electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
go to the radio page Live at electro-music.com radio 1 Please visit the chat
poster
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Thomas Henry designs
X-4046 VCO Page is Up
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: Scott Stites
Page 1 of 7 [175 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Author Message
Scott Stites
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 4127
Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:16 pm    Post subject: X-4046 VCO Page is Up
Subject description: A new 4046 based VCO design
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi all,

I've finished a new page featuring a new VCO design from Thomas.

It's a CD4046 based circuit that has sine, triangle, pulse, sawtooth and rampoid waveform outputs with V/oct control, exponential and linear FM and a very cool hard sync.

There's the usual blather from me plus some sound samples and schematics, etc.

Link is:

http://www.birthofasynth.com/Thomas_Henry/Pages/X-4046.html

Cheerios,
Scott

_________________
My Site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crashlander42



Joined: Oct 21, 2006
Posts: 292
Location: Orlando, FL (US)

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Woo Hoo! Finally an excuse to move that 8038 VCO to vectorboard and free up my breadboard.
_________________
When they plug me in the lights go down in Hong Kong.

http://www.myspace.com/isaciongun
http://www.youtube.com/user/Crashlander42
My DIY stuff Flickr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fonik



Joined: Jun 07, 2006
Posts: 3950
Location: Germany
Audio files: 23

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

i had the privilege to build one on breadboard end of last year. i did not build a module from it yet, though (mainly because i did not manage to source the right brand of 4046 back then). and i just have not had the time.
anyways, this VCO sounds awesome. man! the hardsync is the utter madness! and i believe the "unperfect" triangle adds to it's unique sound.

_________________
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dan Lavin



Joined: Nov 09, 2006
Posts: 649
Location: Spring Lake, Mi, USA
Audio files: 21

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Tim!!
Better fire up the pcb layout software!!
You're going to have the weight of the E-M brethern breathing down your neck for boards of this!

_________________
Synth DIY since 1977!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thomas_Henry



Joined: Jul 24, 2009
Posts: 170
Location: N. Mankato, MN
Audio files: 3

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi Gang,

Well it took a year to get this one out the door, but I think you'll find the wait was worth it. As usual, Scott has done a superior job of writing up the results. I think he's one of the best writers of DIY, don't you? And I hope everyone is picking up on the fact that he's providing this resource free of charge with no strings attached even though it conflicts with him replacing a defunct garage door opener. Now that's dedication!

Be sure to pay heed to what he found about this project: 4046 chips from some manufacturers just don't hit spec for whatever reason. But it's easy to deal with the problem. Don't waste time with the instruments. Just try tuning this by ear first. If you've got a bad brand, you'll know it at once---you won't be able to tune the VCO anywhere in its range. On the other hand, if you've got it nailed down by ear, then either:

1. Quit tuning, since your ears are the final arbiter anyway. Otherwise,
2. Pull out the frequency counter and DVM and have at it.

I used the CD4046 from National Semiconductor with no problems at all.

A new mod occurred to me last night. The square wave from the 4046 tells the triangle/sawtooth circuitry when to do its thing. I wonder what would happen if that signal went through a divider first? Divide-by-two might be boring, but divide-by-three or -five might produce something interesting. Any takers?

Thomas Henry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
v-un-v
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: May 16, 2005
Posts: 8933
Location: Birmingham, England, UK
Audio files: 11
G2 patch files: 1

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thomas_Henry wrote:
I think he's one of the best writers of DIY, don't you?


Yup! Very Happy

_________________
ACHTUNG!
ALLES TURISTEN UND NONTEKNISCHEN LOOKENPEEPERS!
DAS KOMPUTERMASCHINE IST NICHT FÜR DER GEFINGERPOKEN UND MITTENGRABEN! ODERWISE IST EASY TO SCHNAPPEN DER SPRINGENWERK, BLOWENFUSEN UND POPPENCORKEN MIT SPITZENSPARKSEN.
IST NICHT FÜR GEWERKEN BEI DUMMKOPFEN. DER RUBBERNECKEN SIGHTSEEREN KEEPEN DAS COTTONPICKEN HÄNDER IN DAS POCKETS MUSS.
ZO RELAXEN UND WATSCHEN DER BLINKENLICHTEN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Scott Stites
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 4127
Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Ah shucks guys, thanks.

