electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Developers' Corner
Schematic for balanced audio input
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: DrJustice
Page 1 of 1 [17 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:24 pm    Post subject: Schematic for balanced audio input
Subject description: I want to add a balanced input to a regular mic and line input
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I'm working on a preamp circuit with both mic and line inputs (1/4" jack) but want to add balanced XLR sockets to this. Does anyone have or know of a suitable circuit for this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue hell
Site Admin


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 24423
Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Like this? Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.

( http://www.mediacollege.com/audio/connection/images/XLR-monojack2.gif )

_________________
Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks, that might come in handy for later but I didn't mean to convert a balanced cable into an unbalanced one, but rather: I want to add balanced audio to my existing preamp (currently with 1/4" mic and line inputs).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue hell
Site Admin


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 24423
Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Ah ok, do you have a schematic of what you have now?
_________________
Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Sure, here it is.
I want to keep the existing inputs as they are but add a balanced XLR connecter to the mic input (maybe the line input as well).


input_amp_schematic.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  363.72 KB
 Viewed:  880 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

input_amp_schematic.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LFLab



Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Posts: 497
Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

SSM2141?

Maybe a bit too high end for your purposes, but very nice. There was a write up in Elektor magazine on a balanced receiver using this IC.

(bottom schematic)

Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
L´Andratté



Joined: Sep 23, 2012
Posts: 151
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Look at figure 2 for the most simple implementation (works ok),

http://sound.whsites.net/project51.htm

There are also 2 and 3 opamp versions, look for balanced line receiver...
That corp. has some nice off the shelve chips, that are easy to get, if you´re looking for high performance-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks for those suggestions.
I'm not sure how "high end" I need it to be. This will be for the speech and excitation inputs (two input amp PCBs that is) for an ETI vocoder I'm building.

A simple solution such as using one of the THAT chips with just about everything built-in would be the easiest and most tempting, but the Elektor article might be better?

So I suppose I just add the line driver circuit's output to one of the existing preamp inputs (and have it switched (yes, there are XLR sockets with built in switches) so that it'll disable the other inputs whenever an XLR plug is inserted), but does it output a line-level signal (hence the name "balanced line receiver")? In that case, for the mic input; where should I connect the line receiver's output in the preamp circuit?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
L´Andratté



Joined: Sep 23, 2012
Posts: 151
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

That chips are state of the art, you can´t get easily any better regarding noise/distortion, why not use That mic input with That line input, there are app notes with pretty much everything being done for you already..

OTOH don´t let yourself be irritated by micpre discussions on the internet, it´s either very sophisticated stuff or very dumb. For vocoder use the simple circuit I posted above should do very well with your circuit (which should be checked for errors btw., pinout if ic1b is swapped +/- terminals etc.).

You could couple the diff.in to -in of ic1b(the swapped one) via 100k for unity gain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

L´Andratté wrote:
That chips are state of the art, you can´t get easily any better regarding noise/distortion, why not use That mic input with That line input, there are app notes with pretty much everything being done for you already..


I did find an a couple of application notes (see attachement) for application notes with an XLR connector (in the THAT 1200-series datasheet). I couldn't find any mention of the XLR being a line or mic input though.
Is this the one you're referring to?


Quote:

OTOH don´t let yourself be irritated by micpre discussions on the internet, it´s either very sophisticated stuff or very dumb. For vocoder use the simple circuit I posted above should do very well with your circuit (which should be checked for errors btw., pinout if ic1b is swapped +/- terminals etc.).


Audio needs to be decent though as there is a built-in mixer which allows me to use the various inputs directly. What kind of differences in quality are we talking exactly? More or less hiss, distortion, noise, hum depending on which chip or circuit I choose for this?

By the simple circuit from the link you posted I suppose you're referring to the TL-071 based receiver, right? (see attachement)
It sure has less components than the THAT based ones, but on the other hand they're protected against static electricity I believe (ESD) and Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) which I suppose means an XLR cable connected to it won't pick up radio stations, but then again I thought that was one of the points with a balanced receiver in the first place.... perhaps this one is better Confused

As for the schematic -the German one (see attachement) is a little improved and I believe corrected compared to the original one I posted earlier.


Quote:
You could couple the diff.in to -in of ic1b(the swapped one) via 100k for unity gain.


