| Author |
Message |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:52 am Post subject:
Censorship on this forum? |
 |
|
A thread has been deleted.
It was entitled " "Does anyone feel like taking a shot at this?" and was posted by the member Hyde.
Why has this thread been deleted? I sincerely hope it's a mistake rather than admin censorship.
Hyde included a link to a recording of a Mr Bungle gig, which he was hosting on his own webspace. He was trying to emulate an effect Mike Patton used to change his voice. A interesting post, Mike Patton uses some of the most interesting voice effects out there.
Due to the electro-music rules the link was removed, an irrational and kneejerk reaction IMO considering Hyde was hosting the file himself, at the end of the thread Hyde said he wouldn't be coming back to this forum.
What is going on? _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24119 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 279
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes a thread was deleted, and I did it.
What went on is that someone posted a link to copyrighted material. Mosc went into that thread and deleted the link. After that person in question went in again to reestablish the link.
This is not a proper way to handle such a situation. Discussion is fine and there could have been very valid reasons for not deleting the link, but just edit it back in is not an option. At that stage it was not possible for me to communicate with mosc, so I had really no choice but to go in and edit the link out again refering to the forum's conditions of use as to why I had done so.
After that person in question went in again and not only re-re-established the link but also he did put in a few dirty words too many. I then moved the thread and sent a PM to person in question to explain why I had removed the thread.
As said, unfortunately mosc was not available at that stage for comment on this, so I had to guess a bit about what was going on, and just hoped I did the right thing (for which I now have confirmation).
It may have all looked a bit messy an I'm really sorry when this upset anyone.
To more directly answer the question, yes this is censorship. This forum has no license to publish copyrighted material without the copyright holder's consent, such material will be removed (although occasionally someone is "lucky" and slips thru). _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
That's ugly, There were a few swear words and raised voices.. is this forum running to some kind of conservative christian agenda?
Can anyone suggest any alternatives to this forum?
I find this forum really stifling due to it's conservative and obsessive rules and fragmented design. all in all it leads to a lame community compared to a lot of forums.. which is insane considering how good the old mail list used to be!
I know quite a few G2 users now who just don't bother coming here anymore because it just doesn't ever seem to get a good critical mass of chat going, and consequently people just don't seem bothered to post many patches. An interesting thread gets going and then mosc obsessively files it away into some sub-sub-forum on a whim.. but unfortunately this site is the focus for the scene.
It just doesn't seem to represent the openess and creativity of a lot of G2 users. It seems perfectly valid that posting copyrighted material fits into 'fair use' rules. _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| _ Steve _ wrote: | That's ugly, There were a few swear words and raised voices.. is this forum running to some kind of conservative christian agenda?  |
Not "a few swear words", I read it and there were posts that only went "F*** you you f***ing f***" or something along those lines.
There's no sudden knee-jerk; we have a very solid policy on this that has been in effect for a long time now. this is a policy that we agree on because we simply can't afford troube with the law. Mostly we also agree that the laws could be changed to make them more just. Hence we take one stance on copyrighted materials linked to on the board yet we welcome open (and respectfull!) debate on where copyright could/should go in the future.
I think some of the editors/ admins are Christian, others aren't and generaly everybody seems to be pro-progress
| Quote: |
Can anyone suggest any alternatives to this forum?
|
sure.
EM411 is nice if somewhat biased towards IDM. There are some good fora on recording and mastering but the good ones are elitist as Fu... I meant they are quite elitst.
There are alternatives, you are free to go if you'd like. You could also post to multiple boards if you'd like.
| Quote: |
I find this forum really stifling due to it's conservative and obsessive rules and fragmented design. |
Great! Clearly you have better ideas on rules and design! let's hear them!
| Quote: |
all in all it leads to a lame community compared to a lot of forums.. which is insane considering how good the old mail list used to be!
|
I'm unfamiliar with the old E-M mailing list and it's stance on linking to copyrighted materials or how helpfull people were on advising about live recording. Is there a archive somewhere? Also, could you please link to this "lot" of other fora? Thanks.
| Quote: |
I know quite a few G2 users now who just don't bother coming here anymore because it just doesn't ever seem to get a good critical mass of chat going, and consequently people just don't seem bothered to post many patches. |
Let me get this straight; you are saying "quite a few" people stoped posting patches because they couldn't also post mp3 files of copyrighted material for recording advice? Who for example?
| Quote: |
An interesting thread gets going and then mosc obsessively files it away into some sub-sub-forum on a whim.. but unfortunately this site is the focus for the scene.
|
Typically threads get moved by the editors or admins because they were in the wrong section to begin with. This one, for example, is in the wrong section and I recomend that Jan move it. However; this section is Jan's responcibility, not mine.
