Author |
Message |
Photon

Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Posts: 363 Location: Boston
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
akrearke wrote: | Sorry, hope this doesn't change the interest. |
Yes, still interested!  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mono-poly

Joined: Jul 07, 2004 Posts: 937 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:18 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Interested. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
creatorlars

Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 524 Location: Denton, TX
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:53 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm interested as well. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
boosimas johnson
Joined: Nov 15, 2008 Posts: 13 Location: arizona
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
it would be a challenge for me to be disinterested |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Coriolis

Joined: Apr 11, 2005 Posts: 616 Location: Stilling, Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:10 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | If not I can just post the foils and part layouts for all the tkb's designs done so far... |
Akrearke, will you still offer this option?
C _________________ Some Rubber Stamp Sound Effects - and other sound effects |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
yeah, i'm not trying to make a living on this, but to bring in some cash to help with the cost of building the rest of my b clone system. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:39 am Post subject:
tkb |
 |
|
I thank everyone on this thread for being so patient. I have just completed the last 5 circuits for my buchla clone system. I have used many of the designs that have been posted here on electro-music and would also like to thank everyone who contribute freely. The modules I have built are Verbos's 258 in a dual, his 291 in a dual, and the 292 in dual, I have a dual 110, serge vca, and vactrol cross fader, also Topp's 281 in quad form that a I had to layout using the images from the pcb he offered sometime back, and the big one, the 112 Tkb. All that is left is the building of the cabinet and panel for the first part of this system. I wanted to have some modules ready that could be used to demonstrate the TKB. This is the reason for not posting any information., but it is my hope in the next month all will be completed. Then I will post all the information on this thread. In the meantime, I have done a double sided layout for the serge style TKB from the schmatic found on the music machines site, this is the one with the sequencing and whatnot. I'm sure everyone here is familiar with. I will also build a prototype of this as soon as I find an MM74C150, and will keep everyone posted as to it's progress.
Sometime in the next week I will go ahead and post the foil and parts layout for the Synapse article TKB. There may be some bug in this one, i will leave it up to others to find the problems and post there results, if any. Originally it was designed for 25 note operation, but I will trim it back to 16 since this seems to be the desired number of "keys". Again, thanks for your patience and I hope to have all this up very soon. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:26 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi folks, I just noticed this thread and read some of the early posts. I really like the way that folks are sharing information about the subject, so I thought I would add my own contribution. Here goes:
One day a while back I decided I wanted to build a simple Theramin out of a relaxation oscillator and a capacitive touch switch. It ended up sensing my finger at a distance of a few centimeters, but it seemed to really work best when I touched the sensor with my finger. The more pressure I touched with, the faster the oscillator oscillated.
I have long since lost the design values, but they would be easy to come up with. The circuit consists of an opamp or comparator, three resistors, and the touch switch - that's it for each switch. The sensor plates replace the capacitor in the oscillator, very simple and produces a frequency modulated square wave output.
I also experimented with adding some circuitry between the sensor and the oscillator - I think I was using a negative impedance converter IIRC. I found that the NIC was not necessary, all you need is the relaxation oscilaltor I believe.
The attached photo shows how small and simple the circuit is.
I wonder if such a design would be appropriate for your purposes?
Les
Description: |
The relaxation oscillator prototype capacitive sensor |
|
Filesize: |
276.57 KB |
Viewed: |
229 Time(s) |
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge. |

|
_________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bugbrand

Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Posts: 846 Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:26 pm Post subject:
Re: tkb |
 |
|
akrearke wrote: | The modules I have built are Verbos's 258 in a dual... |
Have you started 1v/oct calibration on the verbos 258?
akrearke wrote: | and the big one, the 112 Tkb...In the meantime, I have done a double sided layout for the serge style TKB from the schmatic found on the music machines site |
These two TKBs, if not all of three, are functionally very similar, yes? They all, at least, output pressure CV, pulse, and row of presets? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The 74150 is, i think, supplied by a max. of +5V. the mm74c150 isup to 17v.
No i have not started vco calibration, I start the calibration and trimming after everything is assembled. It seems that the serge style tkb, is note on/off and preset cv only. it appears that it was primarily used as a sequencer. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bugbrand

Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Posts: 846 Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Oh yes - you're right!....
It *may* be that the CD4067 would work though -- they have different pinouts, but appear very similar in operation. (well, I haven't fully checked the stats, but...)
There were two things I wondered about:
- the 4067 is bi-directional while the MM74C150 is one way -> but with the given setup this appears not to be an issue.
- the MM74C150 has a Strobe pin while the 4067 has an inhibit pin -> but this is, I think, basically the same -> Strobe is tied low and the Inhibit would also be.
.....Hmmm!?!.... _________________ http://www.bugbrand.co.uk
http://www.bugbrand.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:09 pm Post subject:
Re: tkb |
 |
|
akrearke wrote: | In the meantime, I have done a double sided layout for the serge style TKB from the schmatic found on the music machines site, this is the one with the sequencing and what not. I'm sure everyone here is familiar with. I will also build a prototype of this as soon as I find an MM74C150, and will keep everyone posted as to it's progress.
|
Hi,
Sounds like you've done some nice work! I hope your own DIY project comes together nicely. And I look forward to reading about it. But I have a question about your stated 112 TKB plans...
Do you plan to ask Serge and/or Rex for permission before posting his/their work to others? Give him royalties, perhaps? After all, TKB's are still in production at STS, and it doesn't sound like you're adding anything. Just taking a copyright schematic and posting the layout you developed for copying it to make the job easier for others?!? Just sayin'
Kind regards, Randal |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:33 am Post subject:
Re: tkb |
 |
|
Randaleem wrote: |
Do you plan to ask Serge and/or Rex for permission before posting his/their work to others? Give him royalties, perhaps? After all, TKB's are still in production at STS, and it doesn't sound like you're adding anything. Just taking a copyright schematic and posting the layout you developed for copying it to make the job easier for others?!? Just sayin'
Kind regards, Randal |
Its not a clone,the title says 'style',so no need to ask any permission.
Who is the one that did ask me in PM pictures of the TKB pcb to clone it?
sorry,am just sayin' ..
also kind regards |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:29 am Post subject:
Re: tkb |
 |
|
TekniK wrote: | Its not a clone,the title says 'style',so no need to ask any permission. akrearke wrote: | In the meantime, I have done a double sided layout for the serge style TKB from the schmatic found on the music machines site, this is the one with the sequencing and what not. I'm sure everyone here is familiar with. |
|
This does not sound like he's talking of something derivative. It looks to be a direct copy of the "music machines site" schematic "everyone here is familiar with". Which IS the Serge 112 TKB; not a "style of tkb". Which is still in production by STS. I stand my my original comments.
If you're going to use a designer's work, and especially if you're going to share it with others, ask permission. If you're going to make money with it, give the designer some. Yes, it's harder to do this than to say 'style of'. I have perhaps a dozen designs on hold due to various issues in this process of getting clear permission from the copyright holder. At least one cost me a great deal of money and embarrassment here, and I have hundreds of unusable PCB's as a result. But it's STILL the right thing to do.
Quote: | Who is the one that did ask me in PM pictures of the TKB pcb to clone it? sorry,am just sayin' .. also kind regards |
Quite a difference! I AM asking permission AND paying royalties IF I decide to use that circuit, OR publish it to others. AND I have modified the circuit extensively to incorporate additional x/y cv features, among other things.
But I will STILL pay royalties AND get permission from Serge. If you recall, the pics requested were to understand the label of one IC? (To help in deciding whether to pursue it as a licensed! design from Serge OR to use a circuit I designed from scratch instead.) Even more will soon be apparent than I can speak about now. In a month or so, additional details will be brought out. Sometimes it takes a great deal of effort to secure permission, if given it at all! Other times, only a short phone call. As I said, QUITE a difference from what's been proposed and written by akrearke here.
Kind regards, Randal |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi Randaleem,
I wonder, why not make some circuit board art out of those boards?
Les _________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Scott Stites
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | Quite a difference! I AM asking permission AND paying royalties IF I decide to use that circuit, OR publish it to others. |
In that case, why don't you ask Rex for a picture? Teknik would have no idea whether you have permission or not. Asking such a thing from an end user comes off as spurious at best.
Akrearke: I think Messr. Bugs is onto something with the CD4067. If you find those hard to obtain, you could use two CD4051s, which are easily procured just about anywhere.
Cheerios,
Scott _________________ My Site |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I didn't make public the schematic. I just designed a PCB that will hold the parts together.
These ethical issues always come up when the word clone is mentioned. As a fan Ayn Rand, these types of questions arise in objectivist philosophy.
Stealing ones idea and putting it of as your own is wrong.
Taking ones idea and building off it and giving praise to the genius of that individual(s) that gave birth to it is sound.
People buy Serge/ Buchla systems because that's what they want and because they can afford to pay for them. I however can not afford them, had I the money I would gladly pay Serge/ Buchla for a system. I think those two designers have made the two coolest things since sliced bread.
