| Author |
Message |
Dexter76
Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: 10 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:41 am Post subject:
Effects and Drum machines |
 |
|
Greetings,
i'm really new into this wonderful forum and i'm quite new to the electronic music in general.
I take my musical inspirations from Underworld, Orbital, Future Sound Of London
at the moment my gear is a Midi Controller+MC909+MC307 and Ableton+Cubase SX 3.
I'm looking for a couple of things:
-1 a great multieffect processor especially suitable for live sessions
-2 a great Drum machine (i read that the TR909 is still the coolest analogue DM)
Any suggestion?
Regards
Dx76 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mtvic

Joined: Feb 03, 2003 Posts: 526 Location: Townbank Cape May NJ
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:47 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Suggestions:
-1 a great multieffect processor especially suitable for live sessions
Korg Kaoss Pad 2
-2 a great Drum machine (i read that the TR909 is still the coolest analogue DM)
Machinedrum if you can afford it _________________ "I'm the transmitter' I give information."
"You're the antenna,catch the vibration."
>>> Kraftwerk Radioactivity<<< |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:53 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
You've asked a very wide open question - one that is hugely based on personal taste. Start looking around for used things that catch your eye - you can usually catch a few decent reviews at http://www.harmony-central.com - in their effects database.
Some people really love the older classic drum machines - some people like the newer groove boxes. The Korg electribes make a lot of people happy. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Dexter76
Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: 10 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 6:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thnx for your answers.
I've read brillant comments about Kaoss Pad 2 (my music store has the Entrancer version for 400euros...not bad)
I was just wandering if it's a professional stuff in term of sound capabilities...
What's better: analogue or digital effects?
Bye!
Dx76 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 7:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Dexter76 wrote: |
What's better: analogue or digital effects?
Dx76 |
both ...depending...an analog delay is snazzy....digital pitch-shifting is nifty _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 8:44 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
modified analogue effects for anything that can be done anlogue, custom code and patches for everything else.
Beware of people that say "you can't tell the difference". What they mean is "I can't tell the difference and so I asume you can't either". Also, beware of any thing marked as "industry standard". The standard in this industry is never being heard: "industry standard" isn't nearly good enough. _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:00 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Kassen wrote: | | Beware of people that say "you can't tell the difference". What they mean is "I can't tell the difference and so I asume you can't either". |
Good point.
And do keep in mind that a huge lot of digital signal processing won´t handle realtime parameter tweaking in the same way analog signal processing will. Imagine you have set up a rig from hell with analog effects. You can adjust all sorts of parameters and effectively play these in realtime. This done digitally will in most cases produce absolutely uncool artifacts. Digital effects are reasonably safe in a workflow which is based on the "choose-your-presets" methodology.
That said, digital processing artifacts can be quite fun too, but it all depends on what you want. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24544 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 299
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 12:32 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| elektro80 wrote: | | Imagine you have set up a rig from hell with analog effects. |
Just to discover you can't save it  _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Dexter76
Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: 10 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 12:57 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Blue Hell wrote: |
Just to discover you can't save it  |
Damn rigth!
What really drive me crazy is when i see (with extreme devotion) live sessions with the stage crowded by huge racks full of "everything"...
The question is that to produce "professional" music is mandatory to have 1 separate delay rack, 1 echo, 1 equalizer, 1 phaser...etc.etc.etc...?
Or a solution "all in one" like the Kaoss Pad is ok to be competitive?
Sorry for being a pain in the ass but i'm really scared (and amazed) by the huge amount of stuff (and money to invest) that involve electronic music and production.
I come from a minimalistic mic+guitar+couple of pedals culture:-D
Cheers!
Dx76 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Dexter76
Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: 10 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 11:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Does anyone tried the Pioneer EFX 1000?
It's too much Dj oriented?
There is also a huge price difference...Kaoss Pad 2 Entrancer is 480€ and EFX1000 820€
i would mainly use echoes/phaser to produce drum progressions and some vocoders...
Thank you in advance for your suggestions
Bye
Dx76 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 11:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Blue Hell wrote: | | elektro80 wrote: | | Imagine you have set up a rig from hell with analog effects. |
Just to discover you can't save it  |
Why would you ever want to save it?  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
a polaroid ? _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:51 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Blue Hell wrote: | | elektro80 wrote: | | Imagine you have set up a rig from hell with analog effects. |
Just to discover you can't save it  |
Well, that would be a bit late to discover that; I always knew ahead and never saw it as a problem, I don't save Nord Modular patches either.
What's the point? If you want the same again later you can do the same again. I never want the same again, I want something new, preferably better. Analogue rigs are great for this; either you improve the patch or you *have* to discard it.
I honestly think the NM and the G2 would have been better instruments if they had only had one save location and no way of archiving. I think Kim Cascone has a very interesting point when he says electronic "musicians" are increasinly like librarians.
<provocation>
Have there even been any signifficant developments in electronic music at all since synths gained save locations?
</provocation> _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Dexter76 wrote: |
The question is that to produce "professional" music is mandatory to have 1 separate delay rack, 1 echo, 1 equalizer, 1 phaser...etc.etc.etc...?
|
I'm not sure what you mean by "professional" but considder that digital multi-fx these days keep claiming that they have a perfect immitation of analogue effects yet new analogue effects are still being developed, sold and used. _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:37 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Kassen wrote: | | Blue Hell wrote: | | elektro80 wrote: | | Imagine you have set up a rig from hell with analog effects. |
Just to discover you can't save it  |
Well, that would be a bit late to discover that; I always knew ahead and never saw it as a problem. |
As for analog signal processing chains, you would of course practice setting these up and taking them down again, learning all the parameter sweet spots, the gain structure problems involved, alternative routings and more. The good ones you need to keep for live use you would of course translate into a SPD so your soundcrew can help you out when you tour.
These days there are digital signal processing devices that are quite good but still many of these will not handle live parameter tweaking. However, it seems that for some obscene reason people aren´t willling to play sound processing devices anymore. Nowadays people have adopted the electric guitar lingo, calling these wonderful devices for "effects"
Hello!! Sanity check!
Ironically guitarists still tend to actually adjust stuff like "ooomph" and "pump" and "pimpstick" in realtime... still.. another 5 years and all these wonderfully expressive parameters will be gone.. traded for sanitized presets. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr Last edited by elektro80 on Thu May 25, 2006 4:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
deknow

