Author |
Message |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:16 pm Post subject:
Bringing the Vocoder to life Subject description: this is the debugging / building thread for the adventurous 10+ |
 |
|
This will be your thread for exchanging information about building / optimizing / debugging.
I rely on the group to self-organize, and won't take any leading role here personally.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
The Bad Producer

Joined: Mar 08, 2009 Posts: 282 Location: The Manhole
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 3:18 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
If I may be so bold as to ask the first question!
How hard/pointless do you guys think it would be to hand-match all the caps, as opposed to getting 1%? Would this even be viable in this situation?
(I've got a fair amount of time on my hands at the moment!)
Charlie _________________ http://loudestwarning.tumblr.com/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:25 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The Bad Producer wrote: | How hard/pointless do you guys think it would be to hand-match all the caps, as opposed to getting 1%? Would this even be viable in this situation? |
Good question (I hope) - I was about to ask the same thing. I think it would be doable. Some discussions about this from last year in this post and Jürgen's answer that follows: http://electro-music.com/forum/post-301322.html#301322
What kept me from asking is that I didn't find any really good alternatives... i.e., considerably cheaper polypropylene 2%-5%-10% capacitors with both the right lead spacing (5 mm) and small enough size (max 8½ mm). Does anybody else have more luck?
(Btw, it would be bad to choose caps with more aging problems - so I asked an R&D representative at Vishay Capacitors about different tolerances vs long-term precision, and he says that higher-tolerance and lower-tolerance caps have the same long-term behaviour since their process is the same. The lower-tolerance ones are just closer to the nominal value.) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
diablojoy

Joined: Sep 07, 2008 Posts: 809 Location: melbourne australia
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:31 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
150 each of 10n + 47n to within 1% you would need to buy thousands
of each at 5% values with no guarantee of complete success i guess it depends on what value you rate your time at but cost wise probably wouldn't work out that much cheaper
you could check out rush on line capacitors presently at 0.75 GBP each for both values or 225.00 GBP + postage the price only recently went up from 0.47 doh! they also have the 10n value in polystyrene in a 'd' tolerance 0.5% at 0.75 GBP though not certain they will fit the board at 7mm x 7mm x 13 mm
cheers |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:48 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
diablojoy wrote: | 150 each of 10n + 47n to within 1% you would need to buy thousands of each at 5% values |
1% precision is not necessary - what is important is matching the 8 caps in each filter, and not changing cap value too much between adjacent filters. See my link above for a description of how matching & selection can be done. For the 144 caps you could probably buy 200 and follow the routine there.  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
diablojoy

Joined: Sep 07, 2008 Posts: 809 Location: melbourne australia
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | 1% precision is not necessary - what is important is matching the 8 caps in each filter, and not changing cap value too much between adjacent filters. |
ah yes i see my bad , i should have realised about matching the cap's firstly in groups of 8. I had completely forgotten those posts must go back over all of them again |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
decaying.sine

