electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
go to the radio page Live at electro-music.com radio 1 Please visit the chat
poster
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software
Op Amps in synth circuits
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: jksuperstar, Scott Stites, Uncle Krunkus
Page 1 of 1 [9 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
3phase



Joined: Jul 27, 2004
Posts: 1189
Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:42 am    Post subject: Op Amps in synth circuits Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi, I am modifying a Vermona DRM 1 drummachine wright now..
A very rare unit..the answer of the komunist east to the 808...
Analog drummachine with trigger output for all instruments and midi !!
with the latest OS it even syncs propperly...

However... Because i wasnt satisfied with the general sound i changed a few things around..it turned out that the east german chips vary pretty much.. so just by changing them around it was possible to improve the sound...

next step was to try some alternate op amps... i was testing singl amp chips..

in the DRm 1 we have one to boost the noise generator that is feed to cymbals, hi hats, snare and clap in various portions, and another one that is doing the bass drum...

So a very drastic impact to the general sound of the machine...
and... a test subjekt to hear big differences even in same types from the same manufactor....

I want to share my conclusions with you.


What is good in a mixingdesk not necessarily gives the best result in a synth circuit.

741 are duller than 081.. and 081 is rougher as an 5534 but...
its a matter of taste.. the 741 can win ...


opa are closer to the sound of a 5534 than a 081...even better...as expected..
finer..more detail... more high end...quite the oposite to the 741...

but 741 are actually very nice in synth circuits !!!

The winner in my contest...


and another audio myth approved..old versions from the 70´s in metal cans indeed sound better...clearly better...
So dont throw away your old 741 metal can op amps...
The sounds of the metal cans even when out of the same time,brand aso varys more than on modern op amps...


Another myth regarding 5534 aproved aswell...texas instrumentrs sounds better than signex .....

Even when the opa sounds more on the point ..more attack...more dirrect than an 5543 in this test i ve to admit that the general 5534 sound has a certain charme... some people claim that a good designed 5534 circuit makes expensiv op ams like opa´s´redundant... i see theire point now...
again a matter of taste...but its clearly to get that the opa even while beeing a direct 071 replacement had soundwise the 5534 in mind...you hear the higher slewrate..but... a bit less is nice aswell...
However ..the opa´s´áre more userfriendly and forgiving when placed in the wrong circuit than an 5534...

In the mix stage of the DRM 1 an opa was the winner of the conntest

tl071 and 081 sound different... slightly.... the 071 is a bit finer..but again... in the drum machine the rougher ones win...

Biggest result of the test...

In a synth circuit the sound of an op amp has much higher impact than in an audio processing circuit.
An opa stays a good one but its not automatical the best in a field where taste matters...


Maybe you know all that allready...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mikmo



Joined: Dec 01, 2005
Posts: 150
Location: Copenhagen - Denmark

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Well i didn't know that.

I knew that there are some differences, but i did not know i was so much.

Craig Anderton writes a little bit about some of the same things in "Electronic projects for musicians", but not as detailed as yuo do heer.

Thanks for sharing.

And also very good that i just found a box full of old metalcan matched pair transistors, maybe the same goes for them as for OPAmps.

_________________
Stay Cool
Mikael
http://www.mikmo.dk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
3phase



Joined: Jul 27, 2004
Posts: 1189
Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

i ve never heard any rumours that give metal can transistors a better name...

However the myth about old op amps is quite often heard...

with the 741 test i did today it was very dominant...even when the general charakter was the same the metalcans sounded much smoother and clear...

so even when the 741 has a rather mushy sound the metalcan version was a clear winner in the noise generator circuit...

for the BD circuit it wasnt as clear..but the charakter of the op amp shines thru even in this totaly different circuit and it defenetly matched better with the charakter of the noise...

So beside some learning my DRM1 now sounds clearly better than before...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
sneakthief



Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 569
Location: Berlin

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

i was using my friend's newly-purchased DRM last week - my god, those claps are amazing! and what a great sequencer.

the only let down is the kick drum. it sounds like poo.

he's got the latest os so it syncs perfectly to midi clock.

_________________
Sneak-Thief - raw electrofunk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
3phase



Joined: Jul 27, 2004
Posts: 1189
Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

i like the BD... its a short kick..nothing special a spike trigers a resonant filter so no complex sound...
the new op amps helped it..especially the opa in the mix stage gives more kick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
etaoin



Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Posts: 761
Location: Utrecht, NL

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

3phase wrote:
i ve never heard any rumours that give metal can transistors a better name...


Well, someone has mentioned to me that the LM394CH metal can is slightly better matched than the LM394CN DIP. And Farnell does charge more for the metal can than for the DIP (or did, haven't checked in a while), but that might just be due to availability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Mikmo



Joined: Dec 01, 2005
Posts: 150
Location: Copenhagen - Denmark

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Well there were only 3 LM394 metal can transistors in the box i found, but a lot of 10 pin UA726 matched transistor with built in heater Smile Used in Jupiter 4 and other synths as far as i know. Most of them in the original packaging.

