electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Jürgen Haible designs
Living VCOs
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: fonik, Scott Stites
Page 16 of 21 [520 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Next

Would you prefer one PCB with 3 VCOs a la JH-5A, or 1 VCO per PCB with more features
One PCB with Oscillator Driver and 3 VCO cores (like JH-5A - cheap!)
60%
 60%  [ 62 ]
1 PCB = 1 VCO (with many waveforms and inputs)
39%
 39%  [ 41 ]
Total Votes : 103

Author Message
janvanvolt



Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 285
Location: Mainz, Germany

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi all,

i finally figured out what the problem was with my LVCO ...

Nwo some questions with regards to the cabling. I am using the Bill&Will Version (7U with Waveshaper).

a)
What i couldn't get to work correctly is the Octave Switch (4'/8'/16') as only one part of it is working. I am using a DPDT on-on-on switch. Alternatively i got a MTS-2 Switch (also DPDT e.g. 6 pins). What is the correct wiring for this ?

b)
The Linear VCO detuning does not seem to have any effect on the VCOs

c)
What is the correct wiring for the VCO1 PW/PWM Switches ?

d)
1V/Oct Front-Adjust: How to wire this as well ?


Thanks for any help in getting this issues fixed ( and ready for the upcoming Happy Knobbing this weekend)

_________________
Homepage - http://www.czmok.de
My dIY - http://diy.czmok.de
Film/Music - http://gfm.me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
numbertalk



Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi Jürgen,

I have found something with my Living VCOs. I have all 3 VCOs' V/Oct scaling calibrated very well. I did them all individually - I turned tracking from the driver off for each and used each VCO's individual V/Oct input with my Midi-to-CV converter unit. But then when I then check the scaling from the driver's V/Oct input and set each VCO to track the driver, each one is very off. I have the driver's vibrato depth all the way down,the driver's tune is close to center - when switching tracking on I tweak it a little to tune from the low note on my keyboard (it's close - don't have to move tune very far from centered) but then when I play the highest note on my keyboard, they are all 3 very sharp.

Have I done or am I doing something wrong?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

If you're using some of the individual CV inputs for precise V/Oct control, you need to match the 100k resistors to 0.1%

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
numbertalk



Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Ah, I thought I might have done this, but guess I didn't.

So it sounds like I should just calibrate using the driver's V/Oct input, then, right? In that case should I use the driver's tune knob on the panel or the frequency vernier for each individual VCO when going back & forth with the trimmers to calibrate, or does it not matter?

Also, just to confirm, it sounds like the individual CV inputs are better strictly for FM/vibrato and not as keyboard-tracking inputs? Good to know.

Thanks!

jhaible wrote:
If you're using some of the individual CV inputs for precise V/Oct control, you need to match the 100k resistors to 0.1%

JH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

numbertalk wrote:
Ah, I thought I might have done this, but guess I didn't.

So it sounds like I should just calibrate using the driver's V/Oct input, then, right? In that case should I use the driver's tune knob on the panel or the frequency vernier for each individual VCO when going back & forth with the trimmers to calibrate, or does it not matter?

Also, just to confirm, it sounds like the individual CV inputs are better strictly for FM/vibrato and not as keyboard-tracking inputs? Good to know.

Thanks!

jhaible wrote:
If you're using some of the individual CV inputs for precise V/Oct control, you need to match the 100k resistors to 0.1%

JH.


Well, you can use the individual CV inputs for precise tracking also, but then the whole chain with all its branches must use 0.1% matching.

If you only use the drive CV inputs for precise V/Oct playing, you only have to match R145 and R146 to get the same sensitivity on both inputs.

But if you want everything to be preccision inputs, then you have to match R1, R2, R3 on VCO1 (and same thing on other two VCOs), *and* you must make sure that the path from driver input to driver output also has precise unity gain, i.e. match R144, R145, R146 and R137, R141

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
numbertalk



Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks!

jhaible wrote:
numbertalk wrote:
Ah, I thought I might have done this, but guess I didn't.

