| Author |
Message |
gddfp
Joined: Jan 11, 2009 Posts: 21 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:36 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Topp, how does this -- the ordering -- work exactly ?
Publicly [here] saying "hey, i'd like xx !", or just wait until you give the get go, and then order with you privately ?
cheers,
_g |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LektroiD

Joined: Aug 23, 2008 Posts: 1019 Location: Scottish Borders
Audio files: 2
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:00 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| gddfp wrote: | Topp, how does this -- the ordering -- work exactly ?
Publicly [here] saying "hey, i'd like xx !", or just wait until you give the get go, and then order with you privately ?
cheers,
_g |
I think the general idea is that people show interest within the thread by requesting their desired amount. Then, once the boards are manufactured, the interested parties will receive an invoice via PM for the requested quantity + shipping. _________________ LektroiD |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gddfp
Joined: Jan 11, 2009 Posts: 21 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | I think the general idea is that people show interest within the thread by requesting their desired amount. Then, once the boards are manufactured, the interested parties will receive an invoice via PM for the requested quantity + shipping. |
Ah, okay. Thanks.
Topp, two boards, please !
_g |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
/mr

Joined: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 223 Location: Elektron City, Sweden
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:48 am Post subject:
Maximizing usability of forum threads and construction hints |
 |
|
Generally, the less uninformative posts (like this one, and 90% of the other posts in this thread) the better.
Discussion threads with a high concentration of useful information about a certain construction is highly valuable afterwards for future DIYers, but "noise" tends to inflate the threads to 30 pages of diluted info where the actual construction hints are hard to follow.
I'm not criticising anobody or saying that I'm anything near perfect in this respect, I'm just often surprised that some threads that I really enjoyed following (both the core topic and the chit-chat) become so cumbersome to use afterwards when the important bits of information are scattered over so many pages. It might be good to have this in mind both when posting answers and starting threads, to keep them as high quality documentation.
For instance, use PM as much as possible when not addressing all the 1000 readers. (And not write "you have a PM" in the thread... ) PMs are also good for taking orders or checking out how many wants a certain PCB that is made.
When just checking for interest without knowing if there will be an order, on the other hand, people's reactions might need to be more public. Then the poll function is a good alternative! Compact and informative, without cluttering the discussion. Very underrated tool in forums, I must say.
I wish there were a way for the thread author or admin to "collapse" unnecessary posts afterwards to make the threads more readable and the topic discussion more quickly accessible. In a perfect world, maybe. I love this forum! That's why I brought it all up. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gddfp
Joined: Jan 11, 2009 Posts: 21 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:56 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
That's why I asked in the first place: the noise & clutter, the "pollution".
The reservations & orders of PCB's -- often inbetween technical data -- reminds me a bit of the early Internet "me too!" days...
I'd be nice if the data and information was separated from the reservations/orders, both for the visitor and the person offering the PCB's.
It's not much fun to wade through +30 noisy pages to look up which resistor value was needed again; even so much that it could possibly turn me away from a purchase.
Then again, just like most people here, I still like this ehm, board. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LektroiD

Joined: Aug 23, 2008 Posts: 1019 Location: Scottish Borders
Audio files: 2
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:28 am Post subject:
Re: Maximizing usability of forum threads and construction hints |
 |
|
| /mr wrote: | Generally, the less uninformative posts (like this one, and 90% of the other posts in this thread) the better.
Discussion threads with a high concentration of useful information about a certain construction is highly valuable afterwards for future DIYers, but "noise" tends to inflate the threads to 30 pages of diluted info where the actual construction hints are hard to follow.
I'm not criticising anobody or saying that I'm anything near perfect in this respect, I'm just often surprised that some threads that I really enjoyed following (both the core topic and the chit-chat) become so cumbersome to use afterwards when the important bits of information are scattered over so many pages. It might be good to have this in mind both when posting answers and starting threads, to keep them as high quality documentation.
For instance, use PM as much as possible when not addressing all the 1000 readers. (And not write "you have a PM" in the thread... ) PMs are also good for taking orders or checking out how many wants a certain PCB that is made.
When just checking for interest without knowing if there will be an order, on the other hand, people's reactions might need to be more public. Then the poll function is a good alternative! Compact and informative, without cluttering the discussion. Very underrated tool in forums, I must say.
I wish there were a way for the thread author or admin to "collapse" unnecessary posts afterwards to make the threads more readable and the topic discussion more quickly accessible. In a perfect world, maybe. I love this forum! That's why I brought it all up. |
I think we already nailed it within 2 posts, and now with this additional message, it's been driven off topic..  _________________ LektroiD |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
KEYKEYEYEKIT

Joined: Sep 08, 2009 Posts: 24 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:28 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'm interested in 2 boards. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
astroschnautzer
Joined: May 22, 2008 Posts: 31 Location: FINLAND
|
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:15 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| in for 2 boards |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bluedonkey
Joined: Aug 09, 2010 Posts: 2 Location: london
|
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:59 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'll take 2 boards please |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elmacaco
Joined: Jul 21, 2007 Posts: 29 Location: NY
|
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:49 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'll take 2 at least. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:10 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| did lots of work on this last night, I might be able to finish this week, keep you posted! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
adambee7
Joined: Apr 04, 2009 Posts: 420 Location: united kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 2:06 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
i'll grab 4 please.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
halhead
Joined: Aug 30, 2010 Posts: 1 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:03 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Any chance I could get 2.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bjb50
Joined: Aug 30, 2010 Posts: 1 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:46 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'll take one |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
zthee

Joined: Feb 20, 2008 Posts: 414 Location: Stockholm
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kollo
Joined: Jun 02, 2009 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'd like two if its not too late! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elmacaco
Joined: Jul 21, 2007 Posts: 29 Location: NY
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:31 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I want some news on this, I'm in for 4 as I've said.
I built a quad version with the single 281 pcb's and it an amazing module! 2 on one PCB would be excellent! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jumunius
Joined: Apr 19, 2010 Posts: 346 Location: San Francisco, CA
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'd take one if there are any unspoken-for. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
XCenter

Joined: Oct 01, 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Superb. Count me in for 2 to 4 double boards, depending on price. _________________ --
How may I be of disservice?
---
Music for conscious listening @ http://www.fmdelight.de/ |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| If this happens, I'd still like 4. I'd much rather use two dual boards than 4 singles-- the wiring will just be so much easier. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toppobrillo

Joined: Dec 10, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: oakland, ca
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:20 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
hello! the board sits at 95% done.. I have been wrapped up in other projects and have neglected this [again] for a while.. it needs some tweaking and the connectors straightened out a bit but yeah.. a good 2-3 hour sitdown and it should be ready for proofreading I promise it will get the attention it deserves very soon. I need some boards too  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LektroiD

Joined: Aug 23, 2008 Posts: 1019 Location: Scottish Borders
Audio files: 2
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ace, did I mention I need 2 of these (maybe 4)? _________________ LektroiD |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
tommi

Joined: Dec 05, 2007 Posts: 247 Location: Italy
Audio files: 3
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
zthee

Joined: Feb 20, 2008 Posts: 414 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| topp wrote: | hello! the board sits at 95% done.. I have been wrapped up in other projects and have neglected this [again] for a while.. it needs some tweaking and the connectors straightened out a bit but yeah.. a good 2-3 hour sitdown and it should be ready for proofreading I promise it will get the attention it deserves very soon. I need some boards too  |
Awesome!  _________________ http://www.thehumancomparator.net/ |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
RSFC
Joined: Sep 02, 2010 Posts: 63 Location: space lab
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:53 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'd be down for a couple. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|