Joined: Aug 31, 2009 Posts: 92 Location: New Haven, CT, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 10:30 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Would there be any appreciable benefit of sorting and matching specific 1% resistors into identical ohm groups and using those in certain areas of, say, the 8 pole filters (or other places)? In other words would this improve performance? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
StephenGiles
Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 507 Location: England
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 11:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
decaying.sine wrote: | Would there be any appreciable benefit of sorting and matching specific 1% resistors into identical ohm groups and using those in certain areas of, say, the 8 pole filters (or other places)? In other words would this improve performance? |
I'm afraid I can see some divorce cases arising out of all this  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:47 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
decaying.sine wrote: | Would there be any appreciable benefit of sorting and matching specific 1% resistors into identical ohm groups and using those in certain areas of, say, the 8 pole filters (or other places)? In other words would this improve performance? |
Matching capacitors or resistors is beneficial to the limit of the precision of the other components. I.e., if the capacitors and the construction's value selection already add up to more than 1% error compared to the theoretically perfect filter, it's probably no use matching the 1% resistors.
Matching capacitors and resistors in absurdum might be beneficial only if the R & C values in the construction are perfectly chosen. I'd expect them to be a bit off from perfect though, but I guess only Jürgen can answer that.
Personally I don't think that it is worthwhile trying to achieve much more than 1% precision in the components of these filters. After all, the neighbouring filter channels are 20% apart, so a total deviation of, say, 3% is not that much. (Unless the phase angles in the transitions between channels are critical... they might or might not be.)
Speaking of the channel filters - they seem to be built from
2-pole LPF + 2-pole HPF + 2-pole LPF + 2-pole HPF.
The HPF construction looks standard, but I can't seem to quickly find this LFP construction elsewhere. Is it common? Where does it come from?
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:56 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
The design is relatively insensitive to component tolerances - that's why 1% is good enough.
That was EMS's method. Sennheiser achieved similarly steep filters with only 6 poles, but required much better component tolerances.
Synton used a similar approach - higher filter order, lower Q of individual stages.
The LPF is quite unique ineed - I've never seen it usesd othe rthan from EMS.
BTW, a single LPF stage is a resonant, 2pole, 6dB/Octave filter.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
jhaible wrote: | BTW, a single LPF stage is a resonant, 2pole, 6dB/Octave filter. |
Only 6 dB/oct, not the ordinary 12?
Increased steepness does make less difference in HPF than in LPF... but anyway... why?
PS: Can the "preliminary BOM" on http://www.jhaible.de/vocoder/living_vocoder.html be considered "official BOM" for us pre-series builders? I see that a small error has been corrected since my first download of the document, so I guess some kind of revision check has been made. It's important to know if it's alright to trust it for the component orders coming up, or if it needs to be checked for more errors before we order.  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:19 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
/mr wrote: | jhaible wrote: | BTW, a single LPF stage is a resonant, 2pole, 6dB/Octave filter. |
Only 6 dB/oct, not the ordinary 12?
Increased steepness does make less difference in HPF than in LPF... but anyway... why?
|
The resonant peak is nore important than the slopes here, as long as there are _any_ slopes. That's why they gat away whith it.
But why did they *do* it?
I thought it was obvious from the first glance on the circuit. And I think it's probably the most brilliant choice EMS made. Still no idea?
(I'll tell you, of course, but don't want to spoil the grin on your face when you find out for yourself. So?)
/mr wrote: |
PS: Can the "preliminary BOM" on http://www.jhaible.de/vocoder/living_vocoder.html be considered "official BOM" for us pre-series builders? I see that a small error has been corrected since my first download of the document, so I guess some kind of revision check has been made. It's important to know if it's alright to trust it for the component orders coming up, or if it needs to be checked for more errors before we order.  |
It's from a forum member who is also among th efirst 10. I haven't personally checked it. Consider it as the first step of the group effort.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
jhaible wrote: | /mr wrote: | jhaible wrote: | BTW, a single LPF stage is a resonant, 2pole, 6dB/Octave filter. | Only 6 dB/oct, not the ordinary 12?
Increased steepness does make less difference in HPF than in LPF... but anyway... why? | The resonant peak is nore important than the slopes here, as long as there are _any_ slopes. That's why they gat away whith it.
But why did they *do* it?
I thought it was obvious from the first glance on the circuit. And I think it's probably the most brilliant choice EMS made. Still no idea?
(I'll tell you, of course, but don't want to spoil the grin on your face when you find out for yourself. So?) |
Equal-valued capacitors?  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
decaying.sine

Joined: Aug 31, 2009 Posts: 92 Location: New Haven, CT, USA
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 12:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I got my 1% caps from Newark already. They shipped very quickly. The 47nf shipped with part blue and part gray color. Now this just upsets my delicate sensibilities.  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 12:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
/mr wrote: | jhaible wrote: | /mr wrote: | jhaible wrote: | BTW, a single LPF stage is a resonant, 2pole, 6dB/Octave filter. | Only 6 dB/oct, not the ordinary 12?
Increased steepness does make less difference in HPF than in LPF... but anyway... why? | The resonant peak is nore important than the slopes here, as long as there are _any_ slopes. That's why they gat away whith it.
But why did they *do* it?
I thought it was obvious from the first glance on the circuit. And I think it's probably the most brilliant choice EMS made. Still no idea?
(I'll tell you, of course, but don't want to spoil the grin on your face when you find out for yourself. So?) |
Equal-valued capacitors?  |
Precisely.
Q factor is set by resistors, instead of capacitors. So all caps can be equal, and bought in bulk.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 12:21 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
BTW, the Korg MS-20 HPF is just the same principle. But here you want equal resistors (for changing them equally), and thus set the Q by capacitor values. So you get a 6dB/Oct slope, but still a resonant and even self oscillating HPF.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
decaying.sine

