| interested in a PCB or 4? |
| yep |
|
98% |
[ 151 ] |
| nope |
|
1% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 153 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:53 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Josh,
Great news! I'm really looking forward to this project. Thank you for making it possible
Also:
| Luka wrote: |
Im also wondering if my QUad / AB / CD section is correct down the bottom |
Is Luka's panel design accurate? If using 4 pcbs, I was thinking there would be A/B and C/D switches, to 'or' the two respective sections--as on the Buchla module. But, as the PCBs are, would there also be a 'quad' switch (presumably to link all 4)? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | Is Luka's panel design accurate? |
it looks like he has an extra switch hole down there [the one that says 'quad']
again, the 'quad' down there does not refer to '4', but quadrature. quad in the title of this project's namesake refers to the fact that there are 4 in the panel.
so, for each pair, you have one 'or' or 'peak' pot and one 'quad[rature]' switch.
hope this clears it up |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
A 16U Eurorack idea
Edited because error. See below. Last edited by Sound on Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Coriolis

Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Great news!
But errmm...do I have to figure out all of those extra paypal charges or do you just calculate the total for me?
C |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | o I have to figure out all of those extra paypal charges or do you just calculate the total for me? |
i will send exact amount on invoice.
| Quote: | | A 16U Eurorack idea Smile |
nice, but you need only one quadrature switch per pair and you would have only one 'or' output |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Coriolis

Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:52 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Those are lurvlee Josh! I've adapted that layout to my own panel format (also using banana jacks). I think the way you've arranged it makes a lot of sense.
Btw: will the documentation explain the necessary connections between the two boards? If I've understood correctly, part of the circuitry that links these two 281's will be off-board?
C |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| hey thanks! yeah i will have a couple wiring diagrams too. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:36 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| topp wrote: |
| Quote: | | A 16U Eurorack idea Smile |
nice, but you need only one quadrature switch per pair and you would have only one 'or' output |
Yes! was very late last night!!!!! I'll correct now!!!! thanks! Last edited by Sound on Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:49 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi topp,
In your front panel, "Peak out" is, I think "OR sustain", but what is "Peak in"? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
as i understood the function generator this is just a gate/trigger in. you may want to call it peak in just because you may retrigger the generator with the peak out. am i right here? _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Fonik, don't understand... also these input tnere are not in the original Buchla design...
It is my corrected 16U Eurorack suggestion:
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject:
Latecomer looking for 4 boards |
 |
|
Latecomer looking for 4 boards!
Hi all,
I found this thread today, I always wanted to clone the Buchla 281 but to my great horror I realize that I'm probably way too late to get any of these nice boards.
But if anybody out there is having regular nightmares after having ordered too many (or if Josh ends up with additional ones) please PM me - as I'd be more than happy to take care of them! Btw, I'm looking for 4 boards.
Thanks,
good luck with the soldering and happy triggering everybody.  Last edited by /mr on Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | Hi topp,
In your front panel, "Peak out" is, I think "OR sustain", but what is "Peak in"? |
hey, 'peak out' is the 'or' output (v. max) for a pair of FGs, 'peak in' is an extra input to the same circuit, because i had panel space to add it.
remember the 'or' output will put out the highest voltage presented to it's inputs.
| Quote: |
It is my corrected 16U Eurorack suggestion: |
looks correct. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:24 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
so i am getting alot of confirmations and a few things have come up:
1. do not send me money yet. for one thing, the boards are not here yet. for another, the yahoo email i provided in the PM is not associated with my paypal account, i set it up specifically to handle support issues with this project. i will send an official invoice from my paypal email address when it is time to pay, with the total.
2. 8$ US does not include shipping. i have to buy a big pack of padded envelopes, print shipping labels [this is one reason i asked for your shipping addresses] and i'm not sure how much that will be yet. domestic mail will be a flat rate, but i will have to price some international orders on a case-by-case basis.
3. if you can pay by US funds, then i don't get charged a currency conversion fee. so by all means, save a buck or two if you can. i hope it is made clear that the paypal charge[s] will be added to your totals.
thanks alot!
josh |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| topp wrote: | 'peak in' is an extra input to the same circuit, because i had panel space to add it.
|
Ok, but what is its function? how it works?
thanks! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Topp, about the payments its same easy to me, and I think for all us, pay on us dollar that pay in euro. It is a lot of work to you. Do not work so much trying to be too fair.
Every one know that you have a lot of work, so. make it easy. If say 9 or 10 or 11 US dollar cover aproxematly or more your paypal taxes it is Ok.
Go ahead and many many thanks! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
hey, so you mean if you [the international buyer] chooses "US Dollars" that you will pay that difference and i wouldn't get that charge? excuse my ignorance, paypal is still pretty new to me.
have a look at Yves' minimum/maximum module here:
http://yusynth.net/Modular/EN/MINMAX/index.html
the 'peak' section works like the maximum, the 'peak in' is just one more input- the others being the 2 functions of course |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sound
Joined: Jun 06, 2006 Posts: 842
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
well, I only know that when I pay I can choose the devise( euro, dollar, etc...)
And you receive it in Us dollar. But I have used Paypal as a customer , not as a saler.
maybe fonik or Tim servo know exactly about that.
I'll take a look to the link. Thanks. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:59 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm in because Topp phoned Don and got approval. Kudos!!!
I wanted to bring something up before people complete their front panels. The slopes of this envelope are linear (scope shots). Grant Richter, in explaining the 281 and his own excellent Envelator, tells of feeding back some of the output CV to the time inputs, in order to continuously modify the slopes from linear through exponential through logarithmic, depending upon the voltage (positive provides one, negative the other, both in increasing depth).
Does Grenader still sell his miniPCB that provides a center-detented inverting attenuator, ala' the Serge and some Buchla modules? I can see having one for each envelope stage.
I'm a nut for keyboard tracking of envelope time, so it looks like I'll have to wire up some CV summing circuits...and something to allow for variable velocity control amount.
Just some thoughts on an aspect that I haven't heard discussed herein. Thanks again Topp, I'm looking forward to it. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Peake wrote: | | I wanted to bring something up before people complete their front panels. The slopes of this envelope are linear (scope shots). Grant Richter, in explaining the 281 and his own excellent Envelator, tells of feeding back some of the output CV to the time inputs, in order to continuously modify the slopes from linear through exponential through logarithmic ... |
That's an interesting possibility. Normally we prefer log envelopes and linear LFOs, and this module is somewhere in between... what to do, what to do? Add every possibility and we're ending up with a modular with the JD-800 syndrome - half of the panel space is occupied by envelope parameters!
Personally I would probably keep them linear and true to the original, and be fine with log CV-ADSRs.... but the possibility of exp response would be something new and exciting for sure. Hmm. Perhaps a straight quad module and a deluxified single module.
(Another thing that is clearly "missing" on the 281 is attenuators for all the Attack and Decay CV inputs. Many many CV input attenuators are missing in the modular world, in everything from lo-fi PAiA to hi-fi Cwejman.
Adding voltage control to parameters is always tempting, but having to add an awful lot of knobs for the CV inputs apparently isn't what everybody likes. And the modules end up with parameters that can only be modulated with maximum sensitivity.
So, owners/builders of such synths, how do you go about it? Do you prefer having extra utility modules with some attenuators to patch in when you need them, instead of having CV amount knobs exactly everywhere?
It feels to me like you'd still end up with quite a lot of hardware (extra jacks and cables instead) and the CV amount knobs are placed in quite bad and illogical locations, outside their respective parameter's module.) |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peake