So it sounds like I should just calibrate using the driver's V/Oct input, then, right? In that case should I use the driver's tune knob on the panel or the frequency vernier for each individual VCO when going back & forth with the trimmers to calibrate, or does it not matter?

Also, just to confirm, it sounds like the individual CV inputs are better strictly for FM/vibrato and not as keyboard-tracking inputs? Good to know.

Thanks!

jhaible wrote:
If you're using some of the individual CV inputs for precise V/Oct control, you need to match the 100k resistors to 0.1%

JH.


Well, you can use the individual CV inputs for precise tracking also, but then the whole chain with all its branches must use 0.1% matching.

If you only use the drive CV inputs for precise V/Oct playing, you only have to match R145 and R146 to get the same sensitivity on both inputs.

But if you want everything to be preccision inputs, then you have to match R1, R2, R3 on VCO1 (and same thing on other two VCOs), *and* you must make sure that the path from driver input to driver output also has precise unity gain, i.e. match R144, R145, R146 and R137, R141

JH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numbertalk



Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 6:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I went back and checked and I did use actual .1% precision resistors, 50ppm as well, for all of these *except* R137, R141 and R144.

Also the interesting thing is, to be clear, I am able to get each of the individual V/Oct inputs to scale great over a wide range. I am also able to get the 3 VCOs to scale to the driver's global V/Oct input over that same range. The problem is that these do not match up - if I calibrate to one then the VCOs do not scale properly to the other. Does this make sense? Could this simply be because of these 3 resistors, if all of those others are .1% resistors?

Right now I have it scaled to the driver but it would be nice and give me some flexibility to also be able to use the individual inputs as well.

Thanks again.


jhaible wrote:
numbertalk wrote:
Ah, I thought I might have done this, but guess I didn't.

So it sounds like I should just calibrate using the driver's V/Oct input, then, right? In that case should I use the driver's tune knob on the panel or the frequency vernier for each individual VCO when going back & forth with the trimmers to calibrate, or does it not matter?

Also, just to confirm, it sounds like the individual CV inputs are better strictly for FM/vibrato and not as keyboard-tracking inputs? Good to know.

Thanks!

jhaible wrote:
If you're using some of the individual CV inputs for precise V/Oct control, you need to match the 100k resistors to 0.1%

JH.


Well, you can use the individual CV inputs for precise tracking also, but then the whole chain with all its branches must use 0.1% matching.

If you only use the drive CV inputs for precise V/Oct playing, you only have to match R145 and R146 to get the same sensitivity on both inputs.

But if you want everything to be preccision inputs, then you have to match R1, R2, R3 on VCO1 (and same thing on other two VCOs), *and* you must make sure that the path from driver input to driver output also has precise unity gain, i.e. match R144, R145, R146 and R137, R141

JH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

numbertalk wrote:
I went back and checked and I did use actual .1% precision resistors, 50ppm as well, for all of these *except* R137, R141 and R144.

Also the interesting thing is, to be clear, I am able to get each of the individual V/Oct inputs to scale great over a wide range. I am also able to get the 3 VCOs to scale to the driver's global V/Oct input over that same range. The problem is that these do not match up - if I calibrate to one then the VCOs do not scale properly to the other. Does this make sense? Could this simply be because of these 3 resistors, if all of those others are .1% resistors?

Right now I have it scaled to the driver but it would be nice and give me some flexibility to also be able to use the individual inputs as well.

Thanks again.




Yes, R137/R141 sets the gain of U11B. If this is not exactly -1, the result is exactly what you describe.

Same for R144/R145 and R144/R146.

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
numbertalk



Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

jhaible wrote:


Yes, R137/R141 sets the gain of U11B. If this is not exactly -1, the result is exactly what you describe.

Same for R144/R145 and R144/R146.

JH.


Ah, good to know. At least it's only a handful of resistors to swap out.