Yes, the garaged door opener was one of many challenges I faced. I also had to deal with lens glare, and at some point in there, I had a vicious hangnail also... Laughing

I figure, if anything, if you run across a 4046 that doesn't want to get over hump, it may not matter if this design is the basis of something other than a VCO module. There are a zillion cigar box synths out there that use 555s or CD40106s for VCOs, which normally only get you pulse waves and more-or-less linear control. I think a couple of these VCOs in a box like that would be insanely cool.

The divide-by sounds like an interesting thing to try out! I wanna get through this other page I'm working on working on first, though, before I try it out.

And yes, the ever-industrious Fonik played a part in all this. In fact, he's the reason why I had two X-4046 VCOs to play with.

Cheerios,
Scott

_________________
My Site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
State Machine
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Posts: 2809
Location: New York
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Really an elegant VCO design. I agree with Thomas, Scott is one of the best DIY writers. The good news is I have a bunch of the Motorola 4046 chips which seem to work very well according to Scotts findings.

Scott; the website is looking real nice Wink

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bugbrand



Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 846
Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Another GREAT Henry-Stites collaboration -- topnotch and very elegant as always! And super new s(t)ite(s)!

The wave options look to be fantastic -- we've seen G.Richter get interesting waves out of the 4046 in the Wogglebug and I've done some similar work, but never with decent triangles or crossfading. Interestingly I was just last night thinking about square-divisions being interesting to generate new waves in similarish VCO setups.

Oh, I just thought of an option -- change the input side of R12 to the PWM --> a switch between either Ramp or Sin would be good I think. Or wouldn't it be better to take Tri instead of Sin? Just a thought -- I think some other VCOs have the option to switch the Pulse source wave (maybe Oakley or Motm?)

Anyways,,,, Sweets!

_________________
http://www.bugbrand.co.uk
http://www.bugbrand.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
v-un-v
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: May 16, 2005
Posts: 8933
Location: Birmingham, England, UK
Audio files: 11
G2 patch files: 1

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I must say, that's the best sync i've heard since the Moog Prodigy! Cool
_________________
ACHTUNG!
ALLES TURISTEN UND NONTEKNISCHEN LOOKENPEEPERS!
DAS KOMPUTERMASCHINE IST NICHT FÜR DER GEFINGERPOKEN UND MITTENGRABEN! ODERWISE IST EASY TO SCHNAPPEN DER SPRINGENWERK, BLOWENFUSEN UND POPPENCORKEN MIT SPITZENSPARKSEN.
IST NICHT FÜR GEWERKEN BEI DUMMKOPFEN. DER RUBBERNECKEN SIGHTSEEREN KEEPEN DAS COTTONPICKEN HÄNDER IN DAS POCKETS MUSS.
ZO RELAXEN UND WATSCHEN DER BLINKENLICHTEN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Scott Stites
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 4127
Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks, Bill! I've got some older MC14046s and some newer ones I ordered from Mouser (ON Semi makes the MC14046 these days). I found the older Motorola ICs easier to tune. As Studs mentioned, he had a National IC that tuned up very nicely. In my experience, the older Fairchild that I had (I don't have any "new" Fairchilds; I don't think Fairchild makes'em anymore) was quite compliant as well. For one reason or another, the TI 4046s just wouldn't play ball for me, and the few I sent to TH didn't for him either. Nor did I much care for the ST HCF4046 ICs (old or new).

Tom B: I imagine one can do anything one wants with the design - it would be interesting to hear what people come up with! The idea of using the sawtooth would certainly give you a pulse output one octave above the sine and triangle outputs.

Tom F: I really didn't give the hard sync much of a chance in the sample. I spent Saturday jacking around with sound samples, but it was one of those days where I couldn't come up with anything I liked musically (it was one of those days). Sunday morning I really wanted to finish the page, so I just said "to hell with it" and recorded the sequence and the waveforms to go along with it. When the sync sample came up, I just twiddled the coarse-tune of the VCO while I sausage-fingered the notes. It is a throaty-growly-screamy kind of hard sync I really like. I'll try to use it on samples for the page that's coming up next.

