| Author |
Message |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:10 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: |
>IIRC, the LF444s were specifically chosen for the XR-VCO - TL0X
>devices did *not* work in that app. Had to do with the value of or lack >of, a HF cancelling cap in the summer amp. Now, I can't recall if they
>worked any better in the SN-Voice or not, but that one does have a 1N
>cap there - so it just may work OK.
thanks, i will try them, but with sockets
cheers
Andrew |
sorry for digging up this thread from the bottom:
did anybody substitute the LF444s with TL084s?
i finished the construction of my sn voice yesterday and it actually works but it sounds very very faint. (havn't had the time to measure the ppV yet). so just before starting troubleshooting, i wonder if the TL084 may be the cause? _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
para
Joined: Oct 16, 2006 Posts: 276
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
i read on the XR VCO page that you shouldn't sub out the LF442 for anything else without ill effects so maybe the same thing applies here
"The LF442 is recommended as the opamp to use for IC2. We tried a few different op amps, LM1458, LF442, TL072 and TL052, with the LF442 giving the best performance. In fact, the TL072 worked abysmally and should not be considered a candidate. The TL052 fared a bit better than the TL072, but tended to act quite squirrely at certain frequencies (heavy oscillation of the VCO output) and should not be considered as well. The LM1458 works 'OK', but does not possess the superior specifications of the LF442 and will not be nearly as accurate. Other op amps other than those mentioned may or may not work - we just never tried them. "
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/scottnoanh/birthofasynth/id20.html |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
andrewF

Joined: Dec 29, 2006 Posts: 1176 Location: australia
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi
I used TL074s (2nd hand ones even)
no problems at all, so I'm sure 084s would be ok |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:29 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
thanks for that info. so it's time to troubleshoot... (business as usual) _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Scott Stites
Janitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2005 Posts: 4127 Location: Mount Hope, KS USA
Audio files: 96
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:34 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | no problems at all, so I'm sure 084s would be ok |
Yep - the main difference between the XRVCO's pickiness for the LF44X and the SN-Voice not caring one whit is, I believe, due to C6 on the SN-Voice - the 1N cap in the feedback loop of the CV summer. The XR VCO doesn't have one. I think if it were added, the XRVCO wouldn't care if it was an LF or a TL as well.
Things were moving at such a clip at the time, Thomas and I never went back to examine it.
| Quote: | | so it's time to troubleshoot... (business as usual) |
Best way to learn! And, besides, does anything sound as sweet as a project that previously didn't work suddenly bursting into life and doing what it was supposed to do?
Cheers,
Scott |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:53 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Scott Stites wrote: | Best way to learn! And, besides, does anything sound as sweet as a project that previously didn't work suddenly bursting into life and doing what it was supposed to do?
Cheers,
Scott |
yessss, it is, i can tell you... when the ps3k resonators eventually started to resonate this week i couldn't stop playing around with it, got wet hands, heartbeat going faster - felt like falling in love (i actually did with the resonators - i will add LEDs indicating the freq and a simple LFO).
and for the sn voice: it can't be a huge bug. i can hear the noise, the pulse, the lfo, the AR...
thanks a lot for your input guys! _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | and for the sn voice: it can't be a huge bug. i can hear the noise, the pulse, the lfo, the AR...
thanks a lot for your input guys! |
Just let me know if you need any reference shots on the o-scope. just for comparisons! Is the triangle output faint? That is on a different buffer.
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:18 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| State Machine wrote: | Just let me know if you need any reference shots on the o-scope. just for comparisons! Is the triangle output faint? That is on a different buffer.
Bill |
thank you bill! on the weekend i will find some time to take closer look. as i said everything seemed to work properly but very faint, i nearly couldn't hear anything at all with headphones connected, i couln't hear the tri at all. and there was that loud pop when inserting the headphones - so i giess it's something with the powerrails or the grounding - a short maybe? i will see... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:45 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | thank you bill! on the weekend i will find some time to take closer look. as i said everything seemed to work properly but very faint, i nearly couldn't hear anything at all with headphones connected, i couln't hear the tri at all. and there was that loud pop when inserting the headphones - so i giess it's something with the powerrails or the grounding - a short maybe? i will see... |
OK, good luck. The pop may typify a large DC offset.
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
hi all,
what should the output of the SN voice actually be?
i measured about 2.8ppV for the pulse before the buffer (0.25 after the buffer - must something wrong with it!).
BTW here is a picture of my SN voice module for my modular (eurorack) _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:36 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | hi all,
what should the output of the SN voice actually be?
i measured about 2.8ppV for the pulse before the buffer (0.25 after the buffer - must something wrong with it!).
|
The way I see it, the gain of the non-inverting buffer is about 3.75 and the product of this and 2.8 you measure is about 10.5 V peak to peak. This is what is supposed to be at the output, U4-8. Check R28, R17 and R23 since they set the gain of the device. If they are good and the buffer is not overloaded, just pop another LF444 or TL074 or TL084 in there. I assume you used sockets?
Oh yes, the panel is very NICE !!
Good luck !
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| State Machine wrote: | | The way I see it, the gain of the non-inverting buffer is about 3.75 and the product of this and 2.8 you measure is about 10.5 V peak to peak. This is what is supposed to be at the output, U4-8. Check R28, R17 and R23 since they set the gain of the device. |
that's what i guessed. unfortunately i don't have the time these days to do any troubleshooting - it will have to wait until better days...
| Quote: | | I assume you used sockets? |
sure: EVER!
thanks bill for taking care... _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | thanks bill for taking care... |
OK, I will wait until your next post. Solving these sorts of problems is when we learn the most.
I do have to do some signal measuremets in my lab within the next couple of days so I can probe some "Key" SN Voice points and post the oscillographs to this thread.
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fonik