Thanks again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frenchyinmunich



Joined: Jun 23, 2009
Posts: 115
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 2:31 pm    Post subject: Which waveshhaper for the living VCO Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hello,

I built few living vco and I find them very stable.
It reminds me the ARP2500 VCOs.
Is there someone here who did a waveshaper for it?

f
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loydb



Joined: Feb 04, 2010
Posts: 393
Location: Providence, RI

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Is there an FPD file for a layout like JH has on his web page? I like the asymmetric layout a lot. I've got two of these puppies I need to start building...

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.TorsionTorque



Joined: Jun 05, 2010
Posts: 14
Location: Minsk, Belarus

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi there... I'm considering ordering the VCOs but I've got one question.
Is hard syncing of OSC's is possible in a way of mod or something?
Thanks in advance for the answer and sorry for my English.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Noiseconformist



Joined: Aug 05, 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Vienna

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

loydb wrote:
Is there an FPD file for a layout like JH has on his web page? I like the asymmetric layout a lot. I've got two of these puppies I need to start building...


look here: http://www.dragonflyalley.com/constructionJHLivingVCO.htm

Maybe Bill & Will got something you like on their fantastic site.

HTH, Michael.

_________________
hear the colours of noise
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Mr.TorsionTorque wrote:
Hi there... I'm considering ordering the VCOs but I've got one question.
Is hard syncing of OSC's is possible in a way of mod or something?
Thanks in advance for the answer and sorry for my English.


I haven't tried this myself, but it cannot be that difficult.
Simply build a second discharge path for C3 (referring to http://www.jhaible.de/living_vcos/living_vcos_sch_1of4.pdf), by connecting a 2nd transitor in parallel to Q3, together with a pulse shaping circuit at the base of this transistor. I will not draw this out for you in detail, but that's the idea how it could be done.

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mr.TorsionTorque



Joined: Jun 05, 2010
Posts: 14
Location: Minsk, Belarus

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

THX for the rapid answer, thats a good idea to think about... Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LetterBeacon



Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 454
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Sorry to ask a simple question, but what exactly is a 10-turn potentiometer? Does it mean it rotates fully 10 times? Why is that better than using a coarse and fine pot?

Is this a suitable pot:
http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=getProduct&R=5222974

£12 each! Are they always that expensive??

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

LetterBeacon wrote:
Sorry to ask a simple question, but what exactly is a 10-turn potentiometer? Does it mean it rotates fully 10 times? Why is that better than using a coarse and fine pot?

Is this a suitable pot:
http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=getProduct&R=5222974

£12 each! Are they always that expensive??

Thanks!


It's a matter of taste. Whatever user interface pleases you more - go for it. It's DIY, and just one extra resistor if you go for two pots.

I don't think a multiturn is that expensive, though. It needs less panel space, less milling for front panel graphics, only a single knob - allthough you can spend a fortune on stylish looking vernier knobs. Or get them cheap on ebay.

The most expensive solution would be a rotary switch for precise octave switching and a fine tuning pot.

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
LetterBeacon



Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 454
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks for the reply!

I'd like to go for the 10-turn pot for all the reasons you mentioned, I just want to know what the advantages are (apart from using 1 pot instead of 2).

So is a 10-turn pot a pot that goes round 10 times? Does it mean you can be more precise with it, so you don't need a fine tune?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

LetterBeacon wrote:
Thanks for the reply!

I'd like to go for the 10-turn pot for all the reasons you mentioned, I just want to know what the advantages are (apart from using 1 pot instead of 2).

So is a 10-turn pot a pot that goes round 10 times? Does it mean you can be more precise with it, so you don't need a fine tune?


Yes and yes.

(As opposed to the method used in the VCS3: There, an ordinary pot is used, in combination with a knob with some gear inside.)

