electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Thomas Henry designs
The VCO-555
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: Scott Stites
Page 17 of 20 [477 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Next
Author Message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2020 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi,
unfortunately after making the change I find myself with distorted waves like the hedefalk user and I can no longer fix them .. Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wackelpeter



Joined: May 05, 2013
Posts: 461
Location: germany
Audio files: 10

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Then perhaps try another LM13700 and as i looked into my outprint of the schematic i saw that i reduced R34 from 100K to 56K, at least i marked it on the paper...
_________________
https://soundcloud.com/bastian-j
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2020 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

wackelpeter wrote:
Then perhaps try another LM13700 and as i looked into my outprint of the schematic i saw that i reduced R34 from 100K to 56K, at least i marked it on the paper...


Thanks, I'll try this too. I will also try to find a power supply at 15 + 15 instead of 12 to also do some other tests.

Carlo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Ok! now I have a nice wide sine wave, but unfortunately when the frequencies go up I have all the waves very very distorted .. (the square becomes a trapezoid etc) will depend on the economic components

Thanks for support!
Carlo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wackelpeter



Joined: May 05, 2013
Posts: 461
Location: germany
Audio files: 10

PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

what fixed the sine?

and btw. can those distorted looks on your waveshapes come from your oscilloscope AC vs DC coupled?

_________________
https://soundcloud.com/bastian-j
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

wackelpeter wrote:
what fixed the sine?


and btw. can those distorted looks on your waveshapes come from your oscilloscope AC vs DC coupled?



R34 from 100K to 56K!


AC if I use analog oscilloscope, automatically if I use economic hantek connected to the PC.
I attach some pictures, as the frequency increases (say after 3/5 kHz) the distortion increases

(I'm not very good, I still have to learn ..)

triangular and square
high frequency
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.

low frequency
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.

Carlo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
elmegil



Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: 2177
Location: Chicago
Audio files: 16

PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

The mess in the middle looks like you haven't calibrated the triangle yet? (the "blip" near the zero crossing)

Going immediately to clipping on the sine shaper makes it look to me like whoever suggested this is trying to boost the signal *before* the shaper, and it's boosted WAY to much. Reduce how much you're boosting (dunno the specifics of the ckt at this very moment, and no time to go read up immediately).

edit: also looks like your triangle may not be centered about zero. That's another important calibration step.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi Elmegil,
I don't have a trimmer to adjust the triangle, how should I do it?

Yes, maybe the sine wave is at the limit, I have to try a compromise with the resistance value.

Thank you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wackelpeter



Joined: May 05, 2013
Posts: 461
Location: germany
Audio files: 10

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Without looking too much into it, i tend to say that you can adjust the offset if you play around with the values of R17 and R21.
_________________
https://soundcloud.com/bastian-j
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
elmegil



Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: 2177
Location: Chicago
Audio files: 16

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I must be remembering the wrong TH VCO, I'd swear there were trimmers for offset and the bump.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 7:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

wackelpeter wrote:
Without looking too much into it, i tend to say that you can adjust the offset if you play around with the values of R17 and R21.

and I thought I had found a vco with few adjustments Laughing Laughing

I will have to do some experiments!

Carlo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

elmegil wrote:
I must be remembering the wrong TH VCO, I'd swear there were trimmers for offset and the bump.


they would have helped me a lot
Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aleencabralia



Joined: Feb 10, 2020
Posts: 5
Location: Brasil

PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2020 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Carlo, it was addressed in the previous page, it might be a fake op amp. Try and buy some tl074 from a trusted seller.
I built 3 of these and I´m having 2 problems: One is the tuning (Is my first osc built, so, pretty noob). I get the first 3 octaves, but the highr are sharp. I think I don´t get how the HF trimmer works: It´s like the calibration one? Like, when freq is flat, I move it even flatter, then go back, re-tune, repeat? Or it just "corrects" the freq? Tryed it in both extremes, HF are always sharp (When I tune them, The lower ones get flat). I matched the transistors using Ian Fritz method.
The other issue is that my sines are triangles! The round trim (I used a 50k in one and 100k in the other 2) just lower the amplitude a bit, the other one doesn´t seem to do anything!!
Any help is really welcome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NuttyMonk



Joined: Jun 30, 2020
Posts: 62
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2020 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

fonik wrote:

anyways, here is a picture of a PTC mounted on top of a super matched pair for a 555VCO. i think you get the idea:

Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.


Thanks a lot!


