Author |
Message |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:42 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | elektro80 wrote: | Yeah... now you are getting it!  |
I'm sorry...I'm a bit slow  |
Well, you are a faster poster than Wyatt Earp.
 _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
OK. I’m just a simple country boy who can’t tell hoof nippers from a pair of dikes and from a personal compositional standpoint consider esoteric analysis irrelevant. Still the following points seem important to me.
It appears that, statistically speaking, the ability to deeply appreciate a style of music has a learning window that opens somewhere in early adolescence and closes in the early twenties. I.e. it has some neuro-physiological/experiential basis and is therefore both inherently personal and universal.
There is a difference between interesting and compelling music. Compelling music survives the test of time because it has some essential element(s) that transcend its historic context. By elimination that must be the patterns and qualities of sound and their linkage to human viscera through emotion. But that linkage is a potential determined by “early” learning, at least for the majority of ears.
Radical departures in tunings can have "cultural" success only if they can be used in a way that stirs the viscera and young people are exposed to it en mass. That’s a tall order.
But then I think that speaking about music in terms other than the personal, or statistical, is typical monkey-hierarchism and contrary to the nature of the art. I gotta go clean some stalls.
Edit:
OK so I'm suspicious of intellectualism in art, so shoot me  _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:36 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
bachus wrote: |
Radical departures in tunings can have "cultural" success only if they can be used in a way that stirs the viscera and young people are exposed to it en mass. That’s a tall order.
|
it took centuries to move from pythagorean to meantone, then from meantone to "well-tempered" and, finally from "well-tempered" to 12tET. so I do not expect any tuning revolution to happen soon but we can/must try new things. don't we this is the forum Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic and electronic music . What is more experimental than tuning  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | so I do not expect any tuning revolution to happen soon |
What about a tuning Evolution yeah !!!
that sounds like fun! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Jason wrote: |
What about a tuning Evolution yeah !!!
that sounds like fun! |
let's do it  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kkissinger
Stream Operator

