look at the mess of cords and think "what the hell was I doing here?" |
Yeah, not a good thing when you're doing a live show and trying to swap out an entire patch under the stopwatch. Also the thinner cables, and being able to buy Pomona cables in any color or length I want, for 5 bucks a piece... that's awesome! I've spent some long, frustrating days making 1/4" cables.
Quote: | Note that they recently came out with the new M series that splits the panel in two |
Yeah, those are very cool... but complicates the panel process compared to just buying those cheap and very nice prepainted Hammond blank rack panels. I suppose I could cut them in half, but my jigsaw cut would be frustratingly imperfect. I've already got a drill press, so I can do quality, accurate drilling myself... and the $25+silkscreen costs being the only real expenses to make a panel is just blowing my mind compared to just about anything else.
I will probably have a "testing panel" with a bunch of holes drilled and labelling done with my Dymo labeler... one of the main reasons I was even able to lay out the above panel is because most all of these modules have already been field-tested quite a bit in my current rig. With future modules I probably need to take the extra time to wire them up on the test panel first... then I can try different things and plan ahead. I think I'll have more patience for doing that once my basic rig is all assembled, and I can actually start "working" with it.
The second panel will either be all drum modules (since I have enough of those to definitely fill out a whole panel) or an almost all CGS based sequencing/timing panel (sequencer/programmer, pulse divider, sequential switch, burst gen, analog logic, etc), then maybe another "synth" panel focusing more on noise/s&h, a little more heavy on the mixers, etc... and then I've also got three sets of quad buchla clones (281, 292, cv processors) -- maybe if i can find a couple more buchla modules to do i will just do a "clone" style panel just replicating the original buchla layouts... those are 4U as well, so it wouldn't be hard I don't think.... just use bananas for everything including audio. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
prophei

Joined: Jan 27, 2007 Posts: 234 Location: san francisco, ca
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Peake wrote: | Could be interesting.
I'd recommend, since you have space, using a large knob (than the rest of them) for your oscillator Coarse frequency control.
Don't forget to brace the panel in the middle to reduce wobble while patching.
I can't wait to see your results! |
i always liked mike brown's idea of making the fine tune knob the big one
seems more useful to me....
might be an idea  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | always liked mike brown's idea of making the fine tune knob the big one Smile |
Yeah, I guess it could work either way... bigger coarse knob makes it easier to get closer to the target frequency first. But I guess bigger fine knob makes the fine adjustment more precise.
The knobs I currently use (eagle plastic w/colored tops) have a 1/2" and 3/4" size, so if I don't end up switching knobs for these new panels, a 3/4" big knob would be perfect. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:55 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
prophei wrote: | Peake wrote: | Could be interesting.
I'd recommend, since you have space, using a large knob (than the rest of them) for your oscillator Coarse frequency control.
Don't forget to brace the panel in the middle to reduce wobble while patching.
I can't wait to see your results! |
i always liked mike brown's idea of making the fine tune knob the big one
seems more useful to me....
might be an idea  |
Depends upon which of the two functions are the most important to you.
Newanderthal, why not simply add banana jacks to your existing 1/4” designs, or add them to what you are currently designing? In addition to your normalizations, you could run the (normalled) I/O to bananas. If you have an existing banana or 1/4" setup you might find that to be beneficial. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
neandrewthal

Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 672 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Peake wrote: |
Newanderthal, why not simply add banana jacks to your existing 1/4” designs, or add them to what you are currently designing? In addition to your normalizations, you could run the (normalled) I/O to bananas. If you have an existing banana or 1/4" setup you might find that to be beneficial. |
I'd love to, but I can't shake the desire to be consistent. I'd rather have one or the other, and converting to bananas is not an option since the holes in my panels are too large. I don't think I'd like having to worry about choosing an appropriate cable(1/4", banana or hybrid) for each patch I make.
I'm amazed at lars' motivation to scrap the beautiful panels he worked on for a year and start fresh. I could never do that.
Oh yeah, and +1 for the big coarse knob. My philosophy is the ones you want to grab and tweak the most get the big knobs. _________________ " I went through quite a few trannies til I found one I liked" - Wild Zebra |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
loss1234

Joined: Jul 24, 2007 Posts: 1536 Location: nyc
Audio files: 41
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:22 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | I'm amazed at lars' motivation to scrap the beautiful panels he worked on for a year and start fresh. |
Bottom line there is performance concerns... everything I build has to be tailored to the performance. And I've had to learn a lot of lessons about what works and what doesn't. At least once everything's rackmounted I have flexibility on enclosures/portable cases, etc...
Quote: | mount the pcbs in a serge style or just through the regular method?
|
I'm not sure. What is the "Serge style"? I've never seen pictures of the back of one.
If you want one of these panels, I can drill and screen a second one. Just let me know/PM me. I have all but a couple of these circuits already built, so for the most part it's just going to be transplanting PCBs and rewiring for bananas, thankfully. I have the panel drilled out and will be silkscreening it over the next few days... I'll post pics when I'm done. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
telstarmagikistferrari

Joined: Jun 16, 2008 Posts: 280 Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Audio files: 43
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:28 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I am about to get started on a banana-jack'd project and I was curious about the things mentioned on this thread about there being noise/compatability problems with bananas. what exactly is this about? forgive a noob!
mark |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | noise/compatability problems with bananas. |
From what I understand, the issue is with Banana cables being unshielded from radio or other types of interference when used for audio. However as long as the cables are of short length (I'm guessing a few feet or less), it seems that people don't usually experience any issues. I plan to make sure I have banana jack-->1/4" converters on any cabinet using banana jacks, and use 1/4" cables for any signals coming into or leaving the synth rack cabinet to or from external sources (such as other synths, sequencers, mixers, amps, etc.) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|