| Author |
Message |
metacohl
Joined: Jul 26, 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Oakland, ca
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:41 pm Post subject:
Filter design using the LTC1562-2 |
 |
|
Does anyone have experience using this chip for audio?
here is the datasheet http://cds.linear.com/docs/Datasheet/15622fa.pdf
Its marketed for radio frequencies, but I am trying to figure out if it can be adapted for audio. The data sheet provides diagrams for chebyshev, butterworth, and other filter types. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
metacohl
Joined: Jul 26, 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Oakland, ca
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:57 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
looking at the data sheet it says that
f0=200khz(sqrt((7958Ohm)/R2)) for one of the filter arrangements
sooo... f0=20khz R2= 795800 Ohms?
So maybe a trimming resistor and a POT in series if you wanted to have a usable f0 range under 20khz? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24587 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 309
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| metacohl wrote: | | f0=20khz R2= 795800 Ohms? |
Yes, or, 0.8 Meg ... so 80 Meg for 2 kHz .. Resistance that large will mean that when you breathe over the circuit f0 will go all the way ... not very usable for the audio range.
I see tho that the internal capacitor is between INV and V1 being both accessible from the outside - maybe you could add some extra capacitance there to help f0 down .. stability may be an issue then or it may blow up under certain conditions. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
metacohl
Joined: Jul 26, 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Oakland, ca
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Blue Hell wrote: | | metacohl wrote: | | f0=20khz R2= 795800 Ohms? |
Yes, or, 0.8 Meg ... so 80 Meg for 2 kHz .. Resistance that large will mean that when you breathe over the circuit f0 will go all the way ... not very usable for the audio range.
I see tho that the internal capacitor is between INV and V1 being both accessible from the outside - maybe you could add some extra capacitance there to help f0 down .. stability may be an issue then or it may blow up under certain conditions. |
Ahh yes, I did not really think about what a absurdly high resistance that is. You might be right about adding more capacitance between INV and V1. I'd have to do some math to figure out the implementation of that and, like you said, any possible issues that might arise from that implementation.
Maybe someone else can confirm this? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|