| Author |
Message |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject:
EFM envelope generators sustain "leak" Subject description: 555-based ones |
 |
|
that is, 3500 series module and wildcat EGs. i can proudly say that i understand the circuit, but i can't figure out why this occurs. the sustain doesn't really sustain, but is dropping in voltage constantly (towards ground, but i never waited that long). anyone else getting this?
here's the schemo (page 24 and 25): http://ele4music.com/documents/efm-wildcat.pdf
after the decay phase is over (555 detects treshold reached), the only way for the C5 to discharge is through the R8 resistor... but even when pot P1 is set for a full sustain, C5 is still discharging towards zero. could anyone help me understand this? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:43 pm Post subject:
Re: EFM envelope generators sustain "leak" Subject description: 555-based ones |
 |
|
| kokoon wrote: | | i can proudly say that i understand the circuit, but i can't figure out why this occurs. the sustain doesn't really sustain, but is dropping in voltage constantly (towards ground, but i never waited that long). |
It's hard to understand how this design could work properly. The internal leakage of C5 will eventually cause D3 to be reverse biased, at which point the sustain-level control becomes isolated and has no effect. At least that's how it looks to me. But maybe there is some subtle feature I'm missing.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
What type of diode are you using ? I have had a really comparable problem when I was using schottky diodes, the problem was fixzd as soon as I used standard 1N4148 diodes. Also it's important that you use good quality capacitors for C5 (that is with low leakage).
I am using a very similar design in my yusynth modular and using good caps and avoiding schottky I have no problem at all. _________________ Yves |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| i'm using ordinary 1N4148 diodes. about the C5 capacitor - does higher voltage rating maybe mean better or worse leakage? i'm using a 63V aluminium electrolytic type capacitor - any other dielectric types possible here? tantalum? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:20 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
63V is OK and I use tantalum. _________________ Yves |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| and you have a steady sustain phase? hmm i just did some reading, apparently tantalums generally have less leakage, i'll give it a try! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i'm trying to move on with the wildcat, but i hit an obstacle. it's the EGs, but (probably) not the leaking - that sorta got solved with better caps.
so - what's happening:
after stuffing all 4 EGs, i started noticing weird phantom frequencies on the VCO. pretty low-freq, under 1kHz, judging by ear. probably even less.
when i connect the first two EGs to the power supply buss (they can only be connected in pairs), the effect kicks in. i haven't noticed it at first, but after connecting the second EG pair, it becomes really obvious.
i'm assuming the EGs make the power lines fluctuate (periodically?), so i tried disconnecting them. the VCO is clean again. then when i connect the +12V rail to the EGs, i'm in trouble again.
so what do i do next? i still don't have a scope, but i can try to isolate the phantom oscillations. what should i be looking for next?
the EGs work otherwise, they're quite useful actually, especially considering how simple design they are.
anyone? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Questions : are you using NE555 chips (BJT version) or more modern CMOS version of the 555 ? If you are using the classic version, I strongly suggest that you replace them by modern CMOS substitutes. The current draw of the NE555 is known to be a problem. If this substitution does not solve your problem, try the following : instead of connecting the EG supplies directly to the power bus lines using the short straps as designed on the board, use long insulated wires and connect them to the power rails as close as possible to power supply output on the board (that is before the power supply straps of the first VCO). _________________ Yves |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
hmm.. connecting to power rails before VCO - i've already tried that, doesn't help.
how can i tell what version my NE555 chips are? they're STMicroelectronics, labeled like this:
ST CHN
NE555N
KPA625 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
That's the bi-junction classical chip, try to substitute them with CMOS versions. _________________ Yves Last edited by yusynth on Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:40 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ah, great! how do know which is which? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
By cheking the datasheets!
Here are some references for CMOS 555 timer : ICM7555, TLC555, LMC555 _________________ Yves |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| great, i found NE555CN, this is supposed to be CMOS. will change them now! thank you very much! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kokoon
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 158 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:11 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
this fixed the problem indeed. the envelopes are no more polluting the rails!
big thanks, yusson! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| kokoon wrote: | this fixed the problem indeed. the envelopes are no more polluting the rails!
big thanks, yusson! |
You're welcome pal ! _________________ Yves |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
do you mind if i uploaded a copy this thread to my EFM info site? i found it very helpful. _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| fonik wrote: | | do you mind if i uploaded a copy this thread to my EFM info site? i found it very helpful. |
Sure go ahead
Yves _________________ Yves |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|