| Author |
Message |
Scott Stites
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
If you mean the schematic on my original site, I had a VC Res circuit in there at one point. I've lost the ability to edit that site, so it's more or less a trainwreck of things I'd like to change (or delete).
I agree with Peter, BTW, about the voltage control - there are much easier ways to control the frequency.
Cheers,
Scott _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
First question for the sucessful builders of the 291... what the hell did I do wrong?? I made a PCB based from the Verbos design, included Scott's changes, and altered any values to gel with the revised schematic. I have been over the layout and parts placement with a the fine tooth several times, and everything looks A-ok.
Having now completed the build...NADA!
Not even a peep. I traced the signal thru the inputs to the TL082. Its fine until it enters the IC. Should I be able to pick up the signal from the C output? I have nothing. I should note that I am using the simple signal tracer from the MFOS site.
I got the idea to skip the input mixer section, and jump my input directly to the other end of "C". Now it gets weird, the signal passes thru all three outputs with no filtering whatsoever...the same straight square wave I am feeding it comes out the LP HP and BP outs. This seems incredibly strange to me, as if there were no circuitry at all between. none of the controls have any effect. Am I going crazy??
Thanks for suffering this fool  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Scott Stites
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hmmm....The TL082 is acting as mixer. You shouldn't be able to hear the signal at pin 2, because this is virtual ground, but you should hear it loud and clear at pin 1, which is the output of the first stage of the mixer. And, of course, you should be able to hear it loud and clear at pin 7 (point C) as well.
Bypassing point C should work fine - in fact, that's the original input of the filter - the mixer was put in there just to easily deal with multiple input signals.
The fact that you can hear the signal on all three outputs isn't crazy, but the fact there is no filtering going on is obviously not right. It's possible the control section isn't drawing any current through the LEDs for one reason or another, or something else is going on (gee, that's helpful, isn't it?).
There could be some basic misconnection that's making it happen all wonky. You might try solving the problem concerning the mixer first - it may lead you to what the problem is, and, if so, will be generally easier to tackle.
Of course, check your rail voltages and whether those voltages are making it to the supply pins of the op amps. Make sure ground is ground. Check the output of the TL072 with a DMM - is it railed high or low? If you put in a sine wave instead of a pulse wave at point C, does it sound clear on the output or is it all harsh and distorted?
Make sure D1 and D2 are each pointed in the right direction as well.
Cheers,
Scott _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
OK, rail voltages are +/- 14.75 VDC, +/-15 before the 10 ohms. I checked that the IC supply pins are getting their respective voltages. The output pin from the mixer IC is showing like +13.5 V. D1 and D2 are properly oriented.
I have tested several 82s in the mixer, no change from one to the next. I pulled all the IC's except the mixer, same deal. Is that Ok to do?? I would assume that there should be no net change to that small circuit if the others are pulled.
I have found that I used a 68k resistor before D1 rather than 68 ohm. I will swap it out today if I have or can cobble something close. Will this have a big effect?
One thing I did find was a tiny bit of cat hair stuck in a solder point on the positive voltage, it did appear to bridge the negative supply!!!! YUCK!!! It did not seem to affect my meter readings but... I have always wondered, if the + and - rails are bridged what will be destroyed??? I understand the ICs will be shot, does this also extend to polarized cap? Vactrols?
Thanks for all the help. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| numbernone wrote: | | I have found that I used a 68k resistor before D1 rather than 68 ohm. I will swap it out today if I have or can cobble something close. Will this have a big effect? |
Hi NumberNone!
I believe you've found the source of your problem. Yes, the resistor difference you've discovered does have a big effect.
Think of it this way, a resistor resists current, and when current is resisted, Mr. Ohm tells us voltage will also drop. The design calls for a fairly slight restriction (68ohm) and you have put a MASSIVE restriction there instead. (1000 times as much!).
It's as if a road crew was supposed to shut down ONE lane of ONE of the bridges into Manhattan, and instead they closed ALL lanes of ALL bridges, leaving only one lane to get in or out of Manhattan...
As a New Yorker, you can probably visualise the "big effect" of that!
Now in this particular circuit the roadblock made by the overly large resistor happens to be in the portion which affects the vactrols that control the filter's center frequency. So it will be no surprise that the filter would have "no effect" as you've posted earlier in this thread, because like the new Yorkers trying to get into Manhattan; the electrons trying to get through the Q1 "bridge" are getting nowhere...
Change the resistor and your circuit will likely work as planned.
The cathair probably just became an "organic additive". Is this how the Cyberdyne T-800 series got its start? (Ah'll be bahck...)
Randal
P.S. Scott S, if you're reading this, could you please PM me your VC resonance circuit as used on this filter? Thank you.
. Last edited by Randaleem on Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Update with some progress.
