| Author |
Message |
lord-b
Joined: Apr 18, 2004 Posts: 2 Location: australia
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 5:16 am Post subject:
like to talk ELECTRO-the genre of dance music |
 |
|
I've got to write a CD review for school and I need to talk with someone to help me put my finger on what is the unmistakable sound of 'electro' which I know as a particular genre of dance music. Any thoughts?
I study contempory music (technical production) and have bought a mac G4 with pro-tools, reason and live. I'm just getting my head around it and would love to talk about recording electronic music or any music for that matter.
Have a good one!! Might here from you later. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 5:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Here's a couple of sources for describing electro:
From All Music Guide - http://www.allmusic.com (search for "electro" in styles) - the page on All Music lists important artists and tracks.
| Quote: | | Blending '70s funk with the emerging hip-hop culture and synthesizer technology of the early '80s produced the style known alternately as Electro. But what seemed to be a brief fad for the public — no more than two or three hits, including Afrikaa Bambaataa's "Planet Rock" and Grandmaster Flash's "The Message," neither of which made the pop Top 40 — was in fact a fertile testing ground for innovators who later diverged into radically different territory, including Dr. Dre (who worked with the World Class Wreckin' Cru) and techno godfather Juan Atkins (with Cybotron). Electro also provided an intriguing new direction for one of the style's prime influences: Herbie Hancock, whose 1973 Headhunters album proved a large fusion hit, came storming back in 1983 with the electro single "Rockit." Despite its successes (documented in full on Rhino's four-disc Electric Funk set), the style was quickly eclipsed by the mid-'80s rise of hip-hop music built around samples (often from rock records) rather than musical synthesizers. Nevertheless, many techno and dance artists continued harking back to the sound, and a full-fledged electro revival emerged in Detroit and Britain during the mid-'90s. |
Ishkur's Guide to Electronic v2.0 - http://www.di.fm/edmguide/edmguide.html
I get a kick out of Ishkur's guide... it's sarcastic and humorous - over the top. Fun stuff. Absolutely be sure to read the disclaimer... "I suppose it could be used as a credited resource or educational primer, but that's not recommended as I made most of it up." Gotta love that. Still - this is a great spot to branch out from and look these people up.
Sound clips from Kraftwerk, Afrika Bambaataa, Freestyle, Mantronix, Herbie Hancock, Twilight 22, Man Parrish, and Jonzun Crew on the site.
(slightly edited quote:)
| Quote: | | ...Kraftwerk invented it in 1971. Hip hop hijacked it in 1981. Everyone forgot it by 1991. And then everyone started releasing "Hey! Remember Kraftwerk?" albums in 2001. Goes to show how much things run full circle. All electronic music everywhere pretty much owe its existance to Kraftwerk. Right next to James Brown and the Beatles, they are the most influential musicians of all time. It also doesn't hurt that robots are so totally wicked ... awesome. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:16 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Welcome to our site. We're very happy you are here.
Whatever electro is, it is a subset of electro-music. What electro-music is, well that's another topic.
I get lots of people lecturing me about electro. It seems some people know exactly what it is and they insist I stick to that definition here on electro-music.com. I have even had people refuse to participate at this web forum because the name contains the word electro.
The trouble is, these strong-feeling people have differing ideas about what electro is. They love and hate different things.
Beware of definitions that define music by the names of artists.
Beware statements like THIS GROUP started it all. That certainly implies ignorance of who or whatever went before.
That said, you have to write a paper and writing is a different game. In that case, it's prefectly appropriate to quote sources like JKN just provided.
When you get your review finished, please post it here. You might as well get it published!!!
(BTW - I'm an editor around here and I removed your Calendar Date. That's supposed to be used for announcements of concerts and other events.) |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Seriously, I think most people who use the term electro would say it is music with a constant beat in 4/4 time and phrases of 16 beats. The sounds are usually electronic sounds, often simple ones. There are usually no words or singing. Sometimes big thumping drumlike sounds are heard. It is associated with Germany primarilly. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
In the more general sense I can definitely see electro being short for electronic and used in the sense it's used around here. As far as I'm concerned - genre's are great for general descriptions as long as everyone agrees on what those descriptions are - and no one does... The very cool thing about this community - is no one cares.
Since lord-b mentioned "unmistakable sound of electro" - I assumed he meant it from the primarily 80's All Music guide definition.
Techno is a very similar one - one person considers *anything* with a keyboard in it as techno - while someone else will say it's only written in Detroit... ha.
Wow - for once I disagree with mosc... (this is rare so far...):
| Quote: | | Beware of definitions that define music by the names of artists. |
I find it hard not to give a point of reference of what I think a genre is like without hitting on a couple of artists. Actually, maybe I don't disagree, the definition doesn't need to list artists - but references on artists that have music in that genre - I think that's valid. So I take that back, I don't disagree with mosc...
| Quote: | | Beware statements like THIS GROUP started it all. That certainly implies ignorance of who or whatever went before. |
I definitely agree with this one. I've never heard any piece of music that didn't draw influences from somewhere else. There may be an artist that popularized something - and became well known for it. Essentially Nirvana became known as the main grunge act for instance... whether that makes sense as a genre or not- discounting a lot of music before they broke... Eno is generally considered the founder/father/whatever of ambient - but that's discounting a lot that came before... etc...
Anyway - I'm rambling. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 12:11 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| jkn wrote: | Wow - for once I disagree with mosc... (this is rare so far...):
| Quote: | | Beware of definitions that define music by the names of artists. |
I find it hard not to give a point of reference of what I think a genre is like without hitting on a couple of artists. Actually, maybe I don't disagree, the definition doesn't need to list artists - but references on artists that have music in that genre - I think that's valid. So I take that back, I don't disagree with mosc... |
He he. That was a quick argument.