Hi Fonik, love the way you have done the thermal mating here. What is the metal cap you used? Are they easy to come by?

On another matter i have a question about the "Sine Round Trim R24" trimpot in the schematic. Is it wired through directly as shown there with nothing connected to the wiper? If so it won't be a voltage divider and it also won't be a variable resistor. What gives? I'm relatively new to electronics so maybe i'm missing something obvious about how this is drawn and what it means.

Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wackelpeter



Joined: May 05, 2013
Posts: 461
Location: germany
Audio files: 10

PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

The trimmer is connected with two pins one of it's outer legs, and the wiper with the other outer leg conected together. Doesn't matter which one you're usig only the direction of the resistance getting higher or smaller would be the opposite.

Common practive to not keep legs on resistors or trimmers unconnected or floating... So the unused leg will simply be connected to the wiper...

_________________
https://soundcloud.com/bastian-j
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NuttyMonk



Joined: Jun 30, 2020
Posts: 62
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks wackelpeter. I understand. I've seen that before in schematics and wondered about it but it makes sense. I guess it prevents the possibility of interference on the floating leg of the pot.

Thanks for the quick reply.

Cheers

NM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlo64



Joined: Apr 02, 2020
Posts: 16
Location: Italia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Resolved! I replaced the tl074 (new grrr) with old recovery smd with an adapter and now the waveforms are perfect. (just some small difference in output level but I'm happy!)
Thanks Aleencabralia and thanks to everyone!
Carlo

Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
injektilo001



Joined: Aug 21, 2020
Posts: 10
Location: Chile

PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:59 am    Post subject: SINGLE SIDED PCB Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hello Everyone, I'm Jean Paul from Chile
I was wondering if somebody has a working single sided PCB and layout from this beautifull VCO for etching myself?
I've been looking like crazy everywhere.
(If somebody has the same kind of files for the Thomas Henry X-4046 it will be wonderfull too).
Hope somebody can help
Cheers from Chile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
warpeggio



Joined: Oct 14, 2020
Posts: 9
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Greetings, fellow synth nerds!

I've made a stripboard layout for Thomas' design. I was running low on stripboards in my parts bin, so my goal was to fit the whole shebang onto a single 93x55mm stripboard. I think the result will make some folks bristle, as I've broken some of the usual layout rules. However, i can confirm this layout works, as i've spent the weekend with it on my bench.

When constructing this board, my method was to work from left to right across the board, soldering 2-5 components at a time, which allows me to build up clusters of components relatively easily. The area around R14 and R32 is particularly prone to shorts, among some other areas. When you see that component legs may come together like that, its a good idea to slip some wire insulation over the component leads. You'll see examples of this on my board.

I will admit that i made errors both in the draft layout, and in my construction. Friends, you must stick with troubleshooting to get far in this hobby! My draft was missing 1 jumper wire, and 3 trace cuts on the left side of R36. The trace cut issues nearly overheated IC3. I made a construction error of omitting the jumper that ties the emitters of Q2/Q3 together, which resulted in the circuit having a narrow oscillation range in the supersonic.

Sorting all these issues out, the build tracked 1v/Oct nearly effortlessly. I am getting 5 octaves now with my inaccurate CV source. I will update when i am able to test with a precise CV input.

The BOM shows values for 15V supply as in the original schematic. The values for 12V supply are provided as well. Also, per Fonik's PCB notes, i've used his part numbering for R25, R26, and R55.

Changelog
v2020-12-13a: The colors on the power connector (PH1) on the right side of the board were wrong. This has been corrected.
v2020-12-13: Initial upload


20201212_222755.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  561.82 KB
 Viewed:  100 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

20201212_222755.jpg



20201212_223020.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  661.91 KB
 Viewed:  115 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

20201212_223020.jpg



TH555VCO.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  508.96 KB
 Viewed:  175 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

TH555VCO.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NathanS



Joined: Sep 13, 2020
Posts: 3
Location: Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 7:25 pm    Post subject: Refactored Schematic Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Some time ago I was taking an electronics course for a physics degree and was allowed to do an analysis of this circuit for the final project. This involved both bread-boarding the circuit, as well as writing a paper describing how it worked.

One of the things that resulted from this was a KiCad schematic which I've done quite a bit of tinkering on in an attempt to decompose it into its core functions. It has been my intention to make a real nice PCB from it as well; though the few attempts I've made haven't resulted in nice enough boards to make me want to give out those files as well --- not yet anyway.