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
zarko



Joined: Mar 25, 2010
Posts: 22
Location: France

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hello All.
Hi Jürgen.
I just finished the wiring of the Living VCO's,and they are fonctional as entended,and sound verry fat Wink
but i have a problem with the tracking v/oct on two vco's, just one is ok and take me less than five minutes to set up,but for the two other imposible to scale correctly.
i go to try explaying in my aproximative english.
Wiring is ok ,i test all the components in ohmmeter mode and i compare all the values with the functional one, and all its ok.
For the tracking i do this:
i connect a cv source directely on the VCO V/oct.
first i ajust the freq trimpot to have 16,20hz for the zero position.
after i aply a CV of 0V and turn the potentiometer knob to obtain 55hz on my freq counter after this i aply 1V and i read 102hz,i ajust the scaling to obtain 110hz. I turn back in 0V CV and i read 57hz, i readjust the freq pot to have 55hz again, after i aply 1V CV again and i read 102hz and this indefinitively until the timpot is in the maximum
range.each time i reajust the freq knob because the freq goes up, the tracking freq goes down.
Here is my problem,i suspect the CA3046 maybe a problem with the unmatched pair?
Lets me know if one of you having the same problem.
Thank you, Regards
Fred
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaible



Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 2014
Location: Germany
Audio files: 24

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

zarko wrote:
Hello All.
Hi Jürgen.
I just finished the wiring of the Living VCO's,and they are fonctional as entended,and sound verry fat Wink
but i have a problem with the tracking v/oct on two vco's, just one is ok and take me less than five minutes to set up,but for the two other imposible to scale correctly.
i go to try explaying in my aproximative english.
Wiring is ok ,i test all the components in ohmmeter mode and i compare all the values with the functional one, and all its ok.
For the tracking i do this:
i connect a cv source directely on the VCO V/oct.
first i ajust the freq trimpot to have 16,20hz for the zero position.
after i aply a CV of 0V and turn the potentiometer knob to obtain 55hz on my freq counter after this i aply 1V and i read 102hz,i ajust the scaling to obtain 110hz. I turn back in 0V CV and i read 57hz, i readjust the freq pot to have 55hz again, after i aply 1V CV again and i read 102hz and this indefinitively until the timpot is in the maximum
range.each time i reajust the freq knob because the freq goes up, the tracking freq goes down.
Here is my problem,i suspect the CA3046 maybe a problem with the unmatched pair?
Lets me know if one of you having the same problem.
Thank you, Regards
Fred


Could it be that you're turning the Scaling pot into the wrong direction?
If your frequency ratio for a 1V CV step is too small, you must turn the scale pot in a direction to increase the ratio, not the absolute frequency. It's a bit counter-intuitive the way that scaling and tuning go into different directions, but once you know it, it's not so difficult to tune at all.

JH.

_________________
"I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
zarko



Joined: Mar 25, 2010
Posts: 22
Location: France

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thank or the reply,i try this tomorrow Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zarko



Joined: Mar 25, 2010
Posts: 22
Location: France

PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi Jürgen

All works fine now Very Happy for the second time i make a neewbe error, in fact its the same procedure to tune the Yusynth CVO, i don't know why i thinking that it was a different way, here was my error Embarassed
Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Bad Producer



Joined: Mar 08, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: The Manhole

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hello all,

Just wanted to say, having just now finally finished my fourth Living VCO, how great they are!

I added the Saw - Tri - Sine waveshaper circuits from Electronic Peasants diagram on page 12 and they really add so much versatility to an already great design! Linear detune on Sine waves is something else!

Having these has and will open up so many musical possibilities to me...

So thank you Juergen for the amazing VCO, and thank you also to Electronic Peasant, Ray Wilson and Ian Fritz!

Very Happy

Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.

_________________
http://loudestwarning.tumblr.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LetterBeacon



Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 454
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

That looks fantastic!

Do you have a stripboard layout for the waveshapers?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: fonik, Scott Stites
Page 16 of 21 [520 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Next
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Jürgen Haible designs
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use