Joined: Aug 31, 2009 Posts: 92 Location: New Haven, CT, USA
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 2:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I wanted to let folks know that I am building a bill of materials to check against Oscar's BOM. I believe that I saw Jürgen post that this would be a good idea. I am almost done at this point. I'll also work on mouser order codes (or other sources) for the parts as well. This would probably only work for United States builders.
I started typing out all the parts from the schematics and quickly fell asleep. Then I opened up the PDF's and copy every bit of text, pasted it into a text document, and then just adjusted the spaces with tab delimits. It takes about 3 minutes per schematic (about 27 of them if I recall). I am sure everyone else already had this figured out long ago, but it was a moment for me! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
The Bad Producer

Joined: Mar 08, 2009 Posts: 282 Location: The Manhole
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 3:52 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Nice one decaying.sine, seeing as you've done the hard work I'd be up for translating your BOM into a UK friendly one with parts number from Rapid/RS/Farnell etc...
Charlie
(not sure whereabouts all ten peeps are based, I'm in UK) _________________ http://loudestwarning.tumblr.com/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
decaying.sine

Joined: Aug 31, 2009 Posts: 92 Location: New Haven, CT, USA
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 7:39 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
This may have been mentioned before but I'll post anyways. I apologize if it has already been reported. These duplicate resistor identifiers came up when making my BOM to compare to Oscar's work.
The duplicates...
Synthesis Amp, Compander, Noise, and S-Generator Schematic
R2663 1k
R2663 1k
Synthesis Amp, Compander, Noise, and S-Generator Schematic
R2634 10R
R2634 100K
Slew Freeze Schematic
R2521 10k
R2521 27k
Silence Bridging Filterbank Control Schematic
U2402 is CD4016 on schematic. On Oscar's BOM there is a CD4066 but no CD4016. They're both Quad Bilateral Switches so either is okay, but 4066 better for audio switching? This may have been addressed earlier, if so, nothing to see here  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
4016 and 4066 will both work. They are used as switches (B, D) and as Inverter (A) and Schmitt trigger (C) in the AR envelope generator of the Silence Bridging.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
JoeMorris
Joined: Apr 26, 2009 Posts: 161 Location: Brighton
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 4:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | Nice one decaying.sine, seeing as you've done the hard work I'd be up for translating your BOM into a UK friendly one with parts number from Rapid/RS/Farnell etc...
Charlie
(not sure whereabouts all ten peeps are based, I'm in UK)
_________________ |
I often find mouser UK cheaper than farnell if you're ordering enough to get free shipping... (takes a couple of days longer of course) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
The Bad Producer

Joined: Mar 08, 2009 Posts: 282 Location: The Manhole
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:19 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
JoeMorris wrote: |
I often find mouser UK cheaper than farnell if you're ordering enough to get free shipping... (takes a couple of days longer of course) |
Cool, I'll have to look into that, thanks! _________________ http://loudestwarning.tumblr.com/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
JoeMorris
Joined: Apr 26, 2009 Posts: 161 Location: Brighton
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:22 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
prefer the usability of their website to farnell's too... (auto-BOM import etc..) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
JoeMorris wrote: | prefer the usability of their website to farnell's too... (auto-BOM import etc..) |
Both have their pros and cons. Farnell's shopping cart have seemed generally less cooperative and less stable for me during the years, sometimes throwing it all away after deciding my session was over, etc. On the other hand, Farnell's product filtering parameters include Lead Spacing for capacitors, whereas Mouser's for some reason don't... I found this to be an unexpectedly important comfortability matter in this big vocoder project.
Speaking of Farnell, a couple of years ago they offered resistors in high-volume pricing even if the resistance values were different. I.e., if I ordered 10 pc each of 50 different values, I got them for the 500pc price. Very nice! I don't see that feature any more... does anybody else offer this kind of pricing? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
decaying.sine

Joined: Aug 31, 2009 Posts: 92 Location: New Haven, CT, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I have all the resistors done for the BOM Mouser order. I included an extra column that recommends buying the number of pieces specified for the project or the next available price break--depending on the one that is cheaper. As you might guess sometimes it is cheaper to buy at the next available price break than the actual amount that you need.
I am working on caps now, but I'll wait and post everything together.
Also, my BOM of materials is identical to Oscar's original BOM. However, I am not 100% done checking yet. My suspicion is that his is accurate and it also has lead spacing for caps and that is awesome! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|