Author |
Message |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:24 pm Post subject:
Schematic for balanced audio input Subject description: I want to add a balanced input to a regular mic and line input |
 |
|
I'm working on a preamp circuit with both mic and line inputs (1/4" jack) but want to add balanced XLR sockets to this. Does anyone have or know of a suitable circuit for this? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:31 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks, that might come in handy for later but I didn't mean to convert a balanced cable into an unbalanced one, but rather: I want to add balanced audio to my existing preamp (currently with 1/4" mic and line inputs). |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:35 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ah ok, do you have a schematic of what you have now? _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LFLab
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 Posts: 497 Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 1:53 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
SSM2141?
Maybe a bit too high end for your purposes, but very nice. There was a write up in Elektor magazine on a balanced receiver using this IC.
(bottom schematic)
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 151 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Look at figure 2 for the most simple implementation (works ok),
http://sound.whsites.net/project51.htm
There are also 2 and 3 opamp versions, look for balanced line receiver...
That corp. has some nice off the shelve chips, that are easy to get, if you´re looking for high performance- |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 5:58 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for those suggestions.
I'm not sure how "high end" I need it to be. This will be for the speech and excitation inputs (two input amp PCBs that is) for an ETI vocoder I'm building.
A simple solution such as using one of the THAT chips with just about everything built-in would be the easiest and most tempting, but the Elektor article might be better?
So I suppose I just add the line driver circuit's output to one of the existing preamp inputs (and have it switched (yes, there are XLR sockets with built in switches) so that it'll disable the other inputs whenever an XLR plug is inserted), but does it output a line-level signal (hence the name "balanced line receiver")? In that case, for the mic input; where should I connect the line receiver's output in the preamp circuit? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
L´Andratté

Joined: Sep 23, 2012 Posts: 151 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 12:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
That chips are state of the art, you can´t get easily any better regarding noise/distortion, why not use That mic input with That line input, there are app notes with pretty much everything being done for you already..
OTOH don´t let yourself be irritated by micpre discussions on the internet, it´s either very sophisticated stuff or very dumb. For vocoder use the simple circuit I posted above should do very well with your circuit (which should be checked for errors btw., pinout if ic1b is swapped +/- terminals etc.).
You could couple the diff.in to -in of ic1b(the swapped one) via 100k for unity gain. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 4:16 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
L´Andratté wrote: | That chips are state of the art, you can´t get easily any better regarding noise/distortion, why not use That mic input with That line input, there are app notes with pretty much everything being done for you already.. |
I did find an a couple of application notes (see attachement) for application notes with an XLR connector (in the THAT 1200-series datasheet). I couldn't find any mention of the XLR being a line or mic input though.
Is this the one you're referring to?
Quote: |
OTOH don´t let yourself be irritated by micpre discussions on the internet, it´s either very sophisticated stuff or very dumb. For vocoder use the simple circuit I posted above should do very well with your circuit (which should be checked for errors btw., pinout if ic1b is swapped +/- terminals etc.). |
Audio needs to be decent though as there is a built-in mixer which allows me to use the various inputs directly. What kind of differences in quality are we talking exactly? More or less hiss, distortion, noise, hum depending on which chip or circuit I choose for this?
By the simple circuit from the link you posted I suppose you're referring to the TL-071 based receiver, right? (see attachement)
It sure has less components than the THAT based ones, but on the other hand they're protected against static electricity I believe (ESD) and Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) which I suppose means an XLR cable connected to it won't pick up radio stations, but then again I thought that was one of the points with a balanced receiver in the first place.... perhaps this one is better
As for the schematic -the German one (see attachement) is a little improved and I believe corrected compared to the original one I posted earlier.
Quote: | You could couple the diff.in to -in of ic1b(the swapped one) via 100k for unity gain. |
You mean connect the balanced line receiver's output to the input amp's IC1b "-" pin with a 100K resistor in between? But that would bypass the input level potmeter so I suppose I could connect it to the RV1 pot instead (the wire pointing upwards to the jack-switch)?