Cheerio,
Scott

_________________
My Site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Stites
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 4127
Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Oh yeah: the way the hard sync is implemented is pretty cool. On the surface, it looks so obvious, but I don't think it ever would have occurred to me to use the inhibit pin in such a manner. It's downright sneaky if you think about it Laughing .
_________________
My Site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thomas_Henry



Joined: Jul 24, 2009
Posts: 170
Location: N. Mankato, MN
Audio files: 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi all,

Scott Stites wrote:
It's downright sneaky if you think about it Laughing .

And it comes along for free (well, all right, a transistor to protect the input). I'm glad you noticed.

I have another VCO from last year itching to leave the door. It uses another equally innocuous chip (ten cents, anybody?) that does sync in almost the same way. The moral is to keep your eyes open---chip manufacturers often miss mentioning the best use of their parts.

Thomas Henry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
State Machine
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Posts: 2809
Location: New York
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Scott,

I see that an LF442 is used to drive the expo circuit. Have you tried any other type of operational amplifier such as the TL072 or LM1458? If so, had it made any difference that would disallow their use in this circuit?

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Scott Stites
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 4127
Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hey Bill,

At some point I didn't have a good connection with the 442 and I was getting wonky results, so I stuck a TL072 in, which made things better (natch, because it was seated correctly). I mentioned this to Thomas in an email, then, after sending the email, I put the 442 back in the circuit and realized it was working just fine. I sent a second email telling Tom not to bother, but it was too late - he was already in his secret dungeon working through applying the TL072, so he missed the second email. This is what he reported:

"...it made very little difference for the range in which my ears work. In particular, from 20 Hz to 5120 Hz the tuning was virtually identical to what I sent you on the spec sheet last night. The only difference was a bit more flatedness at 10 KHz. Conclusion: the TL is more than okay, but the 442 is better. One other thing, I had to increase the HF trim to 1M for the TL. This suggests that the TL really is better in the midrange with no prewarping needed. However, with the specified 100k and the 442 the prewarping works out much better."

Cheerio,
Scott

_________________
My Site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
State Machine
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Posts: 2809
Location: New York
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks Scott

No sense in letting any of that empirical evidence go to waste, Jameco sells the LF442 for a buck a piece in 10+ quantities so I will get some of these:

http://www.jameco.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10001_10001_106681_-1

Digikey is a bit higher in pricing but carries this IC also:

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=LF442CN-ND

The best price of all is here though at Futurlec at $0.67 each so I would get them here if I were to make a large enough order through them:

http://www.futurlec.com/index.shtml

If one were to make a PCB it should be able to use the LM394 matched pair as well as the discrete transistors. This would give the builder choices. Just a thought.

Scott, a nice CMOS programmable Divide-by-N counter is in order right? Just to play around with Wink Wink

I went back to have another listen to this VCO and really like it !!! Hmm, well, there is the Quad Bass++, maybe a Quad VCO to? Would just have to manage X-Talk among the oscillators. I will probably stay away from that since I believe Tim of MS will be doing a board.

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fonik



Joined: Jun 07, 2006
Posts: 3950
Location: Germany
Audio files: 23

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

scott, did you yet try the low offset LT1013 together with the matched pairs from my proto for the expo? any difference?
_________________
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
State Machine
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Posts: 2809
Location: New York
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I am impressed with the tracking since my ears can't tell a difference of +/- 10 cents and considering the error of this VCO is anywhere from 10 cents and below across the usable audio band, that is pretty dam good !! Would be curious to see how this tracks at higher and lower temperatures to see what the CD4046 control input does then.

Oh Fonik, BTW, I like that amplifier also Wink In addition, I just started using the Burr Brown "OPA" series myself in my audio and CV paths for "high fidelity" audio projects.

