| Author |
Message |
Derek Cook

Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 171 Location: Wales, UK
G2 patch files: 3
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
First you need to download the "Generic Total Recall Component", which provides an editor for your own scripts. It comes with some examples.
http://www.studioconnections.org/download/index.html
I'll attach my Nord scripts tonight, now I'm at the office  _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gomidas

Joined: Jul 09, 2004 Posts: 365 Location: La Ciotat, France
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 6
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:13 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| dorremifasol wrote: | First you need to download the "Generic Total Recall Component", which provides an editor for your own scripts. It comes with some examples.
http://www.studioconnections.org/download/index.html
I'll attach my Nord scripts tonight, now I'm at the office  |
Ohhhh! I would LOVE to try that...Thanks for the link  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:26 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi Albert,
A Bit OT but I see you have a 01X, fancy buying a backup one and maybe an I88X?
Andy |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:30 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi Andy,
I have both the 01X and i88x, and while I like them very much I don't have space in my room for another two.
Besides, I have also thought about selling them to have more space. but mLan is so powerful that I haven't found anything that could replace it. _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ok, thats a shame, mine need a good home to go to.
I loved mLan on XP as well but they never got it working properly on the mac, so when I moved ship I stopped using them.
Not many people seem to want these units now which is a shame as they where pretty good bits of Kit let down by bad drivers.
Cheers
Andy |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
buzzr
Joined: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 360 Location: portland
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
NAMM 2008? Maybe a new Nord Modular?
Small like the Micro Modular with 10 times the DSP )))
I'm waiting. Guess I'll be waiting forever...
Time to patch some more.. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Too late now, I moved over to RME and Focusrite for audio and a MC Control for DAW control.
The main problem was graphic patchbay didn't work so you had to connect it to XP in order to change things.
I will probably keep them, the 01X makes a good little mixer for live use and if I ever see a cheap IU88X you can link two of them via mlan to send the audio out by adat, why they never implemented audio to adat in a single I88X I don't know!
Cheers
Andy |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Derek Cook

Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 171 Location: Wales, UK
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| dorremifasol wrote: | Here are my GTRC devices for Studio Manager, including the Nord Rack 2X, Nord Rack 3, Nord Modular G2 and Waldorf Blofeld.
In order to finish the data transfer in the G2 component when receiving, you must press any key on the keyboard controller. That's because its SYSEX messages don't have a fixed length, so you have to end them that way.
May they be useful to someone. |
Many thanks, I'll look into it sometime! _________________ Regards
Derek Cook
www.echoes-music.co.uk
www.purefloyd.co.uk
www.carregddu.co.uk
www.xfactory-librarians.co.uk
www.ex5tech.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
CaptainPoopface

Joined: Dec 09, 2007 Posts: 13 Location: Bentonville
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:47 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I have dabbled in Reaktor and Max/MSP and essentially agree with what has already been said. They are more versatile and powerful, but I seem to spend much more time figuring out my bugs and glitches. Very often, I fall into the trap of getting bogged down in the dry details and losing focus on the musical / creative aspect. While this is probably a foible we all have, Max and Reaktor definitely exacerbate it for me.
That is why the G2 is more rewarding to work with. You can develop a prototype for an idea rapidly compared to other platforms. Of course, that might be due to my lack of experience, but other people seem to echo this sentiment.
I sorely wish the G2 could handle audio sampling and looping without our elaborate workarounds, but it's still my desert island box, because I think it's the best balance I've found between allowing tremendous technical freedom while not getting in the way of making music. And essentially all I do with the G2 is audio effects and MIDI processing! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dasz

Joined: Oct 16, 2004 Posts: 1644 Location: victoria, canada
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 56
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | That is why the G2 is more rewarding to work with. You can develop a prototype for an idea rapidly compared to other platforms. Of course, that might be due to my lack of experience, but other people seem to echo this sentiment. |
I totally agree with this.... and the sound quality out of the box is sweet (I forgot how nice it is, since I've been using nords for so long now).
/Dasz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Derek Cook

Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 171 Location: Wales, UK
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| dasz wrote: | | Quote: | | That is why the G2 is more rewarding to work with. You can develop a prototype for an idea rapidly compared to other platforms. Of course, that might be due to my lack of experience, but other people seem to echo this sentiment. |
I totally agree with this.... and the sound quality out of the box is sweet (I forgot how nice it is, since I've been using nords for so long now).
/Dasz |
It sure is a lovely box, and it will be in my rig for years to come unless Nord bring out something that seriously replaces it, which to me would be a combination of the Nord G2 and the Nord Wave. I love the sound of the G2. _________________ Regards
Derek Cook
www.echoes-music.co.uk
www.purefloyd.co.uk
www.carregddu.co.uk
www.xfactory-librarians.co.uk
www.ex5tech.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
purusha
Joined: Mar 13, 2008 Posts: 131 Location: Ilkley
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I absolutely love my G2 (which I bought 2nd hand from someone on this forum).
It's become a main-stay in my setup, both live and studio.
The flexibility is just phenomenal.
So long as I continue to have a way to edit patches, I'll continue to use it.
I do wish Clavia would get the official Vista editor out the door though! _________________ OVNI Soundcloud Purusha Soundcloud |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
2 Years ago i turned away from using Computers to make music.
so i also turned away from my G2 engine, and i got deeper and deeper into hardware modular.
Last week i built a Doepfer midi controller ( + input output modul ) which is placed in my Modularsynth, it's mainly built for my engine.
2 Days ago i used it the first time with my engine:
My Engine will get now its second live, now as a FX unit for my Hardware modular.
and i'm amazed.................big cinema the engine as a FX unit.
If i could afford it, i would get immediately a G2 Keyboard.
@Tim
very interesting post, thanks |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Eag
Joined: Feb 14, 2007 Posts: 40 Location: Central Pennsylvania
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ever since it first started looking like the G2 was being discontinued, I've been thinking on and off about exactly what Mosc's asking here - roughly speaking "I love the G2, but someday, it'll be impractical to keep using. What then?"
I'm nowhere near as good at synthesis as most of the people here, but I use my G2 extensively in live contexts, and can't imagine going back to a more limited patching environment, after the G2.
Like everyone else, I plan on using my G2X until the sad day it finally dies - it's just an amazing keyboard, with immense patching flexibility, and great real-time control.
However, at least from what I've seen of the current market, finding a good replacement for my G2 will take quite a lot of thinking and planning, so I've started pondering it a bit now.
| Antimon wrote: | | A daydream project I have is to make a NM imitation in software, where the sound engine is implemented separately (maybe in ChucK) from the editor/live interface, the two parts communicating with OSC in such a way that, should hardware controllers supporting OSC start to appear, they should be able to tap into this existing interface/sound engine protocol. |
This is something I've been thinking about too - it'll be a while (if ever) before I start implementing anything to do the job, but I have been thinking about design and a theoretical featureset for something along these lines every once in a while.
It seems to me that if someone actually tackled this project, a plugin architecture for the sound engine would be a good thing - rather than hardcoding it to use just ChucK, try to make it open-ended, so that by just writing the right interface code, other sound engines could be plugged in (SuperCollider, maybe, or CSound, or something no one's written yet. Maybe even a G2 patch rendering engine, once the patch format's decoded enough), and then write the plugin for the one you're planning to use (in this example, ChucK).
What I'm envisioning is really a general modular synthesis UI, I think, probably deciding what modules are available to you based on what the current sound engine's plugin says is available - when you're happy with your patch, grab a copy of the final version, put it on your rackmount computer with appropriate musical interface (OSC, MIDI, etc), and treat the rackmounted computer like a G2 engine.
The one thing I'd really be missing there for what I do is the G2 keyboard's hardware UI. Parameter pages are great, and I haven't stumbled across any pure MIDI controllers that do them quite like the G2. Maybe I just haven't seen them, though - I've never really looked hard at all, and I don't really follow the new gear scene.
I guess those are my thoughts, currently. Will I ever actually do any of that?
Probably not - I'll just hope someone else does the hard work before my G2 dies...
-Nate _________________ "Anything you say can and will be used against you. We probably won't wait for a court of law to do it." |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
NoiseLab