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 3950 Location: Germany
Audio files: 23
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:46 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| State Machine wrote: | | The way I see it, the gain of the non-inverting buffer is about 3.75 and the product of this and 2.8 you measure is about 10.5 V peak to peak. This is what is supposed to be at the output, U4-8. Check R28, R17 and R23 since they set the gain of the device. |
i took the time for a little bit of troubleshooting tonight:
first thing i did was to replace the TL084 (with LF444). nothing changed. as you mentioned i measure a huge offset at the outputs: -13.72V for the TRIOUT and +13,82V for the PUL/NOISE!!
measured DC voltages at the U4 pins:
pin9 0.77V
pin10 2V (fine, i think)
pin6 5.5V
pin5 2.28V
i checked all resistor values around the PUL/NOISE output and they are okay, the network either (everything connected). U4 is correctly connected to the power rails.
additionally i measured a resistance of 27.7K from PUL/NOISE output to GND and about 10K from pin9 to +15V.
so where the heck could be the mistake?
from where could this immense offset come from? could a short be the cause and if so, where should i look for this short?
as often i only have questions right now so any comment or clue is highly recommended and appreciated. _________________
cheers,
matthias
____________
Big Boss at fonitronik
Tech Buddy at Random*Source |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18329 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 235
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| fonik wrote: | | BTW here is a picture of my SN voice module for my modular (eurorack) |
Looks great. Congrats... _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:35 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | as often i only have questions right now so any comment or clue is highly recommended and appreciated. |
OK, I will print this information out and yank the SN from the rack and take a peek with my scope. I am wondering if you have a defective SN76477 IC? First, make sure you have 5VDC at pin 15, Vreg, with respect to pin 2 of U1. If not, check the orientation of the regulator IC. If thats OK, check for solder bridges very closely with a loop between the the pins of U1 and other IC's. Is`R42 feedback resistor correct?
Lat resort, if you have a spare 76477, drop it in but only if you are sure it will not be damaged by 15 volts being shorted to it or something like that. . These CSG chips are fairly old and the silicon die may have "grown" in some contamination. Not unheard of. I know thats not the most technical explanation but semiconductor physics or reliability engineering is not my specialty
Not to worry, we will get it working!
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Fonik,
I had taken some scope images of various signals on on the SN Voice. YOU can use these as a reference as you troubleshoot.
NOTE: The images are partially out pf order so. Image "x" where "x" is the file name.
Image "0" is of U4-10. It is the audio output of the SN76477.
Image "1" is of U4-8, pulse/noise output.
Image "5" is U1-12, feedback.
Image "2" is U4-7, triangle output.
Image "3" is U4-5, VCO CAPACITOR
Also, SYSYTEM INHIBIT, U1-9 should be 0V. AMPLITUDE CONTROL RESISTOR should be a 220K unit.
I hope some of these images help you in your search.
Bill
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
24.88 KB |
| Viewed: |
9946 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
25.54 KB |
| Viewed: |
9946 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
24.82 KB |
| Viewed: |
9946 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
26.47 KB |
| Viewed: |
9946 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
24.47 KB |
| Viewed: |
9946 Time(s) |