Joined: Sep 15, 2004 Posts: 1307 Location: Leominster, MA (USA)
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:41 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | <provocation>
Have there even been any signifficant developments in electronic music at all since synths gained save locations?
</provocation> |
well, it's a heck of a lot easier to be a performer without a big budget or spending 3 hours on setup.
deknow |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| elektro80 wrote: |
As for analog signal processing chains, you would of course practice setting these up and taking them down again, learning all the parameter sweet spots, the gain structure problems involved, alternative routings and more. The good ones you need to keep for live use you would of course translate into a SPD so your soundcrew can help you out when you tour.
|
If you ever have the chance; go see "Church of Carbon" live. They do this. They have a modified Formant and a new song means a new patch. Chord changes mean knob tweaking. I was deeply impressed by them, best thing was; they made it look easy. _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Kassen wrote: | | elektro80 wrote: |
As for analog signal processing chains, you would of course practice setting these up and taking them down again, learning all the parameter sweet spots, the gain structure problems involved, alternative routings and more. The good ones you need to keep for live use you would of course translate into a SPD so your soundcrew can help you out when you tour.
|
I was deeply impressed by them, best thing was; they made it look easy. |
Well, it should look like it is easy because this is the standard way of doing this anyway.
Yet, I am not saying digital sound processing gear is bad.. not at all, but you are supposed to use what makes sense for any given purpose. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 6:03 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Dexter76 wrote: |
The question is that to produce "professional" music is mandatory to have 1 separate delay rack, 1 echo, 1 equalizer, 1 phaser...etc.etc.etc...?
|
You don´t need any of that. You can get away with a pan flute and a nosejob and I am sure many will deem that approach to be the most "professional" indeed.  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Mohoyoho

Joined: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 1632 Location: Tennessee
Audio files: 8
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:35 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I wouldn't worry too much about whether an effect your looking at is 'pro' enough or if it's more 'dj' oriented and you want to use it for 'x' type of music, etc... tools are tools - you can use them however you like!
For effects I run...
Korg SDD-1200 - older dual digital delay rack - great for controlled feedback, stuck in a metal tunnel, and more realistic type delay stuff - puts out the most annoying pumping noise on earth when sitting idle. I've had this thing since about 1988 and I love it to death.
Lexicon Vortex - fun, morphing delay/chorus type stuff. It's quirky, I like it.
Alesis Wedge - cheap, small reverb - for what it cost me ($120 used) - it's perfect for the cost. However, you can get into a Lexicon reverb fairly easily.
Boss ME-8B - bass multi-effects pedal unit. I'd love to upgrade this since the newer boxes have amp modeling and such, though it's worked great on my bass and whatever synths/drums/whatever I run through it for the last decade.
Synthesizers.com modular - this is my newest addition - I have it setup as an aux send from my mixer like all my other effects.
For drum machines - I own an Alesis SR-16 which I don't really recommend. It's fairly plain vanilla - amazingly I think they're still being made new - got to be in the running for longest product lifecylce of an electronic instrument... scary. I just dug it out of the closet after ignoring it in favor of Fruity Loops and Rebirth on the pc. I'm finding it fun to be working with an actual drum machine again - but... I'm tempted to think I'd be having more fun with a different machine.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Dexter76
Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: 10 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:28 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thnx for your answer mate.
Obviously it's not the gear that makes a musician, but the right equipment, i think, helps a lot:-D
I'm aiming to recreate sound similar to Underworld, Orbital, Future Sound of London...i think that they use a lot of analogue sound
I cannot afford Moog and expensive analog stuff so i'm trying to find the best solution with some hardware components (live oriented) and Pc software.
At the moment MC909+Cubase3sx+MasterKeyboard work just fine...i don't like live sessions behind a PC and i prefer knobs and hardware stuff so i think that Kaoss pad 2 should do the work.
My only concern is that i read KP2 is plenty of sound effects and just the 10% is ok ...is it true? what about the sound quality?
And by the way ...what about the old TR909 as a drum machine?
Cheers
DX76 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:18 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
It all depends on what you want to do. If you seriously are considering the 909, then you should get the TR 707. The sounds are almost as outragously bad as the 909 soundset. It will most likely be very inexpensive. The LCD matrix display will be really helpful. The 707 is very underrated. It has individual outputs for each of the sounds at the back and this means you can also easily route the various sounds to diffferent sound processing devices. You can also play the sounds from the small pads. The programming scheme is very intuitive and the visual feedback from the leds is cool. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
BTW: I like the MachineDrum. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Dexter76 wrote: | | I cannot afford Moog |
Too bad.
| Mohoyoho wrote: | | Back to the original question: a good filter would be handy with a drum machine. I like the Moog MF 101. |
This is great advice. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|