Main / Archiving Talk
Main.ArchivingTalk HistoryHide minor edits - Show changes to markup Changed line 67 from:
When a TalkPage gets too long.. an editor could just manually cut out some text from the bottom. It will still be there in the history and can be restored if needed. If there is something in the text that is important.. like a how to.. then that should be transferred the appropriate Page. I am guessing that you have a way to delete spam from the history to:
When a TalkPage gets too long.. an editor could just manually cut out some text from the bottom. It will still be there in the history and can be restored if needed. If there is something in the text that is important.. like a how to.. then that should be transferred the appropriate Page. I am guessing that you have a way to delete spam from the history Added lines 64-69:
Delete it?
Why not just delete it... Deleted lines 53-57:
Hide stuff that is obsolete
Problem description
Changed lines 56-58 from:
Possible solutions
to:
At some stage we will be spammed Possible solutions
Changed lines 61-66 from:
Hide spam
Problem description
At some stage we will be spammed Possible solutions
Why not just delete it? to:
Why not just delete it (for spam, probably so)? Changed lines 14-15 from:
Introduction to:
Introduction
Changed lines 38-39 from:
Objectives to:
Objectives
Added line 54:
Changed lines 56-58 from:
Proble description
to:
Problem description
Changed lines 14-15 from:
Introduction
to:
Introduction Changed lines 38-39 from:
Objectives
to:
Objectives Added line 54:
Proble description
Changed line 56 from:
Possible solutions
to:
Possible solutions
Added line 61:
Problem description
Changed line 63 from:
Possible solutions
to:
Possible solutions
Added lines 41-42:
For what reasons would we want to archive contents. Changed line 54 from:
Hide content
to:
Hide unwanted content
Changed lines 58-60 from:
to:
Copy old stuff out to some other page - maybe in an Archive group .. for which there would be many .. and add some markup in the original page like (:archive Archive.OriginalGroupName_PageName_SectionId:) to be able to refer to it. This would allow for arbitrary bits to be archived out of a page ... but would need careful naming of the archive page prolly Added lines 64-65:
Why not just delete it? Changed line 1 from:
(_stub_) to:
Changed line 50 from:
Hide old content
to:
Hide content
Added line 52:
At some stage page text might be relevant for historic reasons only Changed lines 55-56 from:
to:
Hide spam
At some stage we will be spammed Added lines 34-37:
Changed lines 50-51 from:
Hide old content
Objectives
to:
Hide old content
Deleted line 34:
Deleted line 35:
Deleted line 38:
Added lines 42-50:
Hide old content
Objectives
Hide stuff that is obsolete
Possible solutions
Added lines 1-2:
Archiving talk pages
Deleted lines 10-11:
Archiving talk pages
Changed lines 42-46 from:
We could invent some markup to cut off page markup - like the contents would still be there but they would not be shown on reading, on editing only ... something like {-cut-} I guess. Drawbacks .. it would require new things to be added at the top, it would still be long on editing, it would still show up in the TOC prolly. Pro's it would not need an archive, it seems simple to implement (could even use some JavaScript to unfold the details for the reader), it would still show up in the TOC prolly to:
We could invent some markup to cut off page markup - like the contents would still be there but they would not be shown on reading, on editing only ... something like {-cut-} I guess. Drawbacks .. it would require new things to be added at the top, it would still be long on editing, it would still show up in the TOC prolly. Pro's it would not need an archive, it seems simple to implement (could even use some JavaScript to unfold the details for the reader), it would still show up in the TOC prolly Another option could be to manually cut out some text and copy it to a page called something like (Group).Page-Archive - the contents would then be gone in edit mode as well, but the contents would be 'lost' too. Some possible fix could be to have someting like {_Archived-} to indicate there is more in (Group).Page-Archive - or the system could automatically look if such a page exists maybe. Could then add a link to go to the archived bit. This looks a bit like the -Talk page stuff then - markup like. Deleted line 31:
Added lines 41-42:
We could invent some markup to cut off page markup - like the contents would still be there but they would not be shown on reading, on editing only ... something like {-cut-} I guess. Drawbacks .. it would require new things to be added at the top, it would still be long on editing, it would still show up in the TOC prolly. Pro's it would not need an archive, it seems simple to implement (could even use some JavaScript to unfold the details for the reader), it would still show up in the TOC prolly Added lines 31-37:
Objectives
Avoid long pages
When pages get too long they will not be read. One purpose for archiving could be to cut out old text from a long chat page move it to an archive and maybe link to it. Another point with long pages is that they become harder to editor - the edit overview is not half as nice as the reader overview. Possible solutions
Changed lines 7-9 from:
to:
Archiving talk pages
Changed lines 1-2 from:
Archiving talk pages
to:
Contents
(:toc:) (:indent:)
Changed line 13 from:
to:
Changed line 27 from:
to:
Changed line 20 from:
Plenty of time indeed
![]() to:
Plenty of time indeed
![]() Changed lines 1-22 from:
This page is for talking about archiving wiki articles. to:
Archiving talk pages
Introduction
As copied from the chatter page At some point we are going to need a method of archiving long Talk pages. [Q]. found some interesting discussions on the PmWiki mailing lists ... all pretty much procedural in nature and eventually going into the question "what is archiving". I agree that shortening up will be needed at some stage, but it will need some thought ... like will archived stuff still be linkable, searchable ... shortening of a long thread, should that be only in the presentation? or in the editor too?
Also .. what should the markup look like to accomplish tings.
Anyway .. to me it seemed it needed some thought and discussion,
~ Blue Hell
Lots of good points there that need discussion.. how about we start a page for discussion of ArchivingTalk.. plenty of time yet. [Q]. Plenty of time indeed
![]() |
Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search Page last modified on 2013-03-29 17:34 [UTC-7] - 2177 views