| Author |
Message |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bubblechamber

Joined: Nov 04, 2006 Posts: 280 Location: NYC
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:36 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
the problem i've had in getting a sync to work with LFOs is the waves tend to get cut off when the oscillator resets. With audio rate oscillators this is hard to hear and even adds a little to the overall sound, but with LFOs i've found the result can be a little more unpredictable than i would like.
ian fritz has had some sucess using FETs, but i'm still not completely convinced that it's not truncating waves...
hopefully you'll get more helpful responses from people that actually know what they are doing, just wanted to throw my 2¢ in here _________________ You can check your anatomy all you want, and even though there may be normal variation, when it comes right down to it, this far inside the head it all looks the same. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I think the ARP Odyssey has sync on the LFO (I think it syncs on key press). You might take a look there. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
The Odyssey LFO will 'reset' from key gate. It doesn't sync.
I also want to have sync (or at least reset) on my LFOs. I like VC for controlling rate with a pedal controller, etc, but really, sync would be most useful in many applications. It's definitely great to be able to reset to keybrd gate, tap tempo switch, clock syncing, etc. But on the designs I've seen, I find that it's one or the other.
The Oakley Micro LFO has sync I believe (but no VC). |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bubblechamber

Joined: Nov 04, 2006 Posts: 280 Location: NYC
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i've been thinking about LFO resetting lately, too.
I think it could be done really easily by putting a momentary switch to interrupt the timing cap and ground it. it seems to me that this would achieve a reset when the switch is released. for me this would probably suit my needs.
or i could be completely wrong. i wish i had the time right now to sit down and try this out.
david _________________ You can check your anatomy all you want, and even though there may be normal variation, when it comes right down to it, this far inside the head it all looks the same. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| What's the difference between sync and reset? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24673 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 330
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I think sync is a broader term? It could also mean phase reversal, at least for audio rate oscillators. But in the context presented here it would be the same thing I guess ...
Re. resetting LFOs this would always give jumps, these might be small jumps when the LFOs run at nearly the same speed (and once synced). When syncing to the onset of a note this jump doesn't have to be a problem, as it will likely be masked by an envelope being at zero value at that time.
Anyway, those are the two situation I use LFO reset. To (1) maintain a phase relation between two LFOs where one runs at a speed that is (nearly) an integer multiple of the syncing one and (2) to start a modulation at the onset of a sound in a predictable way. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
9 3 4 .. erm .. not 13 then? .. hmm, ah eight! .. yeah yeah as in 8647 .. 47 is an 88 .. pwew .. numbles! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| bubblechamber wrote: |
I think it could be done really easily by putting a momentary switch to interrupt the timing cap and ground it. it seems to me that this would achieve a reset when the switch is released. for me this would probably suit my needs.
|
I tried this with Ray Wilson's VC LFO. It wouldn't 'sync' to another square wave exactly, but it did reset, so to speak, at each incoming gate. Although, it was jumpier than I would have liked. On the Oddyssey, each key gate very solidly resets the waveform--so it starts rising after each keystroke. On my Ray Wilson experiment, I believe it was more like jerky stopping and starting.
To me, sync suggests a synchronization(for lack of a better term) of frequency whereas resetting doesn't really effect the frequency-- it just re-starts it. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I see. I understand that definition of LFO sync, but I guess my first thought (and I imagine other people's also) is sync like oscillator sync.
I imagine you'll need a counter or frequency and phase lock loop to get LFOs to run at the same (or multiple of) rate. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Sorry I only know a little bit about digital PLLs.
I think if you could come up with a good "synching" LFO (I don't know exactly what to call it) you could sell many of them.
Now that I think about it maybe a counter might be a better solution than PLL since rates can go so low. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| urbanscallywag wrote: | I see. I understand that definition of LFO sync, but I guess my first thought (and I imagine other people's also) is sync like oscillator sync.
|
Maybe I was confused when I spoke above-- but, I thought that audio-type osc hard-sync would be the same with an LFO, and that it would frequency (phase?) lock one VCO to another.
I was under the impression, maybe incorrectly, that this was different from just reseting an LFO. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ian-s

Joined: Apr 01, 2004 Posts: 2672 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Audio files: 42
G2 patch files: 626
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ericcoleridge wrote: | | urbanscallywag wrote: | I see. I understand that definition of LFO sync, but I guess my first thought (and I imagine other people's also) is sync like oscillator sync.
|
Maybe I was confused when I spoke above-- but, I thought that audio-type osc hard-sync would be the same with an LFO, and that it would frequency (phase?) lock one VCO to another.
I was under the impression, maybe incorrectly, that this was different from just reseting an LFO. |
The only diff is what is being synced to. If you sync to a gate, the reset only happens once on key down. If you sync to another oscillator, the reset happens once each cycle of the master. A PLL is something else altogether . |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bubblechamber