None of the editors and admins are perfect, however the good thing is that we have a lot of them and we can and do have debates on what's right. If something does get done "on a whim" we'll have a debate. these debates can get very long and very intence and I think that's good.
In fact I think it's great that you have a problem and bring it up. What I think is not so great is that you are linking this case on copyright to some phenomena you preceive in the G2 scene. Let's seperate these issues and talk about copyright and how we deal with it, then talk about building a G2 scene. It's all quite hard, let's not make it harder then it needs to be and tacle it all one subject at a time.
| Quote: |
It just doesn't seem to represent the openess and creativity of a lot of G2 users. It seems perfectly valid that posting copyrighted material fits into 'fair use' rules. |
Well, I'm all for being open and creative and using fair use. I also agree that there are cases in which you can post copyrighted materials to the G2 or some other section that will be fair use. I just don't think this is one. As I understand it this song was a cover so partial copyright will be with the original performer. This means it's not fair use if no royalites are being paid. true; it was on a different server but hotlinking can be copyright infringement. I don't agree with those lows, nesicarily, but we have to stick to them and I'm very certain this wasn't parody or some other fair use clause.
Let's calm down and take this one issue at a time, there's no use in typing up a set of issues and make them apear as one, there's plenty of room for negotiation.
Take care,
Kas.
(E-M editor, mostly speaking for himself) _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I find it just plain wrong to delete a thread due to swear words, people should be allowed to judge for themselves, I don't need or want moral guidance. It's highly condescending and illiberal.
Including sub-sections the Nord Modular section alone has over 25 forums. It's bureaucratic and fragmented and really counter-productive.
I've voiced my opinions on the design before.
I was all in favour of a change over to a forum when it happened a few years ago but I think what we have ended up with has driven the quality of the community downwards considerably compared to where it was at the start of the decade. There are still fantastic posters and contributions on this forum but it's in spite of the design.
My opinion is to stop trying to cram something amorphous and evolving into your tiny little boxes and just limit it to a handful of forums. If someone posts something off topic maybe the moderators could just take a deep breath and relax... Stop trying to squeeze the humanity out of it... _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
slave to this

Joined: Oct 23, 2005 Posts: 93 Location: nyc
G2 patch files: 7
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i don't really have an opinion on any censorship issues...i'm pretty grateful for this place as it is...have you guys ever checked out the max/msp forum and mailing list? talk about a bunch of elitist pricks who generally don't even know what they are talking about. it makes me happy to at least have some very knowledgeble people with the g2 who constantly view the forum and who are willing to help you out with questions + share their patches/ideas. for that reason alone, i'll never stray.
james |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
cebec

Joined: Apr 19, 2004 Posts: 1098 Location: Virginia
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Wow, it's pretty simple, I think. The user in question violated the policy on uploading copyrighted content, which it is in everyone's best interest to adhere to, and continued to do so until he launched personal attacks at the community and moderators, then said he was 'out of here'. And now you seem to be defending him with the same tactics. There are several better ways he could've handled this and he chose the worst one of them all.
Look, this is the BEST forum I'm on and I've been on them all. I wouldn't call this place conservative, censuring, or Christian.
I would suggest you go start your own forum and run it the way YOU want to and let us know how it works out. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dasz

Joined: Oct 16, 2004 Posts: 1644 Location: victoria, canada
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 56
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
my $0.02
i have, through experience learned to PM folks when I have an issue to resolve with a member of the community -- directly is the best approach, right?..
I think kassen put it eloquantly ... there are rules we abide by, and esp when they involve copyright, since it is too easy to use someone else stuff, and too easy to sue any organization that support it.
our motto of "you're free to use my patch as long as i get credited for it", and our efforts to stop anyone from selling 50,000 G2/NM1 patches on ebay ensure we are following good practises and everyone can reap the rewards (even if they are merely mentioned in someone's credit).
I do agree that if you are looking for a specific sound, you may need to play it. in which case either list the artist and track, or PM someone privately with a sample of the work if they ask.
/Dasz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24119 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 279
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| cebec wrote: | | I would suggest you go start |
I think that ... well let me say that I can really understand people getting upset about what happened, but we must try to find constructive ways to deal with reality, that's the point here I guess, but I wasn't really born that way either. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:46 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
It's an extremely conservative forum by it's very nature.
A need to fit everything into a filing system, censorship and bowing to the climate of fear generated by RIAA lawyers.
