Author |
Message |
davep

Joined: Jul 05, 2004 Posts: 467 Location: Oakland, CA
Audio files: 10
G2 patch files: 73
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 3:42 pm Post subject:
Chorus module DIY equivalent? |
 |
|
Hi all,
I've been working on some external effects processor patches and I have run into a puzzle. When using the G2 (or any other outboard effects processor) with the effects sends on a mixing console, you want to be able to create the effect in the outboard device and bring the effect back into the console with the effect 100% "wet", meaning with none of the dry signal mixed in with the signal coming back from the effects device. This is important for two reasons -
1. So you can bring up the effect without increasing the volume of the dry track (which would happen if the dry signal is also coming back into the console mixed with the effects), and
2. To avoid unpredictable phasey mess caused by outboard gear that has A/D-D/A conversion, which will bring the dry signal back into the console with some slight delay and affect the sonics of the dry signal when the two signals mix.
So this is all easy to do when creating various reverb and delay and pitch shifting effects, because the modules involved in these effects allow you to build a signal chain that does not pass the dry signal to the output (the pitchshifter is 100% wet unless you add a mixer to change that, and the reverb has a mix control that can be set to 100% wet, etc.).
BUT - Then there is the Chorus module. I really like the sound of this module and it would be great to have this effect available for external signal processing, but the Chorus module passes the dry signal to it's output in a 50/50 wet/dry mix when the Amount control is set to max. Bah! This results in the two problems described above when you use it on a console effect send.
So does anyone know how to replicate the sound of the Chorus module using DIY patching so you can omit the dry signal from the output? I have tried various tricks with short swept delays but I can't get it to sound the same. Thanks! _________________ Dave Peck |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2672 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Afro88

Joined: Jun 20, 2004 Posts: 701 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Audio files: 12
G2 patch files: 79
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
davep

Joined: Jul 05, 2004 Posts: 467 Location: Oakland, CA
Audio files: 10
G2 patch files: 73
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 11:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hey, thanks you guys. Ian, that sounds nice! And afro88 - DOH! Of course! I had tried inverting the ENTIRE signal to try to cancel the dry signal coming from the G2 with the original dry signal at the console once the two signals got re-combined at the console, but that didn't work because of the slight A/D-D/A latency coming from the G2. But when you do it this way, cancelling the dry signal with itself entirely inside the patch, it works! The dry signal never gets out of the G2. Cool. _________________ Dave Peck |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|