| Author |
Message |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24584 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 309
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ian-s wrote: | | That has been done already by Mr qfingers and Jan. |
Probably the best way to study it is to look at qFingers' g2ools code, especially as it has the reader / writer code needed and data structures to represent patches. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
purusha
Joined: Mar 13, 2008 Posts: 131 Location: Ilkley
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I might be interested in helping out with a reverse-engineering project if it became necessary.
Depends on day-job (software engineering) time constraints though...
 _________________ OVNI Soundcloud Purusha Soundcloud |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
cappy2112

Joined: Dec 24, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: San Jose, California
Audio files: 2
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:35 pm Post subject:
Re: If there's no G3, I reckon G2 should become soft-synth |
 |
|
| Blue Hell wrote: | | cappy2112 wrote: | | What would be the alternative- in an all-software solution? |
Recode to target processor ... |
Without the DSP hardware, how can you execute the target processor code without an emulator? _________________ Free Tibet. Release the Panchen Lama from prison. Let the Dalai Lama return to his home. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24584 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 309
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject:
Re: If there's no G3, I reckon G2 should become soft-synth |
 |
|
| cappy2112 wrote: | | Blue Hell wrote: | | cappy2112 wrote: | | What would be the alternative- in an all-software solution? |
Recode to target processor ... |
Without the DSP hardware, how can you execute the target processor code without an emulator? |
not, I guess .. I meant that it should be recoded so it will perform (currently the emulator performs not so good IMHO). _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
marlon brando
Joined: Dec 31, 2008 Posts: 12 Location: new york
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 3:52 am Post subject:
Re: If there's no G3, I reckon G2 should become soft-synth |
 |
|
| purusha wrote: | If (note, that's an "if") Nord no longer think that modular hardware is a goer, I reckon they should consider expanding the demo to a fully blown commercial soft-synth.
I know they're a hardware company, but surely this would be something worth considering. They're most of the way there anyhow, as we know, with the demo.
Everyone who's worried about their hardware breaking down would then at least have their investment in patch design secure.
Any thoughts on that?
 |
My thoughts is that G2 in Reason 5 would be kind of cool
This guys know each other, and that would make Reason kind of cool
Cheers |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LektroiD

Joined: Aug 23, 2008 Posts: 1019 Location: Scottish Borders
Audio files: 2
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:28 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| They should at least make the software for the hardware devices open source, it's not far off a year since they said they would update the last one to integrate with Apple/Intel and vista compatibility. The last email I had back from them said "the updated drivers are coming soon", this was in July 2008. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
monobass

Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Posts: 275 Location: UK
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
To me it seems very unlikely we will see any new modular updates or products from Clavia for a good few years if ever. It would be a very bad time financially to release a new boutique modular product.
I remember thinking when the patch mutator came out for G2 it was the end of development, based on how the original NM development finished. They will never admit that while they still have units to sell though.
I can't see why it would ever be in Clavia's interest to make anything open source. It would only divert attention from new products and wouldn't make them any profit anyway. _________________ Steve |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
realtrance
Joined: Jul 18, 2004 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:16 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I remember hearing at one point that the NM architecture was the foundation upon which they did work for other synths. That may have been a few years ago, when the focus was Nord Lead and such, however.
Anyways, I can't see the G2 needing to be superceded by any equivalent instrument any time soon; it's a very niche instrument, not likely to garner lots of sales, and probably a labor of love any time it's paid attention to. The fact that a lot of people end up calling Clavia's baby ugly no matter what they do probably isn't encouraging.
Me, I'll be happy to buy the next NM if there ever is one. If it's hardware. There's nothing like a real instrument, no matter how good computers and software synths get.
What do I miss in the NMG2? Hmmmm..... a ribbon controller, that's all. Maybe a mini Haaken Continuum built into the next generation?  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
But what's puzzeling me... Who ever said there will be no G3, or G4, or G5?
Wout |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24584 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 309
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Wout Blommers wrote: | But what's puzzeling me... Who ever said there will be no G3, or G4, or G5?
|
Don't know about the G4 and the G5 ... but some people have said here that they don't expect a G3 ... not Clavia of course though  _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
realtrance
Joined: Jul 18, 2004 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I really am at the point where I don't feel I'd ever really need to buy another synth to do anything I can't already do with what I have. But if it were a next-gen NM, that would be different.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
varice

Joined: Dec 29, 2004 Posts: 961 Location: Northeastern shore of Toledo Bend
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 54
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:45 pm Post subject:
Who said? |
 |
|
| Wout Blommers wrote: | | But what's puzzeling me... Who ever said there will be no G3... |
From this topic:
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-30840.html
Commenting about why Clavia DMI AB were not making any more G2s or expansion boards:
| Axiom Crux wrote: | | you guys should talk with the people at clavia through their contact info on the site if you want more info. All I know is they aren't making any more for a reason and no g3 is planned... |
Wout, can you prove that he got some bad information about plans for a G3?  _________________ varice |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:42 pm Post subject:
Re: Who said? |
 |
|
| varice wrote: | | Wout Blommers wrote: | | But what's puzzeling me... Who ever said there will be no G3... |
From this topic:
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-30840.html
Commenting about why Clavia DMI AB were not making any more G2s or expansion boards:
| Axiom Crux wrote: | | you guys should talk with the people at clavia through their contact info on the site if you want more info. All I know is they aren't making any more for a reason and no g3 is planned... |
Wout, can you prove that he got some bad information about plans for a G3?  |
Who should I believe? "Axiom Crux" or the guy who works for Clavia?
"Hi
Thanks for your email,
I really can't discuss or make any comments on future products or
updates, we just have to wait and see.
Best Regards
Tomas Johansson
Product Manager - Clavia DMI" _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
varice

