Author |
Message |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:48 am Post subject:
Spacing of Jacks, Pots, Switches on Panel |
 |
|
About to start making panels using FPE and am wondering how you all determine/know the spacing to use between jacks/pots/switches/etc...? I'm thinking I could just cut a piece of paper or cardboard and lay out all the components there and measure before going into FPD - is there an easier way? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
neandrewthal

Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 672 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:22 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Id recommend making a full blown cardboard panel to try out first, before you start making real panels with the same spacing. _________________ " I went through quite a few trannies til I found one I liked" - Wild Zebra |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:37 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
best is to lay it out on paper, yes.
my opinion:
The magic spacing is 30mm, same as Nord modular1 (many other Synths too as it seems ) if you use small knobs.
You can go down till 28mm, maybe 26mm with having enough room for the Fingers, but not less !
With this spacing you can twiddle the Knobs free, smaller spacings will limit acess for extensive twiddling.
sometimes it is just a thing how things match up:
Knobs vs. jacks.
so i layout first the knobs . The jacks usually have enough space to find a good solution.
If not: I make the panel a bit wider. ( ohh, i'm relativly free in euroformat )
Switches i put sometimes to close to the Jacks, i regret it in some cases.
so think to the direction it switches when placing them close to jacks.( i did not )
jacks can be really cramped: If it's the only solution thats ok, IMO. If having "some" room for fingers it's nicer to patch,
Note:
think also that you have to wire up that shit.
Sometimes it's useful cause of that not to go with to cramped layouts. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dar303

Joined: Jul 15, 2007 Posts: 97 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:52 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Funky: cool, I call that the "Korg spacing" after the korg MS-series that has good ergonomics and relatively small knobs. 30mm between knob centers for ordinary modules and 25mm betwen sequencer knobs. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:56 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for all the info.
One more question - I don't actually have a cabinet yet, because I have an MS-50 (speaking of the Korg design) and have been integrating the modules with that, storing them in tupperware. I've decided, though, since I like the 1/4" jacks and a little wiggle room, that I'm going to go with the Moog/Synthesizers.com 5U panel height. Given that, and also given that I'll probably start out with a cabinet that I buy from synthesizers.com, when I lay this out in FPD, where exactly should the mounting holes go on my panels for mounting the panel to the cabinet and what size should these drill holes be?
Thanks! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sduck

Joined: Dec 16, 2007 Posts: 459 Location: Nashville
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
If you're going the 5u route, you might want to take a look at the modularsynthpanel yahoo group - http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/?yguid=126193340
Most of the fpd files there are for motm format, which is similar to synthesizer.com size in height, but a little easier to get manafactured, and a lot cheaper. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:41 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks again for the info. Good to know about the MOTM panels. I can see where they would be cheaper with the horizontal units being a bit smaller. Found the technical layout of the dotcom panels as well. Also I submitted to join the yahoo panels group yesterday and am waiting to hear back. I feel like it's such an important decision but you don't really know what exactly works for you until you have it in front of you and are using it. I'm sick of keeping things in tupperware though (talk about a pain in the ass with with a mess of jacks, pots and switches with no real organization or nice panel labels) so I'm going to use others' designs at least as a launching point to get started. If I keep feeling like it's an insurmountable thing, or secondary to just creating more modules as well as worrying I'll make panels I don't like, I'll never do it. Time to give it some thought and just jump in and do it. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
neandrewthal

Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 672 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:52 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
If you want to use other's designs to start off, then MOTM is right format and yahoo synth panels is definitely the right place
Come to think about it, you should check out Bridechamber's panels. They are excellent quality and 1/3 - 1/2 the price of what a simularly decked-out Schaeffer panel would cost.
If you go MOTM, you can still use the synthesizers.com cabinet if you install MOTM mounting rails, or just drill holes in the wooden rails as you see fit. You will be able to fit 26U horizontally instead of 22U of dotcom modules. _________________ " I went through quite a few trannies til I found one I liked" - Wild Zebra |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
synthetic
Joined: Jun 02, 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Glendale, CA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:11 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
There's a mechanical drawing of a panel on the MOTM site if you want to see what that standard looks like. Knobs are always on top and jacks on the bottom, which is nice and neat. I would go with a standard like this so that you can add Bridechamber, MOTM, Oakley, etc. modules in the future. Unless you're determined to design every LFO and envelope yourself.
http://www.synthtech.com/tech/m440_panel.pdf |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:28 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Try the Buchla or Serge/Modcan aesthetics. Once you try banana jacks, you won't go back. _________________ We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid. -mwagener
"IC 741. Sometimes you don't want fidelity." -Small Bear Electronics Catalog |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:51 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
neandrewthal wrote: | If you go MOTM, you can still use the synthesizers.com cabinet if you install MOTM mounting rails, or just drill holes in the wooden rails as you see fit. You will be able to fit 26U horizontally instead of 22U of dotcom modules. |
Are the rails bridechamber sells MOTM mounting rails or do I need to get these from Synthtec? And there is enough depth in a dotcom cabinet for MOTM modules with brackets (because most dotcoms are mounted PCB parallel to panel, right?)? Also there's room for the power supply as well?
EDIT: Found a couple guides to tweaking a dotcom cabinet to become a MOTM cabinet - seems like a somewhat tricky process. Any other options? How would a 19" rack work as far as mounting a power supply? I think this might be a good option just to get me started, especially since I'll only have about 1/2 dozen modules for a bit anyway. Also, could anyone point me to this type of rack - just did a google search and didn't find anything that looked quite right and were all really expensive. I'm guessing you buy a 19" rack and mount the MOTM rails on it, which is appealing to me, to be up and running pretty quickly. I'm just not sure about how the power supply would mount and what rack to use.
Thanks for all the info!! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|