It's just that I heard someone who is in a prog rock band tell me that prog rock was like Beatles' rock. I was confusted because the Beatles played many styles of rock. (They even played folk and country styles, also avant-garde at one point). So to say this genre is defined as being like the Beatles is meaningless. Must artists do different styles at different times.
One could say something like Prog Rock is defined as blah blah blah and one of the groups that played this is The Beatles. Asside from the fact that no one used that term when the Beatles were making music, this statement might be of some value. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:19 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Electro? OK... do you want the US version.. or the european version?
You have actually two different trends going on here.. disco and headmusic.
Electro seems also later to have been confused with brit new wavish synth pop too.
Rythmically, early electro mixed ideas from euro sequencer music, disco, funk and reggae. The actual sounds were pretty much defined by the low end japanese gear from Roland and Yamaha and others. At the time.. 80-83, George Clinton and Parliament Funkadelic was also seen as part of something new and electroish. However, the french label Egg released in the last half of the 70s a series of LPs by various artists.. like Tim Blake which was very popular in the underground clubs. Some of this was used reggae dubstyle as actual dance music. A great example of this music is Crystal machine by Tim Blake. This breed was very much an underground thing... but it was huge. You would see partys in the style of Koolaid acid tests and with huge soundsystems. From what I saw back then.. the US version of this scene was mainly black and very innocent. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Electronic music fanzines in the late 70s started to talk about something called electronic boogie, eurobeat and elektroboogie. This is in fact the european sequencer music by artists like Tangerine Dream, KS, Michael Hoenig, Manuel Gøttsching and others. Blend this music with disco and lowend gear.. and you get the US breed of electro. From a european perspective, this was basically hiphop using real instruments.. ( yes.. synths!) _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
This is what's so great about genre names... here with electro - we have at least 3, maybe 4 perfectly reasonable definitions - each can be definited as having an "unmistakable sound" and all are slightly different.
I think the "electroclash" reference - the most recent thing - I agree that seems to be more confused with new wave stuff. (Well, whatever new wave was... grin.)
Ok - lets do IDM next.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Well.. most of the electroclash stuff I have heard is more or less a mix of elements known from bands like human league and similar early 80s britsynth pop bands.. and then with a mix of bauhaus and early 80s brit industrial pop
that said.. some of the electroclash music is far more entertaining than any of this ever was
IDM.. what is that?
 _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:44 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Your electroclash description is great. That does about sum it up.
IDM? I don't know. I think it's something about dancing.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| jkn wrote: | IDM? I don't know. I think it's something about dancing.  |
I do not remember if it means Intelligent Dance Music or Incredibly Demented Music _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
| Quote: | | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
It's intelligent dance music according to just about every source I've run across - stemming from the list hosted on Hyperreal many many moons ago. Can't remember if Warp's Artificial Intelligence comp spurred the name or not - if I remember right it does.
What it really stands for or means has been debated a trillion times on a number of lists. I used to be on the IDM list - couldn't stand it. Flame wars, etc... Not my cup of tea.
The best part about IDM having "dance" in it - is that the vast majority of what IDM became later is totally undanceable. I have that Artificial Intelligence comp - it does seem a bit of a pivot point album as far as definining something. Not that there wasn't stuff before it, but it sort of cemented the sound a bit and started other artists expanding that sound.
On the discogs listing - the comment from a user pretty much explains it: http://www.discogs.com/release/549 - only thing that's missed is that one of the artists is Richie Hawtin under a pseudo.
Nothing better than overanalyzing the importance of non-important things. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 9:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
We have a thread about IDM already. See:
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-537.html
I like IDM quite a bit. I don't care very much for regular beat oriented stuff which would include almost all dance music.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | the vast majority of what IDM became later is totally undanceable |
yup..IDM morphed into a [questionable] genre 'Glitch'...spawning from guys like Oval who would make little cuts in cd's so that they skipped randomly...or using broken synths for 'glitch' sounds
but then it began to mean anything that sounds like a digital error or clicky clakety little blip or bloop...kind of deconstructive of music/sound..has a 'intellectual' vibe..meaning very abstract and un-emotional
which rendered most if it un-danceable,sometimes unlistenable and highly forgetable hehe
Autechre's transformatoin from early 90's album 'Amber' to 2001's 'Confield' illustrate this well.... _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:51 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Ahhh, glitch. I didn't realize that it is a genre. Well, glitch is nothing new. We were doing it in the late 60s. We didn't call it anything. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:59 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
'everything old is new again'
the 'new new'
seems to me that the 90's and the 2000's have seen all of the original electronic tools/concepts made readily available,and all in one place, and so these orignial ideas/concepts are 're-discovered'...and sometimes people believe they have in fact found a new thing[due to a lack of knowledge of the near past]...
but what does make the difference now, is that all of the original ideas/concepts/techniques can now be utilised in a recombinant fashion...all the techniques can be used all at once, all in the same DAW session file....
so the new electronic music is really the original elecrtonic music but is characterized by the propensity to recombine the original techniques into new-ish hybridized forms of electronic music _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| sudden wrote: | | so the new electronic music is really the original elecrtonic music but is characterized by the propensity to recombine the original techniques into new-ish hybridized forms of electronic music |
You've got it right. We are in a golden age, or just starting to get there. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
petersykes
Joined: Apr 24, 2004 Posts: 2 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 11:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Electro has its own unique sound, that's about the only thing that you can be sure of when trying to describe what it is.
I often ask non electro people how much electro they have listened to when they say that its a cold soulless sound because on the contrary, electro is a warm sound.
Its the warm basslines and warm beats that make the sound unique. Whether people in general like the sound, it will always have people thinking "wow! that's different!". _________________ 'Synthesizers can make so many sounds, that we would like to play!' |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|