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fonik



Joined: Jun 07, 2006
Posts: 3950
Location: Germany
Audio files: 23

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

back then i made myself a PCB for the VCO core, using LT1013 and LM394, however i have had access to TI 4046 only, so i could not get it scaled anyways. i just ordered a couple of ON Semi 4046's to resurrect this project.
as said before, i had only the bad TI IC's on hand. nevertheless i still remember the moment when i powered up the VCO and played for about half an hour only with the hardsync Laughing

_________________
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Scott Stites
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 4127
Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

And the sync I recorded came from the attached picture: that's Fonik's PCB there. It has everything but the Sine output, I believe. I just hard wired coarse and fine tune pots, though you can see he put headers in for the panel connections, and Doepfer/MOTM type power connections.

Tom actually started the X-4046 last year, but, at the time I was using the HCF4046, which I couldn't get going all that well. We dragged Matthias into the project to get a third eye and (IIRC) he had the same type 4046 I had(?). Anyway, during that time Fonik graciously designed and produced a PCB in what seems like no time flat. By the time we got back to brass tacks, the summer was over and Studs disappeared back into the vortex of Academia.

Matthias: Last year while trying to figure things out, I replaced the LT with a TL. I never went back to the LT so I couldn't say how well it works.

If I were to market PCBs for the VCO as a tuned VCO module, I'd almost want to supply a tested 4046 with it; I can see someone getting the PCB and plopping in a TI or HCF and starting a chain of support messages to you. Laughing But, that's just me.

Cheerio,
Scott


Fonik_Board.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  131.64 KB
 Viewed:  962 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

Fonik_Board.JPG



_________________
My Site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Danno Gee Ray



Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 1351
Location: Telford, PA USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

If either of you decided to market a PCB with an accompanyaing tested chip I would buy the set. Given the affore stated issues with different chip manufacturer's product, I second Scott's idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rykhaard



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 1290
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Whoooaaaaaaamy gawd! Surprised This is perfect! I had bought a BUNCH of 4046's back when I was working on the design for my first Liquid HiHat. Now though, having my new design, I've still got a bunch of 4046's that had no use. And NOW, they will! Very Happy

Many great thanks to Thomas, Scott and Matthias for all of your work in this! Surprised O-M-F-G! Surprised
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Thomas_Henry



Joined: Jul 24, 2009
Posts: 170
Location: N. Mankato, MN
Audio files: 3

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hey, Rykhaard,

Rykhaard wrote:
I've still got a bunch of 4046's that had no use.

You're a wiser man than me. About five years ago, I sold a thousand or so 4046's to someone or other for peanuts just to clear out the basement.

Comes time time to do this X-4046 project and I discover I don't have any and had to order some from Jameco at full retail cost plus shipping!

Talk about planning for the future...

Anyway, let us know how the project goes for you,

Thomas Henry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rykhaard



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 1290
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thomas_Henry wrote:
Hey, Rykhaard,

Rykhaard wrote:
I've still got a bunch of 4046's that had no use.

You're a wiser man than me. About five years ago, I sold a thousand or so 4046's to someone or other for peanuts just to clear out the basement.

Comes time time to do this X-4046 project and I discover I don't have any and had to order some from Jameco at full retail cost plus shipping!

Talk about planning for the future...

Anyway, let us know how the project goes for you,

Thomas Henry


But Thomas! That's ALWAYS the way! Laughing Both my parents were 'collectors' of stuff that'd be 'useful some day', and so came to be I. But I've also tossed out things after years I thought I'd never use ...
- Nat. Semi. databooks
- equipment service manuals
- dead synthesizers ( doh! )
- PILES of TTL (years later, getting into the Lunetta world, heavily)
and on and on and ... Laughing

At least this time, I've kept all've the 4046's I'd ordered. (Only 25 or so ordered originally, but still ... for 1 person. Smile )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
fonik



Joined: Jun 07, 2006
Posts: 3950
Location: Germany
Audio files: 23

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

scott, it's great to see the boards was of use for you. Very Happy

Danno Gee Ray wrote:
If either of you decided to market a PCB with an accompanyaing tested chip I would buy the set.

i won't. i think magic smoke would be the right place for such a PCB/IC set!?

_________________
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: Scott Stites
Page 1 of 7 [175 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Thomas Henry designs
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use