There is now a debate about the use of words. Well, to be clear It is a direct clone of the the schematic on music machines. I don't think STS would be terribly worried by perhaps a handful of people who would build one themselves from the schematic. All I would be doing is helping them skip a step. I am not going to manufacture the board and sell it.
I think this may come down to an individual who is wanting to make some money. I am not interested in making money here, Save maybe enough to finish the rest of my system, and that by the japanese TKB. Buchla/ Serge are not going to lose money by having these foils published. But, you might.
Two points I would like to make 1) the synapse article was intended for DIY. 2) the Buchla 112 is no longer in production and the schematic is in public domain.
Since the Japanese version of the 112 is the one I cloned, (to be exact, which is clone of the 112, also a DIY project) I will post the foil and parts layout for this as well as make the PCB's available.
The other two will not be made by me for sale, but I would like to post the foils and layouts for these projects to get feedback from others.
There are I think many who would love to have these circuits for their own use, but cannot afford to buy them,and perhaps prefer DIY.
So, here is what I will do to try and make everyone happy.
I will post everything I have for the Buchla112/ Japanese TKB, and the Synapse TKB. I will not post the current serge model, it will probably not be of any use anyhow. But I will make one and if people have questions regarding this, I will answer.
Does that make everyone who gives a shit happy? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the Info Scott! Your right about the CD4051's, they could work, looking at the datasheets, but I didn't get enough from my digital fundamentals course to even begin to design the circuit around them. I know just enough to get an inkling on how the circuit works. But, maybe a recent member on this thread my find this useful in getting around the ethics of his own "clone" If there was anyone who offered the PCB's for these projects I would not have started making my own. It is a real pain in the ass. I spent most of my weekend perfecting the Serge layout and would have much rather been making music...
There has to be some other equivalent to the MM74C150, a drop in replacement. I'm still searching for a supplier...
In the meantime, I have a Lm3914 I would be willing to trade for MM74C150, if anyone has one. The LM3914 is used in Grant Richter's CV Twister and Optical Mixer. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
we all have to thank randaleem to have fucked up this project so now he don't have to be afraid for any competitor when he releases his TKB version because thats the only reason of his first comment.
BTW did u asked Don buchla permission to release the same style wooden cabinets u gonna offer?
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
deleted due to errors Last edited by akrearke on Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
TekniK wrote: | we all have to thank randaleem to have fucked up this project so now he don't have to be afraid for any competitor when he releases his TKB version because thats the only reason of his first comment. |
Nice to hear that you want to blame me for pointing out the obvious. You are incorrect. I did not post out of any concern WRT "competition". That would be unnecessary. There is little crossover between those who build for themselves and those who pay to have something built. I doubt there would be any measurable impact at all on a commercial release.
So that's NOT why I posted. I posted because Many designs and designers are ripped off, and it's wrong. Period. You can try to justify it a thousand ways (and I've read many of them over the years in various threads), but it's still wrong. Not being able to afford it is not justification. So you can question my motives, but you're conclusions as posted so far are 100% incorrect.
And as I've already pointed out, I have TWO different circuits which do approximately the same thing for this specific product. Neither is a direct clone of the TKB. One was done without ever even seeing the TKB schematic! Which one I will ultimately use is still unclear as the final agreement(s) are not in place.
But it WAS the fact of having done a great deal of work on a prior design with initial designer approval which was then never finalised which causes me now to cover myself in case the design I hope to use is not available! IOW, I do it myself, find another designer, or do without, because that's the right response when a designer says no. What to do when a designer says yes to an agreement, then says no after the work is done and offered is less clear.
Quote: | BTW did u asked Don buchla permission to release the same style wooden cabinets u gonna offer? |
No I did not ask Don permission for my 246 cabinets, because I am not doing a copy of his 200e cabinet. I DID ask him about his older cabinets, and his older circuit designs, keyboard layouts and schematics . And I DID ask AND receive permission from him directly for the things I will be releasing which are derivative of his work!
There was even a clarification call to clear up a small misunderstanding pointed out by a third party.
So again, you can blame me if you want, but I DO ask for AND receive permission from the designers whose work I offer or build upon. Often paying royalties as part of the agreement. Usually, actually. There've only been a couple who said not to worry about it, and two who asked that I give their royalties to a local charity.
@ScottStites: When I was first looking into this, Serge was not easy to find and the relationship between he and Rex was unclear at best. As before mentioned, I was trying to see an IC detail of a public pic to aid in understanding the also public schematic only. At that time I did not plan to use the circuit, having developed my own expanded touchSeq before knowing the TKB design was even about. Finding it made me curious how the two independently developed circuits compared, and that's when I asked about a better picture of the IC in question. I have since made progress in seeking and receiving proper permission, so my options have changed.
@akrearke: Thank you for your thoughtful and detailed response.
Kind regards, Randal |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TekniK