Joined: Mar 28, 2006 Posts: 1438 Location: Kansas City, Mo USA
Audio files: 45
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I don't listen to much commercial radio -- my exposure is limited to times when I take my teenaged daughter to school and she takes over the car radio. For me personally, I find a small percentage of commercial music to be particularly creative or interesting -- my comments concern what I consider to be the majority of music that is featured on commercial broadcasts. I also live in Kansas City, Mo. where there is a noteable lack of variety on the radio.
dewdrop_world wrote: | I would say that social function, particularly religious function, rather than temperament is the cause of the demise of Western art music. |
One of the major influences on art has been the emergence of mass markets. For many of us, to "study music" means to learn form, theory, tunings, history, aesthetics, etc. However for others, to "study music" means to determine what sells (attracts listeners).
We also live in a cult of celebrity. Someone or something that isn't popular (celebrity status) is irrelevant in the eyes of most people.
Modern entertainment (i.e., the "pop" world) lacks nuance. Entertainers today must "go all-out all the time". There is no sense of ebb and flow in most modern entertainment. Audiences lack the patience (or in many cases the experience) to audition music, movies, or programs that alternate between loud and soft passages. Audiences want the climax NOW and they want it ALL THE TIME.
(I am reminded of a hilarious scene from "Brainstorm" where an executive snuck into the corporate laboratory one evening, pulled out a brain-wave tape of some particularly hot sex, spliced the climax into a tape loop, attached the brain-machine's electrodes to his head, and hit [PLAY]. When his co-workers found him the next morning, they had to carry him out on a stretcher.)
sebber wrote: | There's a terribly bad filter installed in commercial radio stations that's called "Best of the 70s, 80's and 90's and the best of today"-filter. One of the worst filters ever implemented, but obviously so cheap no radio station can ignore it. |
I am amused when every station calls themselves "alternative" while playing the same stuff as everyone else.
elektro80 wrote: | It is truly amazing how the music programmers come up with those playlist.
Do they have some secret rituals involving soon-to-be-mutilated cattle? .. and I am sure they have some very potent browlowering potions. |
Radio stations' product is the listeners who are, in turn, sold to the advertisers. The only function of radio programs is to attract listeners (purchasers for advertisers' products). Some rather elaborate schemes to select music exist.
I have read about computer programs wherein you can feed them music (I assume in MIDI format) and they will crank out stats on the keys, tempi, chords, progressions, etc and correlate them to the sales stats for the songs. Love of the craft has little to do with anything. It is all about money. Had these methods been in place in times gone by, I wonder if bands such as "The Beatles" would have been promoted.
Frank Zappa has a funny (and frightening) discourse on the topic in his "Autobiography". He claims the marketing folks have invented "Debbie: the ultimate arbitrer of musical taste. She is 14, talks on the phone all the time, and dreams of being kissed by a lifeguard. She likes music that goes BOOM BOOM BOOM and she wants more music JUST LIKE THAT because she is REALLY INTO MUSIC!!!" I think Zappa tells it like it is in this book!
Another hideous "filter" is the audio compressor. Radio and TV folks know that listeners surf the channels with remote control. They tend to stop on the loudest channels. Thus, music is compressed beyond musicality and broadcast within an inch of overmodulation. This is a patently horrible sound that the public expects to hear all the time. Live concerts often are amplified beyond the point of pain. When the music isn't playing, the DJ's are babbling or the commercials are yelling.
Ultimately, what the broadcasters sell is NOT music. The product is the listeners. The music is simply a tool to attract listeners. The broadcasting industry consumes entertainers and listeners to feed itself.
"Soylent Green is People!"
Music without immediate commercial value simply will wither and die in such a commercial environment. As an artist/composer, it is very easy to become discouraged in the face of all this. The internet is changing things for the better.
This of us who love music as an art form (as opposed to a vehicle to boost ratings) have often worked in isolation. After I finished college and left the "arty" world I have felt extremely isolated in my musical interests and preferences -- this despite the fact that I have worked as an organist most of the decades since college. The internet is bringing together people with similar interests and many of us are discovering that music created by and for music-lovers can be relevant, entertaining, and even inspiring. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:19 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | What is more experimental than tuning |
Hey! I prefer organs that are well tempered to those in E.T. and I'm all for experimental tunings. If I were younger it's definitely the direction I'd go in for my next composition. (Though my own taste doesn't want to go much beyond Partch and Wendy Carlos. And I've tried--but my window is long closed, sigh.)
I don't think experimental means non-visceral but it may mean a very limited number of ears can connect it to the viscera. And nothing wrong with that. My skepticism is directed at music that doesn't even connect to its composer's viscera, and the seeming lack of interest in that connection.
You can't really care about (be motivated to action by) what you can't feel. There is substantial evidence for this from studies of individuals who, through brain damage, have literally lost contact with their feels and emotions (feeling and emotions are not identical but close enough in this context). In structure and function the intellect is the handmaid of the emotions. And that's true of everyone even though we each secretly believe that it's only true of everyone else.  _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
bachus wrote: | my own taste doesn't want to go much beyond Partch and Wendy Carlos |
HOLY COW there is not much beyond that. I'd love to get there  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:03 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | bachus wrote: | my own taste doesn't want to go much beyond Partch and Wendy Carlos |
HOLY COW there is not much beyond that. I'd love to get there  |
Being able to appreciate a style or tuning is not the same as being able to authentically create in it. I wouldn't try anything beyond mean tone myself and then only if I had several years to spend on it's study. (Craft is not the same as intellectualism.)
And Partch is a special case. Analytically I can't tell why I respond to it. May have something to do with his mastery of combining musical and conceptual elements. And yes you can feel that in your gut. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
bachus wrote: | And yes you can feel that in your gut. |
Partch called his music "corporeal" (versus "art music" that he called: abstract)
Quote: | Craft is not the same as intellectualism |
that's a great truth  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:28 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | Partch called his music "corporeal" (versus "art music" that he called: abstract) |
Of course the point I've been trying to make is that such a distinction is entirely subjective. It's very difficult not to mistake one's taste for sound aesthetic judgement. To my mind "The Just Intonation Primer" reflects the repeated application of that mistake.
Edit:
I wish I'd said "..mistake one's taste for universal aesthetic judgement. " _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kkissinger
Stream Operator

Joined: Mar 28, 2006 Posts: 1438 Location: Kansas City, Mo USA
Audio files: 45
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Since we are discussing the "End of Common Practice", and cultural factors, I noticed this interview with Sheryl Crow where she says that the music business is "a failing business". Interesting perspective from a pop star (one of my daughter's favorites )
(she talks about this about halfway down the article)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15221144/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
kkissinger wrote: | Since we are discussing the "End of Common Practice", and cultural factors, I noticed this interview with Sheryl Crow where she says that the music business is "a failing business". Interesting perspective from a pop star (one of my daughter's favorites ... |
Wonderful! It's my dream that the internet will kill music as big business and remake it into a cottage industry art form. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
bachus wrote: | a cottage industry art form. |
or a cottage industry art farm  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dewdrop_world