You mean connect the balanced line receiver's output to the input amp's IC1b "-" pin with a 100K resistor in between? But that would bypass the input level potmeter so I suppose I could connect it to the RV1 pot instead (the wire pointing upwards to the jack-switch)?
I want to disable the other mic (jack socket) input as well as the line (jack socket) input while a mic XLR is plugged into the line receiver, so would switching the same line as the existing switched mic input work?

After some searching I came across both a 3-pin XLR socket with built-in switch and a combined jack/XLR socket, also with a built-in switch from Neutrik which would be perfect for this.
I haven't decided yet, but if I figure out how to add both a mic-level balanced receiver circuit and a line-level balanced receiver I could maybe use those combined sockets (XLR and 1/4" jack), and that way I would only have to bother with one switch for each input (line or mic) as you can't insert both type plugs at the same time.


bal_line_receiver.png
 Description:
TL-071 based receiver from http://sound.whsites.net/project51.htm
 Filesize:  15.22 KB
 Viewed:  711 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

bal_line_receiver.png



that_xlr1200.png
 Description:
XLR input circuit for THAT 1200 (from 1200 series datasheet)
 Filesize:  74.31 KB
 Viewed:  514 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

that_xlr1200.png



that_xlr1203_1206.png
 Description:
XLR input circuit for THAT 1203 and 1206 (from 1200 series datasheet)
 Filesize:  76.18 KB
 Viewed:  393 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

that_xlr1203_1206.png



vocoder_input_ger.png
 Description:
Vocoder mic/line input amplifier (improved schematic)
 Filesize:  225.95 KB
 Viewed:  402 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

vocoder_input_ger.png



neutrik_switched_xlr_combi.png
 Description:
Neutrik combined 1/4" jack and 3-pin XLR socket with built-in switch
Neutrik 3-pin XLR socket with built-in switch
 Filesize:  215.1 KB
 Viewed:  352 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

neutrik_switched_xlr_combi.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LFLab



Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Posts: 497
Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

It's convenient that they mentioned the XLR connector, but a balanced connection can be on a stereo jack as well.....

Regarding THAT 12xx, it could be that these are the same functionally as SSM2141.
I've only looked into balanced outputs myself, but SSM2142 is the same as THAT1646 and DRV134.

Apart from the fact that quality is very good, the limited number of components is convenient as well, so that might push the decision towards specialised silicon, despite the price.
But it is a lot more expensive than a sole TL071 (I think the SSM2142 is about 4,50 euro or so).

Elektor also did PCB layouts, didn't post that part of the article, if you are into self etching, I can send you that section as well (don't recall if the layout was double sided, as I rolled my own for the balanced output).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Yes, I just checked and the TL071 is indeed a lot cheaper than both the SSM2141 and the THAT ICs. I haven't done a side by side comparison of the schematics, but getting high quality audio and less components (though the TL071 circuit doesn't use many external components anyway) is much preferred despite the higher costs (I won't be using so many of these anyway). The THAT schematics I found also seem worth going for as they have input protection too.

Thanks for offering to scan the PCB layout but I'll likely redo it in Eagle as I don't have the equipment or room for etching my own PCBs. While at it I'll see if I can include the input sockets on the same board as well, then use a cable and connector to attach it to the existing input amp PCB (also redone in Eagle).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LFLab



Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Posts: 497
Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

banana
Stopped etching myself, so much easier and convenient to get boards readymade (ah, double sided, silkscreen, plated holes, solder resist, swooonnnnn).


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Too true Very Happy
Are there sites out there with Eagle PCB layouts for various projects? Perhaps someone else has built a THAT-based balanced receiver so I don't have to reinvent the wheel.

Another question: I plan to add a compressor/limiter to the input amp boards, but I suppose it has to be placed before the balanced receiver circuit? Or doesn't it work in the same way as a preamp and can be clipped by a strong mic (or line) signal?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LFLab



Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Posts: 497
Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

The first thing happening in most outboard studio equipment is conversion to unbalanced. I would place your compressor/ limiter after the balanced receiver, else you'll need extra circuitry. Balanced connection is needed for transport of signal only Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
electrospeaker



Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

That's good to hear -makes things easier indeed Very Happy
So you're saying the balanced receiver simply passes on the electrical signal as it is, so there's no chance of distortion like within the preamp circuit itself?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LFLab



Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Posts: 497
Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands

PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Distortion and noise are a fact of life, but will be very small, especially when using specialised receiver IC's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: DrJustice
Page 1 of 1 [17 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Developers' Corner
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use