Joined: Aug 10, 2008 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:32 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
If the relationship or deal is unclear between serge and rex,nobody knows who of both have the legal right to claim any royalties or give permission . |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
akrearke
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 Posts: 53 Location: US
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I just wan to build shit man...
And "not being able to afford" something is a good reason to clone. I clone for myself, and if somebody else is in the same position I help them out where I can. The ethics issue; As i said before i agree that work should not be stolen. On the other hand, I didn't release the schematics. If some is one is that worried about their stuff be copied, then they don't post detailed information for the world to see. "There is nothing new under the sun" This old saying has always kept me humble. The fact that Serge would make a TKB when Buchla was doing it long before, is kind of copying someone else's work. The fact that all other synthesizer companies use a piano style keyboard is copying the original Moog work. If you play a style of music that is akin to another style, you are copying someone else's work. Everything we have is built off the work of someone else. Directly or indirectly. An anyone who claims any different is either delusional or super egotistical. Perhaps the greatest inventor that ever lived, Nikola Tesla, didn't even claim to have come up with his ideas on his own, and he shared the freely. We wouldn't have AC power were it not for him. Edison the thief Wanted everything to be DC, and HE DIDN"T INVENT THE LIGHTBULB. Deforest didn't invent radio. Man didn't invent fire. Invent is such an ugly word anyway, I prefer discover. The Principal that make things work were always there, someone just came along and discovered a means of generating and exploiting those principals. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Randaleem
Joined: May 17, 2007 Posts: 456 Location: Northern CA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:42 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
TekniK wrote: | If the relationship or deal is unclear between serge and rex,nobody knows who of both have the legal right to claim any royalties or give permission . |
Teknik, Please look again at what I wrote. I've added bold to help with the key points:
randaleem wrote: | When I was first looking into this, Serge was not easy to find and the relationship between he and Rex was unclear |
@akrearke: Again a thoughtful and detailed reply. Thank you for sharing your position. We disagree, but I'll agree to disagree and leave this issue to rest. Believe me when I say I feel no competition from any DIY offerings you may decide to pursue!
I still wish you the best in your DIY project!
Kind regards, Randal |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|