Author |
Message |
djthomaswhite

Joined: Nov 22, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Orange, CA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:43 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes, I can't think of anything that has changed. Maybe 1 less 100K resistor but I think is is accurate. (Just ordered parts for 3 LPG's and 10 Vactrols myself today).
Has anyone got any experience with VTL5C2 Catrols from Vactec? Slow/Fast?
Thomas _________________ Thomas
www.naturalrhythmmusic.com/diy.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Speaking of "slow/fast" Vactrols:
I hope you guys are aware that faster is not necessarily better. An ideal VCA or VCF should have infinitely fast CV response, but part of the character of the Buchla 292c is the sloppy response of the Vactrols. The short envelope that is introduced can give the sound a more "physical, acoustic" character. I experienced similar effects recently when I built my Vactrol based Korg PS resonator clone, it sounded really nice when connecting very glitching CV cables, much more interesting than sweeping it with an LFO...
The question is what Vactrol the user would consider "the best" for a modern day 292c... it might be different from the model that Buchla preferred to use in the '70s. Might be interesting to try out, or build some different ones! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
chrissugar
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 Posts: 34 Location: ROMANIA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:13 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
djthomaswhite wrote: |
Has anyone got any experience with VTL5C2 Catrols from Vactec? Slow/Fast?
|
The fastest vactrol in the industry for audio applications is the Perkin Elmer VTL5C1. It is fast and has a wide dynamic range.
The VTL5C4 has a very slow release about 1.5seconds.
The VTL5C2 is significantly slower than the VTL5C1 but faster than the VTL5C4.
Of course we talk about release times, attack times are relatively similar in the few millisecond range.
I use all the three vactrols in audio compressor applications, the 5C1 in compressors where you want to have full control of time constants, the 5C2 mostly in comps with fixed but musical time constant, and the 5C4 in compressor-leveler aplication. They all have qualities but you have to adapt them to your specific applications.
I will try the 5C2 (not instead of the 5C4 but as an option) in the LPG because I think it has a very usable (musical) time constant.
chrissugar |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
XeNoN23
Joined: Oct 06, 2007 Posts: 16 Location: AuStRiA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Wow, the demo on y.t. sounds great!!!
If possible, please put me down for 2 boards!
Prepay is no problem!!
thx and b.r. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
djthomaswhite

Joined: Nov 22, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Orange, CA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
hanks for the vactrol info! Do you know the approximate decay times of each type of vactrol? You said vtl5c4 is about 1.5seconds... Where does the vtl5c3 fall etc? I will be makin a bank of these will different speeds. If anyone wants to get in on a shared front panel express order in motm format then email me so we can talk about what we want on the panels. Thanks guys!
Thomas _________________ Thomas
www.naturalrhythmmusic.com/diy.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Depending on how many others are interested/what the total cost per panel would be I would probably be interested in a group buy on MOTM panels. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
chrissugar
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 Posts: 34 Location: ROMANIA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:56 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
djthomaswhite wrote: | Do you know the approximate decay times of each type of vactrol? You said vtl5c4 is about 1.5seconds... Where does the vtl5c3 fall etc? |
Here is a small table for comparison:
VTL5C1
attack=2.5ms release=35ms dynamic range=100dB Ron(10mA)=600ohm
VTL5C2
attack=3.5ms release=500ms dynamic range=69dB Ron(10mA)=800ohm
VTL5C3
attack=2.5ms release=35ms dynamic range=75dB Ron(10mA)=5ohm
VTL5C4
attack=6.0ms release=1500ms dynamic range=72dB Ron(10mA)=125ohm
The two fast release vactrols are probably suitable for applications like high speed LFO modulations, stuttering, gating etc.
chrissugar |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
djthomaswhite

Joined: Nov 22, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Orange, CA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:40 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the cool chart! I'll be making a vtl5c2 unit to sit between my slopass vtl5c4 from the YouTube video and the traditional vtl5c3's.
Update: prototypes shipped today. Will have Friday. Beta testers will have theirs shipped to them on Saturday! Happy times!!!
Now if I could just get my box from bridechamber I'll be 100% ready for testing (fingers crossed and hoping). Time for some serious Deyo-power. Can't beat Scott's price on the Chinese 112a jack clones!
Thomas
Thomas _________________ Thomas
www.naturalrhythmmusic.com/diy.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sourcery
Joined: Feb 16, 2007 Posts: 11 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:16 am Post subject:
2 please? |
 |
|
If it is not too late, I'll sign up for two pcb's (or more) depending on price...
Thanks!
/Kristian |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
djthomaswhite wrote: | Do you know the approximate decay times of each type of vactrol? You said vtl5c4 is about 1.5seconds... Where does the vtl5c3 fall etc? |
i did not see any tolerance (+/- %) listed for the decay time specs on any of the datasheets i looked at, but i've heard there may be substantial variation between units of the same number. one mfr (who will remain nameless) claimed he handselected his vactrols for specific decay times (again, i don't know to what tolerance) and generally only got 1 out of 5 that matched.
b _________________ www.fluxmonkey.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BananaPlug