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1113 Location: Loss Angeles
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Don Buchla is the man, and he left off attenuators...his 281 layout is excellent, as are his other modules, so you have to give him credit where credit is due. A bunch of attenuators would so clutter a panel that it would be nigh unusuable (unless someone can prove me wrong). I'm seeking additional panels or panel space dedicated to CV manipulation, as that is the module's strong point. VC LFO, VC envelope, VC quadrature LFO, VC gate delay, etc.
Once you've played with continuously variable envelope slopes, you won't want to go back  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Luka

Joined: Jun 29, 2007 Posts: 1003 Location: Melb.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
about the input attenuators, i personally don't see them as a necessity for this type of circuit [a controller itself].
you can add them of course, but be aware that the input circuit wasn't designed for this and is hence not buffered as in, say, a VCO. the consequence is that the [grounded] input attenuator will likely have some effect [not much] on it's respective slope when the CV input is not being used.
you may have to change a few resistor values in the input circuit if this annoys you. i guess it wouldn't be too big a deal, as if you are messing with the attenuator knob, you probably have something plugged into the CV jack anyway.
i think of the CV inputs in this circuit as facilitating a more or less 'programmable' envelope [according to synthesizer programming techniques of the early 70's ] for example, ganging all CV inputs together in a 281 module lends itself to applications in polyphony where a user might want to play 4 duplicate voices...
this isn't to say, though, that dynamic [vs. static] control of the slopes isn't
super useful as well. it's just that the attenuator knob here might not be something one reaches for while playing nearly as much as with other types of modules.
there are lots of modifications that come to mind with these generators. it will be really interesting to see how people build them! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|