Joined: Aug 28, 2006 Posts: 858 Location: Guangzhou, China
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:24 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
bachus wrote: | It appears that, statistically speaking, the ability to deeply appreciate a style of music has a learning window that opens somewhere in early adolescence and closes in the early twenties. I.e. it has some neuro-physiological/experiential basis and is therefore both inherently personal and universal. |
I did read the theory somewhere that people, throughout their adult lives, tend to favor the music they were listening heavily to at the time in their lives when they were first becoming sexually active (or at least sexually aware, e.g., puberty).
Which must be why mid-90's Pet Shop Boys always hits my g-spot... (please don't throw me off the board for saying that! ).
Speaking of which, did you ever hear their version of "Somewhere" (yes, the one from West Side Story)? It is the most fantastically gaudy, overproduced, tasteless and expertly constructed satire on dance remixes of "sensitive ballads" I've ever heard. Sublime, no. Perfect, yes.
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playlistId=199963474&s=143441&i=199968508
I have the CD single with the orchestral accompaniment only... there is a huge amount of rich detail in this track that you can't hear over the techno beat, and all of it as tacky as Trump Tower. Sure to put a smile on your face.
OK, I'm done embarrassing myself now.
James _________________ ddw online: http://www.dewdrop-world.net
sc3 online: http://supercollider.sourceforge.net |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jason

Joined: Aug 12, 2004 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
sometimes when I hear the music I used to listen to when I was younger it makes me sick. And I think to myself, wow how could I have listened to this CRAP! I am so glad I have grown... But that is just me... LOL
I actually like the pet shop boys though dewdrop_world
though I dont really listen to them, they arent so bad imho. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
dewdrop_world wrote: | g-spot... |
Quote: | April 2006 update: New Release of Famous G Spot Book
Dr. Perry's research leading to the modern re-discovery of the Gräfenberg Spot is described in the best-selling book, The G Spot (1982), written with Alice Ladas and Beverly Whipple. The G Spot has now been translated into at least 26 languages; most recently, Chinese in 1995, and Thai in 1997. |
http://www.libchrist.com/sexed/Gspot.html
 _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
dewdrop_world wrote: |
I did read the theory somewhere that people, throughout their adult lives, tend to favor the music they were listening heavily to at the time in their lives when they were first becoming sexually active |
fortunately that theory does not apply to me otherwise I would be stuck listening to "Popcorn" (see http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-12200.html ) but I still like "The Who"  _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | dewdrop_world wrote: |
I did read the theory somewhere that people, throughout their adult lives, tend to favor the music they were listening heavily to at the time in their lives when they were first becoming sexually active |
fortunately that theory does not apply to me otherwise I would be stuck listening to "Popcorn" (see http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-12200.html ) but I still like "The Who"  |
It's not a theory it's a statistical observation. It may, in part, explain why "common practice" materials/techniques music swept through the non-Western world with such force. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dewdrop_world

Joined: Aug 28, 2006 Posts: 858 Location: Guangzhou, China
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
But on a more technical note... Open Sound Control is a lot better equipped than MIDI to handle temperaments. In SuperCollider I can write a custom function to convert a note number into a frequency and implement any tuning I want. SC also allows fractional MIDI note numbers (69.midicps == 440, 69.5.midicps == 452.89298412314, 70.midicps == 466.16376151809) which is very nice. Max/MSP, PD, Reaktor also accept OSC.
So, what if Logic communicated with OSC-enabled softsynths using OSC and allowed you to edit with fractional note numbers, or apply a temperament table to the MIDI data?
I'm not holding my breath...
James _________________ ddw online: http://www.dewdrop-world.net
sc3 online: http://supercollider.sourceforge.net |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | If equal temperament played a prominent role in stimulating the growth of harmonic music in the common-practice era, |
And as long as we're back to technicalities isn't it true that equal temperament did not come into general use until ~1900, a time often cited as the end of common practice? _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18249 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 226
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes, rock and roll and common practice are dead. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18249 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 226
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:18 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Long live rock and roll and common practice. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|