Author |
Message |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:16 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
From what I read on this thread, it has a subset of the VG-99's features, and the synth engine is a fairly limited sample player.
It could certainly be a solution to guitarists who want a simple and small all-in-one synth box. I guess the main key to its success is how much better the MIDI tracking would be - to me this is a nonissue as I also play keyboards. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:35 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I read somewhere that the synth control is meant to be more advanced than the VG, more parameters are meant to be extracted from the strings, rather like the string port.
Also midi tracking is meant to be 3 times quicker than the GR20/VG99, faster than an axon apparently.
I will definitely go to a shop and have a play.
What I would prefer though is the new technology as a firmware update to the VG99! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
DrJustice

Joined: Sep 13, 2004 Posts: 2114 Location: Morokulien
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
BobTheDog wrote: | ...What I would prefer though is the new technology as a firmware update to the VG99! |
Roland had an upgrade planned. They were even taking feature requests for a while. I don't know what to expect. Dare we hope that they have held it off to include some of the GR55 feaures...
DJ
-- |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Not sure what you mean by the vg99 not having synths?
http://www.rolandconnect.com/product.php?p=gr-55
Lightning-Fast Tracking
Thanks to Roland’s decades of research and dedication to guitar synthesizers and powerful new pitch detection technology, the GR-55 is far and away the fastest guitar synth ever. Furthermore, the COSM guitar-modeling engine needs zero detection time, allowing the GR-55 to respond instantly and exactly as you play. The GR-55 detects pitch, velocity, and behavior for unprecedented response to your performance. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:28 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
BobTheDog wrote: | Not sure what you mean by the vg99 not having synths?
|
As stated earlier, I mean that the VG-99 does not have rompler engine.
The GR-55's synth parameters that you're interested in apply to it's onboard rompler. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
http://media.rolandus.com/manuals/GR-55_OM.pdf
I think I see what you mean now.
I thought the gr55 was a proper guitar synth, like the vg99. Where really it is just a midi converter with a midi synth in it.
Well that has saved me some money! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Now you have put me right about what it is my interest has dropped
I am on the edge of getting a StringPort though now you can get at the AIM data via OSC it is beginning to look like a nice tool, a bit pricey though! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
All the StringPort demos sound pretty bad to me!
They should have employed a better guitar player thats for sure.
I must admit I would not go for the software package, just the unit with the MIDI/AIM software. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ReaktorFreak
Joined: Sep 28, 2007 Posts: 65 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 4:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
it's very surprising that roland came back to guitar synths (and with some revolutionary improvement )
too bad there's still no video yet demonstrating how good (or bad) the MIDI out is. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jksuperstar

Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:40 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I thought the string port was more or less a glorified audio interface, that came with some MAX/MSP software to do break out all the info regarding the strings (envelopes, pitch, etc). So, it'd inherently have many milliseconds of delay for USB/Audio buffering, compared to other units like the Axon that start sending MIDI data as early as 2ms after the initial pluck. Am I wrong on that?
I have an Axon50, and am really impressed by the tracking it provides for my 5 string bass. Even low-B gives me no problem at all. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ReaktorFreak
Joined: Sep 28, 2007 Posts: 65 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 3:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
BobTheDog wrote: | All the StringPort demos sound pretty bad to me!
They should have employed a better guitar player thats for sure.
I must admit I would not go for the software package, just the unit with the MIDI/AIM software. |
how good is the MIDI out from the stringport actually (latency / glitch free / response / correctly interprets the playing style, etc.) ?
jksuperstar wrote: | I thought the string port was more or less a glorified audio interface, that came with some MAX/MSP software to do break out all the info regarding the strings (envelopes, pitch, etc). So, it'd inherently have many milliseconds of delay for USB/Audio buffering, compared to other units like the Axon that start sending MIDI data as early as 2ms after the initial pluck. Am I wrong on that?
I have an Axon50, and am really impressed by the tracking it provides for my 5 string bass. Even low-B gives me no problem at all. |
if i understand correctly about stringport, its 'internal' synths doesn't need MIDI data, and that gives speed advantage, just like in those analog pre-MIDI guitar synths...while in PCM guitar synths, although it's not exactly MIDI for the internal synths, it does need MIDI-like data...and the conversion to MIDI or MIDI-like data is the annoying cause for latencies / glitches etc . |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
stevenclements