The mixer section still aint happenin'. Its just weird. I am hopping straight to the old input. Some filtering is starting to happen. for a square wave, the BP out has a good sweep with the initial center pot. FM input is also functioning tho not a giant range. Resonance is adding a bit of peak. At this point the BW pot must be fully CCW to pass a tone, the slightest CW turn pulls the signal out instantly, its CV is acting like a gate, cutting in and out. HP out acts just like the BP.
LP is passing no signal. Now the Center freq CV is functioning and in observing its behavior, it appears to function almost bipolar, with zero input at its center position. However the sweep it is producing sounds exactly the same to my ears, CW or CWW. But damn it does sound nice! Sine waves are in the same boat, although the resonance seems much more pronouced on the square wave. Probably forgetting a bit but I'm hungry!
So thats where I stand before dinner tonight. Good bit of progress , finish line hopefully in sight. Incomplete yet BADASS filter. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the info Randal, the NYC allegory really hits home! Trying to ride my bike as much as possible these days. As my last post says it is starting to get its legs but is hardly up and running yet. I will change that resistor post haste.
Looking forward to those QFG boards, as well as your model of the 291 should it come to pass.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:24 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| numbernone wrote: | Thanks for the info Randal, the NYC allegory really hits home! Trying to ride my bike as much as possible these days. As my last post says it is starting to get its legs but is hardly up and running yet. I will change that resistor post haste.
Looking forward to those QFG boards, as well as your model of the 291 should it come to pass.  |
Glad to help, hope it works!
As for the QFG, expect a message tomorrow. And as for the 291, the reason I caught your post is that I was reviewing this thread as I'm laying out the Board. So it is coming to pass.
Randal |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Swapped out the 68k to 68 Ohm. Sounding much more rubust but my silly mixer problem is still present, as well as the Bandwidth cutting it all out. LP out is now in action as well so its coming together in fits and starts!! WOOWOO |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Scott Stites
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
How's the filtering coming along Numbernone?
Oh, yes, I somehow missed this:
| Quote: | | P.S. Scott S, if you're reading this, could you please PM me your VC resonance circuit as used on this filter? Thank you. |
Since I worked with that, a very wise man told me:
| Quote: | | Just because I can do something doesn't mean I should. |
And I seem to have read elsewhere
| Quote: | | I believe a large part of being a good designer is to know when to say when. |
I've learned much since that page was put up, and, again, I must point out I have no method to edit it, otherwise I'd strike the entire damn thing.
The point being, if you understand the 291, or have built it, you'll find that the concept of VC resonance is redundant and mostly pointless. It already has it for all intents and purposes with the VC BW. Putting further control over it was a perfect example of the law of diminishing returns, and I dropped it.
If I'd thought it ultimately worthwhile, it would have been put in full on my web page. And it certainly would have been made available here for all to freely use as well, rendering a PM quite needless.
Cheers,
Scott _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:55 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Scott,
Makes sense. BTW, I think I've seen those quotes somewhere before
Thank you,
Randal
| Scott Stites wrote: |
I've learned much since that page was put up,
Putting further control over it was a perfect example of the law of diminishing returns, and I dropped it. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Well I have been in Montana for the last 5 days...visiting my girlfriends family. Only to be chased away by the most raging forest fire in years!!! Serious yikes...Needless to say i will be working on the 291 again starting today, and certainly pestering the smarties with ????s.
Thanks for asking!!! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Scott Stites
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Oh, that's a shame. I heard just yesterday on the radio those trees have really been taking a beating from some beetle or whatever. I was in CO earlier this summer, and saw the same thing going on the with the trees in Rocky Mountain National Park. Made the north part of the park look like one giant tinderbox. _________________ My Site |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbernone
Joined: Aug 16, 2006 Posts: 477 Location: new york city
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Ok, I have found that a mega slight adjustment to the BW manual pot, say 5 degrees seems to encompass the full range of its function, any further CW and the pass band is closed completely (I think). Is there a single resistor perhaps that is controlling the range? I had to swap out one on my wave multiplier that had bogged down the PWM range, hoping something similar is happening here, and a wizened one may point it out before I start plucking out parts. Thanks. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
keithwin

Joined: Jul 20, 2007 Posts: 83 Location: uk
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:25 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Wow I am glad I found this topic.
I started a 291 clone years ago from Marks design and was never to happy with my result - never had the time to troubleshoot either.
Its just been on a shelf looking good.
I hopefully will be changing some 68K resistors this weekend,
Thanks Scott!!
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
3vcos
Joined: Oct 26, 2006 Posts: 107 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Where did you find the skirts for the blue buchla knobs? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
keithwin

Joined: Jul 20, 2007 Posts: 83 Location: uk
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Group buy years ago, they are one piece moulded,
I got the small and med knobs - The large ones as on the
oscs we too expensive. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
3vcos
Joined: Oct 26, 2006 Posts: 107 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Oh well, I have lots of the skirtless buchla style knobs. Anyone know if you can just buy the skirts anywhere? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Noiseconformist

Joined: Aug 05, 2008 Posts: 27 Location: Vienna
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi,
I've just discovered mark's blog today, and it reminded me that only one 291 is not enough for the greedy man I am.
