Author |
Message |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:48 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I dont see any guns to any peoples head to be forced to use any scale.
If people dont like something then they can choose not to use it if they are smart and actually have a brain that functions.
Its not like there arent other scales available.
This is pretty silly.
kkissinger makes some great points.
This whole "The End of Common Practice"
thing to me seems like a big advocation for staying narrowminded.
Oh right lets all be slaves to our scales? No thanks... |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:46 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Jason wrote: |
This whole "The End of Common Practice"
thing to me seems like a big advocation for staying narrowminded.
|
I don't read it that way. The author advocates the expansion of tonal resources beyond the limit of 12 tone equal tempered tuning. That quote of his book may be controversial but certainly thought-provoking. _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | The author advocates the expansion of tonal resources beyond the limit of 12 tone equal tempered tuning. |
This stuff is not narrowminded at all. I am simply raising issues related to the statements re tonality and modern music. The tuning ideas suggested here are just fine with me. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | The tuning ideas suggested here are just fine with me. |
my idea is that technology may enable us to move forward exploring tunings not easily available before (whatever tuning). Never mind "the end of common-practice" even though.......  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sebber

Joined: Aug 27, 2004 Posts: 502 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 33
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:38 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
This filtering process is not a pure, objective filtering, no doubt. There's an aspect of fashion in who we play today. And before 1840 nobody played "old" music anyway, and 2006 other music is played than 1960. What's more important: it's played differently, that's where, in notated music, the interpretation comes in.
I think the constant reinterpretation of the same piece by different musicians is what makes good music immortal. The interpreters choose what they want to play (the filtering process) and the interpretations change over time and "keep track" with today in a subtle manner.
I admit, if that's true it's bad news for anyone, whose music can only survive on a tape.
I'm really excited if we will still listen to the Beatles in 50 years (though I should care a little bit better for myself to be there then). I almost doubt that we'll listen to, say, a Christian Vogel live set that I know have on my ipod. I'm dead though sure I'll listen to Beethoven. _________________ Fish don't swim. They dive. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2672 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
sebber wrote: | I almost doubt that we'll listen to, say, a Christian Vogel live set that I know have on my ipod. |
Not sure about in 50 years time but I might like to listen to that now. Got a link? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sebber

Joined: Aug 27, 2004 Posts: 502 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 33
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
http://www.play.fm/ has a lot of interesting sets. You've got to register to listen to them, but that was hassle-free and they only sent me an email once. _________________ Fish don't swim. They dive. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:41 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I am not saying you guys are narrowminded.
Sorry if I offended anybody...
that wasnt my intention |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
chuck
Joined: Apr 26, 2005 Posts: 58 Location: cincinnati, oh
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:15 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | Is it a valid assumption that what survives the "test of time" will be the essential and good stuff? There is still a context to most art anyway and when the context is removed does this change vital characteristics or even the content of the artwork?
If we truly demand of art that it has to have a timeless component ( as in.. the artwork is still popular or accepted as a prized item after X number of years ) aren´t we then also reinventing it and ignoring its context and meaning/impact? |
What survives the 'test of time' may survive more because of the influence it had (has) on other music than for itself. I'm thinking of Ives, Cage and Schoenberg here... that the intention of their art may be more important than what pieces they produced. I don't think any artwork that is original can be judged to have a 'timeless quality' very soon after its creation.
As far as reinventing a work of art or taking it out of the context of its creation, that's pretty much done all the time. All art of the past is fair game for use in the future. And technology is making this more and more the issue. How many Mona Lisa's are there? And also, once a piece of music has outlived its impact on our lives, its context and meaning no longer having any influence on us, it should be remembered as some kind of museum piece, some kind of way of seeing 'what once was'. _________________ Never confuse beauty with the things that put your mind at ease.
Charles E. Ives |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Jason wrote: | I am not saying you guys are narrowminded.
Sorry if I offended anybody...
that wasnt my intention |
somehow "music tuning" is a touchy subject but I don't think anybody took offense
someone said:"music is a footnote of the history of tuning" (that's controversial ) _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:44 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks Seraph
Now I don't feel so bad
It is for sure an interesting topic and good to get us thinking |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sebber