Joined: Mar 02, 2005 Posts: 68 Location: Zandvoort, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:17 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Blue Hell wrote: | | xav wrote: | | I would like it to be quicker [...] |
I agree that there is room for improvement on all of the points you mentioned.
[The DSPs used are basically 10 years old and not very sophisticated compared to the thing thing that calculates the average PC ... the Capybara uses the same chips, basically ... maybe we would need better ones these days.] |
Quote from Matrixsynth:
"New Kyma Pacarana?
via sequencer.de:
"There will be two new products: the Pacarana and the Paca sound computation engines. Both the Pacarana and the Paca are named for animals smaller than the Capybara and either can serve as a smaller-yet-more-powerful replacement for the Capybara-320 in a Kyma sound design workstation. Each of these new platforms connects to your computer via FireWire 800 (we can supply an 800-400 cable if your computer has a FW 400 port). The new devices use external FireWire or USB audio converters and they can also use the Capybara-320 converters through the Flame FireWire interface.
Kyma X continues to work exactly as before.
Millimeters Inches
Pacarana 357 X 249 X 45 14 X 10 X 1.77
Paca 281 X 249 X 45 11 X 10 X 1.77
Capabilities
The flagship Pacarana is 50% more powerful than a fully-loaded Capybara-320 for far less than half the price. The entry-level Paca is $500 less than the price of a Basic Capybara-320, but the Paca is 5 times more powerful. The new machines are more compact and do not require expansion cards.
Summary
The Paca and Pacarana sound engines provide more computing power in a smaller package for less money. Pacas and Pacaranas are easier to take on stage for live performances, to bring along on tours, to move from your personal studio to a sound stage, to transport between work and home or to move from one studio to another.
What’s next
We are currently accepting orders for the new machines and will begin shipping on December 1st. (If you were to decide to place an order in advance, we would not charge your credit card until the day we actually ship the system to you. Ordering in advance is simply a way to reserve a system and to reserve an early position in the queue)."
There is no news of Pacarana on Symbolic Sound's website as of this post." _________________ http://www.myspace.com/noiselab56309 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24549 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 301
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:19 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| NoiseLab wrote: | | "New Kyma Pacarana? |
That looks like great news! _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Gotta love Symbolic Sound. Still here after all those years, and everyone who's dealt with them raves about their customer service.
The first time I heard about the Nord Modular (G1), a couple of guys were going with the Nord over the Kyma despite the reduced feature set (esp. regarding sampling), because of the Nord offered knobs and other hardware UI niceties.
I think its a safe bet Symbolic Sound will get something out before Sonic Core does, and it will be more stable to boot. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
cebec

Joined: Apr 19, 2004 Posts: 1100 Location: Virginia
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I am extremely excited about the new Kyma hardware. I sold my 320 system last year to finance some other things and have been waiting and hoping for a successor ever since. Seems like that news was leaked, though, and pulled in the meantime while we wait for the formal launch. The new pricing structure / performance ratio sounds promising, too! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18272 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 232
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:57 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Good posts...
That Symbolic Sound new hardware does indeed look very exciting. I have a Kyma system. IMHO, the Kyma software will resonate with very many NM patchers though, from an ease-of-use perspective.
A NM emulator that compiled code for a Symbolic Sound engine would be pretty cool though, and quite within the technical capabilities of our members. The Kyma system is very open, so there would be no need to reverse engineer the Kyma. But, unfortunately the Kyma software is hardware dependent.
So, I think the first goal should be to make a G2-like patching environment whose target is the general purpose computer. Preferably the NM would compile VST instruments, so they can be integrated in a nice performance environment. Then, maybe it could be ported to other hardware platforms.
Update on my experiments:
I've been kicking the tires on Ableton Live 7 for over a month now and I'm in love with that program. I'm planning on writing up my thoughts about Live in the near future.
Also, SynthMaker is quite nice - understatement. A G2 like interface could be built using SM. IMHO, SM is appropriate for a G2 patcher, but SM is much more flexible. For example, it has wave table and sample capability. You can do sample accurate DSP and write code directly, even in assembler if you really want. There is a code module, with IOs like any module. Like the G2, SM has poly/mono modes to conserve resources, but SM lets you set POLY/MONO mode on any module in a patch. This is better than the G2's POLY/MONO areas, IMHO.
I don't know how exactly one could do it, but it might be possible to take the G2 patch files and convert them to a SM synth. Just a thought.  _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:42 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I must admit when I looked at Synthmaker I was very impressed, the user interface is very good.
It's just a shame they haven't got a mac version, if they did I would buy it straight away.
Andy |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dasz

Joined: Oct 16, 2004 Posts: 1644 Location: victoria, canada
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 56
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
mosc, what a great idea. thanks for making me think about something different than the G2 ...
I'm off performing tonight!!! There will be a recording and video if things go well...
/Dasz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|