Also;

MAT01, MD7002, 2C415, 2V435, AD832

I know the LM394 and UA726 are nice.

Anbody know if the rest of them are any good for synt use ?

_________________
Stay Cool
Mikael
http://www.mikmo.dk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sneakthief



Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 569
Location: Berlin

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

the mat01 can also be used as a lm394 substitute - it's got worse noise characteristics but i'm not sure if this translates to worse performance in an exponential converter circuit:

MAT01 vs. MAT02:
http://www.analog.com/en/prod/0,,773_865_MAT01,00.html
http://www.analog.com/en/prod/0,,773_865_MAT02,00.html

_________________
Sneak-Thief - raw electrofunk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mooger5



Joined: May 02, 2007
Posts: 199
Location: Portugal
Audio files: 8

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 2:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Op Amps in synth circuits Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

3phase wrote:
Hi, I am modifying a Vermona DRM 1 drummachine wright now..
A very rare unit..the answer of the komunist east to the 808...
Analog drummachine with trigger output for all instruments and midi !!
with the latest OS it even syncs propperly...

However... Because i wasnt satisfied with the general sound i changed a few things around..it turned out that the east german chips vary pretty much.. so just by changing them around it was possible to improve the sound...

next step was to try some alternate op amps... i was testing singl amp chips..

in the DRm 1 we have one to boost the noise generator that is feed to cymbals, hi hats, snare and clap in various portions, and another one that is doing the bass drum...

So a very drastic impact to the general sound of the machine...
and... a test subjekt to hear big differences even in same types from the same manufactor....

I want to share my conclusions with you.


What is good in a mixingdesk not necessarily gives the best result in a synth circuit.

741 are duller than 081.. and 081 is rougher as an 5534 but...
its a matter of taste.. the 741 can win ...


opa are closer to the sound of a 5534 than a 081...even better...as expected..
finer..more detail... more high end...quite the oposite to the 741...

but 741 are actually very nice in synth circuits !!!

The winner in my contest...


and another audio myth approved..old versions from the 70´s in metal cans indeed sound better...clearly better...
So dont throw away your old 741 metal can op amps...
The sounds of the metal cans even when out of the same time,brand aso varys more than on modern op amps...


Another myth regarding 5534 aproved aswell...texas instrumentrs sounds better than signex .....

Even when the opa sounds more on the point ..more attack...more dirrect than an 5543 in this test i ve to admit that the general 5534 sound has a certain charme... some people claim that a good designed 5534 circuit makes expensiv op ams like opa´s´redundant... i see theire point now...
again a matter of taste...but its clearly to get that the opa even while beeing a direct 071 replacement had soundwise the 5534 in mind...you hear the higher slewrate..but... a bit less is nice aswell...
However ..the opa´s´áre more userfriendly and forgiving when placed in the wrong circuit than an 5534...

In the mix stage of the DRM 1 an opa was the winner of the conntest

tl071 and 081 sound different... slightly.... the 071 is a bit finer..but again... in the drum machine the rougher ones win...

Biggest result of the test...

In a synth circuit the sound of an op amp has much higher impact than in an audio processing circuit.
An opa stays a good one but its not automatical the best in a field where taste matters...


Maybe you know all that allready...


(Sorry for the long quote )

Hi,

I´ve been tailoring the sound of my Moog Rogue and came to similar conclusions. An effective mod was swapping the MC4558 that´s in the overdrive circuit for a JRC4558. People DYIing stompboxes have been praising the JRC as the key for the vintage Ibanez TS-808 sound and accept no other. Well the JRC definitely adds a bit more oomph, which is great for bass noises. The 1458 (dual 741) sounded too dirty. I tried an NE5534 and it improved the high-end which was good at enriching the harmonics of certain lead sounds, but I felt the general character of the synth was lost. It´s just a subtle thing to note in a sound that´s ever-changing...
I bought a bunch of JRCs and putted them in the signal path where possible to discover it was too much of a good thing. Ended up with a JRC in the overdrive and a 5534 in the last amplifying stage for resolution.
After reading the quoted post I went out and bought seven metalcan CA3080s (one for the Rogue´s filter and the others for my on-going Juno project). Didn´t note any difference to the Moog sound yet but it´s still there... I also bought two metalcan 741s but I didn´t start to evaluate them yet.
So far the biggest improvement was replacing the TL071 with a TL081 in the VCOs circuit. Looks like it´s only a buffer for the control voltage, but the sound now is more proeminent and cuts better through the mix. Almost like a Minimoog. Either that or I´m hearing things! Why it sounds better beats me; I can only speculate the poorer 081 specifications drive the oscs in a more random, less precise manner. Infinitely subtle variations in pitch that make the oscillators sound fatter and still in tune...
In this last case swapping opamps made an improvement, even if indirectly Smile

About the JRC4558: it´s a dual opamp, AFAIK there isn´t a single version, but it´s possible to cheat by making the right connections with bits of wire and an IC socket.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: jksuperstar, Scott Stites, Uncle Krunkus
Page 1 of 1 [9 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use