I want to disable the other mic (jack socket) input as well as the line (jack socket) input while a mic XLR is plugged into the line receiver, so would switching the same line as the existing switched mic input work?
After some searching I came across both a 3-pin XLR socket with built-in switch and a combined jack/XLR socket, also with a built-in switch from Neutrik which would be perfect for this.
I haven't decided yet, but if I figure out how to add both a mic-level balanced receiver circuit and a line-level balanced receiver I could maybe use those combined sockets (XLR and 1/4" jack), and that way I would only have to bother with one switch for each input (line or mic) as you can't insert both type plugs at the same time.
Description: |
TL-071 based receiver from http://sound.whsites.net/project51.htm |
|
Filesize: |
15.22 KB |
Viewed: |
711 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
XLR input circuit for THAT 1200 (from 1200 series datasheet) |
|
Filesize: |
74.31 KB |
Viewed: |
514 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
XLR input circuit for THAT 1203 and 1206 (from 1200 series datasheet) |
|
Filesize: |
76.18 KB |
Viewed: |
393 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
Vocoder mic/line input amplifier (improved schematic) |
|
Filesize: |
225.95 KB |
Viewed: |
402 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
Neutrik combined 1/4" jack and 3-pin XLR socket with built-in switch Neutrik 3-pin XLR socket with built-in switch |
|
Filesize: |
215.1 KB |
Viewed: |
352 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LFLab
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 Posts: 497 Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
It's convenient that they mentioned the XLR connector, but a balanced connection can be on a stereo jack as well.....
Regarding THAT 12xx, it could be that these are the same functionally as SSM2141.
I've only looked into balanced outputs myself, but SSM2142 is the same as THAT1646 and DRV134.
Apart from the fact that quality is very good, the limited number of components is convenient as well, so that might push the decision towards specialised silicon, despite the price.
But it is a lot more expensive than a sole TL071 (I think the SSM2142 is about 4,50 euro or so).
Elektor also did PCB layouts, didn't post that part of the article, if you are into self etching, I can send you that section as well (don't recall if the layout was double sided, as I rolled my own for the balanced output). |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:00 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes, I just checked and the TL071 is indeed a lot cheaper than both the SSM2141 and the THAT ICs. I haven't done a side by side comparison of the schematics, but getting high quality audio and less components (though the TL071 circuit doesn't use many external components anyway) is much preferred despite the higher costs (I won't be using so many of these anyway). The THAT schematics I found also seem worth going for as they have input protection too.
Thanks for offering to scan the PCB layout but I'll likely redo it in Eagle as I don't have the equipment or room for etching my own PCBs. While at it I'll see if I can include the input sockets on the same board as well, then use a cable and connector to attach it to the existing input amp PCB (also redone in Eagle). |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LFLab
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 Posts: 497 Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 12:12 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Stopped etching myself, so much easier and convenient to get boards readymade (ah, double sided, silkscreen, plated holes, solder resist, swooonnnnn).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:19 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Too true
Are there sites out there with Eagle PCB layouts for various projects? Perhaps someone else has built a THAT-based balanced receiver so I don't have to reinvent the wheel.
Another question: I plan to add a compressor/limiter to the input amp boards, but I suppose it has to be placed before the balanced receiver circuit? Or doesn't it work in the same way as a preamp and can be clipped by a strong mic (or line) signal? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LFLab
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 Posts: 497 Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:12 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
The first thing happening in most outboard studio equipment is conversion to unbalanced. I would place your compressor/ limiter after the balanced receiver, else you'll need extra circuitry. Balanced connection is needed for transport of signal only  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electrospeaker
Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:57 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
That's good to hear -makes things easier indeed
So you're saying the balanced receiver simply passes on the electrical signal as it is, so there's no chance of distortion like within the preamp circuit itself? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LFLab
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 Posts: 497 Location: Rosmalen, Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Distortion and noise are a fact of life, but will be very small, especially when using specialised receiver IC's. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|