It just feels at odds with the point of the community to me. I just imagine a seperate or self contained Nord Modular community would be so much better. _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
There are many issues raised here.
First the issue of removing the post because of swear word. I have read the post. It was not just swear words, it was insulting and disrespectful. Respect is a core value of this community. I guess requireing respect is conservative, I can handle that. Determining what is disrespectful and what is not is a judgement call. The editors have to make that call and sometimes we may get it wrong. There are many forums and lists where no one takes any stand as to what is respectful and what is not. Many of us have found those places to be distasteful at best.
We've gotten a lot of heat for running a moderated forum from a few people, but many more have expressed appreciation. We can't be all things to all people. It is important to understand that very editor is a volunteer; we do this as a a labor of love.
Now, as for the organization of the Nord Modular section, we've been over that many times. Some people would like a flat list, so I hacked the forum code to allow a flat list of the most recent NM topics. See, About this Forum - the first topic of the NM Discussison Forum - http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-1559.html
I'm willing to hack the code to make the forum more useful. In fact, I get a kick out of it, but it is hard to be enthusiastic about doing something for someone who insults you. I might be more forgiving if I was a Christian.
Sorry for being sarcastic. I know the Cristian Conservative comment was made in gest. Thanks for the feedback. I hope nobody gets so fussed that they drop out of the community.
I invite Hyde to repost. There are many ways to provide access to this particular song without a direct link.
 _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:25 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I must admit one of the reasons I like this forum so much is the lack of unneeded swearing and in-fighting you get on other more chaotic forums. Now don't get me wrong I am not conservative and I do swear a fair bit, but at the right place and time. There is no need to swear here, this is just basic politeness.
Also copyright is important, I want to get paid for the things I produce and other people should get paid for the things they produce, this is just fairness.
So for me this forum is a polite and fair place, seems good to me.
Cheers
Andy |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| mosc wrote: |
I invite Hyde to repost. There are many ways to provide access to this particular song without a direct link.
|
for example a short snippet of the abovementioned song containing the sound to analyze instead of the entire song. _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
| Quote: | | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Fozzie

Joined: Jun 04, 2004 Posts: 875 Location: Near Wageningen, the Netherlands
Audio files: 8
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Of course Steve is entitled to his opinion. So am I, and I for one am very (VERY) glad that this place is polite and open. I too have been on several different forums where trolling and flame wars are more important than having serious, funny or other 'nice' conversations. That's a definite turn-off for me, so I am very happy with this forum and thought I'd express it. *Done*
Regarding forum-structure: sure, it could be less organized with less sub-sections and all, but I don't think any model would be good enough for all members to reach concensus. By just looking at the overview pages and monitoring the orange thingies or the last-posted dates, it is very easy to watch it all (I do it daily, it doesn't take much time; IMHO it is better than a mailing list with some members who habitually respond to digests and forget to delete unnecessary parts).
Regarding conservatism on this forum: although I am a christian myself (and not considering myself conservative, but if this means I am by anyone's definition then I am ), I cannot find anything christian about E-M.com. I think it is open to any ideas about the large issues in life, and I think Mosc actively tries to convey that.
Live long and prosper (we need an emoticon with the finger/hand thingie) |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 6:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| _ Steve _ wrote: | It's an extremely conservative forum by it's very nature.
A need to fit everything into a filing system, censorship and bowing to the climate of fear generated by RIAA lawyers.
It just feels at odds with the point of the community to me. I just imagine a seperate or self contained Nord Modular community would be so much better. |
You keep mixing up the issues, this isn't conductive. There are sections so people will be able to find stuff. This board is huge; if it would be a flat list it would be a huge mess and nobody would be able to find anything. This is not to be taken as a sign that you can't post stuff that doesn't fit anywhere yet. If you want to post something that doesn't I urge you to ask questions or make sugestions. We have a seperate section devoted to such sugestions.
Also; the composition section is the unoficial free-haven for stuff that doesn't fit for some reason. I welcome any and all posts there that seem too far out for any of the other sections.
As for the morals; that's just plain silly. there is a huge difference between going "fucking editors who do fucking X" (which we are oposed to) and posting a song inspirered by last weekend's group-sex session (which I personally feel is perfectly valid as a inspiration). You can in fact be progressive as well as polite at the same time. If you find you can't do that yourself I suspect you'll quickly end up being progressive on your own.
Also; the NM list -as far as I know- was never about recording advice.