Joined: Nov 16, 2005 Posts: 74 Location: Edmonton, Alberta
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
ReaktorFreak wrote: | it's very surprising that roland came back to guitar synths (and with some revolutionary improvement )
too bad there's still no video yet demonstrating how good (or bad) the MIDI out is. |
Thanks to Wayne... No video yet but
GR-55 Internal: 20.31 milliseconds.
GR-55 External: 19.01 milliseconds.
http://www.joness.com/gr300/MIDI_SPEED.htm
MC-1: 33.62 milliseconds.
GR-700 V1.4 with G-707: 29.87 milliseconds.
GR-700 Turbo V1.5 with GK-3: 28.54 milliseconds.
Korg Z3: 20.11 milliseconds.
GR-300: 3.32 milliseconds.
GI-20 GK-2A with Parker NiteFly: 15.96 milliseconds.
GI-10 GK-2A with Parker NiteFly: 18.58 milliseconds.
GM-70 with G-707: 40.39 milliseconds.
GM-70 with G-77: 45.64 milliseconds.
GI-20 with BX-13-VX + G-77: 39.54 milliseconds.
GR-33B with G-77: 13.00 milliseconds.
VB-99 with BX-13-VX + G-77 GR-300 Sim : 14.40 milliseconds.
VB-99 with BX-13-VX + G-77 Music Man: 3.76 milliseconds.
VG-88 (Polyphonic Pitch Transpose): 7.34 milliseconds. _________________ http://soundcloud.com/pilfermusic
http://www.gearjunkies-userstudios.com/studio.php?stid=221
life is a treasure... dig it! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:08 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
jksuperstar wrote: | I thought the string port was more or less a glorified audio interface, that came with some MAX/MSP software to do break out all the info regarding the strings (envelopes, pitch, etc). So, it'd inherently have many milliseconds of delay for USB/Audio buffering, compared to other units like the Axon that start sending MIDI data as early as 2ms after the initial pluck. Am I wrong on that?
I have an Axon50, and am really impressed by the tracking it provides for my 5 string bass. Even low-B gives me no problem at all. |
Apparently the USB interface is very quick and based on their own technology in some way.
The unit outputs OSC packages over USB, the max stuff converts to midi.
The OSC stuff looks interesting. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:10 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
stevenclements wrote: | ReaktorFreak wrote: | it's very surprising that roland came back to guitar synths (and with some revolutionary improvement )
too bad there's still no video yet demonstrating how good (or bad) the MIDI out is. |
Thanks to Wayne... No video yet but
GR-55 Internal: 20.31 milliseconds.
GR-55 External: 19.01 milliseconds.
http://www.joness.com/gr300/MIDI_SPEED.htm
MC-1: 33.62 milliseconds.
GR-700 V1.4 with G-707: 29.87 milliseconds.
GR-700 Turbo V1.5 with GK-3: 28.54 milliseconds.
Korg Z3: 20.11 milliseconds.
GR-300: 3.32 milliseconds.
GI-20 GK-2A with Parker NiteFly: 15.96 milliseconds.
GI-10 GK-2A with Parker NiteFly: 18.58 milliseconds.
GM-70 with G-707: 40.39 milliseconds.
GM-70 with G-77: 45.64 milliseconds.
GI-20 with BX-13-VX + G-77: 39.54 milliseconds.
GR-33B with G-77: 13.00 milliseconds.
VB-99 with BX-13-VX + G-77 GR-300 Sim : 14.40 milliseconds.
VB-99 with BX-13-VX + G-77 Music Man: 3.76 milliseconds.
VG-88 (Polyphonic Pitch Transpose): 7.34 milliseconds. |
So much for the GR55 being fast! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:58 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The GR-55's external MIDI output is actually faster than it's internal synth???
I've read some claims elsewhere from new GR-55 owners that the 55 is just as fast as Axon converters. Then again, there are no Axon numbers on Wayne's site. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
alancarl
Joined: May 03, 2011 Posts: 4 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:52 pm Post subject:
Stringport AIM OSC |
 |
|
Hey BobTheDog and other canines,
I made 5 demo videos for the Stringport Suite. The response of the system is good. I want to get a hold of a gr55 to compare triggering and latencies.... So much cool gear to play with these days eh?
Anyway, here is a link to my videos to get a better idea of what SP can do.
http://www.keithmcmillen.com/stringport/overview
I totally agree with you that the AIM protocol is much better suited for stringed instrument data than MIDI can ever hope to be and OSC is also exciting as well!
Enjoy,
Al |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:45 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi Al,
Nice demos!
Now I want one.
Cheers
Andy |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Oh and I would not bother getting the GR55, I have one here and it is not too great.
Issues:
1. Only really useable with GK pickups, piezos just do not work well.
2. Noisy audio. It creates loads of hiss on all outputs even with no guitar connected.
3. Low E string tracks very badly
4. Doesn't track anywhere near as well as the Axons.
5. Internal synth sounds are not that good
6. Very little setup options on the midi out.
Overall the midi out is slightly better than the VG99 but no where near as good as the axons. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
BobTheDog wrote: | Hi Al,
Nice demos!
Now I want one.
Cheers
Andy |
So good in fact I ordered one, well it is my birthday soon  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jksuperstar

Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
So, did you get the Full Suite, or "MIDI OUT"? I wonder what is the big difference between the two, as the website descriptions don't differ. I was curious if the Suite comes with Synful Orchestra or something, while "MIDI out" comes with the standard Keith McMillen software (Analysis, VST rack, processing, notation, etc).
Please, review! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I went for the full version, they kindly gave me a discount that they had offered me before so I got a bit off the price
There is a comparison chart here: http://www.stringport.com/midiout/
The full version gives you access to Synful but the actual product is an extra $199 and I didn't go for that yet, I am hoping there is a demo to try out.
I will put up a review when I get it but it may be a while as parcels get from the States to the Uk in a day and are then usually held up in customs for a week! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|