Joined: Nov 04, 2006 Posts: 280 Location: NYC
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ericcoleridge wrote: | | urbanscallywag wrote: | I see. I understand that definition of LFO sync, but I guess my first thought (and I imagine other people's also) is sync like oscillator sync.
|
Maybe I was confused when I spoke above-- but, I thought that audio-type osc hard-sync would be the same with an LFO, and that it would frequency (phase?) lock one VCO to another.
I was under the impression, maybe incorrectly, that this was different from just reseting an LFO. |
even with audio rate sync you still get truncated waves, the only way they really get in sync and in phase is if both are tuned the same to start with and the further off tune the slaved oscillator is from the clock the bigger the problem.
i've looked at how everyone has done this and there were some pretty good o-scope pics in a recent thread which shows how waves are truncated that i can't find at the moment.
i've come to the conclusion that a freq counter to set the LFO rate and a reset to get it oscillating is the best solution for me...
and i'm building a simple pot tied to 0-10V with several outputs to send CV to multiple oscillators at once. this way i can tune them to a fixed freq and sweep multiple osc. with one knob. this sounds a little better to my ears, but that's not saying much. this is pretty much the same solution Moog came up with about 45 years ago...
i know i was really screwed up by using sync in soft synths for years and it took a long time for me to really get my head around how this worked in the real world. i agree, if anyone really came up with a sync that really worked in a phase accurate manner, they'd get rich. but conversely, the fact that no one has really managed it after 40 years or so of trying is not a great sign.
i'm sure that if this problem is actually going to get solved it'll be from the people in this community putting our heads together. _________________ You can check your anatomy all you want, and even though there may be normal variation, when it comes right down to it, this far inside the head it all looks the same. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
loss1234

Joined: Jul 24, 2007 Posts: 1536 Location: nyc
Audio files: 41
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bubblechamber

Joined: Nov 04, 2006 Posts: 280 Location: NYC
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
i've been going nuts trying to find the oscilloscope pics of an osc. resetting. it's looking like i might have seen them in a dream... _________________ You can check your anatomy all you want, and even though there may be normal variation, when it comes right down to it, this far inside the head it all looks the same. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| loss1234 wrote: | | where is the IAN fritz lfo with sync (using fets) that you mentioned? |
Well, my mind isn't what it used to be, but I don't remember ever posting anything like that, although I do indeed have a bank of six VC LFOs with reset sync. Sorry.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bugbrand

Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Posts: 846 Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| bugbrand wrote: | | Here's the thread that maybe caused the confusion??!! |
Ah, thanks! Now I'm with you. I got confused because that wasn't specifically LFO related.
My VC LFO that has sync uses a cap to ground off an OTA for the integrator. The sync is done by shorting the cap. This is done by connecting a JFET (MPF102, etc.) across the cap and connecting its gate to: (1) a 1M resistor to the (-) supply and (2) a small input cap. A signal with a positive-going edge will trigger it. The synced signal will continue in the same direction it was already going, since the integrator is still integrating in the same direction. If you wanted it to always go in one particular direction, you would have to set the flipflop to the correct state at the same time as the cap is discharged.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bugbrand

Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Posts: 846 Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Sounds similar to what I suggested for an alternate XR2206 sync:
http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?highlight=sync&t=28182
-- Now, given a couple of months, I've had *some* success using this approach.. but sometimes not.
I've been using, for example, the XR2209 and this required a stronger reset pulse - so I replaced the tranny with an opamp comparator.
And on some other things I just used the tranny and diode (no JFET)
I'd say --- do up a test LFO and then take wires out to a breadboard on which to try various syncing ideas. Check with an oscope, listen with the ears! _________________ http://www.bugbrand.co.uk
http://www.bugbrand.blogspot.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BOB-SNARE
Joined: Sep 26, 2008 Posts: 30 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| bugbrand wrote: |
-- Now, given a couple of months, I've had *some* success using this approach.. but sometimes not.
I've been using, for example, the XR2209 and this required a stronger reset pulse - so I replaced the tranny with an opamp comparator.
And on some other things I just used the tranny and diode (no JFET)
|
Did you mean XR2206?
How did you reset the direction?
I've had luck using an analog switch (4066) to short the cap for XR2206 VCO, but limited success on resetting direction. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bugbrand

Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Posts: 846 Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:27 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi
No - I've been making use of the XR2209 - simple 8pin VCO chip (not so easy to locate... kind of like the NE566 but still in production). Much of it behaves similar to the 2206, but without all the extra features. Just Tri/Sqr output..
I'll have to check on a scope.. I'd kind of presume that the direction would always be the same on resetting if you're shorting the cap out?? ..... _________________ http://www.bugbrand.co.uk
http://www.bugbrand.blogspot.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:37 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm having trouble understanding that circuit. Aren't T1 and D2 biased on all the time? I don't see how the FET gets pinched off.
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|