Joined: Dec 29, 2004 Posts: 961 Location: Northeastern shore of Toledo Bend
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 54
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:54 am Post subject:
Oh Come On! |
 |
|
| varice wrote: | Wout, can you prove that he got some bad information about plans for a G3?  |
Umm... Of course, my post was not a serious challenge to Wout!... I tried to signal that with the winking smiley face ...
And, of course, Wout does not have to prove anything to us about what he might know about anything  _________________ varice |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wout Blommers

Joined: Sep 07, 2003 Posts: 4529 Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
Audio files: 123
G2 patch files: 12
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:16 am Post subject:
Re: Oh Come On! |
 |
|
Ehhh...
Wout
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
the plot thickens
 _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
| Quote: | | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:25 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I wonder what kind of processor drives the Wave, and how difficult it would be for Clavia to get the G2 OS to run on that processor. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
buzzr
Joined: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 360 Location: portland
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
All you need to do is put virtual bananna jacks in the wave and then you have a G3.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TEMAS
Joined: Mar 20, 2007 Posts: 69 Location: London
G2 patch files: 6
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:47 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Given the choice of new G3 hardware or new G3 softsynth, I'd take the hardware, no question. The reason is that realistically a G3 softsynth is a recipe for CPU spikes and overloads and will most likely cause massive problems with my DAW.
I love that the G2 is hardware and puts practically no CPU strain on my DAW. It also has no latency and sounds great. I hate the latency of playing softsynths at buffer settings above 64 and most of them sound crap. Imagine making a 32 track song at 96khz at 64 buffer and then trying build an epic G3 patch on the same computer. Even the top Macs would crash.
What I'd most like to see in a new G3 hardware synth is more DSP power and digital I/O (preferably AES, but S/Pdif would suffice).
Given the choice of a G3 softsynth or no G3, I'd take the softsynth and buy a separate computer just for the G3.
Its a bummer there's no memory upgrades available. Prepare to see G2 prices rise. Last edited by TEMAS on Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| TEMAS wrote: | What I'd most like to see in a new G3 hardware synth is more DSP power and digital I/O (preferably AES, but S/Pdif would suffice).
| And sampling, a la Wave.
And bigger LCDs. Having to toggle between two modes because the LCDs can display only two lines of text instead of 3 should be unnecessary with current technology.
And I would love for it to be built as a separate keyboard and module that can be detached from each other, a la Radias. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TEMAS
Joined: Mar 20, 2007 Posts: 69 Location: London
G2 patch files: 6
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ark wrote: |
And I would love for it to be built as a separate keyboard and module that can be detached from each other, a la Radias. |
That would be cool. And would make sense.
I really hope they do G3. Nord Modular is my favourite synth of all time. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:19 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ark wrote: | | TEMAS wrote: | What I'd most like to see in a new G3 hardware synth is more DSP power and digital I/O (preferably AES, but S/Pdif would suffice).
| And sampling, a la Wave. |
I'm having these dreams where there's a module called "sample" with a rec gate input and a play gate input, rate modulation input and maybe a start/end point mod too. It has to be so easy to modify the existing delay modules to do this, and what a cool tool it would have been. Does anything like that exist in the market for modular systems (virtual or no)?
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Antimon wrote: | I'm having these dreams where there's a module called "sample" with a rec gate input and a play gate input, rate modulation input and maybe a start/end point mod too. It has to be so easy to modify the existing delay modules to do this, and what a cool tool it would have been. Does anything like that exist in the market for modular systems (virtual or no)?
/Stefan |
Reaktor? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Kleinert
Joined: Mar 12, 2004 Posts: 1148 Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 236
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:54 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Antimon wrote: |
I'm having these dreams where there's a module called "sample" with a rec gate input and a play gate input, rate modulation input and maybe a start/end point mod too. It has to be so easy to modify the existing delay modules to do this, and what a cool tool it would have been. |
It's not that easy. If you want to non-volatile sample storage, you'd need additional flash rom chips and USB software to handle the sample management and memory allocation.
Volatile sampling is possible, I've done it many times. There is some klutzy patching necessary for the stable readout pointer, but if you put that into the FX area and pipe the control thingies back to the voice area via interslot busses, you can make the whole thing quite usable. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:39 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I was thinking about volatile sampling. I'm ashamed to say I haven't looked that closely at your patches Tim, but I know that you've done a lot of good stuff in this area. I'm pretty bad at reading patches, if I can't understand a concept so I can patch it myself, then I tend to pass it over - perhaps I shouldn't.
I was just thinking about that simple module as a part of the G2s palette. From what I've heard Reaktor is a lot different - but if that module exists there then that might be something to check out.
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|