Regardless, I figured I'd give out the schematic so far in the hope that it would save someone a ton of time if they had plans to transcribe the original to digital. Also included is a PDF print-out, in case someone is interested in seeing it without using KiCad.

I'd be interested in hearing any recommendations for modifications to the file to make it more understandable or more generalized. There is currently a lot more space for comments to be added, and I'm sure it could be used well.

Edit (2021-02-03): Changed out PDF to a properly formatted version that allows text selection. Updated the KiCad schematic to the version the PDF was plotted from. The only diffs in the schematic file are of a couple of connectors (J2, J3).

Edit (2021-08-16): Fixed wrongly connected wire in the sawtooth shaping sub-circuit. R20 was connected to U4 through pin 2, where it should have been connected to pin 7. It was making some interesting ramps, anyway... Embarassed

The schematic as a whole was revised. It's a bit more organized and hopefully more understandable as a result. A few more references were linked in, and my notes were expanded on a bit. R27 and R24 were changed based on Fonik's suggestion a ways back in the thread. Lastly, the OTA's unused buffer's input was grounded - which I'm hesitant to claim makes any difference.

I did make a PCB using this version which I just finished putting through its paces. I haven't checked how well it tracks, but it sounded good and I'm reasonably confident no major bugs are present at the schematic level now.


Thomas_Henry_555VCO.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  Thomas_Henry_555VCO.pdf
 Filesize:  134.38 KB
 Downloaded:  2853 Time(s)


Thomas_Henry_555VCO.sch
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  Thomas_Henry_555VCO.sch
 Filesize:  57.75 KB
 Downloaded:  192 Time(s)


Last edited by NathanS on Mon Aug 16, 2021 2:41 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wallybob



Joined: Sep 26, 2015
Posts: 7
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks a lot for posting the KICAD schematic file for this!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alfredo



Joined: Nov 20, 2008
Posts: 52
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 1:18 pm    Post subject: Tuning issue Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I have this board that someone gave me for free. Look very similar to the Fonik one and sound fantastic, all potentiometers work as it should as well as the modulation inputs. Only problem is I can't calibrate because the HF trim R36 doesn't do nothing,maybe the person who designed the board made a mistake, anyway my knowledge is not sufficient to detect the problem.
I show you some images of the plates in case someone can see the problem.
Any help appreciated, thanks!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co-Rp9sCECs


BACK.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  2.79 MB
 Viewed:  103 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

BACK.jpg



FRONT.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  3.72 MB
 Viewed:  104 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

FRONT.jpg



ESTA SI.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  4.31 MB
 Viewed:  120 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

ESTA SI.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
elmegil



Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: 2177
Location: Chicago
Audio files: 16

PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Did you mirror your bottom-side scan around with software? Normally there's no way to scan it so that the holes on one side line up directly with the holes on the other, but that's what it looks like to me.

So the circled leg of R36 is supposed to be ground, it ties to D2 where D2 is also supposed to be ground. I would verify the continuity between those two points, that your solder joint there was good, and that both points show continuity to ground. That would be the most likely cause for a problem.

If that all seems correct, next thing would be to measure the cathode of D1 when things are powered on and verify that you're seeing control voltage there, that tracks the linear FM input with the pot all the way up. Then measure the wiper of the trimmer and make sure that it's changing when you turn the trimmer. It is possible that the trimmer is defective if your solder joints are solid and it doesn't do anything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NathanS



Joined: Sep 13, 2020
Posts: 3
Location: Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

It looks to me as if R2 and R23 should be swapped around. At least according to the original schematic, R2 should go to ground and the trimmer R1, but it's going out to D1 and IC3-pin7 - as R23 should.

Thus in that pcb, R2 should be 22 kOhm while R23 should be 390 Ohm. Does this match up with how it's been put together?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alfredo



Joined: Nov 20, 2008
Posts: 52
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hello elmegil, thnaks for your answer. I scan the board with a desktop scanner and mirrored with photoshop, then I followed the tracks and drew them with a Sprint Layout software so the image of the third photo is the same as the board.
Verified continuity between circled leg of R36, diode and ground, I tried various trimmers, this timmer seen don't do nothing, no changes in pitch or voltage when turn it. I thing the PCB has a routing error but i don't have enough knowledge to compare schematic and board Sad


board 2.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  5.37 MB
 Viewed:  93 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

board 2.jpg



Last edited by Alfredo on Sun Feb 07, 2021 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: Scott Stites
Page 17 of 20 [477 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Next
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Thomas Henry designs
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use