Author |
Message |
ambi-J
Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Posts: 20 Location: belgium
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
richardc64

Joined: Jun 01, 2006 Posts: 677 Location: NYC
Audio files: 26
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Blue Hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 23989 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 274
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Nice find!
I did not see it before either .. not in some conscious state at least ... as to why ... some ideas are too simple I guess
Apart from that .. yeah it has the drawbacks you mention ... it would depend very much on the actual threshold voltage of the port too .. but hey .. this is the Lunetta forum  _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Blue Hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 23989 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 274
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
richardc64 wrote: | I've done it, but in a more "complicated" way.
The diode acts as a voltage controlled resistor varying "how much" of the cap connects to ground. A quirk of this method is the higher the voltage the lower the frequency.
With the cap directly to ground and an npn transistor across it, synthmonger made a VCO with a normal CV-to-freq. response.
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-28799.html |
Didn't notice those apparently
All nice ideas! _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
DUBmatze

Joined: Feb 18, 2013 Posts: 150 Location: south Germaica (schwabilon)
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
richardc64 wrote: | A quirk of this method is the higher the voltage the lower the frequency. | ui ... thats cool. So when i feed a AD in it it goes from low to high... mhm i have to breadboard this quickly... |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektrouwe
Joined: May 27, 2012 Posts: 140 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:06 am Post subject:
Re: simpliest cmos vco |
 |
|
ambi-J wrote: |
I am wondering why I cannot find information about it on the net and why nobody is doing it that way |
because it does NOT work. At least not for DC CV, which can obviously not
pass the capacitor. What CV source did you use ? If it was a CV from a potentiometer, you got the effect from the change in Rpot ( which is,
what Richard is doing with the diode ). For AC CV there is a kind of frequency/pwm modulation, but you can't call this a VCO. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ambi-J
Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Posts: 20 Location: belgium
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 150 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PHOBoS

Joined: Jan 14, 2010 Posts: 5449 Location: Moon Base
Audio files: 701
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
ambi-J wrote: | When the controll voltage is near the trigger level, which is approx 8v with a chip supply of 15v the oscillator stops oscillating. But in between it gave me a range from about 10hz till above my hearing: 12khz
I challenge everyone to give it a try, it's easy to breadboard. |
That's a pretty wide range, even if not used as a VCO (with an external control voltage) it might already be a nice way to extend the range of the
oscillator (with another pot in the feedback path). I'll give it a try sometime  _________________ "My perf, it's full of holes!"
http://phobos.000space.com/
SoundCloud BandCamp MixCloud Stickney Synthyards Captain Collider Twitch YouTube |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 150 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:45 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
wow, now I get what you mean!
it´s called lateral thinking...
challenge accepted, you´ll hear from me tomorrow  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
richardc64

Joined: Jun 01, 2006 Posts: 677 Location: NYC
Audio files: 26
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Eliminate the PNP from the Rene Schmitz VCO and it will be single-supply. The response won't be V/Oct and probably not Oct/V, either.
I favor replacing the diode in the feedback path with a resistor or pot. That should give a more square-ish waveform, instead of a spiky saw. _________________ Revenge is a dish best served with a fork... in the eye |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektrouwe
Joined: May 27, 2012 Posts: 140 Location: Germany
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PHOBoS

Joined: Jan 14, 2010 Posts: 5449 Location: Moon Base
Audio files: 701
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:49 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektrouwe wrote: | Proof: disconnect your V+ power supply from the potentiometer and GND lboth ends of the potentiometer.
I claim the "pseudo VCO" -behaviour will be the same without CV ! |
I just tested it and you are correct, well actually I get a slightly larger range with the pot connected to GND at both sides. You can also leave
one side unconnected. I did another test connecting the capacitor to the output of an opamp configured as a voltage follower, doesn't work. _________________ "My perf, it's full of holes!"
http://phobos.000space.com/
SoundCloud BandCamp MixCloud Stickney Synthyards Captain Collider Twitch YouTube |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 150 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PHOBoS

Joined: Jan 14, 2010 Posts: 5449 Location: Moon Base
Audio files: 701
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Blue Hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 23989 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 274
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektrouwe wrote: | Proof: disconnect your V+ power supply from the potentiometer and GND lboth ends of the potentiometer.
I claim the "pseudo VCO" -behaviour will be the same without CV :-) !
|
That is not really a proof though for the original circuit idea not working ..
You built a different, and also interesting, circuit that works too for frequency control but through another effect than the one intended in the original circuit proposed ...
A real proof would be to buffer the pot, or use a very low resistance value for it, such that it behaves more like a voltage source. When the voltage control effect disappears with that it would show that the principle does not work. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PHOBoS

Joined: Jan 14, 2010 Posts: 5449 Location: Moon Base
Audio files: 701
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Blue Hell wrote: | A real proof would be to buffer the pot, or use a very low resistance value for it, such that it behaves more like a voltage source. When the voltage control effect disappears with that it would show that the principle does not work. |
PHOBoS wrote: | I did another test connecting the capacitor to the output of an opamp configured as a voltage follower, doesn't work. |
_________________ "My perf, it's full of holes!"
http://phobos.000space.com/
SoundCloud BandCamp MixCloud Stickney Synthyards Captain Collider Twitch YouTube |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Blue Hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 23989 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 274
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:02 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ah ok, convinced now  _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ambi-J
Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Posts: 20 Location: belgium
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:19 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
you are right. when I feed the cap from an opamp voltage folower it loose the vco effect almost. the change in frequency is verry little then.
maximum effect is attchieved this way by using a high cap (1uf) and a very low R1 : 1.5 octaves, and the change in frequency is reversed then. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
commathe

Joined: Jul 26, 2013 Posts: 153 Location: Beijing
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I don't think this is voltage control. It looks to me like you are affecting how quickly the cap can discharge itself by adjusting the resistance to ground. If you disconnect the pot from the power rail and just use it as a series resistance it should probably still work nearly the same. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektrouwe
Joined: May 27, 2012 Posts: 140 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Blue Hell wrote: | That is not really a proof though for the original circuit idea not working |
why don't you believe in physics ( a C blocks DC, period) ?
this is not about "ID"-biology
Blue Hell wrote: | Ah ok, convinced now  |
good, Farraday rules again  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 150 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 150 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rossics
Joined: Nov 23, 2013 Posts: 12 Location: Australia
Audio files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 150 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Nice Rossics, I mean´extra noise´
I think those CMOS vcos, especially cascaded, are much underappreciated,
they yield very interesting sonic textures.
I´m tending to the cv-way explained by richardc64, diode to ground (while vactrols are nice, I need them for my vcf´s already).
I´m thinking about and will be trying soon if it is possible to use bipolar cv in a scheme like the Steiner VC Phaser circuit...
http://electro-music.com/forum/phpbb-files/sp_phaser_1_153.jpg |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|