| Author |
Message |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2672 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
It would undoubtedly be possible to make a real instrument like this, using the latest silicon technology.
This may be one of the few situations where playing the virtual instrument in front of an audience, is less embarrassing than playing the real thing. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
phoenix

Joined: Dec 09, 2005 Posts: 33 Location: munich, germany
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
For those who are still as enthusiastic about this topic as me, I write an abstract of the previous postings:
I will distinguish between hardware and software postings.
Robotic hardware:
drjustice: fully servoed glove. Glove at the end of a telemanipulator. force and damping at each finger joint. Force if you touch something in a virtual environment.
mosc: interactive sound sculptures (robots with non-human look)
sequencer steering with buchla lightnin system
g2ian: use nextgen materials like silicon for robots
kkissinger: robots reacting/dancing to music.
synths reacting dynamically to man's input
Haptic Software:
phoenix: virtual haptic models of instruments- resonance, destroyable. Like Mp3 psychophysically adapted to the human. Haptic Feedback.
opg: many many virtual control knobs
elektro80: GUI-tactility. 1 EG per finger.
bachus: virtual keyboard with morphing haptic representation _________________ www.myspace.com/birdflame
talk to me per skype: electrobias
(My real name is Tobias  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
phoenix

Joined: Dec 09, 2005 Posts: 33 Location: munich, germany
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:28 am Post subject:
Re: F vs. E and robot musings |
 |
|
| kkissinger wrote: |
I have always been pretty hardware oriented however the potential of software synths is staggering. I can envision a software synth with "smart" modules that can contain rules -- etc -- to respond to whatever I am doing -- say on a keyboard or on one of my Theremins.
Do such software synths exist now?
|
This sounds pretty much like what the Karma-technology of steven kay does. _________________ www.myspace.com/birdflame
talk to me per skype: electrobias
(My real name is Tobias  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
opg

Joined: Mar 29, 2004 Posts: 954 Location: Berkeley, CA, US
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Why do I have this weird feeling that if/when this technology is in use, it would be lots of fun but REALLY BORING to the average audience? _________________ One Player Game | OPG on SoundCloud |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| opg wrote: | | Why do I have this weird feeling that if/when this technology is in use, it would be lots of fun but REALLY BORING to the average audience? |
It seems to me that much of this would enhance the creation and performance of music. How would that bore the audience? _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
opg

Joined: Mar 29, 2004 Posts: 954 Location: Berkeley, CA, US
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| bachus wrote: | | It seems to me that much of this would enhance the creation and performance of music. How would that bore the audience? |
New technology is often used in the wrong or exaggerated ways at first. In this case, however, it focuses on having so many options available to you all at once that you may not know where to start. This may cause some artists to fall back on what they are familiar with - older sequencer and synth arrangements. Would this technology appeal to DJs who know a Akai MPC or Roland SH-32 inside and out? There would be a big learning curve for them. On the other side, experimental electronic artists may focus too much on being able to control so many things at once that they would end up with a "wall of sound." Although this "wall of sound" would excite the artist, I feel like it would overwhelm the audience such that they would not be able to focus on all of the many, many changes that were happening at once.
I'm trying to think of an electronic music subgenre that was/is similar to this. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see it happen...  _________________ One Player Game | OPG on SoundCloud |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
phoenix

Joined: Dec 09, 2005 Posts: 33 Location: munich, germany
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| opg wrote: | | bachus wrote: | | It seems to me that much of this would enhance the creation and performance of music. How would that bore the audience? |
New technology is often used in the wrong or exaggerated ways at first. In this case, however, it focuses on having so many options available to you all at once that you may not know where to start. |
I think the most important question is: Which innovation would help you to make the music that you can not make yet?
Or maybe: Why are you making music? Is it an act of communication? Or is it an act of self-realization? Everyone has a different answer to questions like these, but I think ANY technology that prevents an answer is not worth developing. Eventually, I am doing this for me and you. _________________ www.myspace.com/birdflame
talk to me per skype: electrobias
(My real name is Tobias  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator

Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 7:12 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
How about something which can read brainwaves, and then use these signals to feed a neural net which over time would learn to interpret the responses you were having to the sounds it made out of them?
You hear a sound
Which elicits a response
Which the net associates with the sound
And converts into an algorithm
Which can evolve other algorithms
And are used to make a new sound
Repeat
Probably using a number of channels at the same time would ramp up the complexity pretty quickly. Even just used as a mixing aid, would mean anyone could think their own mix of any track in real time. _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
phoenix

Joined: Dec 09, 2005 Posts: 33 Location: munich, germany
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| bachus wrote: |
But I might be affraid to use it.  |
Me too  _________________ www.myspace.com/birdflame
talk to me per skype: electrobias
(My real name is Tobias  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:49 pm Post subject:
Re: Robot tech in Future Instruments Subject description: Let us discuss how robot technology could change the way we make music |
 |
|
| phoenix wrote: |
How will your personal virtual Instrument feel like? Or: Think about the way you program your synth. What would help you in playing your patches, which do not yet have a body? It is all virtual! Would you reprogram your beloved synths or would you try out totally new designs? |
If you take this kind of augmented reality:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oHkUOpYNhoM
And then add to that the kind of haptic, immersive interaction you're talking about, that'll make me one happy synthesist!
I would love to go into my studio, switch on my workbench and then spawn any synth I feel like, playing it and tweaking the knobs with realtime feedback. Maybe I could patch in unusual modulators - why limit myself to white or pink noise when I can patch in the traffic flow on the M1 or how many people have googled the word 'gazebo' that day?
Hell, I'd love to perhaps pull synths apart, bung the filter from a 2600 onto an OSCar and then play it via a Stylophone panel. Perhaps I'll stretch the panel so it's ten feet long and I can tap dance on it, Homer-style?
I really hope the whole field of augmented reality takes off in the next few years. The mass applications will be very profitable: just think how immersive GTA Ten will be with the kind of feedback these technologies will provide.
Beyond that, I think we'll bypass all our existing sensory apparatus and just pass synthesised reality direct into our brains. But that's a way off yet, from what I'm reading.
And then, after that, The Singularity and, *finally*, I shall own every synth ever and every synth that could ever be...  _________________ My music: here! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
destroyifyer

Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: Babylon
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Uncle Krunkus writes,
| Quote: | | How about something which can read brainwaves,... |
Uncle Krunkus, in all respects, I oppose brianwave music technology, and like devices, for several reasons. First, as a good friend once said about the brain recorder, "That would take all the fun out of making music...", and it really would. In my mind, it's a goofy concept, really. A brain sound kontroller, I suppose it would be neat; But, come on, that's an undertaking for a mad scientist as opposed to a musician. How lazy can you be...if you ask me, the silent symphony of the mind is a personal experience...certainly limited to psychic listeners. Seccond, any serious effort put into making such a device would only support the development of mind-scanning type things, which, could ultimately be the end of freedom of thought...which, if you ask me, would be worse than losing freedom of speech.
So if anyone ever develops such a device, I'll be happy to erase thier memory and burn thier research for the sake of mankind. Forbidden knowledge! Burn brainwave instrument proposers at the stake! Down with brainwave technology! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| destroyifyer wrote: | | So if anyone ever develops such a device, I'll be happy to erase thier memory and burn thier research for the sake of mankind. Forbidden knowledge! Burn brainwave instrument proposers at the stake! Down with brainwave technology! |
Violents is the first resort of the incompetent.
Or was it Violins  _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
destroyifyer

Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: Babylon
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I feel greatly insulted. Fine then! I hereby declare war on la-la land! Snipers, take out thier unicorn leigons! Bombers, napalm thier fields of psychadelic flowers! Impale the gnomes! Enslave the mermaids...Poison the crystal river! Turn the talking clouds to smog...Take King Bachus prisoner, and bring him to Isengard. Off with his head! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
destroyifyer

Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: Babylon
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Jyoti writes:
| Quote: | | Hell, I'd love to perhaps pull synths apart, bung the filter from a 2600 onto an OSCar and then play it via a Stylophone panel. |
Hey, you might really like this thing-The Arturia Origin... I haven't heard anyone talk about it ever, I just kind of stumbled upon it. It's kind of like what you're talking about...not virtual reality, of course. But like, you can pull the filter off a 2600 and use moog oscillators or whatever (they got a few videos of it under the media section)... It looks pretty neat...pretty expensive but certainly not as much as a V.R. setup would be. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator

Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| destroyifyer wrote: | | But, come on, that's an undertaking for a mad scientist as opposed to a musician. |
I would be the first to admit that I am a lot more of a mad scientist than I am a musician!
Anyway, what's so wrong with a little bit of brain deconstruction? Maybe a spot of home surgery even?! Have we not tired of the shackles imposed by these pathetic biological shells in which we live? Bring on the reign of the machines!
And on the subject of brainscanning thingies, if anyone is actually interested in what is going on inside my head,........well,..... that's their problem, not mine!  _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18260 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 228
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:51 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| destroyifyer wrote: | | Off with his head! |
I assume you are being funny. I don't get it. Images of violence, even in jest, aren't appropriate on electro-music.com. When you write it and we read it then we think it. What a drag.
 _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| bachus wrote: |
Or was it Violins  |
Nope, it´s supposed to be claymores.. at least according to the manual. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
destroyifyer

Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Posts: 425 Location: Babylon
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:46 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I wrote:
| Quote: | | Off with his head! |
Mosc wrote:
I won't complain, or appologize, but will defend my little jokes--
I'm used to saying whatever I want, even if it gets me in trouble. I wish everyone had my kind of arrogant freedom...I wouldn't trade that for any set of mannors. I do acknowledge that there are those with more sensitive minds than me. I can't expect everyone to be as savage as me...if that was the case we would be fighting WW4 right now. I just felt a little cornered, between 'incompetent' and 'inappropriate', and it's a shame I occupied La La land and brought about it's ruin.
No hard feelings, Mosc, I think highly of everyone here. You know, I'm glad you said something. This is my favorite site, I don't want to piss anyone off, with E.M. right around the corner and what-not.
From, Kyle |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18260 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 228
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
No hard feelings, of course.
I'm very much looking forward to meeting you in Kingsport. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
How about a robotic glove that teaches me to play the guitar? I've just started learning and like most beginners I'm having trouble fingering the frets properly. Not that I've practiced until my fingers bled or anything, but I was thinking that a haptic glove that actually pushed on my fingers to guide them to the proper position on the fretboard would be a great teaching device. It wouldn't have to push that hard, just provide some guidance. _________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
It´s all about concepts and culture.
I´m expecting that one major future advance is fuzzy parameter assignment to gesture controlled objects. There are many uses, but since we are talking synthesis ( or whatever ) then imagine shaping envelopes in the air.. using your hands.. and then assign say filter/spectral/waveform controls to event states on the envelope shape. OK, this sounds like Hollywood doing its magic on Philip K. Dick´s The Minority Report or something of the sort. Still, gesture control and the whole VR thing will see daylight one day. I´m guessing that the most obvious early mainstream application would be for making music. We do have prototypes running this shit that kinda do this already, but what we want to see are mass market products. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:54 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| elektro80 wrote: | | Still, gesture control and the whole VR thing will see daylight one day. I´m guessing that the most obvious early mainstream application would be for making music. We do have prototypes running this shit that kinda do this already, but what we want to see are mass market products. |
I feel that my Guitar Mouse project (that's a new name I just thought up for it) fits that bill, but in a very simple, today-technology way. Certainly not futureware as is being discussed in this thread.
You mention gestures. With the Guitar Mouse you knock on the guitar like knocking on someone's front door as a gesture that can represent whatever you want. Also the software should be able to recognize certain sweeps of the guitar as being gestures. These gestures can be made to command things like menus. I had not thought about drawing a spectrum with the guitar, but that's certainly a possibility.
Alas, it may be months before I can build the thing, but it will hopefully be really cool when I get there. _________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| destroyifyer wrote: | | Hey, you might really like this thing-The Arturia Origin... I haven't heard anyone talk about it ever, I just kind of stumbled upon it. It's kind of like what you're talking about...not virtual reality, of course. But like, you can pull the filter off a 2600 and use moog oscillators or whatever (they got a few videos of it under the media section)... It looks pretty neat...pretty expensive but certainly not as much as a V.R. setup would be. |
Yeah, I want that but...
totally virtual.
And the moon on a stick, while I'm at it.  _________________ My music: here! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|