Joined: Jul 04, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Philly
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes, I'm wondering about that too. See my post a couple pages back. A standard way to test them would facilitate matching people up with matched sets of Vactrols. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:28 am Post subject:
Vactrol datasheets |
 |
|
For the still curious out there; the Vactrol product pages, each with a datasheet:
http://optoelectronics.perkinelmer.com/catalog/Category.aspx?CategoryName=VTL5C+Series
The attack times are spec'ed as typ, whereas the decay times are max values.
If matching is important, I guess the resistance tracking in steady-state operation is at least as important as decay time tracking. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:12 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
BananaPlug wrote: | See my post a couple pages back. A standard way to test them would facilitate matching people up with matched sets of Vactrols. |
How about the following simple method for comparing two Vactrols:
The more similar they are, the closer to GND the output will be.
It should be fairly possible to grade several Vactrols by using one as a "reference", compare the others with it, and see how high or low their oscilloscope lines end up. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Your V+ and V- should be calibrated pretty well for that to work. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:52 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
urbanscallywag wrote: | Your V+ and V- should be calibrated pretty well for that to work. |
They are.
Well, not more than the precision you need in matching these low-tolerance objects. And a straight line will at least show that the resistance ratio is constant, this might be the important point in some applications (I haven't studied the 292c case myself).
How much precision do you need, for this and other applications?
Btw, I wrote "+V" and "-V" to show that they should be the same voltage with different polarity. Not "V+" and "V-". |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:13 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ah, I see. I guess I was just thinking that you'll never get zero if matched because the -V and +V would have some offset. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
hodad
Joined: Jul 31, 2007 Posts: 41 Location: atlanta
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:15 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'd like to put myself in for 2 boards.
Thanks!
Tom |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Junk Rhythm

Joined: Jan 07, 2008 Posts: 81 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Prepay sounds good and a lot safer. Since the there is no cap now, I would like to adjust my order from 2 PCBs to 4 instead. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
djthomaswhite

Joined: Nov 22, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Orange, CA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Here's a photo of the first (old) prototype "slopass version with vtl5c4" in a nice FPE panel (also attached). Express PCB sells 3 of these for 64 US shipped to your door in 3 days. I have a triple Preamp with headphone amplifier I am working on at the moment.
Enjoy the photo!
Thomas
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
1.1 MB |
Viewed: |
279 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
1010.09 KB |
Viewed: |
287 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
|
 Download (listen) |
Filename: |
TW_RES_LOPASS_GATE_SINGLE.fpd |
Filesize: |
2.22 KB |
Downloaded: |
252 Time(s) |
_________________ Thomas
www.naturalrhythmmusic.com/diy.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BananaPlug

Joined: Jul 04, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Philly
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
See image about 6 posts back:
Quote: | How about the following simple method for comparing two Vactrols... |
I like that. Very practical. But I was thinking more of a way for DIYers to swap with each other. If I buy 10 Vactrols and find a couple matching pairs in that batch I'll be very happy. Maybe I won't be so lucky. In any case it would be cool if I could post quantifiable test results and then swap with somebody for a better match. I can see all sorts of problems with this standardized test idea however. Pretty unlikely that we'd be able to reproduce each others results. I should go back and look at Perkin Elmer's datasheet to see how they quantify things. It's been a while since I looked at it. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
intercorni
Joined: Jun 04, 2007 Posts: 69 Location: hamburg
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
2 for me please.
Thx,
Cornel |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
it would be nice to have the disscussion about matching Vactrols in a own thread.
I'm very interested to know how to match them. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
djthomaswhite

Joined: Nov 22, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Orange, CA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hey guys,
I just received the non-solder masked prototypes and took a couple of quick snapshots. You will see there are two carbon pots mounted on these.
Here are any issues I notice immediately:
I have found one connection that needs to be modified by the pots. Nothing spacing the pots off the PCB won't fix, but I'd rather eliminate any potential for trouble by the final design (as you would expect me to do my best job here). With the smaller Alpha pots, the metal surrounding the pot pins can short out the connection between the pots. The Alpha pots also need to be about 1/8th of an inch closer to the edge of the board to avoid having to bend the PCB when mounting to the panel via the pots.
Nothing else yet. I realize and you will see that the pads for soldering are smaller, but this whole PCB is fairly compact and larger spacing will not work. I needed to make sure the connections don't short out. In my proto's without the solder mask it is more of an issue that it will be when the production versions are created. I can say that Express PCB does not sacrifice quality to be "Express". The PCB's look great and will look even better with any kinks worked out and sitting proudly behind your future panels. I have attached two photos, but two more can be found at my Flickr page.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/26485243@N06/
Thanks guys!
Thomas
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
1.07 MB |
Viewed: |
259 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
1.09 MB |
Viewed: |
251 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
_________________ Thomas
www.naturalrhythmmusic.com/diy.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
RF

Joined: Mar 23, 2007 Posts: 1502 Location: Northern Minnesota, USA
Audio files: 28
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Nice Thomas! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
trance4ever
Joined: Sep 21, 2008 Posts: 3 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject:
292c LPG Subject description: 292c LPG |
 |
|
If there is another run or any boards come available, I'll take 2 boards.
thx. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|