My only complain about the 291 that is already here : I have to use (waste) a complete three channel mixer before feeding CF CV input...
(keyboard tracking, plus a bit of envelope, and just a touch something else...).
So, I need more CV inputs on the next BPF.
| Scott Stites wrote: | I changed R39 from 68K to 33K.
You see, I'd just built it and the control signals from my synth weren't.....um, you know the rest of the story.
BTW, I did the same thing with the bandwidth input resistor, R43.
I left the FM input resistor at 47K.
Scott |
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/scottnoanh/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/291%20.jpg
Can we easily add FM and CF CV INPUTS to it ?
(with a simple pot, non reversing wise)
I just add another R45 and C8 for FM ?
and another R36 resistor for CF (non reversing attenuator)
I hope a couple of these beasts to be enough - Don releases now a triple version.
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan06/articles/buchla200e.htm?print=yes
New AMPLITUDE feature is a VCA (or "GATE"....vactrol ?) at audio input ?
It aims to lower signal amplitude when BW really starts rocking ?
Cheers,
ff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:15 am Post subject:
Re: Great Thanks ! |
 |
|
| funkyfarm wrote: |
| Quote: | Hey dear all !
Can anybody find 2N3566 datasheet ?
(or the pinouts for a TO-105 transistor)
We've build here two of this filter (trying to drop some pix) and have problem with the transistor implementation on verbos' pcb...
|
|
two years later...still didn't find 3566 pinout...
Can anyone confirm this to-105 pinout ?
Maybe i 've get some faulty ones back in time...
Cheers,
ff
http://english.electronica-pt.com/db/cross-reference.php?ref=2N3566
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've just etched my first Verbos 291 PCB. I was hoping someone might be able to help me with a few details that I'm unsure of:
I've read here that the (2) 2N3566 gen purpose NPNs (per filter) can be substituted with 3904s, and that the pin-outs are compatible. Is there anyone here who has successfully completed the 291 using this substitution?
Also, the (2) diodes in this circuit are both 3.9v Zeners, yes?
Last, which of these caps call for critical high quality polystyrene/silver mica? I'm guessing the 910pf; any others?
I appreciate any suggestions anyone could make! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
guitarfool

Joined: Feb 26, 2007 Posts: 161 Location: Maryland
Audio files: 8
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ericcoleridge wrote: | I've just etched my first Verbos 291 PCB. I was hoping someone might be able to help me with a few details that I'm unsure of:
I've read here that the (2) 2N3566 gen purpose NPNs (per filter) can be substituted with 3904s, and that the pin-outs are compatible. Is there anyone here who has successfully completed the 291 using this substitution?
Also, the (2) diodes in this circuit are both 3.9v Zeners, yes?
Last, which of these caps call for critical high quality polystyrene/silver mica? I'm guessing the 910pf; any others?
I appreciate any suggestions anyone could make! |
I just finished mine ( using the Funkyfarm layout from earlier in this thread) and it's working. I haven't played around with it much yet. Too tired (it's way past my bedtime).
I used 3904's and mine were the same pinout as shown in the Mark Verbos parts overlay.
D1 is a 3.9v Zener, and D2 is just a 1N4148. You could probably use a 1N914 in place of the 1N4148.
The two .022uF (22nF) are the main ones. I used polyester 'cause I ran out of polypropylene. That's second best to polystyrene, which you probably can't find in that large a value anyway. I used polystyrene for the 220pF and 470 pF, but that's overkill I think.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject:
Re: Great Thanks ! |
 |
|
On the Buchla schematic, and the Marjan Urekar re-draw, there is a 5k pot for 'Q'. However, on the Verbos PCB, the pads for this pot are labeled 'Res'. Is this the panel mount 'Q' from the Buchla module?
Then, there are pads labeled 'Q' for a 100k pot. Looking at the schematic, this looks more like an input attentuator to me. What I'm wondering is, was this a trim pot on the Buchla 291? As far as I know, there is no panel mount input attentuator on the 291, so, I'm assuming it was a trim. But why does Verbos label it 'Q'? This is very confusing.
| funkyfarm wrote: |
 |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:47 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i have a new adaptation of the verbos layout with mods if anyone is interested. input mixer (with a error fixed from scott's mod schematic), cv processor, hp/lp tap/buffers - single filter per board.
here is a jpg
ill upload the pdf soon
Q has always been resonance in my book, and its on the buchla panel
 _________________ problemchild
melbourne australia
http://cycleofproblems.blogspot.com/
http://www.last.fm/user/prblmchild |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|