Ideally we'd have the sort of budget that would allow us to stand up to those parts of the RIAA's reign of terror that we have issues with and if we did I'd advocate doing that. As it stands we simply don't. It's very easy to say other people should take a stand and thus take the risk, quite another to do so yourself. What elements of the RIAA's policy do you disagree with and what are you doing to cause a change? _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18202 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 213
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 6:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
We still support the NM list, BTW... _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:18 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
If the NM community was freestanding it would be quite a small and anonymous thing which wouldn't attract the attention of anyone malicious. It then wouldn't have to be subject to rules which have to govern electro-music as a whole inlcuding the shop and artist space etc. I don't have a problem with electro-music as a whole, I just see that on balance it is restrictive to the possibilities of this community.
As for my views on copyright, I freely distribute all the music I release commercially on my label through p2p networks. I regularly download other artists music over p2p networks and if I like it enough to want to listen to it multiple times I buy it in some form.
I liked the free-for-all nature of the mailing list though, it was a very creative atmosphere.. if you would consider that a very liberal atmosphere.. and as I do the structure of the electro-music very conservative then I feel that swing has left a big gap. _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:27 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I do realise.. that by definition I am preaching to the un-converted here.. _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator

Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I know next to nothing about the NM, but I am very appreciative of the fact that electro-music has moderators who are willing to put in the time and effort to keep the posts organised and relevant.
I've looked around at other forums, and most of them are just overflowing with shit!! Miles and miles of sewerage where people just slag each other off, backwards and forwards, simply because someone else has a different viewpoint. No-one has any pride in the forum because they are basically of the attitude that they can always resort to some literary head kicking and then go off and crap in someone elses nest. _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| _ Steve _ wrote: |
I liked the free-for-all nature of the mailing list though, it was a very creative atmosphere.. if you would consider that a very liberal atmosphere.. and as I do the structure of the electro-music very conservative then I feel that swing has left a big gap. |
Right, well then I sugest you immediately go to the NM list, post MP3 files of cover songs to it and ask for recording advice. I myself have some questions on the exact workings of "desktop configuration files" in Debian Linux, I think I'll go ask those on the NM list too.
Oh, and in your second post above you asked for alternatives to this forum, then later you mentioned there are plenty that are all far superior. I take it you found those since then, could you please share this list? _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Kassen wrote: | | Right, well then I sugest you immediately go to the NM list, post MP3 files of cover songs to it and ask for recording advice. I myself have some questions on the exact workings of "desktop configuration files" in Debian Linux, I think I'll go ask those on the NM list too. |
Are you available for parties? _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:42 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| _ Steve _ wrote: |
Are you available for parties? |
Sure. Mail my label manager, he also handles bookings.
To answer the core of the whole thing; no, of cource a G2 is not going to sound better then a BOSS for this sort of thing. _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Kassen wrote: | | To answer the core of the whole thing; no, of cource a G2 is not going to sound better then a BOSS for this sort of thing. |
That is not the core of this thread. Unfortunately that thread was deleted to protect us from bad words. _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Fozzie wrote: | | Of course Steve is entitled to his opinion. So am I, and I for one am very (VERY) glad that this place is polite and open. I too have been on several different forums where trolling and flame wars are more important than having serious, funny or other 'nice' conversations. That's a definite turn-off for me, so I am very happy with this forum and thought I'd express it. *Done* |
THX a lot for the support Fozzie... and that goes for all of you guys too.
This is about community building and this would never have been pulled off without all the help and patience from you guys.
Mr. sez:  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:52 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| _ Steve _ wrote: |
That is not the core of this thread. Unfortunately that thread was deleted to protect us from bad words. |
No, it wasn't.
There was a link that was removed, then it was put back again, that time with language that seemed to mean "I don't respect how this site is run". We don't want a silly tug of war of that sort so it was *moved* (not deleted) while we would sort this out.
We move threads like that because that way they can be moved back if some sort of agreement can be reached; deleting is permanent. I don0t think we ever delete anything excpet for double posts.
If Hyde would contact Mosc or Jan he could negotate some sort of compromise that wouldn't involve direct links to complete songs and would use language that would be a bit more respectfull and we could put a edited version back.
There is no sensorship against words as such; as far as I know it would be perfectly ok to write -for example- a review of "shitfuckers" by Venetian Snares. That is entirely different from making a distincton between "I disagree because of...." and "you are a f*ing...."
The point here is comunication. We have a board to enable comunication and the list is for comunication as well. Disagreement is great and can be a part of that, name calling does not work so well as comunication.
I explained all of this already, why do you insist on creating some sort of image of intollerance instead of trying to make a compromise that's agreeable to all? _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|