electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software
Step Sequencer question
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: jksuperstar, Scott Stites, Uncle Krunkus
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic

Rotary or Slider?
Rotary
50%
 50%  [ 4 ]
Slider
50%
 50%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 8

Author Message
lordavon



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 45
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 5:04 am    Post subject: Step Sequencer question
Subject description: Rotary of Slider?
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I'm considering making a new version of my GorF sequencer in a case, ready assembled and so on.

But I'm considering swapping the pots for sliders (60mm travel), it'll make it slightly bigger but I'm wondering what you guys all think?

I think the only other sequencer I've seen that does this is the frost wave.

I'll keep the same options, i.e. note value (scalable from 127 notes to 12 notes), velocity, MIDI CC, etc, etc.

So a simple poll question, rotary or slider for step data?

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
emdot_ambient



Joined: Nov 22, 2009
Posts: 667
Location: Frederick, MD

PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Q: Pots or sliders?
A: Yes.

As in, "it all depends". My $0.02 is that I prefer sliders from an aesthetic/ergonomic viewpoint, however, the sequencer has to be set up to accomodate that choice.

I have an ARP Sequencer, which is slider based. What I love, love, love about it is that you can look at the 2 sets of 8 steps and instantly see the pattern. There's no confusion or obfuscation when it comes to which steps are set to high, low, or mid-ranged note values.

HOWEVER...it is terribly hard to dial in a sequence on that machine if you're not using the quantized outputs. See, the quantized outputs on the ARP limit the step outputs to 0V - 3V, whereas the unquantized outputs are 0V - 10V. So you can see, with a 10 octave range it makes dialing up a specific note rather fiddly. Not at all bad with a 3V range, though. However, if you're using the sequencer for non-quantized purposes (filter control, etc.), then a 10V range is better and you don't really need to do such fine adjustments. So the ARP set up is actually quite nice. If you want to do harmonically accurate work, then the quantized 3-octave range is great (you can always offset it externally, or with a CV input). Otherwise, 10V non-quantized FTW and in both cases, the sliders work wonderfully.

Pots, OTOH, are a little easier to use than sliders when it comes to fine adjustments. But you lose the graphic display of the sequencer's pattern.

For me, if you have the luxury of space, and the ability to limit or change the output of the sequencer, then sliders are great. But if you're stuck with a large fixed output voltage, or are limited in space, then Pots FTW.

_________________
Looking for a certain ratio since 1978
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lordavon



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 45
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks for your comment.

On GorF you can "scale" the note range, so if you want you can have the control giving you all 127 notes, but you can have it so a full rotation gives you an octave, two octaves, two and half octaves, 3 octaves or 4 octaves. (I found with it set to 127 it was almost impossible to hit the note you wanted reliably, but maybe that's just me).

Personally I like the look of the sliders, however rotary pots are cheaper to buy and easier to make cases for (one drill hole instead of a cut out). They also eat up less PCB space, which again means the cost can be kept lower.

I just wondered as the frostwave and arp sequencers are the only ones I've ever seen with sliders, if people had a preference and possibly, why Smile

Thanks

_________________
-----------------------------------------------------
VacoLoco

http://www.vacoloco.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JingleJoe



Joined: Nov 10, 2011
Posts: 878
Location: Lancashire, England
Audio files: 14

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I propose you add the option "it doesn't matter" to the poll.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lordavon



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 45
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

<ROFLMAO>

Fair enough

_________________
-----------------------------------------------------
VacoLoco

http://www.vacoloco.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
emdot_ambient



Joined: Nov 22, 2009
Posts: 667
Location: Frederick, MD

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

lordavon wrote:
...the frostwave and arp sequencers are the only ones I've ever seen with sliders, if people had a preference...

Modcan's 54B VC Sequencer also uses sliders:
http://www.modcan.com/bseries/vcseq.htm

And from what I've heard from users, its tiny sliders are really difficult to set accurately since it's go a full 10V output range (I believe) and no quantizer.

To me it sounds like the one you're building should work fine with sliders. I really love being able to look at the pattern graphically. It makes working with knob-based sequencers feel like you're working blind.

_________________
Looking for a certain ratio since 1978
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
magman



Joined: Feb 04, 2009
Posts: 363
Location: Liverpool, UK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

As there aren't too many controls needed for the Gorf, I would suggest sliders. Especially as you can get sliders with integral LED's which is a nice visual aid - especially in a performance situation.

I expect you would be building a PCB to mount the sliders if you use them anyway, so extra connections to power the LED's shouldn't be a problem.

Regards

Magman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wmonk



Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 528
Location: Enschede, the Netherlands
Audio files: 15

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

My Klee sequencer has sliders and I like them.
The main advantage of sliders over rotaries is that one can move more at the same time and to the same position. The downside is that it is a little bit harder to tune. But looking at the GorF, with midi quantized notes, that doesnt much matter.
Besides that the fact that you can move sliders at the same time makes a sequencer more playable. And I guess that is the purpose of the GorF too: playability.
So I would say: do it! Very Happy

_________________
Weblog!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lordavon



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 45
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks for the input guys, and yes my aim was to make gorf a performance tool.

Found a slider at Mouser, a bit pricey -
http://uk.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Bourns/PTL60-15G1-104B2/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMta4trl6r8pJ4n7BD4SIqVHhBjSitbIGT4%3d

I'll keep an eye out...

_________________
-----------------------------------------------------
VacoLoco

http://www.vacoloco.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
emdot_ambient



Joined: Nov 22, 2009
Posts: 667
Location: Frederick, MD

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

You may not want that particular one. Aside from the price, they have a center detent, which to me doesn't sound like what you'd ultimately want for a sequencer.
_________________
Looking for a certain ratio since 1978
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
diablojoy



Joined: Sep 07, 2008
Posts: 809
Location: melbourne australia
Audio files: 11

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

for this particular sequencer
i would also vote for sliders
makes more sense in this case
and i would expect more saleable.
Quote:
I'm considering making a new version of my GorF sequencer in a case, ready assembled and so on.

If it were for pure DIY i would vote the other way

_________________
In an infinite universe one might very well
ask where the hell am I
oh yeah thats right the land of OZ
as good an answer as any
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: jksuperstar, Scott Stites, Uncle Krunkus
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use