|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:20 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
One other thing I wanted to add to the above post is that in all the oscilloscope screen shots, the ground reference is center display indicated by the channel number "1" and right arrow.
As you already know I am sure, an inexpensive dual trace 30 mhz oscilloscope is the best choice when trying to troubleshoot problems concerning waveform shape, amplitude, frequency, etc .... Sometimes you can find very good second hand scopes on Ebay for very good prices.
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | took a big chunk of State Machines layout and added my touches to it. Right now I'm tryin to get the keyboard part working correctly. There's a bad connection somewhere I cannot figure out where 8x |
Hey Synthmonger, did you solve your keyboard problems? I really like the way you packaged the SN Voice Let us know ....
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
synthmonger
Joined: Nov 16, 2006 Posts: 578 Location: flada
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Oh yep! I ordered MOFS single buss PCB's and used that hehe
2 pics for ya
Also I posted some vids of my Bleep Machine on my youtube account. One of which is being CV'd by the EG of the SN-Voice.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=synthmonger
I still have one PCB left that I'm going to use with a 4-5 octave keyboard and extra typical synthie goodies. I won't have time to start it until the summer though when my band "Bananarchy" is in full effect. Last edited by synthmonger on Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
toybox

Joined: Aug 03, 2005 Posts: 176 Location: chicago/peru,illinois usa
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bambam
Joined: Feb 20, 2007 Posts: 60 Location: australia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:43 pm Post subject:
A few build questions for the guru's ;) |
 |
|
Hi All
I've just about finished my two snvoice pcbs but wanted to confirm a few things before i finish them up before the weekend.
I found i dont have 470pf poly caps at home and i went to a few local places today and they only seem to ahve the value in ceramics and not in polys 'apparently' its a pretty small value for a poly and thats why they dont have it as its not that common.
Of course i can order a few and wait but theres a chance they wont get here before the weekend and i really would like to have them up and running by then!
Does anyone know if the 470pf poly at C5 can be raplaced with maybe just a ceramic without any negative results?
I know ceramic can be swapped for poly in some situations but im not sure here.
Apart from that the only other thing thats holding me up is the pot wiring etc
I was looking at the wiring diagram for the pots and it seems to indicate the resistor etc to wire to and not the pin on the connectors labelled J1 to J3 Do I need to follow the schematic to figure out what wires into where? Also the parts list has J1-10 listed as being for the 1\4” jacks but I cant find them anywhere.
Am I missing a bit of doco that covers this or is it a case of following the schems to figure out wiring pots and jacks?
I have asked bil but our mail is playing up and anyway id prefer not to hassle him direct
cheers
Brett
cheers
Brett |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
andrewF

Joined: Dec 29, 2006 Posts: 1176 Location: australia
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:38 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi Brett
C5 is the timing cap for the VCO in the 4046, if I didn't have anything else I'd use a ceramic. it won't hurt to use a ceramic temporarily but replace it when you can.
Bill sent out a page with all the pots and jack connections to the connector pins, it sounds like you are missing it.
i can scan it and post it if you like?
or if Bills around, I'm sure he already has a digital version...Bill? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
CJ Miller

Joined: Jan 07, 2007 Posts: 368 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Bambam, I'm in the same boat here with 470pF caps. This is a rare value for polypropylene in my experience, but not uncommon for polystyrene. I too will likely sub a ceramic for the short term.
My boards are 95% done! I am just trying to be patient while waiting for the last few parts to arrive. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bambam
Joined: Feb 20, 2007 Posts: 60 Location: australia
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the replies guys.
Bill got back to me overnight and forwarded the doc with the wiring and now it all makes sense I was pulling my hair out trying to figure where the hell J1-10 were for the jacks!
I think i may use a ceramic for C5 for now but if its just a temp thing i may be patient and wait till an online order for the polys arrive.
Huge thanks to bill for answering all my questions along the way and for forwarding the doco last night despite being sick with the flu!
B |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|