Author |
Message |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:25 am Post subject:
The secret of the NL2 sound, and how to emulate it with a G2 |
 |
|
I own both the G2 and the Nord Rack 2, and I have noticed that the lead has a unique sound that I can not emulate with the G2.
I wonder, what is so special about the Nord lead that sounds so different? Is it the DAC? the envelopes? even the most basic sound sounds different, more punchy, why?
Does anybody know? This is a question for the experts out there...
Cheers _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:47 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I made some investigation to an emulation of the NL2 on the G2. There is a thread somewhere. Wait, I'll use the search option
What I found so far...
http://electro-music.com/forum/post-91759.html#91759
and
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-17562.html
Hey, in both threads you are there already!
But I also made some research of the LFO's and the Envelopes. They are out there too, I think.
My best findings:
the G2 sounds much more defined, more clear the the NL2;
the Unison is hard to create;
most sounds using Saw waves and triangle waves sound simular, Pulse wave is very hard (Most NL2 sounds are Pulse waves).
My conclusion:
why emulate a NL2 as you already have a NL2
(Which still doesn't say anything about your question, right?)
Wout |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi Wout!
Now that you mentioned them, I remember those threads. In fact, I have your sawbrass patch installed in my G2 as a preset.
I'm not specifically interested in emulating the NL2 with my G2 since as you said I own both, but what I really want is to understand why simple basic waveforms and envelopes can sound so different in both machines. Trying to emulate the sound can help me understand what's involved in the sound quality.
I'm only searching for knowledge  _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Lets work together...
In a week from now I have a nine day holiday and my wife hasn't
Wout |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2672 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
As an owner of both synths, can you pick a patch that best illustrates this difference then post a short wav of each?
If the difference is just down to the antialiasing algo's, then probably nothing can be done without an update from Clavia.
There might be some differences that can be emulated on the G2. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Well, first one who 'almost' sounds the same...
Wout
Description: |
|
 Download (listen) |
Filename: |
0001SawBrassV205.pch2 |
Filesize: |
4.91 KB |
Downloaded: |
1804 Time(s) |
Description: |
|
 Download (listen) |
Filename: |
0001SawBrass.syx |
Filesize: |
139 Bytes |
Downloaded: |
420 Time(s) |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24391 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 296
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Nah, these can't possibly sound the same - even the file size differs
Still, I 'd like to check it, but I have nothing understanding syx files, could you maybe make some short wavs Wout (like Ian suggested)? _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Not at the moment...
You know what mess my studio can be, Jan
Maybe one of the other two can do it, if you're in a hurry.
Wout |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24391 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 296
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Wout Blommers wrote: | hurry. |
Who, me? I can wait till next week  _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Unfortunately I don't have both machines in the same place, one is at home and the other is at work, so I can not make A to B comparisons or recordings with the same equipment.
What should I record by the way? _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sheridan

Joined: Jun 05, 2005 Posts: 473 Location: London, England
Audio files: 27
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
dorremifasol wrote: | What should I record by the way? |
It might be an idea to record short examples of the different oscillator shapes (no filters/effects) of the two synths and direct comparisons can be made using an oscilliscope, or just by zooming into the waveform in an audio editor.
Even slight variances in the shapes can account for different sounds, but might be emulatable on the G2. I'm not so sure how you could compare the filters though... they could easily account for the difference in sound too. _________________
Sheridan
Hear music and Nord Modular G2 patches and find out music production tips at
http://www.nitetimeproductions.co.uk |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2672 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:22 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
sheridan wrote: | dorremifasol wrote: | What should I record by the way? |
It might be an idea to record short examples of the different oscillator shapes (no filters/effects) of the two synths and direct comparisons can be made using an oscilliscope, or just by zooming into the waveform in an audio editor.
Even slight variances in the shapes can account for different sounds, but might be emulatable on the G2. I'm not so sure how you could compare the filters though... they could easily account for the difference in sound too. |
Yes, that is good.
Or perhaps you could start with just 1 example that you think shows the difference most obviously. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Wout, have you recorded the samples in the NL2 with the LP24db filter? Because the sound is different when you use the LP12db, even if the cutoff frequency is maxed.
In the samples you recorded the G2 is brighter, but I'm sure that it's because the reason I explained before.
I'm using the G2 demo to compare sound, and I'm unable to recreate the same ADSR envelopes. I think that they are one of the biggest differences as they are involved in the filter and volume "liveness". The filter is quite different too. _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm not sure anymore, because these recordings I made allready a couple month ago in another thread (about strange scope readings, due to filter resonance)
Well, the G2 recfordings are without any filter, though
This evening I will make some recordings using both with the same filter. Should I take the 24dB Nord filter?
Wout |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I suppose that in order to get the maximum recording of the original oscillator signal you should record the 12db filter instead of the 24db one. _________________ Cheers,
Albert |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24391 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 296
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:15 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
dorremifasol wrote: | I suppose that in order to get the maximum recording of the original oscillator signal |
The oscillators look pretty much identical to me ... having seemingly "perfect" (or analytic) wave forms. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dorremifasol

Joined: Sep 28, 2006 Posts: 823 Location: Barcelona, Spain
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 49
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
What is the difference?
I listen closely to both Saw waves...
Is one sharper, rounder, softer, more narrow or something like that?
I don't hear any differences, although I'm an old man
I still think the differences between both synths are the DAC's and their parameter values, so together the sound is different.
I play the NordLead3 with Patches where almost all parameters are assigned to the Morphes, only not the Keyboard Morph. There are alot of extremes there...
Wout |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dasz

Joined: Oct 16, 2004 Posts: 1644 Location: victoria, canada
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 56
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
It sounds to me like there is some dithering/brightness/noise differences between the 2. The difference is similar across each pair of waveform comparisons. Just my $0.02 CDN or USD (or $0.0206 CDN )
/Dasz |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
interesting thread
I have wondered such things myself, in terms of the differences.
I will have a listen just too for fun and educational purposes.
Thanks |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
3phase

Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
not possible...i would wish that this changes in an update because in the end of the day the old internal leveling sounds better...
and that is what i guess makes the different... its overload and feedback situations where the old algos sound sweeter..
there are however many sounds that can be made allmost identical by parameter tweaking.. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
3phase wrote: | not possible...i would wish that this changes in an update because in the end of the day the old internal leveling sounds better...
and that is what i guess makes the different... its overload and feedback situations where the old algos sound sweeter.. | Uhhh... Yeah... Sure... Ehhh.... It's an older thread, so I can't connect this post to another one. Sven, what are you referring to? The update you mention has to be a G2 update, 'cauce I think the NL2(X) will stay 'as is'. Quote: | there are however many sounds that can be made almost identical by parameter tweaking.. | That's for sure! A couple of month ago someone asked to recreate all the factory presets of the NL2X in the G2. There were some idea's about implementing a conversion tool into G2tools (?), but those who had to do it already own both synths, so why the effort? Anyway, there is a lot of tweaking to be done when recreating it.
Wout |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
3phase

Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i thought NL2 and NM1 share the same engine while NL3 and G2 use a new one..isnt that wright?
i was reffering to Nm1 to G2 conversions and expect the same detail difficulties when trying to do perfect NL2 sounds on the G2 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|