Joined: Aug 27, 2004 Posts: 502 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 33
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I could have felt offended? Darn, I missed an opportunity
I feel fine, too. _________________ Fish don't swim. They dive. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:32 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Right on folks
I have been wanting to experiment with eastern scales mainly Indian for years now. I even have a sitar , I just need to learn.
Maybe this will give me some motivtion to go learning more and grow!
The G# harmonic thing is just not enough. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | elektro80 wrote: | The tuning ideas suggested here are just fine with me. |
my idea is that technology may enable us to move forward exploring tunings not easily available before (whatever tuning). Never mind "the end of common-practice" even though.......  |
Indeed, but at the moment there aren´t really any accessible and affordable electronic instruments around suitable for the really esoteric tuning schemes.  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:41 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Kassen wrote: | elektro80 wrote: |
Is it a valid assumption that what survives the "test of time" will be the essential and good stuff? There is still a context to most art anyway and when the context is removed does this change vital characteristics or even the content of the artwork?
If we truly demand of art that it has to have a timeless component ( as in.. the artwork is still popular or accepted as a prized item after X number of years ) aren´t we then also reinventing it and ignoring its context and meaning/impact?
|
That's a uncomfortably good question.
|
A lot of what a piece of art is about are external references. These references, the context as such, are not only the contemporary there and then, but also about how that moment in time was understood. Consider that we are right now completely slipping away from the contextuality the cold war period constituted to a whole lot of art and art critique.
Quote: |
You can seriously doubt wether the same process that filtered the "classics" is still available as well. |
...and with good reason. The sudden development of the Western art music for the blooming middle class is a weird phenomenon. The curated filtering itself is most of all a defining trait of the development of the middle class and its understanding of itself and how it could use art consumption and art appreciation as class defining rituals. It also a paradox ( but far from surprising ) that these mechanisms caused the evolution of a whole lot of radical art movements of the early 20th century. It can in fact also be argued that the way the middleclass suddenly discovered and used the concept of "high art" was indeed an extremely radical event. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | at the moment there aren´t really any accessible and affordable electronic instruments around suitable for the really esoteric tuning schemes.  |
I am sorry to disagree with you but you can retune almost any synthesizer you can think of. check the link on the first page of this thread. with LMSO I can retune ANY synth. I retuned Propellerhead Reason that is not supposed to be tunable, my digital piano Kawai MP4, that is not supposed to be retunable. I have not tried the G2 but I do not see any reason why it should not be retuned (the limit for the G2 should be 4 monophonic voices, I guess). so there is plenty of esoteric scales waiting for us. as Harry Partch said: the steps of the equal tempered scale are familiar islands in the vast and mostly unexplored ocean between the unison and the far away shores of the octave" isn't it a beautiful definition (btw Partch was a genius, check him out) _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:10 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | elektro80 wrote: | at the moment there aren´t really any accessible and affordable electronic instruments around suitable for the really esoteric tuning schemes.  |
I am sorry to disagree with you but you can retune almost any synthesizer you can think of. check the link on the first page of this thread. with LMSO I can retune ANY synth. I retuned Propellerhead Reason that is not supposed to be tunable, my digital piano Kawai MP4, that is not supposed to be retunable. I have not tried the G2 but I do not see any reason why it should not be retuned (the limit for the G2 should be 4 monophonic voices, I guess). so there is plenty of esoteric scales waiting for us. as Harry Partch said: the steps of the equal tempered scale are familiar islands in the vast and mostly unexplored ocean between the unison and the far away shores of the octave" isn't it a beautiful definition (btw Partch was a genius, check him out) |
Yes indeed, but this is not really what I meant.  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:13 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: |
Yes indeed, but this is not really what I meant.  |
so, tell us what you meant  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sebber

Joined: Aug 27, 2004 Posts: 502 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 33
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:41 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
There's a terribly bad filter installed in commercial radio stations that's called "Best of the 70s, 80's and 90's and the best of today"-filter. One of the worst filters ever implemented, but obviously so cheap no radio station can ignore it.
I think the filtering process is still there and working for the masses, as it's always been, because they choose to only go to concerts, where a filter process already applied (a record company contract, heavy rotation, mass media hype) because they don't want to "waste their time" going in bad concerts. Secondly: too much music is composed/produced today. No one can possibly listen to everything that's on the net. I think the biggest filter is still the record companys, because I know of no band that made their way through the internet to the charts.
When I ask friends: what good book did you read lately he'll apply a filter in his answer. Although you're right with what you say about the bourgeois music culture I don't think that's the only way of selection. _________________ Fish don't swim. They dive. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
sebber wrote: | There's a terribly bad filter installed in commercial radio stations that's called "Best of the 70s, 80's and 90's and the best of today"-filter. One of the worst filters ever implemented, but obviously so cheap no radio station can ignore it. |
It is truly amazing how the music programmers come up with those playlist.
Do they have some secret rituals involving soon-to-be-mutilated cattle? .. and I am sure they have some very potent browlowering potions.
True, there are several filters and processes going on. I focused on the artyfarty bit of because that what was the essay was using as a theoretical foundation for that just intonation pimping session. Hmm.. a new idea for MTV? "Pimp My Scale"? OMG _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | sebber wrote: | There's a terribly bad filter installed in commercial radio stations that's called "Best of the 70s, 80's and 90's and the best of today"-filter. One of the worst filters ever implemented, but obviously so cheap no radio station can ignore it. |
It is truly amazing how the music programmers come up with those playlist.
Do they have some secret rituals involving soon-to-be-mutilated cattle? .. and I am sure they have some very potent browlowering potions. |
These filters you are talking about here do in fact serve many purposes. This is not only about the supposedly "best" music, but we are also looking at a reinvention of what these decades were about. That said, stuff happens and the decade angle on what is truly going on doesn´t really work that well at all.
Anyways, sometimes I feel I am waking up to a society that has been Andy Warholified overnight. Man, I gotta reduce the PKD intake bigtime.  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: |
Obviously what "we" need is a new breed of keyboard oriented synths with truly useable and playable tuning schemes/scale tweaks. I am thinking a kind of Roland polkaboard "Ivor Darreg style".
|
you mean the problem of user interface once you use a tuning different from 12tET. that's right. try googling "generalized keyboard"
yes, you mentioned Ivor Darreg before. the history of tuning is a constellation of amazing human beings  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yeah... now you are getting it!  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | Yeah... now you are getting it!  |
I'm sorry...I'm a bit slow  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|